Skip to main content

The relationship between existential well-being and mood-related psychiatric burden in Indian young adults with attachment deficits: a cross-cultural validation study



Attachment and spirituality are thought to have deep evolutionary roots but are always interpreted within the framework of culture, religion and personal beliefs. While insecure attachment has been observed to be positively related with psychopathology, a positive mental health effect has often been described for spirituality. To examine the cross-cultural validation of previous research focused on Austrian young adults with Western socialization, we attempt to replicate our study examining the influence spirituality has on the connection between insecure attachment and mood-related psychiatric burden with Indian young adults.


We investigated Avoidant (AV) and Anxious (AX) Attachment (ECR-RD), Religious (RWB) and Existential (EWB) Well-Being (MI-RSWB), and mood-related psychiatric burden (Anxiety, Depression, Somatization; BSI-18) in 443 (31% female) Indian young adults (age range: 18–30 years) with a Hindu upbringing.


Compared to young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization, Indian participants did not differ in AX and EWB but scored higher in mood-related psychiatric burden (eta2 = .04), AV (eta2 = .14), as well as RWB (eta2 = .28; all p < .01). As in previous research only AX (β = .40) positively predicted mood-related psychiatric burden (ΔR2 = .15, all p < .01), while EWB was an additional negative predictor (β = −.11, p < .05).


Our findings emphasize the universal importance of attachment and spirituality for mental health as well as the potential influence of socialization on their development.

Furthermore, they underline that Existential Well-Being – including hope for a better future, forgiveness, and the experience of sense and meaning – appears to have a compensating effect on the relation between insecure attachment and impaired mental health.

Peer Review reports


As a fundamental drive with evolutionary importance [1], the attachment system is continuously active for the duration of the lifespan [2]. It influences every human/environmental interaction [3] and thus physiological as well as psychological development [4]. Formed by positive early family environment, secure attachment creates a ‘secure base’ from which one can explore the world while simultaneously offering a ‘safe haven’ to retreat to during times of distress [5]. In contrast, an aversive family environment promotes insecure attachment styles: Inconsistent behavior in the caregiver [6] leads to anxious attachment that implies the use of hyperactivating strategies, such as demanding care [7] or worry and rumination [8]. On the other hand, neglectful behavior in the caregiver [9] leads to avoidant attachment that is defined by deactivating strategies, for instance the inability to trust others and the need for self-reliance [10]. While insecure attachment can be linked to psychopathology (e.g., affective symptoms) [11] and substance use [12, 13], secure attachment appears to provide protection against several problematic behaviors (e.g., substance abuse) and risk beliefs (e.g., underestimation of an actual risk) [14].

Attachment across cultures

Previous studies have already shown that culture influences childhood development [15] as well as attitudes formed about the self and others [16]. For example, with regard to parenting techniques, a universal positive impact can be attributed to parental acceptance (e.g., [17]), while parental control is more likely to be seen as supportive by adolescents in collectivistic cultures but as constraining by adolescents in individualistic cultures [18]. A related influence of culture on adult attachment seems very likely [19]. From an evolutionary perspective, highly stressful factors in the early (cultural) environment – e.g. economic hardship, harsh physical conditions – are furthermore thought to steer reproductive patterns towards short-term mating strategies that imply insecure attachment patterns (e.g., [20]), while the decreased amounts of stress encountered in (cultural) environments with rich resources facilitate the long-term reproductive patterns associated with secure attachment patterns [4].

Despite these possible cultural influences on attachment patterns, an extensive cross-cultural study by Schmitt and colleagues [19] supports the universality of an internal working model of the self and others and strengthens the role of attachment as a fundamental component of human psychology [2]: Secure attachment – in line with its normative nature – appears to be the most prevalent style in almost 80% of cultural regions [19]. Furthermore, intra-cultural differences in attachment patterns generally seem to be more extensive than inter-cultural differences (e.g., [21]).

Protective spirituality

Much like attachment, ‘spirituality is a universal experience, not a universal theology’ (p. 116) [22]. It therefore may apply to the theism in Christianity, the polytheism in Hinduism as well as to the non-theistic beliefs of Buddhism [22]. In previous studies, spirituality has not only been linked to lower levels of affective symptoms [11, 23] but has also been suggested to support the self-management of longer-term depression [24].

Due to the progressive replacement of the primary attachment figures by friends and intimate partners [25], adolescence is a turbulent time that often coincides with ‘the age of religious awakening’ [26], defined by an augmented likelihood of religious conversion or apostasy. The relationship to God or a higher power frequently meets the parameters of attachment and may consequently confer very similar positive psychological influences [27]. In line with this, an evolutionary perspective would suggest that the experience of spirituality is linked to the same neural developments underlying the need to socialize and create communities [27].

While securely attached individuals are generally relatively stable in their spiritual beliefs, insecurely attached individuals are more prone to undergo major fluctuations [28] that correspond with distressing life events [29]. However, even individuals with insecure attachment and severe mental disorders (e.g. schizophrenia) seem to be able to profit from the attachment to spiritual entities [30]. Furthermore, for its use in prevention and treatment, it may be important to consider different aspects of spirituality not only in potential participants but also in health care professionals [31].

In this study we follow on the conceptualization of spirituality as the ‘ability to experience and integrate meaning and purpose in existence through a connectedness with self, others or a power greater than oneself’ (p. 117) [32]. Therein, the quality of the attachment to a higher power can be linked to the level of spiritual well-being [33]. In line with earlier work [34], this conceptualization integrates an immanent (i.e., bio-psycho-social) and a transcendent (i.e., spiritual) field of perception [35]. The measure used to assess this Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (RSWB) includes ‘Hope Immanent’, ‘Forgiveness’ and ‘Experiences of Sense and Meaning’ as components of an immanent Existential Well-Being (EWB), while ‘Hope Transcendent’, ‘General Religiosity’ and ‘Connectedness’ are components of a transcendent Religious Well-Being (RWB) [35]. Therein, General Religiosity can be understood as a person’s faith in connection to institutions or specific religious communities and traditions, Connectedness refers to a more deinstitutionalized form of religious belief [35]. In total, the scale therefore follows the idea of a bio-psycho-socio-spiritual model of health and disease [35]. While RWB is mainly linked to a relationship with God, EWB does not refer to a specific higher power but is linked to life satisfaction as well as a confidence in the meaningfulness of life [36]. Studies have shown that Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (RSWB) is connected to lower levels of anxiety, depression, neuroticism and suicidal ideation while simultaneously being connected to more adequate coping and more sense of coherence [35].

In our previous study on young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization [11], increased amounts of EWB and RWB were related to decreased amounts of Anxious Attachment (AX) and Avoidant Attachment (AV) as well as a decreased amount of mood-related psychiatric burden. Further regression analyses indicated that only AX, but not AV, positively predicted mood-related psychiatric burden while EWB, but not RWB, might act as a potential mediator and therefore appeared to compensate, at least partly, for insecure attachment.

The present study

In this study, we therefore aimed to test the applicability of our previous findings on the relationship between attachment, spirituality and mood-related psychiatric burden in young adults with Western socialization [11] by investigating the same variables in Indian young adults with a Hindu upbringing.


Sample description and procedure

The sample consisted of 541 students and post-graduates between 18 and 30 years of age at Karnatak University, Dharwad, India. Participants were recruited randomly; the number of those declining participation was not assessed. All questionnaires were completed in a physical, pencil and paper, format. As some studies indicate that religious orientations differ in their association with mood-related psychiatric burden [37, 38], we focused on the most common religious orientation in India and therefore included only participants with a Hindu upbringing. Consequently, 56 participants with other religious orientations were excluded. After also excluding participants with missing data (n = 42), 443 participants with completed questionnaires and were selected for data analyses. Regarding the missing data, there was no clear pattern indicating that participants had difficulties with specific questionnaires or items.

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Karnatak University, Dharwad, India.

Psychometric assessment

In replication of the previous study [11], were a more extensive description of the psychometric assessment can be found, the following standardized self-report questionnaires were applied: The Experience in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-RD) [39] measures ‘Avoidant Attachment’ (AV) and ‘Anxious Attachment’ (AX) with 36 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-being (MI-RSWB) [40] measures Existential Well-Being (EWB), Religious Well-Being (RWB) and a total scale of Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (RSWB). The 48 items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale. To date, the MI-RSWB has already been extensively applied in studies of different clinical as well as healthy populations [35]. The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) [41] measures the mood-related psychiatric burden (Anxiety, Somatization and Depression) for the preceding 7 days with 18 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Overall, the Global Severity Index (GSI) can be generated.

Statistical analyses

ANOVAs and ANCOVAs were conducted to examine possible differences between this sample and young adults from a Western socialization [11]. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to examine the connection between study variables. Furthermore, hierarchical regression analyses were used to examine the influence of spirituality and attachment on all dimensions of mood-related psychiatric burden. Due to the explorative nature of the study alpha was set to p < .05.



The mean age of the participants was 22 years (SD = 1.41). 137 (31%) were female. 75 (17%) were in a romantic relationship and 5 (1%) had children. The nationality of all participants was Indian. For highest completed education level, 3 (1%) had a high school diploma while 440 (99%) had a university degree.

Cultural differences

To investigate possible cultural differences, we compared the present sample with a sample of young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization (92% Austrian nationality, Age: M = 23, SD = 2.93, 76% female) from our previous study [11] (see Table 1): As the samples differed in age and sex, with Indian participants being slightly younger (F(1,922) = 30.66, p < .01, eta2 = .03) and predominantly male (Chi2 = 175.76, p < .01), we controlled for these variables by defining them as covariates in the following group comparisons. Consequently, Indian participants showed increased amounts of mood-related psychiatric burden (GSI: F(1,920) = 35.10, p < .01, eta2 = .04) and AV (F(1, 920) = 145.57, p < .01, eta2 = .14) but also increased amounts of RWB (F(1, 920) = 352.59, p < .01, eta2 = .28). Interestingly, no differences in AX (F(1, 920) = 5.52, p > .01, eta2 = .01) and EWB (F(1, 920) = 3.14, p > .01, eta2 = .00) were found between Indian young adults and young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization.

Table 1 Differences in attachment, spirituality and mood-related psychiatric burden between young adults with a Hindu compared to a Roman Catholic upbringing

Regression analyses

A correlation analysis (see Table 2), as well as hierarchical regression analyses (see Table 3), were conducted to explore the impact of attachment and spirituality parameters on mood-related psychiatric burden in Indian young adults.

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics and correlations of study variables
Table 3 Hierarchical regression analyses predicting mood-related psychiatric burden

As in our previous study [11], correlation analyses showed that increased amounts of AX were related to an increased amount of mood-related psychiatric burden (r = .38, p < .01) and a decreased amount of RSWB (r = −.24, p < .01). However, while AV was also related to a decreased amount of RSWB (r = −.27, p < .01) it was not related to mood-related psychiatric burden.

In the hierarchical regression analyses, sex was entered as a control variable at Step 1 to ensure comparability with the analyses performed in our previous study [11]. AX and AV were entered at Step 2, RWB and EWB at Step 3. Including all predictors and the control variable, the hierarchical regression analyses accounted for 10% of the variance in Anxiety (F(5, 441) = 9.47, p < .01), 18% of the variance in Depression (F(5, 441) = 18.81, p < .01), 8% of the variance in Somatization (F(5, 441) = 7.37, p < .01) and 16% of the variance in GSI (F(5, 441) = 16.64, p < .01).

At every stage sex was unrelated to any dimension of mood-related psychiatric burden. At Step 2, AV did not predict mood-related psychiatric burden but AX positively predicted all three dimensions of mood-related psychiatric burden (Anxiety: β = .29; Depression: β = .41; Somatization: β = .28; GSI: β = .40, all p < .01). At Step 3, AV also did not predict mood-related psychiatric burden while AX still positively predicted all dimensions of mood-related psychiatric burden with β only slightly smaller than at Step 2. In addition, EWB was a negative predictor for Anxiety (β = −.12, p < .05), Depression (β = −.12, p < .05) and GSI (β = −.11, p < .05) but not Somatization. RWB was unrelated to all dimensions of mood-related psychiatric burden. Interestingly, only the model for Depression showed a small increase in R2 between Step 2 and Step 3 (ΔR2 = .02, p < .05).


As with our earlier research [11] that was focused on young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization, the results of this study also show a close relationship between attachment, spirituality and mood-related psychiatric burden. Specifically, an increased amount of Religious/Spiritual Well-being (RSWB) was related to less anxious attachment (AX) and less avoidant attachment (AV) while an increased amount of mood-related psychiatric burden was related to more AX as well as a decreased RSWB. Furthermore, Existential Well-Being (EWB) served as an additional negative predictor of mood-related psychiatric burden independent of AX which supports our hypothesis that spirituality influences the relationship between insecure attachment and mood-related psychiatric burden. This suggests that EWB can have a corrective effect on insecure attachment and can therefore be highly valuable to mental health. In addition, while individuals with insecure attachment generally find it difficult to rely on a higher power, the mechanisms applied by those who manage to overcome these difficulties likely also contribute to an increased well-being. As in our previous study [11], avoidant attachment (AV) as well as Religious Well-Being (RWB) seem of less importance regarding mood-related psychiatric burden than AX and EWB.

Attachment related coping strategies

The different relation of AX and AV to mood-related psychiatric burden could be attributed to the contrasting coping strategies connected to these attachment dimensions: Dysfunctional emotional regulation [42] and heightened distress resulting from hyperactivating strategies [25] likely underlie the connection between AX and mood-related psychiatric burden. Conversely, the deactivating strategies associated with AV that are defined by a lack of visible negative emotions, as well as a high level of unconscious distress [43], might explain the missing connection between AV and mood-related psychiatric burden. The ‘segregated’ mental systems [44] associated with deactivating strategies likely lead to an exclusion of upsetting cognitions, like personal deficiencies, from consciousness. However, as deactivating strategies tend to be unreliable [45], one might argue that AV does increase mood-related psychiatric burden but that the relating symptoms are unlikely to be acknowledged by avoidant individuals. In line with this, hyperactivating strategies appear to mediate the relationship between AX and mood-related psychiatric burden while evidence for deactivating strategies in this regard is mixed [9] and will have to be explored in more detail in future studies.

Correspondence and compensation pathway

As stated above, the relationship to a higher power can fulfil the criteria of an attachment bond and can consequently be assumed to have similar psychological advantages [27]. This association between attachment and spirituality can be explained by two hypotheses [27]: On the one hand, Bowlby’s [46] correspondence hypothesis states that mental models can generalize across various attachment relationships and therefore may also extend to the relationships with a higher power. On the other hand, Ainsworth’s [47] compensation hypothesis suggests that an attachment to a higher power may be developed as a surrogate for secure human attachment figures. Therefore, correspondence and compensation hypotheses can be seen as two pathways to as well as two ways of being religious [48]. In addition, the compensation pathway implies that secure attachment can be learned even later in life and without support from another human individual [48].

The results of this study furthermore support our previous finding [11] that only EWB, but not RWB, is related to mood-related psychiatric burden independent of attachment. The small correlation between RWB and Depression might simply occur due to the parallels in criteria and therefore psychological advantages between attachment relationships and the relationship between believers and God [27]. While the relation between lower RSWB and more insecure attachment (low AX / low AV) supports these similarities (i.e., correspondence pathway), EWB appears to offer some protection against mood-related psychiatric burden independent of attachment security. Importantly, as we only found a small independent effect of EWB on mood-related psychiatric burden, future research will have to further explore whether and under what conditions EWB can influence mood-related psychiatric burden independent of attachment security. In general, this independent effect of EWB tentatively supports the idea that the relationship to a higher power might compensate for an insecure attachment to other people (i.e., compensation pathway). In line with this, EWB – including the experience of sense and meaning, forgiveness as well as immanent hope – may be able to develop based on a previously (through secure attachment to primary caregivers and/or a higher power) established ‘secure base’ [5]. More specifically, this ‘secure base’ enables the individual to perceive the different identities of self and others so that autonomy as well as connectedness can be developed [1]. Conversely, RWB – including general religiosity, connectedness and transcendent hope – may be more closely related to social contexts and therefore to the correspondence pathway [49]. This consequently may explain why RWB did not contribute to the prediction of the mood-related psychiatric burden independent of attachment parameters.

Methodological considerations

As this study centred on young Indian adults with a Hindu upbringing, the generalizability of our findings to young adults with different religious upbringings could be limited. Furthermore, it is beyond the scope of this study to separate the possible interconnections among culture, religion and socialization. However, the similarity in results between this study and our previous research on young adults with a Roman Catholic upbringing in a Western socialization [11] suggests a fundamental and universal connection between attachment, spirituality and mood-related psychiatric burden. In line with this, a recent study by McClintock and colleagues [50] supports a universal connection of love and interconnectedness with less risk of psychopathology. However, while spirituality was connected to less risk of psychopathology in India and the United States, it was connected to a higher risk in China [50]. With some recent models of happiness and well-being still being based on ancient (Indian) texts (e.g., [51]), future studies might also benefit from considering possible cross-cultural differences and similarities in these models.

Furthermore, the use of English questionnaires (due to the lack of appropriate translations) in the present study might have influenced the results. A replication of this study with translated questionnaires should therefore be one possible aim for future research. However, a strength of this study lies in the extensive assessment of religious and spiritual well-being, since belonging to a religious denomination is not thought to be equivalent to the engaging in spiritual and/or religious beliefs and practices [52]. Regarding attachment, our assessment of the current attachment style – although largely based on past experiences [53] – might not be as strong a predictor of spirituality. Furthermore, the inherent problem of self-report measures (e.g., defensive responding) [49] may have influenced the assessment, especially of attachment and RSWB. In addition, non-ignorable non-response (e.g., affective symptoms decreasing the likelihood of participation) as well as within-person variability in affective symptoms over time could have led to an un-representative high amount of healthy participants. Therefore, additional studies in clinical settings are needed.

Regarding the statistical analyses, alpha was set to p < .05 due to the explorative nature of the study. While the results have therefore to be interpreted with some caution, a more stringent alpha or different (e.g., multivariate) analyses were not applied as this may have promoted a premature exclusion of potentially relevant variables in future studies.

Lastly, studies with a longitudinal design are needed to explore all possible interactions between attachment, spirituality and mood-related psychiatric burden. For example, as insecurely attached individuals are more prone to undergo major fluctuations [28] in their spiritual beliefs that correspond with distressing life events [29], mood-related psychiatric burden might cause and/or result from lower RSWB. Interestingly, research shows that older adults with high levels of religiosity and spirituality are also less likely to have high levels of depressive symptoms [23].


This research contributes to clinical as well as cross-cultural psychology by highlighting the fundamental and universal importance of attachment and existential well-being for the mental health of young adults. Furthermore, it contributes to the research on the role of spirituality over the duration of adulthood [50, 54].

Especially existential well-being appears be relevant for the connection between attachment and mental health. By integrating findings on different components of existential well-being – e.g., with hope already predicting life-satisfaction in adolescents [55] and the presence of life meaning being connected to secure attachment [56] – future studies might also focus more closely on the relevance of these components in clinical settings. In addition, the inclusion of (positive) emotions might be prudent, as they also appear to have a strong connection to spirituality and mental health [57, 58]. Integrated with other relevant research in this area, our findings will hopefully inform future strategies for prevention and treatment of mood-related psychiatric burden in young adults with different cultural backgrounds.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Avoidant Attachment


Anxious Attachment


Brief Symptom Inventory


Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised


Existential Well-Being


Global Severity Index


Multidimensional Inventory of Religious/Spiritual Well-Being


Religious-Spiritual Well-Being


Religious Well-Being


  1. 1.

    Flores PJ. Addiction as an attachment disorder. Plymouth: Jason Aronson; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bowlby J. A secure base: clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sheinbaum T, Kwapil TR, Ballespí S, Mitjavila M, Chun CA, Silvia PJ, et al. Attachment style predicts affect, cognitive appraisals, and social functioning in daily life. Front Psychol. 2015;6.

  4. 4.

    Belsky J. Attachment, mating, and parenting. Hum Nat. 1997;8:361–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: attachment. 2nd edition. New York: Basic Books; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ainsworth MD, Blehar M, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of attachment: assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdal: Erlbaum; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Pereg D. Attachment theory and affect regulation: The dynamics , development, and cognitive consequences of attachment-related strategies. Motiv Emot. 2003;27:77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cassidy J. Emotion regulation: influences of attachment relationships. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59:228–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Malik S, Wells A, Wittkowski A. Emotion regulation as a mediator in the relationship between attachment and depressive symptomatology: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2014;172C:428–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. Attachment theory and research: resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. J Res Pers. 2005;39:22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hiebler-Ragger M, Falthansl-Scheinecker J, Birnhuber G, Fink A, Unterrainer H-F. Facets of spirituality diminish the positive relationship between insecure attachment and mood pathology in young adults. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158069.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Unterrainer H-F, Hiebler-Ragger M, Koschutnig K, Fuchshuber J, Tscheschner S, Url M, et al. Addiction as an Attachment Disorder: White Matter Impairment is linked to Increased Negative Affective States in Poly Drug Use. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hiebler-Ragger M, Unterrainer H-F, Rinner A, Kapfhammer H-P. Insecure attachment styles and increased borderline personality Organization in Substance use Disorders. Psychopathology. 2016;49:341–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lac A, Crano WD, Berger DE, Alvaro EM. Attachment theory and theory of planned behavior: an integrative model predicting underage drinking. Dev Psychol. 2013;49:1579–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gardner HW, Kosmitzki C. Lives across cultures: cross-cultural human development. 2nd edt. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Markus HR, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev. 1991;98:224–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Khaleque A, Rohner R. Percieved Parental Acceptance-Rejection and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Cultural and Intracultural Studies. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64:54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rohner RP, Pettengill SM. Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and parental control among Korean adolescents. Child Dev. 1985;56:524–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schmitt DP, Alcalay L, Allensworth M, Allik JJ, Ault L, Austers I, et al. Patterns and universals of adult romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions: are models of self and other pancultural constructs? J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2004;35:367–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P. Childhood Experience, Interpersonal Development, and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Theory of Socialization. Child Dev. 1991;62:647–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Invariance of adult attachment across gender, age, culture, and socioeconomic status? J Soc Pers Relat. 2010;27:200–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vaughan F. Spiritual issues in psychotherapy. J Transpers Psychol. 1991;23:105–19.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Anyfantakis D, Symvoulakis EK, Linardakis M, Shea S, Panagiotakos D, Lionis C. Effect of religiosity/spirituality and sense of coherence on depression within a rural population in Greece: the Spili III project. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chambers E, Cook S, Thake A, Foster A, Shaw S, Hutten R, et al. The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Publications Inc; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Argyle M, Beit-Hallahmi B. The social psychology of religion. London: Routledge & Kegan; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kirkpatrick LA. Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York: Guilford; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Granqvist P. Attachment and religiosity in adolescence: cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluations. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28:260–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Granqvist P, Hagekull B. Longitudinal predictions of religious change in adolescence: contributions from the interaction of attachment and relationship status. J Soc Pers Relat. 2003;20:793–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Huguelet P, Mohr S, Rieben I, Hasler R, Perroud N, Brandt PY. Attachment and coping in psychosis in relation to spiritual figures. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ho RTH, Chan CKP, Lo PHY, Wong PH, Chan CLW, Leung PPY, et al. Understandings of spirituality and its role in illness recovery in persons with schizophrenia and mental-health professionals: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Unterrainer H-F, Ladenhauf KH, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Fink A. Different types of religious/spiritual well-being in relation to personality and subjective well-being. Int J Psychol Relig. 2011;21:115–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Diaz N, Horton EG, Malloy T. Attachment style, spirituality, and depressive symptoms among individuals in substance abuse treatment. J Soc Serv Res. 2014;40:313–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ellison CW. Spiritual well being: conceptualization and measurement. J Psychol Theol. 1983;11:330–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Unterrainer H-F, Lewis AJ, Fink A. Religious/spiritual well-being, personality and mental health: a review of results and conceptual issues. J Relig Health. 2014;53:382–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ledbetter MF, Smith L, Fischer J, Vosler W. An evaluation of the Research and Clinical Usefuleness of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale. J Psychol Theol. 1991;19:49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gearing RE, Lizardi D. Religion and suicide. J Relig Health. 2009;48:332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Loewenthal KM, Cinnirella M, Evdoka G, Murphy P. Faith conquers all?: beliefs about the role of religious factors in coping with depression among different cultural-religious groups in the UK. Br J Med Psychol. 2001;74:293–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ehrenthal JC, Dinger U, Lamla A, Funken B, Schauenburg H. Evaluation of the German version of the attachment questionnaire ‘experiences in close relationships - revised’ (ECR−RD). Psychother Psychosom Medizinische Psychol. 2009;59:215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Unterrainer H-F, Huber HP, Ladenhauf KH, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Liebmann PM. MI-RSB 48: the development of a multidimensional inventory of religious-spiritual well-being. Diagnostica. 2010;56:82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Franke GH, Ankerhold A, Haase M, Jäger S, Tögel C, Ulrich C, et al. The usefulness of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in psychotherapeutic patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2011;61:82–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Campbell-Sills L, Barlow DH. Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In: Gross JJ, editor. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 542–59.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attach Hum Dev. 2002;4:133–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mikulincer M, Dolev T, Shaver PR. Attachment-related strategies during thought suppression: ironic rebounds and vulnerable self-representations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;87:940–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bowlby J. Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: separation: anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ainsworth MD. Attachments across the life span. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1985;61:792–812.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Granqvist P, Kirkpatrick LA. Attachment and Religious Representations and Behavior. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR, editors. editors Handbook of Attachment. 3rd ed. New York/ London: Guilford Press; 2016. p. 917–40.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Granqvist P. Religion as attachment: the Godin award lecture. Arch Psychol Relig. 2010;32:5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    McClintock CH, Lau E, Miller L. Phenotypic dimensions of spirituality: Implications for mental health in China, India, and the United States. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gotise P, Upadhyay BK. Happiness from ancient Indian perspective: Hitopadeśa. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:863–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bos EH, Snippe E, de Jonge P, Jeronimus BF. Preserving subjective wellbeing in the face of psychopathology: buffering effects of personal strengths and resources. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Granqvist P, Ivarsson T, Broberg AG, Hagekull B. Examining relations among attachment, religiosity, and new age spirituality using the adult attachment interview. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:590–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ray RE, McFadden SH. The web and the quilt: alternatives to the heroic journey toward spiritual development. J Adult Dev. 2001;8:201–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Marques SC, Lopez SJ, Mitchell J. The role of Hope, spirituality and religious practice in adolescents’ life satisfaction: longitudinal findings. J Happiness Stud. 2013;14:251–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lopez FG, Ramos K, Nisenbaum M, Thind N, Ortiz-Rodriguez T. Predicting the presence and search for life meaning: test of an attachment theory-driven model. J Happiness Stud. 2014;16:103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Van Cappellen P, Toth-Gauthier M, Saroglou V, Fredrickson BL. Religion and well-being: the mediating role of positive emotions. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17:485–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hiebler-Ragger M, Fuchshuber J, Dröscher H, Vajda C, Fink A, Unterrainer H-F. Personality Influences the Relationship Between Primary Emotions and Religious/Spiritual Well-Being. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to acknowledge the work of Nikolas Bonatos for making helpful and invaluable critical comments to the manuscript.


Funding for open-access publication was provided by the University of Vienna. The funding body was not involved in the study design, the data collection, the analysis and interpretation of the data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information




HU, MHR, EA and SK conceptualized the work. SK acquired the data. MHR analyzed and interpreted the data. MHR drafted the article. HU supervised the analysis and interpretation of data and revised the article. EA proof read the manuscript. All authors gave their consent for publication. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscripts

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Human Friedrich Unterrainer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Karnatak University, Dharwad, India. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hiebler-Ragger, M., Kamble, S.V., Aberer, E. et al. The relationship between existential well-being and mood-related psychiatric burden in Indian young adults with attachment deficits: a cross-cultural validation study. BMC Psychol 8, 21 (2020).

Download citation


  • Mood-related psychiatric burden
  • Attachment
  • Spirituality
  • Young adults
  • Mental health