Brankaer C, Ghesquière P, De Smedt B. Symbolic magnitude processing in elementary school children: a group administered paper-and-pencil measure (SYMP Test). Behav Res Methods. 2017;49(4):1361–73.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Landerl K. Neurocognitive perspective on numerical development. In: Fritz A, Haase VG, Räsänen P, editors. International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: from the laboratory to the classroom. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 9–24.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learn Individ Differ. 2007;17(2):147–59.
Article
Google Scholar
Butterworth B. Forward. In: Fritz A, Haase VG, Räsänen P, editors. International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: from the laboratory to the classroom. Cham: Springer; 2019.
Google Scholar
Ritchie SJ, Bates TC. Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(7):1301–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Butterworth B, Varma S, Laurillard D. Dyscalculia: from brain to education. Science. 2011;332(6033):1049–53.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cantlon JF, Brannon EM, Carter EJ, Pelphrey KA. Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLOS Biol. 2006;4(5): e125.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Carvalho MRS, Haase VG. Genetics of Dyscalculia 2. In search of endophenotypes. In: Fritz A, Haase VG, Räsänen P, editors. International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: from the laboratory to the classroom. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 345–65.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Cohen Kadosh R, Dowker A. The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
Book
Google Scholar
De Smedt B, Noël M-P, Gilmore C, Ansari D. How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2013;2(2):48–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Rinaldi L, Girelli L. A place for zero in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20(8):563–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E. Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(7):307–14.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Starr A, Libertus ME, Brannon EM. Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:18116–181120.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Libertus ME, Odic D, Feigenson L, Halberda J. The precision of mapping between number words and the approximate number system predicts children’s formal math abilities. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016;150:207–26.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Odic D, Le Corre M, Halberda J. Children’s mappings between number words and the approximate number system. Cognition. 2015;138:102–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Siegler RS, Lortie-Forgues H. An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Dev Perspect. 2014;8(3):144–50.
Article
Google Scholar
Fias W, Verguts T. The mental number line: exact and approximate. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8(10):447–8 (author reply 8–9).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
von Aster MG, Shalev RS. Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(11):868–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolf S, McCoy DC. The role of executive function and social-emotional skills in the development of literacy and numeracy during preschool: a cross-lagged longitudinal study. Dev Sci. 2019;22(4): e12800.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Berteletti I, Lucangeli D, Piazza M, Dehaene S, Zorzi M. Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Dev Psychol. 2010;46(2):545–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Siegler RS, Booth JL. Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Dev. 2004;75(2):428–44.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Soltész F, Goswami U, White S, Szűcs D. Executive function effects and numerical development in children: behavioural and ERP evidence from a numerical Stroop paradigm. Learn Individ Differ. 2011;21(6):662–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Best JR, Miller PH. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Dev. 2010;81(6):1641–60.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Best JR, Miller PH, Jones LL. Executive functions after age 5: changes and correlates. Dev Rev. 2009;29(3):180–200.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Miyake A, Friedman NP. The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):8–14.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Röthlisberger M, Neuenschwander R, Cimeli P, Michel E, Roebers CM. Improving executive functions in 5- and 6-year-olds: Evaluation of a small group intervention in prekindergarten and kindergarten children. Infant Child Dev. 2012;21(4):411–29.
Article
Google Scholar
Kolkman ME, Hoijtink HJA, Kroesbergen EH, Leseman PPM. The role of executive functions in numerical magnitude skills. Learn Individ Differ. 2013;24:145–51.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmitt SA, Geldhof GJ, Purpura DJ, Duncan R, McClelland MM. Examining the relations between executive function, math, and literacy during the transition to kindergarten: a multi-analytic approach. J Educ Psychol. 2017;109(8):1120–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Geary DC, van Marle K. Young children’s core symbolic and nonsymbolic quantitative knowledge in the prediction of later mathematics achievement. Dev Psychol. 2016;52(12):2130–44.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Prager EO, Sera MD, Carlson SM. Executive function and magnitude skills in preschool children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016;147:126–39.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Verdine BN, Irwin CM, Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K. Contributions of executive function and spatial skills to preschool mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014;126:37–51.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gashaj V, Oberer N, Mast FW, Roebers CM. The relation between executive functions, fine motor skills, and basic numerical skills and their relevance for later mathematics achievement. Early Educ Dev. 2019;30(7):913–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Hawes Z, Moss J, Caswell B, Seo J, Ansari D. Relations between numerical, spatial, and executive function skills and mathematics achievement: a latent-variable approach. Cogn Psychol. 2019;109:68–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilkey ED, Pollack C, Price GR. Dyscalculia and typical math achievement are associated with individual differences in number-specific executive function. Child Dev. 2020;91(2):596–619.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bull R, Scerif G. Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(3):273–93.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garon N, Bryson SE, Smith IM. Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(1):31–60.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davidson MC, Amso D, Anderson LC, Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037–78.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McKenna R, Rushe T, Woodcock KA. Informing the structure of executive function in children: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:154.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 2002;8(2):71–82.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuhs MW, Tavassolie N, Wang Y, Bartek V, Sheeks NA, Gunderson EA. Children’s flexible attention to numerical and spatial magnitudes in early childhood. J Cogn Dev. 2021;22(1):22–47.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmitt SA, McClelland MM, Tominey SL, Acock AC. Strengthening school readiness for Head Start children: evaluation of a self-regulation intervention. Early Child Res Q. 2015;30:20–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Spiegel JA, Goodrich JM, Morris BM, Osborne CM, Lonigan CJ. Relations between executive functions and academic outcomes in elementary school children: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(4):329–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41(1):49–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Ribner A, Moeller K, Willoughby M, Blair C. Cognitive abilities and mathematical competencies at school entry. Mind Brain Educ. 2018;12(4):175–85.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harvey HA, Miller GE. Executive function skills, early mathematics, and vocabulary in head start preschool children. Early Educ Dev. 2017;28(3):290–307.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmerold K, Bock A, Peterson M, Leaf B, Vennergrund K, Pasnak R. The relations between patterning, executive function, and mathematics. J Psychol. 2017;151(2):207–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Magalhães S, Carneiro L, Limpo T, Filipe M. Executive functions predict literacy and mathematics achievements: the unique contribution of cognitive flexibility in grades 2, 4, and 6. Child Neuropsychol. 2020;26(7):934–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Espy KA, McDiarmid MM, Cwik MF, Stalets MM, Hamby A, Senn TE. The contribution of executive functions to emergent mathematic skills in preschool children. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(1):465–86.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pellizzoni S, Apuzzo GM, De Vita C, Agostini T, Ambrosini M, Passolunghi MC. Exploring EFs and math abilities in highly deprived contexts. Front Psychol. 2020;11:383.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(2):270–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Viterbori P, Usai MC, Traverso L, De Franchis V. How preschool executive functioning predicts several aspects of math achievement in Grades 1 and 3: a longitudinal study. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015;140:38–55.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Traverso L, Viterbori P, Usai MC. Effectiveness of an executive function training in italian preschool educational services and far transfer effects to pre-academic skills. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2053.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Scionti N, Cavallero M, Zogmaister C, Marzocchi GM. Is cognitive training effective for improving executive functions in preschoolers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2812.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Diamond A, Ling DS. Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016;18:34–48.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gilmore C, Cragg L. Chapter 14—the role of executive function skills in the development of children’s mathematical competencies. In: Henik A, Fias W, editors. Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2018. p. 263–86.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Coolen I, Merkley R, Ansari D, Dove E, Dowker A, Mills A, et al. Domain-general and domain-specific influences on emerging numerical cognition: contrasting uni-and bidirectional prediction models. Cognition. 2021;215: 104816.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuhs MW, Nesbitt KT, O’Rear CD. Approximate number system task performance: associations with domain-general and domain-specific cognitive skills in young children. J Numer Cognit. 2018;4(3):590–612.
Article
Google Scholar
Gilmore C, Keeble S, Richardson S, Cragg L. The role of cognitive inhibition in different components of arithmetic. ZDM Math Educ. 2015;47(5):771–82.
Article
Google Scholar
Braeuning D, Hornung C, Hoffmann D, Lambert K, Ugen S, Fischbach A, et al. Long-term relevance and interrelation of symbolic and non-symbolic abilities in mathematical-numerical development: evidence from large-scale assessment data. Cognit Dev. 2021;58: 101008.
Article
Google Scholar
Scalise NR, Ramani GB. Symbolic magnitude understanding predicts preschoolers’ later addition skills. J Cognit Dev. 2021;22:185–202.
Article
Google Scholar
Geary DC, Bailey DH, Hoard MK. Predicting mathematical achievement and mathematical learning disability with a simple screening tool: the number sets test. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2009;27(3):265–79.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Arán Filippetti V, Richaud MC. A structural equation modeling of executive functions, IQ and mathematical skills in primary students: differential effects on number production, mental calculus and arithmetical problems. Child Neuropsychol. 2017;23(7):864–88.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wei W, Guo L, Georgiou GK, Tavouktsoglou A, Deng C. Different subcomponents of executive functioning predict different growth parameters in mathematics: evidence from a 4-year longitudinal study with Chinese children. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1037.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Geary DC. Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(6):1539–52.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hellstrand H, Korhonen J, Räsänen P, Linnanmäki K, Aunio P. Reliability and validity evidence of the early numeracy test for identifying children at risk for mathematical learning difficulties. Int J Educ Res. 2020;102: 101580.
Article
Google Scholar
Gray SA, Reeve RA. Preschoolers’ Dot Enumeration Abilities Are Markers of Their Arithmetic Competence. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4): e94428.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Huber S, Klein E, Moeller K, Willmes K. Spatial-numerical and ordinal positional associations coexist in parallel. Front Psychol. 2016;7:438.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schneider M, Merz S, Stricker J, De Smedt B, Torbeyns J, Verschaffel L, et al. Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. Child Dev. 2018;89(5):1467–84.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cohen Kadosh R, Henik A, Rubinsten O. Are Arabic and verbal numbers processed in different ways? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34(6):1377–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dadon G, Henik A. Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task. Mem Cognit. 2017;45(6):891–902.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Henik A, Tzelgov J. Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Mem Cognit. 1982;10(4):389–95.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Buttelmann F, Karbach J. Development and plasticity of cognitive flexibility in early and middle childhood. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1040.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wongupparaj P, Kumari V, Morris RG. The relation between a multicomponent working memory and intelligence: the roles of central executive and short-term storage functions. Intelligence. 2015;53:166–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Freunberger R, Pecherstorfer T, Hanslmayr S, Doppelmayr M. Relevance of EEG alpha and theta oscillations during task switching. Exp Brain Res. 2006;170(3):295–301.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bjork IM, Bowyer-Crane C. Cognitive skills used to solve mathematical word problems and numerical operations: a study of 6- to 7-year-old children. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2013;28(4):1345–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Passolunghi MC, Costa HM. Working memory and mathematical learning. In: Fritz A, Hase V, Räsänen P, editors. International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties: from the laboratory to the classroom. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 407–21.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Kelley K, Preacher KJ. On effect size. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(2):137–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Arbuckle JL. SPSS Amos. 26.0 ed. Chicago: IBM SPSS; 2019.
Fan Y, Chen J, Shirkey G, John R, Wu SR, Park H, et al. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecol Process. 2016;5(1):19.
Article
Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8(2):23–74.
Google Scholar
Gao S, Mokhtarian PL, Johnston RA. Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Transp Res Rec. 2008;2082(1):116–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001.
Google Scholar
Göbel SM, Watson SE, Lervåg A, Hulme C. Children’s arithmetic development: it is number knowledge, not the approximate number sense, that counts. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(3):789–98.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
van Marle K, Chu FW, Li Y, Geary DC. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers’ quantitative development. Dev Sci. 2014;17(4):492–505.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gimbert F, Camos V, Gentaz E, Mazens K. What predicts mathematics achievement? Developmental change in 5- and 7-year-old children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019;178:104–20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuson KC. Relating math words, visual images, and math symbols for understanding and competence. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2019;66(2):119–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Daucourt MC, Schatschneider C, Connor CM, Al Otaiba S, Hart SA. Inhibition, updating working memory, and shifting predict reading disability symptoms in a hybrid model: project KIDS. Front Psychol. 2018;9:238.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Park J, Li R, Brannon EM. Neural connectivity patterns underlying symbolic number processing indicate mathematical achievement in children. Dev Sci. 2014;17(2):187–202.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shrager J, Siegler RS. SCADS: a model of children’s strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychol Sci. 1998;9(5):405–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Siegler RS, Crowley K. The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. Am Psychol. 1991;46(6):606–20.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ecker UK, Lewandowsky S, Oberauer K, Chee AE. The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010;36(1):170–89.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Passolunghi MC, Pazzaglia F. Individual differences in memory updating in relation to arithmetic problem solving. Learn Individ Differ. 2004;14(4):219–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Passolunghi MC, Siegel LS. Working memory and access to numerical information in children with disability in mathematics. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004;88(4):348–67.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gebuis T, Reynvoet B. The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(4):642–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gevers W, Kadosh RC, Gebuis T. Chapter 18—sensory integration theory: an alternative to the approximate number system. In: Henik A, editor. Continuous issues in numerical cognition. San Diego: Academic Press; 2016. p. 405–18.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Hassler Hallstedt M, Ghaderi A. Tablets instead of paper-based tests for young children? Comparability between paper and tablet versions of the mathematical Heidelberger Rechen Test 1–4. Educ Assess. 2018;23(3):195–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Blumenthal S, Blumenthal Y. Tablet or paper and pen? Examining mode effects on german elementary school students’ computation skills with curriculum-based measurements. Int J Educ Methodol. 2020;6(4):669–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Landerl K. Development of numerical processing in children with typical and dyscalculic arithmetic skills-a longitudinal study. Front Psychol. 2013;4:459.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Balzer C. Computer-Based Assessments. Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis; 2010.