Skip to main content
Download PDF

Interventions promoting mental health dimensions in infertile women: a systematic review

BMC Psychology volume 11, Article number: 254 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Scientific developments have brought hope to infertile couples; however, the results are not always favorable. This makes women suffer psychological pressure. Therefore, previous studies have investigated the effectiveness of many psychological interventions but no research identified the most common psychological interventions. In this regard, the present review aimed to investigate different psychological interventions that promote mental health in infertile to identify the most frequent (common) ones.

Methods

In the present study, the search was carried out using appropriate keywords Infertility, psychological interventions, mental health, stress, anxiety, depression and women in the Google Scholar، Magiran، SID، Pubmed، Scopus، Science Direct، ProQuest، Web of Science databases and One of the leading websites in health- WHO with Persian and English languages and two operators of “AND” and “OR” between 2000 and 2021.

Results

First, 7319 articles were searched, 6948 articles of which were removed due to irrelevant subjects, and 31 articles were removed due to duplication. 340 abstracts were examined and the results of 60 articles were extracted. Two approaches (examining the type and content of intervention) were used to extract findings. The first approach indicated high diversity in psychological interventions, leading to the categorization of the interventions into 4 categories of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mind-body interventions (MBI), stress management skills, and others. CBT and MBI and stress management skills were found as the most frequent promoting interventions for mental health in infertile women. The second approach indicated the differences in protocols (number of sessions and time of interventions).

Conclusion

Despite differences in protocol of interventions under study, the results of all articles revealed the effectiveness of interventions in improving infertile women’s mental health; therefore, it is suggested to apply the most common psychological interventions based on scientific evidence (CBT, MBI, and stress management skills) along with infertility treatment methods. The results will help the specialists, policy-makers, and planners to select and implement the most appropriate psychological interventions for infertile women.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), infertility as one of the world’s health problems has affected millions of people in their reproductive age. About 48 million couples and 186 million individuals suffer from infertility around the world, and infertility-caused disability is the fifth disability in the world [1]. The prevalence of infertility is 15% in the world [1, 2] and it has been reported between 5 and 22% (on average 9.10%) in Iran [3]. In recent years, the prevalence of infertility has been on the rise due to sexually transmitted diseases and environmental pollution [2]. Pregnancy is one of the important goals of developing countries, and infertility is considered a harmful factor for reproductive health, which is associated with many physical and psychological problems [4, 5]. Infertility and treatment for it is a source of mental suffering for infertile women, with direct effects on different dimensions of their mental health (stress, anxiety, and depression) [6, 7]. The results of studies have revealed the reduction of mental health indicators in infertile women so that 44% of infertile women suffer from mental problems and are twice higher at risk of suffering from mental disorders than infertile men [8, 9] and are emotionally more anxious, distressed, and depressed than their husbands [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and use the most common psychological interventions that promote mental health in women with infertility to deal with the psychological consequences of infertility.

The fact that the mental disorders caused by infertility can be prevented and, like other diseases, their implications and chronicity can be mitigated if diagnosed and treated timely can explain the importance of the research [11]. Also, recently, mental health professionals have concluded that psychological interventions are as necessary as medical treatments for infertility. Therefore, it is a need to identify the most common scientific evidence-based psychological interventions to improve mental health and use them along with medical treatments for infertility. In this regard, with the rapid development of assisted reproductive technology (ART), many infertility centers were set up around the world to provide counseling, treatment, and attention to the concerns and emotional needs of infertile patients [12], and many interventional studies have designed and implemented to improve and promote mental health in these patients. However, it should be noted that most interventional studies and even systematic and review studies have only focused on the effects of a single treatment approach (cognitive behavioral, mind-body interventions, educational programs, psychotherapist programs, and counseling) [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and no review or systematic study has investigated a large range of psychological interventions that promote mental health in women with infertility.

Considering the above-mentioned issues, there are various and complex psychological interventions on the issue of infertility; however, no research identified the most common (frequent) psychological interventions in this regard. The present study is an attempt to address this gap for the first time. Regarding the results of previous studies that indicated the importance of performing appropriate psychological interventions along with supporting patients with infertility [20], the present study aimed to systematically review different types of psychological interventions that promote mental health in infertile women to determine the most common psychological interventions used for women with infertility.

Materials and methods

This study was carried out based on the PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) systematic review and meta-analysis checklist (Fig. 1). A comprehensive and systematic search was carried out on articles published between 2000 and 2021. The keywords taken from MeSH included infertility, psychological interventions, mental health, stress, anxiety, depression, and women. The databases included Google Scholar, Magira, SID, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, ProQuest, Web of Science, and One of the leading websites in health- WHO. The search was carried out in Persian and English using two operators “AND” and “OR”; for the keywords of the same category, the operator “OR” was used, and “AND” was used to combine the words. Then, considering the following 4 criteria, the articles were selected and the present systematic review was compiled. The criteria included (1) determining the research questions, (2) searching the databases to select articles, (3) selecting articles, and (4) drawing diagrams and Table [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flowchart of study entry and exit process

Full size image

To determine the research question, the PICO format was first determined. Then, the research question, i.e. (what are the most frequent (common) psychological interventions to improve mental health in women with infertility?) was typed to be searched.

P (Patient): Infertile women.

I (Intervention): Interventions that promote different dimensions of mental health (stress, anxiety, and depression).

C (comparison): women with healthy fertility.

O (outcomes): mental health.

To search the databases, the researchers used the keywords taken from MeSH, including infertility, psychological interventions, mental health, stress, anxiety, depression, and women to retrieve the related articles for 4 weeks from 30 April to 31 March 2022. Using a manual search, the researchers reviewed the reference list of the retrieved articles to find more articles.

To select the articles, two authors independently evaluated the articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria included infertile women, Persian or English articles, articles published in domestic or international journals, articles that examined the effectiveness of psychological interventions on the mental health, anxiety, stress, and depression of infertile women and experimental and quasi-experimental studies. The exclusion criteria were lack of access to the full text of articles, articles that examined other factors such as self-efficacy, psychological well-being, etc. in infertile women, articles with a male target group, review and observational articles, and protocols. Any disagreement in selecting articles was solved by negotiation and the help of a third person in the next step.

The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool was used to assess the quality of the articles. It is a general instrument to assess different types of interventional studies in six categories: selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection practices, withdrawals, and dropouts. Once the assessment was fulfilled, each examined practice received a mark ranging between “weak” (1) “moderate” (2), and “strong” (3). The total score was obtained by calculating the average score of each study. The maximum average total score in each study was 3.00. According to the average total score, the quality of the articles was categorized as weak (1.00-1.50), medium (1.51–2.50), or strong (2.51-3.00) [22]. To prevent bias, searching the articles and assessing their quality was performed by two researchers.

To select the articles, two authors independently evaluated the titles, abstracts, and full texts of the articles were first examined. Then, the articles were checked concerning the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full texts of articles were read and the information (authors’ names, publication year, type of intervention, the content of the intervention, number of sessions, results, main findings, and conclusion) were extracted. Then, the findings were organized into different categories to conduct a review study and answer the research question. The information was shown in 4 tables (interventions related to cognitive-behavioral treatment (Table 1), interventions related to mind-body interventions (Table 2), interventions related to stress management skills (Table 3), and other interventions (Table 4), and the PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 1). The protocol of study was not prepared and the review was not registered.

Table 1 General characteristics of studies that were performed by CBT (N = 19)
Full size table
Table 2 General characteristics of studies that were performed by MBI (N = 6)
Full size table
Table 3 General characteristics of studies that were performed by SMS (N = 5)
Full size table
Table 4 General characteristics of studies that were performed by other interventions (N = 30)
Full size table

Ethical considerations

Ethics approval

is not required as the systematic review does not involve the participation of human subjects; rather it involves reviewing and collecting data from publicly available sources. However, the present research was extracted from the doctoral dissertation on reproductive health with code of ethics (IR.SBMU.PHARMACY.REC.1400.011) from Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.

Results

First, according to the research question, 7319 articles were found. Then, 6979 articles were removed (6948 articles due to irrelevant titles and 31 articles due to duplicate data). The abstracts of the remaining 340 articles were examined. After reviewing the abstracts, 275 articles were removed and 65 articles remained. Then, the full texts of 65 articles were examined and 5 other articles were removed, and finally, the results of the remaining 60 articles published between 2002 and 2021 were used to write the present review (Fig. 1). To extract the findings from 60 articles, the researchers used two approaches (investigating types and contents of interventions). The results of the first approach indicated high diversity of psychological interventions on women with infertility so that among the articles under study, 19 studies investigated cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), 6 articles investigated mind-body interventions (MBI), 5 articles focused on stress management skills (SMS), 3 articles studied collaborative counseling, 3 articles investigated positive psychology (PP), 2 articles examined problem-solving skills, 2 articles investigated music therapy, 2 articles studied holistic psychological interventions (HPI), and 18 articles focused on other interventions (like yoga, acupuncture, relaxation, etc.). On the other hand, this approach led to the organization of psychological interventions into 4 categories of cognitive behavioral therapy, mind-body interventions, stress management skills, and other interventions. Thus, three more common interventions that promote mental health in women with infertility (anxiety, stress, and depression), i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy, mind-body interventions, and stress management skills, were identified. The results of the second approach (investigating the contents of the intervention) indicated the differences in implementation protocols (number of sessions and time), which are discussed in the following.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

19 articles used in this study focused on this technique. The interventions were often in the form of individual or group training sessions; however, they varied in terms of the number of sessions and duration of intervention; 3 studies conducted cognitive behavioral interventions in ten 90-minute sessions, 1 study in 8 sessions, 1 study in 6–8 sessions, 1 study in fifteen 90- minute sessions (15 weeks), 1 study in 12 h per week for 3 months, 1 study in 15–20 days, 1 study in 12–13 days, 1 study conducted the internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for 8 weeks (13 sessions), 1 study conducted 1-hour sessions 4 days a week for 4 weeks, 1 study conducted ten 120-minute sessions for 2/5 months ,2 study conducted psychotherapy with CBT along with supportive psychotherapy and medication therapy for 6 months, 2 studies conducted an electronic and web-based intervention during the ART cycle and the waiting period after embryo transfer and 3 studies conducted CBT and Pharmacotherapy (20 mg fluoxetine daily for 90 days). The results of all studies indicated that CBT is an effective intervention in changing attitudes and beliefs and can help improve mental health and prevent and reduce anxiety, stress, and depression in women with infertility (Table 1).

The results of studies by Oraki et al. [24], Faramarzi et al. [29], and Manochehri et al. [27] indicated the effectiveness of CBT in improving mental health in infertile women [24, 27, 29]. Starabadi et al. [35], Afshariyan et al. [25], Faramarzi et al. [28], and Minden et al. [38] revealed the effectiveness of CBT in reducing stress caused by infertility. Starabadi et al. found that cognitive-behavioral techniques caused adaptive thoughts in individuals, and training in behavioral methods was an effective treatment to reduce stress and depression caused by infertility [35]. Afshariyan et al. showed that the integrated approach of positive cognitive behavioral therapy was effective in reducing stress caused by infertility and increasing hope, and suggested its application [25]. Faramarzi et al. also confirmed the effectiveness of CBT in reducing infertility compared to fluoxetine [28].

The results of studies by Kraaij et al. [26], Talaei et al. [34], Nisi et al. [23], Mosalanejad et al. [18], Noorbala et al. [31], and Faramarzi et al. [30] indicated the effectiveness of CBT on reducing infertility-caused depression. In studies by Talaei et al. [34], Mosalanejad et al. [36], and Noorbala et al. [32], a significant difference was found between the intervention and control groups in reduced scores of depression in women with infertility after CBT [26, 31, 32, 34, 36]. In the study of Nisi et al., the cognitive behavioral group training reduced depression, which led to a reduction in negative attitudes, and an increase in positive beliefs [23]. Faramarzi et al. also confirmed the effectiveness of CBT in reducing depression and anxiety compared to fluoxetine [30]. The studies of Dongen et al. [37], Qaraei et al. [4], Mosalanejad et al. [18], and Heidari et al. [33] indicated the effectiveness of CBT in reducing infertility-caused anxiety. In the study of Dongen et al., electric therapy programs (online psychological training and CBT) led to a reduced number of women with clinical symptoms of anxiety and depression over 3 months after the first ART cycle compared to the control group [37]. In the study of Qaraei et al., Mosalanejad et al. and Heidari et al., there was a significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the scores of anxiety before and after the study [4, 18, 33].

Mind body intervention (MBI)

In the present study, 6 articles used this technique. In all of these articles, the interventions were in the form of training sessions; however, there were differences in the number of sessions and duration of interventions; 2 studies investigated mind-body intervention in ten 120-minute sessions, 1 study investigated internet-based intervention in ten 60-minute sessions, 1 study in eight 90-minute sessions, 1 study in four 60-minute sessions along with 20 min of daily practices at home, and 1 study conducted the intervention in four 3-hour sessions. Also, the results indicated the positive effect of MBI in improving mental health and mitigating the symptoms of anxiety, stress, and depression in women with infertility (Table 2). In the study of Clifton et al. [16], the internet-based mind-body intervention reduced distress (anxiety, depression, stress) in women with infertility, and the chance of fertility in the intervention group was 4.47 times more than that in the control group [16]. The results of studies by Kalhori et al. [17], Bai et al. [40], Psaros et al. [43], and Galhardo et al. [41] showed the effectiveness of MBI in reducing infertility-caused depression. In the study of Kalhori et al. group counseling based on mindfulness was effective in reducing depression symptoms in women undergoing IVF [17]. Bai et al. showed that mindfulness not only reduced depression but also improved sleep quality [40]. The results of a study by Psaros et al. indicated the effect of MBI on reducing perceived depression and stress and increasing perceived social support [43]. Galhardo et al. found a significant difference in the score of depression between the intervention and control groups after the intervention so that an increase in mindfulness skills, acceptance, and decentralization led to reduced mental distress in women with infertility [41]. The study by Chan et al. also indicated the effectiveness of the mind-body-spirit intervention in reducing anxiety in women undergoing IVF (In vitro fertilization) compared to women in the control group, and the fertility rate was higher in the intervention group than in the control group [42].

Stress management skill (SMS)

In the present study, 5 articles investigated the use of this technique in the form of training sessions. However, they varied in terms of the number and duration of the sessions; 1 study investigated the stress management intervention in twelve 120-minute sessions, 1 study in ten 120-minute sessions, 1 study in 8 sessions of a maximum of 60 min, 1 study in one 90-minute session, and 1 study sent the interventions monthly to email addresses of women with infertility for 3 months. The results of the studies indicated the effectiveness of SMS in improving mental health and reducing the symptoms of anxiety, stress, and depression in women with infertility (Table 3).

In the study of Hashemi et al. [44], training stress management skills were found to be effective in increasing mental health in women with infertility [44]. The findings of a study by Koumparou et al. [45] indicated the effectiveness of stress management sessions in reducing the stress of all women undergoing IVF [45]. Akiko et al. [48], Hamid [46]. and Heredia et al. [47] revealed the effectiveness of stress management skills in reducing anxiety and depression. Akiko et al. performed a supportive stress management program on women undergoing infertility treatment and succeeded to reduce anxiety and depression in patients [48]. Hamid found significant differences in the scores of depression and anxiety between the intervention and control groups after the intervention and during a 12-month follow-up process [46]. Heredia et al. found that short-term interventions focusing on stress management can contribute to psychological adjustment in women undergoing IVF, reduce their anxiety levels and improve their quality of life [47].

Other interventions

In the 4th category, other psychological interventions that promote mental health in women with infertility were examined. The number of retrieved articles related to other interventions was less than that of CBT, MBI, and SMS. 3 articles studied collaborative counseling, 3 articles investigated positive psychology (PP), 2 articles examined problem-solving skills, 2 articles investigated music therapy, 2 articles studied holistic psychological interventions (HPI), and other interventions (yoga, acupuncture, relaxation, etc.) were examined each in one separate study. Table 4 presents the following interventions: Problem-solving skill training (PSS), Nursing versus peer-based education methods, Expressive writing intervention (EWI), Nursing consultation based on Orem’s theory of self‑care and bandura’s concept, Group counseling by collaborative approaches, Infertility collaborative counseling, Group counseling, Hope-oriented group counseling, Counseling for infertile couples, Iranian–Islamic positive therapy, Positive psychotherapy based on belief to good, Psychological empowerment therapy and dialectical behavior therapy, Iranian positive therapy (IPT) and Acceptance-Commitment Therapy (ACT), Antidepressant medication and psychological intervention, Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), Music therapy, Logotherapy, Art therapy, Online psychoeducational support, Structured yoga program, Acupuncture, Wellbeing therapy, Positive reappraisal and problem-solving skills training, Psychodrama, Holistic-oriented psychological, Integrated model of emotional focused approach and Gottman model, Relaxation, Psychological empowerment package and dialectical behavior therapy.

Discussion

The results of this systematic review study indicated a high diversity in the types and protocols of psychological interventions in infertile women. Moreover, the examinations not only led to the categorization of interventions into four categories of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mind-body interventions (MBI), stress management skills (SMS), and other interventions, but also contributed to identifying 3 most common interventions promoting mental health in women with infertility, including CBT (with 19 articles), MBI (6 articles), and SMS (5 articles). It should be noted that despite using different implementation protocols for interventions, the results of all articles indicated the effectiveness of interventions in improving mental health. According to findings, CBT was one of the most frequent interventions (with 19 relevant articles) used for women with infertility. The application of CBT, including various methods of relaxation (muscular and respiratory), cognitive reconstruction, desensitization, behavioral training, thought-stopping, and courage training, has been suggested by all researchers as one of the methods to deal with psychological problems during infertility treatment.

In explaining the findings, it can be said that the events and accidents do not upset individuals but their thinking way that is the result of their attitudes and beliefs and influences the information process and causes emotional reactions in individuals; therefore, one’s thoughts and beliefs about infertility affect the person’s type and level of reaction. Thus, since CBT is a short-term skill-focused psychological approach and aims at changing maladaptive emotional responses through changing thoughts and behaviors in patients, it helps patients to identify their negative attitudes and obtain new skills to change behaviors, communicate with others, solve problems, change wrong beliefs and attitudes, and reconstruct cognitions [35, 76].

On the other hand, in cognitive behavioral therapy, more desired results are achieved due to the use of such techniques so that the problem-solving technique and muscle relaxation cause self-awareness, and recognition of the psychological aspects of anxiety and stress, leading to reduced symptoms (anxiety and stress). The person’s awareness and knowledge about the effect of negative emotions on mental health, and the advantages of a happy life will cause an increase in performing the tasks learned in therapy sessions, and as a result, depression will be reduced [35]. In general, the effectiveness of CBT in improving the mental health of infertile women can be attributed to the correct thinking way and wrong beliefs, reduced tension, and psychological support of the group. Reduced tension is the result of correcting and adjusting incompatible beliefs and values, cognitive errors, and defective schemas about infertility, and since most infertile patients feel lonely and consider their problems as unique and they cannot talk about their problems, so CBT group sessions are the safest place for emotional discharge and overcoming the feeling of loneliness [77]. Therefore, it is suggested to use CBT preferably in a group as a supplement to infertility medical treatment. According to findings, after CBT, mind-body interventions (with 6 related articles) were used to improve mental health in women with infertility and showed great effects in improving mental health, stress, depression, and anxiety. In explaining the result, it can be said that the interventions based on mindfulness belong to third-generation cognitive behavioral therapies with roots in Eastern religious traditions, especially Buddhism [78]. This style promotes psychological improvement through compromise and flexibility methods and includes interventions that focus on the relationship between the brain, mind, body, behavior, and their effects on health and diseases, and helps the person to be aware of thoughts, feelings, and physical states from moment to moment [79]. Conscious living helps the person to gain a deeper understanding of the realities of life and perceive things “as they are” without attributing expectations, judgments, pessimism, or apprehensions to them, and to see the sufferings, desires, dependence, and instabilities of life [80]. Another prominent feature of this skill is that the person is trained in loving kindness, and the person repeats it during breathing, so it helps to understand experiences in a compassionate and open-minded way [80]. In general, the effectiveness of MBI in improving the mental health of infertile women can be considered to be the result of increasing awareness, paying attention to the body and its movements, and stretching the body to achieve relaxation and mind-body balance; therefore, since it focuses on both mental and physical dimensions, not only it is beneficial for patients with psychological disorders but also to improve wellbeing in normal people [81]. Since personal well-being is the result of balance and harmony of the inner aspects of mind-body-spirit and MBI is a holistic approach, it helps women with infertility experience negative states in new ways and reduces mental distress, and improves mental health [42]. In this regard, it is suggested to use MBI along with infertility medical treatment. According to findings, after CBT and MBI, stress management skills (with 5 related articles) were among the interventions used to promote mental health in women with infertility, and the results indicated the effectiveness of this intervention in improving dimensions of mental health. It can be explained that stress is the body’s uncertain response to any demand and is one of the psychological factors of infertility [6, 7, 82]. Stress management is an individual’s ability to reduce stress and adjust to stressful situations [83]. Stress management interventions contain several interventions including knowledge about stress, identifying inefficient thoughts, self-expression skills, anger, and time management. The purpose of the intervention is to create and develop a set of skills to reduce stress and better deal with the needs and challenges of life [45].

The most important feature of stress management skills (SMS) is helping people to identify the source of stress, precisely evaluate the situations, feelings, and thoughts, and use efficient and problem-solving-based coping styles; as a result, it leads to finding the best solution and provides psychological satisfaction [44]. Since infertile women use emotion-focused coping more to deal with the mental pressure of infertility and have less general health, focusing on stress management skills to make more use of efficient and problem-solving-based coping styles can be effective in improving their mental health [47]. Given that individuals who receive stress management skills can overcome distressing thoughts and experience lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, stress management skills (SMS) can be an effective intervention, and it is suggested to use it along with infertility treatment methods.

The search and examination of a variety of psychological interventions in infertility was one of the strengths of the present study. In addition, the research team used two approaches to precisely examine articles in terms of types and contents of interventions, and could identify the most frequent psychological interventions in infertility; however, since it was not possible to access all international databases, a limited number of articles may not have been retrieved, which can be considered as a limitation of this study. Another limitation is that to find relevant articles, articles with an infertile male target group were excluded and only the most common psychological interventions were identified in infertile women, so it is suggested to identify common psychological interventions that promote mental health in infertile men.

Since infertile women face different mental-social challenges and a lack of appropriate interventions and support during treatment influence all aspects of their lives [84], the findings of this research will help specialists and policy-makers in this field to include scientific evidence-based psychological intervention in the care program of infertile women. These can also be used as the foundation for designing training, treatment, counseling, and support programs to reduce psychological disorders and increase adjustment in women with psychological problems caused by infertility.

Given that in most studies, the effectiveness of interventions was evaluated immediately or shortly (1 to 3 months) after finishing the intervention, it is suggested to conduct studies to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of these methods (CBT, MBI, and stress management skills) in infertile women’s psychological empowerment.

Conclusion

The review of findings of 60 articles not only indicated high diversity of psychological interventions in women with infertility in terms of types and contents of interventions, but also helped to categorize the interventions into 4 categories of CBT, MBI, SMS, and other interventions. According to findings, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mind-body interventions (MBI) and stress management skills (SMS) have been the most frequent and common psychological interventions in infertile women. The application of the most common scientific evidence-based psychological interventions is of great importance to psychologically empower infertile women, especially in societies where women are blamed for infertility, and this causes them to suffer psychological pressure. Due to the importance of having children in line with the population policies of the country and the increasing prevalence of infertility in some societies, including Iran, the use of scientific evidence-based intervention in infertility treatment centers by a team skilled in the field of psychological infertility problems, including reproductive health specialists, psychologists, and midwives is necessary to reduce mental disorders, increase adjustment, and improve the results of infertility treatment. Also, a meta-analysis study on different types of psychological interventions in different aspects of mental health in infertile women is suggested.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PP:

Positive psychology

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

IPT:

Iranian positive therapy

MBI:

Mind-body interventions

SMS:

Stress management skills

CBT:

Cognitive behavioral therapy

WHO:

World Health Organization

EFT:

Emotionally focused therapy

PSS:

Problemsolving skill training

EWI:

Expressive writing intervention

ACT:

Acceptance commitment therapy

HPI:

Holistic psychological interventions

EPHPP:

Effective Public Health Practice Project

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Infertility. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infertility#tab=tab_1.

  2. Direkvand-Moghadam A, Delpisheh A, Sayehmiri K. An investigation of the worldwide prevalence of infertility as a systematic review. Qom Univ Med Sci. 2016;10(1):76–87. http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-443-fa.html.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kazemijaliseh H, Tehrani FR, Behboudi-Gandevani S, Hosseinpanah F, Khalili D, Azizi F. The prevalence and causes of primary infertility in Iran: a population-based study. Global J health Sci. 2015;7(6):226–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qaraei V, Mazaheri MA, Sahebi A, Peyvandi S, Agha Hosseini M. Investigating the role of cognitive-behavioral training on reducing the anxiety of women with primary infertility under ZIFT and GIFT treatment. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY; 2003. pp. 170–80.

  5. Zayed AA, El-Hadidy MA. Sexual satisfaction and self-esteem in women with primary infertility. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2020;25(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-020-00024-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasanpour S, Bani S, Mirghafourvand M, Kochaksarayie FY. Mental health and its personal and social predictors in infertile women. J caring Sci. 2014;3(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2014.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Koochaksaraei FY, Mirghafourvand M, Hasanpoor S, Bani S. Mental health and its socio-demographic predictors in male partner of iranian infertile couples. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016;37(8):563–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2016.1164772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dadipour A, Alavi A, Zarei F, Safari moradali M. Evaluation of mental health level of infertile women in Bandar Abbas. J Prev Med. 2016;3(2):20–8. http://jpm.hums.ac.ir/article-1-186-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moghadam MHB, Aminian AH, Abdoli AM, Seighal N, Falahzadeh H, Ghasemi N. Evaluation of the general health of the infertile couples. Iran J reproductive Med. 2011;9(4):309–14. PMID: 26396581.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel A, Sharma P, Kumar P, Binu V. Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments: a dyadic approach. J Hum Reproductive Sci. 2018;11(2):180–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pakravan-Nejad M, Sadeghi M. Mental Health,Textbook of Public Health. ed, editor. Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Deputy of Research; 2013.

  12. PAK GM, Vizheh M, Babaei GR, Ramazanzadeh F, Abedinia N. Effect of counseling on sexual satisfaction among infertile women referred to Tehran fertility center. 2008;14(1):21–30. http://hayat.tums.ac.ir/article-1-152-en.html.

  13. Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2325–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00138-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamzehgardeshi Z, Yazdani F, Elyasi F, Moosazadeh M, Peyvandi S, Gelehkolaee KS, et al. The efficacy of group counselling on perceived stress among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: an RCT. Int J reproductive Biomed. 2019;17(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i1.3821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ying L, Wu LH, Loke AY. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0690-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Clifton J, Parent J, Worrall G, Seehuus M, Evans M, Forehand R, et al. An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: a randomized pilot trial. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):e62. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalhori F, Masoumi SZ, Shamsaei F, Mohammadi Y, Yavangi M. Effect of mindfulness-based group counseling on depression in infertile women: randomized clinical trial study. Int J Fertility Steril. 2020;14(1):10–6. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2020.5785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mosalanejad L, Koolaee AK, Jamali S. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy in mental health and hardiness of infertile women receiving assisted reproductive therapy (ART). Iran J Reproductive Med. 2012;10(5):483–8. PMID:25246916.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cousineau TM, Green TC, Corsini E, Seibring A, Showstack MT, Applegarth L, et al. Online psychoeducational support for infertile women: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(3):554–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mirghaforvand M, Hasanpoor Sh, Bani S, Yahyavi F. Perceived social support in infertile couples and its individual-social predictors. J Mazand Univ Med Sci. 2014;24(Supple 1):213–23. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3612-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(101002):14651858. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas H, Ciliska D, Dobbins M. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Toronto: Effective Public Health Practice Project McMaster University; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nissi A, KarmalianH, Homai R. Investigating the effect of cognitive-behavioral religious intervention group training on the mental health of infertile couples in Isfahan city. J Family Couns Psychother. 2012;2(2):151–62.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oraki M, Vaziri Nasab B, Alipour A. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral intervention for anger management on mental health of infertile women. Stud Med Sci. 2015;26(8):652–62. http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-3093-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ashrafian F, Sadeghi M, Rezaei F. The effect of integrative positive cognitive behavioral therapy on infertility stress and hope in Infertile Women. J Clin Nurs Midwifery. 2019;8(3):436–45. http://78.39.35.47/article-1-1101-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kraaij V, Garnefski N, Fles H, Brands A, van Tricht S. Effects of a self-help program on depressed mood for women with an unfulfilled child wish. J loss trauma. 2016;21(4):275–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2015.1057451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Manochehri K, Zandipoor T, Pourshahriari M, Mirdamadi SR. Investigating the effectiveness of cognitive-emotional-behavioral group counseling on the mental health of infertile women. Couns Res. 2005;5(2):9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Faramarzi M, Pasha H, Esmailzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Heidary S, Afshar Z. The effect of the cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: a randomized controlled trial. Int J fertility Steril. 2013;7(3):199–206. PMID:24520487.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F, Esmaelzadeh S, Alipour A, Hjiahmadi M, Rahnama J. Is psychotherapy a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy to promote the mental health of infertile women? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biology. 2008;141(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Faramarzi M, Alipor A, Esmaelzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Poladi K, Pash H. Treatment of depression and anxiety in infertile women: cognitive behavioral therapy versus fluoxetine. J Affect Disord. 2008;108(1–2):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Noorbala AA, Ramazanzadeh F, Malekafzali H, Abedinia N, Forooshani AR, Shariat M, et al. Effects of a psychological intervention on depression in infertile couples. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;101(3):248–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nourbala A, Ramazanzadeh F, Malek AH, Abedinia N, Rahimi FA, SHariat M. Effectiveness of psychiatric interventions on depression rate in infertile couples referred to Vali-Asr reproductive health research center. 2008.

  33. Heydari P, Latif Nejad R, Sahebi A, Jahanian M, Mazloum SR. The effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on the anxiety of primary infertile women undergoing IUI. J Reprod Infertility. 2002:42–51.

  34. Talai A, Kimiaei SA, Borhani Mughani M, Mohareri F, Talai A, KhanqaeiR. Investigating the effect of group cognitive-behavioral therapy on depression of infertile women. IJOGI. 2014;17(94):1–9. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2014.2774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Starabadi M, Amirfakhraei A, Keramati K, Samavi A. Efficacy of cognitive- behavioral therapy (CBT) on the infertility stress and depression in the infertile couples. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci. 2021;63(6):3127–36. https://doi.org/10.22038/MJMS.2021.17962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mosalanejad L, Koolaee AK, Behbahani BM. Looking out for the secret wound: the effect of e-cognitive group therapy with emotional disclosure on the status of mental health in infertile women. Int J Fertility Steril. 2012;6(2):87–94. PMID:25493164.

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Dongen AJ, Nelen WL, IntHout J, Kremer JA, Verhaak CM. e-Therapy to reduce emotional distress in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART): a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):1046–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sexton MB, Byrd MR, O’Donohue WT, Jacobs NN. Web-based treatment for infertility-related psychological distress. Arch Women Ment Health. 2010;13(4):347–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-009-0142-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hämmerli K, Znoj H, Berger T. Internet-based support for infertile patients: a randomized controlled study. J Behav Med. 2010;33(2):135–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9243-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bai C-F, Cui N-X, Xu X, Mi G-l, Sun J-W, Shao D, et al. Effectiveness of two guided self-administered interventions for psychological distress among women with infertility: a three-armed, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(7):1235–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J. Mindfulness-based program for infertility: efficacy study. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):1059–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chan CH, Ng EH, Chan CL, Chan TH. Effectiveness of psychosocial group intervention for reducing anxiety in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):339–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Psaros C, Kagan L, Shifren JL, Willett J, Jacquart J, Alert MD, et al. Mind–body group treatment for women coping with infertility: a pilot study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2015;36(2):75–83. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2014.989983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hashemi F, Fili A, Safarinia M. Effectiveness of stress management skill training (cognitive-behavioral) on mental health of infertile women. Health Psychol. 2015;3(4):59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koumparou M, Bakas P, Pantos K, Economou M, Chrousos G. Stress management and in Vitro fertilization (IVF): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychiatriki. 2021;32:290–9. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2021.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamid N. The effectiveness of stress management on Depression, anxiety and fertilization of Infertile Women. J Behav Sci. 2011;5(1):55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Heredia A, Padilla F, Castilla JA, Garcia-Retamero R. Effectiveness of a psychological intervention focused on stress management for women prior to IVF. J Reproductive Infant Psychol. 2020;38(2):113–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1601170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mori A. Supporting stress management for women undergoing the early stages of fertility treatment: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Japan J Nurs Sci. 2009;6(1):37–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7924.2009.00119.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gojani MG, Kordi M, Asgharipour N, Esmaeili H, Amirian M, Eskandarnia E. The effect of problem-solving skill training on mental health and the success of treatment of infertile women under intrauterine insemination treatment. J Educ Health Promotion. 2017;6:107. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_20_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bahrami Kerchi A, Manshaee G, Keshti Aray N. The effectiveness of psychological empowerment Package and Dialectical Behavior Therapy on Depression of Infertile women in pretreatment stage of Invitro fertilization (IVF): a Randomized Clinical Trail. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2020;19(9):979–94. https://doi.org/10.29252/jrums.19.9.979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nekavand M, Mobini N, Sheikhi A. A survey on the impact of relaxation on anxiety and the result of IVF in patients with infertility that have been referred to the infertility centers of Tehran university of medical sciences during 2012–2013. Nurs Midwifery J. 2015;13(7):605–12. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-1789-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Khalatbari J, Hashemi Golpayegani F. The effectiveness of integrated model of emotional focused approach and Gottman model on fear of intimacy and anxiety in infertile women. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2018;13(48):27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hosseini M, Nissi A, Daudi I, Zargar Y. Effectiveness of comprehensive psychological intervention on psychological health and fertility rate of women with infertile women with unknown cause and undergoing IVF treatment. Psychol Achievements. 2018;4(25):59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hosseini M, Neissi A, Davodi I, MehrabiZade-Honarmand M, Zargar Y. The effectiveness of holistic-oriented psychological intervention on health psychology in infertile women undergoing IVF. J Clin Psychol. 2017;9(3):47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rahimi R, Afsharinia K, Golmohammadian M, Jarare J, Narimani B. Efficacy psychodrama the on reducing depression in infertile women. Res Clin Psychol Couns. 2016;5(2):65–85. https://doi.org/10.22067/IJAP.V5I2.45283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ghasemi Gojani M, Kordi M, Asgharipur N, Amirian M, Esmaeli H, Eskandarnia E. Comparing the effect of positive reappraisal coping intervention on anxiety of waiting period in IUI treatment using problem-solving skills training. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2017;27(149):111–23. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-8666-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Farnia F, Aflatoonian A, Kalantari A. Comparing the effects of nursing versus peer-based education methods on the preoperative anxiety in infertile women: an RCT. Int J reproductive Biomed. 2019;17(12):883. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i12.5795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Matthiesen S, Klonoff-Cohen H, Zachariae R, Jensen‐Johansen MB, Nielsen BK, Frederiksen Y, et al. The effect of an expressive writing intervention (EWI) on stress in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment: a randomized controlled pilot study. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):362–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02042.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zaidouni A, Ouasmani F, Benbella A, Kasouati J, Bezad R. The effect of nursing consultation based on orem’s theory of self-care and Bandura’s concept on infertility stress. J Hum Reproductive Sci. 2019;12(3):247–54. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_159_18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rabeipour S, Ordoni Avval Z, Arefi M, Behroozilak T. The effectiveness of group counseling by collaborative approaches on specific stress in infertile women. Nurs Midwifery J. 2016;14(1):56–65. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-2523-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Latif Nejad Rudsari R, Rasulzadeh Bidgoli M, Mousavifar N, Modares M. The effect of collaborative infertility counseling on the perceived stress of infertile women undergoing with IVF. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2011;14(4):22–31. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2015.5766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rahimi R, Hasanpour S, Mirghafourvand M, Esmaeilpour K. Effect of Hope-oriented group counseling on mental health of infertile women with failed IVF cycles: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03280-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sorkhani TM, Ahmadi A, Mirzaee M, Habibzadeh V, Alidousti K. Effectiveness of counseling for infertile couples on women’s emotional disturbance: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. 2021;43(11):826–33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Jamshidian-QalehShahi P, Aghaei A, Golparvar M. Investigating the effectiveness of iranian–islamic positive therapy on Depression, anxiety, and stress of Infertile Women. J Isfahan Med School. 2017;35(418):70–6.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zarif GYH, Aghamohammadian SH, Mousavifar N, Moeenizadeh M. The effectiveness of well-being therapy on stress, and psychological well-being in infertile women. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2012;15(2):48–55. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2012.5744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shahi-Senobari S, HR A-S, Moeenizadeh M. The effectiveness of positive psychotherapy based on belief to good on the mental health and marital quality of infertile women. Feyz J Kashan Univ Med Sci. 2021;25(1):752–60. http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-4206-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jamshidian QalehShahi P, Aghaei A, Golparvar M. Comparing the effect of iranian positive therapy and acceptance-commitment therapy on depression, anxiety and stress of infertile women in Isfahan city. J Health Promotion Manage. 2017;6(5):8–16. https://doi.org/10.21859/jhpm-07032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pasha H, Basirat Z, Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F. Comparative effectiveness of antidepressant medication versus psychological intervention on depression symptoms in women with infertility and sexual dysfunction. Int J Fertility Steril. 2018;12(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Soltani M, Shairi MR, Roshan R, Rahimi CR. The impact of emotionally focused therapy on emotional distress in infertile couples. Int J fertility Steril. 2014;7(4):337–44. PMID:24520504.

    Google Scholar 

  70. de Barros Fleury EA, Approbato MS, Barbosa MA. Interactive music therapy on stress level reduction in women submitted to IVF/ICSI. Prospective randomized study. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25(2):209–14. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20200068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Aba YA, Avci D, Guzel Y, Ozcelik SK, Gurtekin B. Effect of music therapy on the anxiety levels and pregnancy rate of women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;36:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mosalanejad L, Koolee AK. Looking at infertility treatment through the lens of the meaning of life: the effect of group logotherapy on psychological distress in infertile women. Int J fertility Steril. 2013;6(4):224–31. PMID:24520444.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hughes EG, da Silva AM. A pilot study assessing art therapy as a mental health intervention for subfertile women. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(3):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jasani S, Heller B, Jasulaitis S, Davidson M, Cytron J. Impact of a structured yoga program on anxiety in infertility patients: a feasibility study. JFIV Reprod Med Genet. 2016;4(183):2014–26. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4508.1000183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Smith CA, Ussher JM, Perz J, Carmady B, De Lacey S. The effect of acupuncture on psychosocial outcomes for women experiencing infertility: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(10):923–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kaczkurkin AN, Foa EB. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: an update on the empirical evidence. Dialog Clin Neurosci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.3/akaczkurkin.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Warne E, Oxlad M, Best T. Evaluating group psychological interventions for mental health in women with infertility undertaking fertility treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2022:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582.

  78. Öst L-G. Efficacy of the tird wave of behavioral therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46(3):296–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Shahrestani M, Qanbari BA, Nemati SH, Rahbardar H. The effectiveness of mindfulness based cognitive group therapy (MBCT) on improving perceived infertility-related stress and irrational parenthood cognitions among infertile women undergoing IVF treatment. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertility. 2012;15(19):28–38. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJOGI.2012.6158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Patel A, Sharma P, Kumar P. Application of mindfulness-based psychological interventions in infertility. J Hum Reproductive Sci. 2020;13(1):3. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_51_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15(5):593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. ooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 2022. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/klrooney.

  83. Keshavarz F, Mosalanejad L, Ghavi F, Abdollahifard S, Khodabakhshi Koolaee A. Coping strategies and perceived stress in infertile couples. J Client-Centered Nurs Care. 2018;4(2):80–7. https://doi.org/10.32598/jccnc.4.2.80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mirghaforvand M, Hasanpoor S, Bani S, Yahyavi F. Perceived social support in infertile couples and its individual-social predictors. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014;23(1):213–23. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3612-en.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all people who helped us conduct this study.

Funding

Not applicable in this section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Fatemeh Yahyavi Koochaksaraei

  2. Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Masoumeh Simbar

  3. E-Learning Department, Virtual school of Medical Education and management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mehrnoosh khoshnoodifar

  4. Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Mahbobeh Faramarzi

  5. Population and Family Spiritual Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran

    Mahbobeh Faramarzi

  6. Department of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Malihe Nasiri

Authors
  1. Fatemeh Yahyavi Koochaksaraei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masoumeh Simbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehrnoosh khoshnoodifar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mahbobeh Faramarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Malihe Nasiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FY contributor in searching, screening, quality assessment, data extraction, analysis and was a major contributor in the writing of the manuscript. MS was a major contributor in writing the manuscript and data analysis. MKH contributor in quality assessment and revised manuscript. MF contributor in quality assessment and revised manuscript. MN contributor in analysis and revised manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoumeh Simbar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable in this section. Manuscript does not involve the use of any animal or human data or tissue.

Consent for publication

Not applicable in this section.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koochaksaraei, F.Y., Simbar, M., khoshnoodifar, M. et al. Interventions promoting mental health dimensions in infertile women: a systematic review. BMC Psychol 11, 254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01285-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01285-1

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us