Kuyken W, Orley J. Development of the Whoqol - rationale and current status. Int J Ment Health. 1994;23(3):24–56.
Article
Google Scholar
Chang KC, et al. Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Organization, W.H. WHOQOL measuring quality of life: the World Health Organization quality of life instruments; 1997Disponível: http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf. Acesso em, 2010. p. 26.
Google Scholar
Blay SL, Marchesoni MSM. Association among physical, psychiatric and socioeconomic conditions and WHOQOL-Bref scores. Cadernos De Saude Publica. 2011;27(4):677–86.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Silva SM, et al. Psychometric properties of the stroke specific quality of life scale for the assessment of participation in stroke survivors using the rasch model: a preliminary study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):389–92.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Debiec J, et al. Effect of diabetes on neurological condition and quality of life of patients with ischaemic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 1999;144:192.
Article
Google Scholar
Jia HM, Zack MM, Thompson WW. The effects of diabetes, hypertension, asthma, heart disease, and stroke on quality-adjusted life expectancy. Value Health. 2013;16(1):140–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Richardson J, et al. Modelling utility weights for the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-8D. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(8):2395–404.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Berzon RA, et al. Quality of life bibliography and indexes: 1994 update. Qual Life Res. 1995;4(6):547–69.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Iqbal MZ, et al. Health-related quality of life among Esrf patients in Pakistan: a cross-sectional Aproach using Whoqol-Bref. Value Health. 2015;18(3):A29.
Article
Google Scholar
Lucas-Carrasco R, et al. Using the WHOQOL-BREF in persons with dementia a validation study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011;25(4):345–51.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lin JD, et al. Quality of life in caregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: use of WHOQOL-BREF survey. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(6):1448–58.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wahl AK, et al. Quality of life in the general Norwegian population, measured by the quality of life scale (QOLS-N). Qual Life Res. 2004;13(5):1001–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ohaeri JU, et al. Confirmatory factor analytical study of the WHOQOL-Bref: experience with Sudanese general population and psychiatric samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Redko C, et al. Development and validation of the Somali WHOQOL-BREF among refugees living in the USA. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(6):1503–13.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Saxena S, et al. The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): the importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(8):711–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cruz LN, et al. Quality of life in Brazil: normative values for the Whoqol-bref in a southern general population sample. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(7):1123–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Usefy AR, et al. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in an Iranian adult sample. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46(2):139–47.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Power M, et al. Quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–85.
Article
Google Scholar
Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial - a report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bank W. Bangladesh current population; 2016. [cited 2017 16/8/2017]; Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=BD.
Google Scholar
Bank W. World development indicators 2016 (English). World Development Indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group; 2016.
Book
Google Scholar
Quality of Life Ranking by Countries. 2019,
https://www.numbeo.com/quality-of-life/rankings_by_country.jsp, Assessed, 25 Apr 2019.
Izutsu T, et al. Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(7):1783–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tsutsumi A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF in an adult population in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60(4):493–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Applied Rasch Measurement : A Book of Exemplars. Applied Rasch Measurement : A Book of Exemplars, 2005. 4: p. 1–359.
Fan X. Item response theory and classical test theory: an empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 1998;58(3):357–81.
Article
Google Scholar
De Champlain AF. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):109–17.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rusch T, et al. Breaking free from the limitations of classical test theory: developing and measuring information systems scales using item response theory. Inf Manag. 2017;54(2):189–203.
Article
Google Scholar
Uddin MN, Islam FMA. Psychometric evaluation of an interview-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for use in a cross-sectional study of a rural district in Bangladesh: an application of Rasch analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):216.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Smith AB, et al. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Mes Trans. 1994;7:328.
Google Scholar
Uddin MN, et al. Psychological distress and quality of life: rationale and protocol of a prospective cohort study in a rural district in Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Lindhiem O, et al. Mobile technology boosts the effectiveness of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions: a meta-analysis. Behav Modif. 2015;39(6):785–804.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Goodspeed R, et al. Comparing the data quality of global positioning system devices and Mobile phones for assessing relationships between place, mobility, and health: field study. Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth. 2018;6(8):e168.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Svoronos T, et al. CommCare: automated quality improvement to strengthen community-based health. Weston: D-Tree International; 2010.
Google Scholar
Bogan M, et al. Improving standards of care with mobile applications in Tanzania. In W3C workshop on the role of Mobile Technologies in Fostering Social and Economic Development in Africa; 2009.
Google Scholar
DIMAGI. CoomCare; 2018. [cited 2018 25/05/2018]; Available from: https://www.dimagi.com/commcare/.
Google Scholar
RUMM2030. RUMM2030 for analysing assessment and attitude questionnaire data; 2017.
Google Scholar
Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (expanded edition, 1980). Chicago. Copenhagen: Institute of Educational; 1960. The University of Chicago Press, ed.).
Google Scholar
Rasch G. An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology. 1966;19:49–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Andrich D. Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):561–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. Rasch models for measurement: RUMM2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory Pty Ltd; 2010.
Google Scholar
Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
da Rocha NS, Fleck MPD. Validity of the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-BREF in depressed patients using Rasch modelling. Revista De Saude Publica. 2009;43(1):147–53.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baghaei P. Local dependency and Rasch measures. Rasch measurement transactions. 2008;21(3):1105–6.
Google Scholar
Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for Yen’s Q3: identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2017;41(3):178–94.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology:what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? 2007.
Google Scholar
Engelhard G. Rasch models for measurement - Andrich, D. Appl Psychol Meas. 1988;12(4):435–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Leon AC. Multiplicity-adjusted sample size requirements: a strategy to maintain statistical power with Bonferroni adjustments. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(11):1511–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bond TG, Fox CM, editors. Applying the Rasch model : fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2007. p. 340.
Google Scholar
Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85–106.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gerbing DW, Anderson JC. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating Unidimensionality and its assessment. J Mark Res. 1988;25(2):186–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Brentani E, Golia S. Unidimensionality in the Rasch model: how to detect and interpret. Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends. 2007;67(3):1–9.
Google Scholar
Tennant A, Pallant JF. DIF matters: a practical approach to test if differential item functioning makes a difference. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 2007;24(2):1082–4.
Google Scholar
Smith RM. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. J Appl Meas. 2000;1(2):199–218.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Andrich D, et al. RUMM: a windows-based item analysis program employing Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth: Murdoch University; 2000.
Google Scholar
Romanoski J, Douglas G. Test scores, measurement, and the use of analysis of variance: an historical overview. J Appl Meas. 2002;3(3):232–42.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marais I, Andrich D. Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of response dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas. 2008;9(2):105–24.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kirchengast S, Haslinger B. Gender differences in health-related quality of life among healthy aged and old-aged Austrians: cross-sectional analysis. Gender Medicine. 2008;5(3):270–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pomeroy IM, Tennant A, Young CA. Rasch analysis of the Whoqol-Bref in post polio syndrome. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(9):873–80.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caballero FF, et al. Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:177.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Uddin MN, Islam FMA. Psychometric evaluation of the modified Kessler seven-item version (K7) for measuring psychological distress using Rasch analysis: a cross-sectional study in a rural district of Bangladesh. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):1–10.
Miech R, Power C, Eaton WW. Disparities in psychological distress across education and sex: a longitudinal analysis of their persistence within a cohort over 19 years. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(4):289–95.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Baillie AJ. Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress scale (K10). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(9):743–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kosidou K, et al. Socioeconomic status and risk of psychological distress and depression in the Stockholm public health cohort: a population-based study. J Affect Disord. 2011;134(1–3):160–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zeldenryk L, et al. Cognitive testing of the WHOQOL-BREF Bangladesh tool in a northern rural Bangladeshi population with lymphatic filariasis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):1917–26.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gott M, Hinchliff S. How important is sex in later life? The views of older people. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(8):1617–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith AB, et al. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:33.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Andrich D. Understanding the response structure and process in the Polytomous Rasch model. In: Handbook of Polytomous item response theory models; 2010. p. 123–52.
Google Scholar
Andrich DA. A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory: Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences. 1st ed. Ed. I.a. Marais and SpringerLink. Singapore: Springer Singapore: Imprint: Springer; 2019.
NREC. Ethics committee approval from Bangladesh. http://www.dghs.gov.bd/images/docs/Notice/Notice_30_07_2017.pdf, Accessed 5 July, 2019.