Skip to main content

The effect of positive thinking training on hope and adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing hemodialysis are exposed to psychological problems, such as despair, which in turn can be a trigger for them to abandon the treatment process. This study aimed to determine the effect of positive thinking training on hope and adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was performed on 80 hemodialysis patients referred to two hemodialysis centers in Shiraz, Iran. They were randomly divided into an intervention and a control group. Eight sessions of positive thinking skills training carried out individually on the patients' bedsides. The primary and secondary outcomes were hope and adherence to treatment, respectively. The data were collected using Snyder Hope Questionnaire, End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire, laboratory tests, and weight measurements. Data were analyzed by Chi-square and Paired and Independent T-test using SPSS software version 18.

Results

After the intervention, the mean score of hope was significantly higher in the intervention group (42.1 ± 6.1) than in the control group (38.7 ± 6.5) (p = 0.024). Moreover, after the intervention, the mean score of adherence to treatment was significantly higher in the intervention group (1070.2 ± 80.1) compared to the control group (1018.4 ± 105.3) (p = 0.019). In addition, blood urea nitrogen, phosphate and inter-dialytic weight gain were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group after the intervention.

Conclusions

The findings showed that positive thinking interventions could lead to improvement in hope and adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients. Positive thinking training could be used in caring of hemodialysis patients to improve their hope and adherence to treatment.

Trial registration RCT Registry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; RCT registration number: IRCT20180915041044N1; Registration date: 19/12/2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

End stage renal disease (ESRD) is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide [1, 2]. In Iran, the disease has an annual growth rate of approximately 4–5%. Given the country's 1.2% population growth, treating the disease is a challenge, both medically and economically, for the country. Moreover, Iran is among the countries with the lowest incidence of the disease. Hemodialysis is the most common renal replacement therapy whose main purpose is bringing the life of patients with renal diseases closer to the normal status [1, 3, 4].

ESRD and dialysis make major changes to the patients' normal lifestyles. In addition to the various physical effects, it has numerous psychosocial consequences and results in dramatic changes in their daily lives [5, 6]. Consequences like frequent hospitalization, need for complex treatment regimens, skin and mucosal manifestations, and fear of disability and death lead to a difficult life for patients and their families [7]. These patients are often worried about their unpredictable future and may suffer from depression and hopelessness [8, 9]. Meanwhile, hope is a factor that can protect people from life's stressful events. Hope is a process in which one sets goals, creates solutions to achieve them, and creates the motivation to execute and maintain them along the way[10]. Therefore, hope is considered an effective factor in coping with chronic diseases [11].

Adherence to treatment regimens is of great importance in patients with chronic diseases [12]. Hemodialysis can bring about changes in the lifestyle, health, and roles of patients [13]. Adherence is essential for having high-efficiency hemodialysis, achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes, and reducing the complications, disability, and mortality [14]. Evidence has suggested that non-adherence to treatment was relatively high among hemodialysis patients [15]. The findings of a descriptive-analytic study in Iran showed that 77% of the hemodialysis patients had moderate treatment adherence and their adherence was positively related with their quality of life [16]. A meta-analysis showed that various interventions including educational, counseling, psychological, and behavioral interventions have reported moderate effects on some outcomes of treatment adherence in patients with ESRD [17].

In the recent years, psychologists have been emphasized on positive thinking and tried to focus people on their capacities and capabilities despite the illness. The ultimate goal of this approach is to identify the components and methods that promote humans' health and happiness [18,19,20]. According to Quilliam, positive thinking means having the appropriate inner balance, keeping calm when confronted with problems, and using helpful and effective ways in challenging situations. Positive thinking does not mean not confronting problems, but it is about taking a proper approach without breaking down when faced with problems [18]. People who think positively cope better with psychological stress and build better social support networks around them by using more effective strategies, such as reassessment and problem-solving. They also follow healthier lifestyles that protect them from diseases. Even if such people get sick, they will perform better on medical advice. They follow these recommendations with appropriate behavioral patterns that accelerate recovery [19]. Positive thinking interventions have shown positive effects on individuals' physical and psychological outcomes [21, 22]. Previous studies have shown that positive thinking training improved the quality of life of hemodialysis patients [23], resilience and quality of life of patients with cancer [24], and hope and sleep quality of patients with thalassemia major [22].

Hemodialysis patients usually have low hope scores [25]. In addition, these patients are often frustrated with their treatment due to the chronicity of their illness and may abandon their treatment [15, 16]. Nurses can play an important role in promoting adherence to treatment among hemodialysis patients and help improve their adherence by establishing a strong and supportive relationship with them [26]. Although psychological interventions are widespread today, the effectiveness of positive thinking interventions in hope and treatment adherence has been less studied in this group of patients. Therefore, given the high likelihood of hopelessness and discontinuation of treatment in patients with ESRD, the present study aimed to determine the effect of positive thinking training on hope and adherence to treatment amongst hemodialysis patients.

Methods

Design and participants

This randomized controlled trial with the pre/post-test control design was performed in two hemodialysis centers located in two hospitals in Shiraz, Iran from February to May 2019. We have complied with CONSORT standards in the report of this trial. At the first, ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Based on a study aimed to determine the effectiveness of motivational interviewing in depression and hope in hemodialysis patients [9], using the Med-Calc software, and considering β = 90%, α = 5%, µ1 = 26.2, σ1 = 3.42, µ2 = 23, and σ2 = 3.79 a 56-subject sample size was determined for the study. Considering the 20% probability of loss, the total sample size was estimated as 80 participants (40 participants in each group).

In order to prevent the dissemination of information, the hospitals were first divided into an intervention and a control group using simple random sampling (tap and line). The participants were selected by simple random sampling using the table of random numbers. Then, based on the hospitals, the patients were allocated to the intervention and control groups. During the study, one individual from the control group and two individuals from the intervention group were excluded due to transplantation. One of the control group participants was also excluded due to transfer to another hospital and one of the intervention group participants was removed due to intubation and hospitalization. Finally, data from 75 participants (38 in the control group and 37 in the intervention group) were analyzed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort diagram of the study

The inclusion criteria were having the ability to read and write, having the ability to speak and understand Persian, aging 18–65 years, being diagnosed with chronic renal failure by a nephrologist, and undergoing hemodialysis two or three times a week. The exclusion criteria were suffering from well-known psychiatric disorders such as severe depression, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and acute physical illnesses, being under a mechanical ventilator, having kidney transplants, and attending psychological training and interventions simultaneously.

Data collection

The primary and secondary outcomes were hope and adherence to treatment, respectively. Data collection tools included a demographic information form, Snyder Hope Scale, End-stage renal disease adherence questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), laboratory evaluations such as Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, phosphate, and potassium, and inter-dialytic weight gain.

Both groups completed the questionnaires of hope and adherence to treatment before and three months after the intervention. Similarly, the laboratory tests and inter-dialytic weight gain were measured before and three months after the intervention. In both intervention and control groups, BUN, creatinine, and phosphate levels were measured using similar kits (Man). A similar device (easy light) was also used to measure the potassium level. Furthermore, the patients' weights were measured using the calibrated scales in the centers. Finally, the inter-dialytic weight gain was calculated by subtracting the post-dialysis weight from the pre-dialysis weight in each session. The mean weight difference between the two consecutive dialysis sessions was then calculated as the final score.

Snyder Hope Scale was developed by Snyder et al. in 1991. In this 12-item questionnaire, the items could be responded via a five-point Likert scale ranging from completely disagree (score 1) to strongly agree (score 5), while the scoring was inverted for items 3, 5, 7, and 11. A higher score on the questionnaire indicated a higher hope in the respondents. Snyder et al. reported a negative correlation of 0.44 with the Beck Depression Inventory to assess the simultaneous correlation validity [27]. In addition, this scale showed a significant positive correlation with positive affect, optimism, life satisfaction, and self-esteem, but a significant negative correlation with anxiety and pessimism [28]. Snyder et al. calculated the reliability of the Hope Scale by the test–retest method after three (r = 0.85), eight (0.73), and 10 (0.82) weeks and approved the internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha coefficient (r = 0.84) [27].

ESRD-AQ was developed by Kim et al. in 2009. This questionnaire consisted of 46 questions/items divided into five sections. The first section pursued general information about the patients' history of ESRD and Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) (5 items), while the remaining four sections asked about adherence to treatment (14 items), medications (9 items), fluid restrictions (10 items), and diet recommendations (8 items). These four final sections directly measured the adherence behaviors and the patients' knowledge and perceptions about the treatment. The ESRD-AQ items could be responded via Likert scales, multiple choices, or “yes/no” options. The scores of the questionnaire could range from zero to 1200, with higher scores representing higher adherence to treatment [29]. The item level content validities for the 46 items ranged from 0.86 to 1.00, which resulted in the average Item-level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) of 0.99. The fairly high level of CVI for each item implied that the content for the construct was adequately represented by the item. Additionally, strong test–retest stability existed across all items, with Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Moreover, Phi correlations indicated that the self-reported adherence behaviors and perceptions were consistent across the two administrations of the ESRD-AQ [29].

Intervention

The intervention included positive thinking training presented in eight 30-min sessions. The intervention was conducted by individual counseling on the patients' bedsides during their dialysis sessions. The educational content used in this study was selected from the book 'Positive Thinking and Applied Positivism' by Susan Quilliam, and the curriculum was designed accordingly [18]. In each session, practice was done on the topics discussed. The patients were also assigned assignments to perform at home. The assignments were reviewed at the beginning of each session. It should be noted that positive thinking training was provided by the first author in collaboration with a psychologist expert in positive thinking skills. The contents of the training included cognitive and behavioral skills of positive thinking, such as ways to moderate negative thoughts, institutionalizing positive thinking strategies, establishing constructive relationships, calming, bringing laughter to life, and building self-esteem (Table 1).

Table 1 The content of the positive thinking training program

The control group participants received no interventions; they received only the routine training, including fluid restraint, diet, and medications, by the hemodialysis nurses.

To provide blindness, the statistician who performed the data analysis and the individual who was responsible for collecting the data were blind to the study groups.

Data analysis

SPSS software, version 18 was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the variables. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used for assessment of the normal distribution of the data. In addition, paired and independent t-tests were used to compare the means within and between groups, respectively. Chi-square test was also used to compare the two groups based on the demographic and clinical data.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 51.1 ± 5.3 years. Most of the participants were female (52%), married (64%), and unemployed (82.6%) and had below diploma education levels (64%). More than half of the participants underwent hemodialysis three times a week (76%). The mean duration of hemodialysis treatment was 49.95 months. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups concerning the duration of the hemodialysis treatment (p = 0.5). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic and clinical variables (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of the two groups regarding demographic and clinical data

Before the intervention, the two groups were homogeneous regarding the mean scores of ESRD-AQ, laboratory tests, and hope. After the intervention, however, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in the mean score of treatment adherence, BUN level, phosphate level, and mean inter-dialytic weight gain compared to the control group. The mean score of hope was also higher in the intervention group (42.1 ± 6.1) compared to the control group (38.7 ± 6.5) after the intervention. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in term of potassium and creatinine levels after the intervention (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of the two groups regarding treatment adherence, laboratory tests, inter-dialytic weight gain, and hope before and after the intervention

Discussion

The results of the present study indicated that eight sessions of positive thinking training along with assignments and practice promoted adherence to the treatment and hope among the hemodialysis patients. Previous studies have also revealed the role of individual attitudes and positive thinking in adherence to treatment in chronic diseases [30,31,32,33]. For instance, the results of a study conducted on African Americans demonstrated that the positive attitudes of patients with diabetes predicted their adherence to the medication regimen [30]. In addition, induction of positive affect and self-affirmation increased physical activity in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. These were induced through training, emphasis on positive thoughts, and creation of positive self-esteem through telephone calls and unexpected small mail gifts [32].

The present study results revealed an improvement in weight control as well as in some laboratory tests, such as BUN and phosphate levels, after the intervention. However, no significant change was observed in potassium and creatinine tests. Serum levels of phosphate, potassium, creatinine, and BUN indicate a patient's adherence to diet and medication, and weight gain between two dialysis sessions shows the patient's adherence to fluid regimens [34]. Therefore, it can be argued that positive thinking training promoted adherence to fluid restriction and some of the consequences of adherence to diet and medication among the patients. In the same vein, the findings of the previous studies approved the effects of psycho-educational interventions on improvement of adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients. As an instance, using Benson's relaxation technique for eight weeks could improve the BUN and phosphorus levels of hemodialysis patients and reduced their inter-dialytic weight gain [35]. In another study, psychological interventions, including group discussions, over five weeks led to weight loss between the two dialysis sessions [36]. On the contrary, an empowerment program involving individual and group counselling did not change the laboratory results of hemodialysis patients, except for hemoglobin and hematocrit levels [37]. A possible explanation for the lack of significant change in the potassium levels among the patients in the current investigation is that it was within a high normal range at the baseline. The intervention has had a minimal effect on the potassium level and it was maintained within the normal range at the end of the study. Furthermore, observation of no changes in the creatinine levels could be related to the fact that the long-term effects of the intervention were not examined. Hence, it is suggested that in future studies, people practice positive thinking for a longer period of time and then the results of the study are evaluated. Most of the patients in the present study were middle-aged and married. Therefore, they received sufficient family support. However, most of them were unemployed and underwent hemodialysis three times a week. These could make these patients more vulnerable to psychological problems, including hopelessness. Previous studies have also raised the possibility of hopelessness among hemodialysis patients [25, 38].

The findings of the present study showed that positive thinking training increased hope among the patients. Prior studies have also revealed the effects of positive thinking on psychological variables of individuals in different groups. In this regard, positive thinking training improved hope among elderly individuals [39]. In addition, a brief positive psychology intervention, including watching a video containing positive thoughts and feelings and three positive thinking exercises, increased the hope of young people in a city in Greece [40]. In the same line, a positive thinking intervention with the Islamic approach, including seven sessions of group therapy, increased the hope of patients with multiple sclerosis [41]. Besides, training based on positive thinking proposed by Martin Seligman increased hope in patients with thalassemia [22].

In this study, due to the intimate and close relationships among the patients undergoing hemodialysis, it was not possible to randomly assign the participants to the two groups. Thus, random allocation was done based on the hospitals. In addition, the participants were aware that they belonged to the control or the intervention group. These two limitations could reduce the generalizability of the findings. However, the use of face-to-face training at the time of hemodialysis was favorable for the patients in the intervention group and made them more willing to continue the study. Other strengths of the study included the use of a two-group, pre-post design, practices in each training session, and presentation of assignments in each session.

Given the lack of research on the role of positive thinking in the hope of patients undergoing hemodialysis, it can be concluded from the results of the present study and the above-mentioned studies that interventions inducing positive thinking and motivation could increase hope among patients under hemodialysis. Therefore, because of its cost-effectiveness, this method can be used to increase these patients' hope.

Conclusion

According to the results of the current study, positive thinking interventions could improve hope and increase adherence to treatment among the patients under hemodialysis probably by reducing hopelessness, emphasizing the positive aspects of patients' lives, and training strategies for accepting the realities and enhancing their physical and mental abilities. Therefore, the use of positive thinking could be recommended to improve adherence to treatment and hope in patients undergoing hemodialysis. By conducting further studies in this area, positive thinking training can be considered a feasible, low-cost, and safe non-pharmacological intervention as a complement to psychological and nursing interventions to improve treatment adherence and hope among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study available from the first author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ESRD:

End stage renal disease

ESRD-AQ:

End-stage renal diseaise adherence questionnaire

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

SPSS:

Statistical package for the social sciences

References

  1. Thurlow JS, Joshi M, Yan G, Norris KC, Agodoa LY, Yuan CM, Nee R. Global epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease and disparities in kidney replacement therapy. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(2):98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Divyaveer SS, Ramachandran R, Sahay M, Shah DS, Akhtar F, Bello AK, Iyengar A, Johnson DW, Harris DC, Levin A. International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas: structures, organization, and services for the management of kidney failure in South Asia. Kidney Int Suppl. 2021;11(2):e97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Consortium ID: Periodical dialysis of Iran. Tehran; 2016.

  4. Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Annan R, Turkey H, Akhtar N, Gray F, Hamdy K. Epidemiology and management of chronic renal failure: a global public health problem. Biostat Epidemiol Int J. 2018;1(1):11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orlandi FDS, Pepino BG, Pavarini SCI, Santos DAD, Mendiondo MSZD. The evaluation of the level of hope of elderly chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2012;46:900–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurita N, Wakita T, Ishibashi Y, Fujimoto S, Yazawa M, Suzuki T, Koitabashi K, Yanagi M, Kawarazaki H, Green J. Association between health-related hope and adherence to prescribed treatment in CKD patients: multicenter cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aghakhani N, Nazari R, Sharif Nia H, Nahrir B. A comparative study of quality of life (qol) among patients with haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J GorganBouyeh Fac Nurs Midwifery. 2011;8(2):35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al Salmi I, Kamble P, Lazarus ER, D’Souza MS, Al Maimani Y, Hannawi S. Kidney disease-specific quality of life among patients on hemodialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2021;2021.

  9. Alidoust Ghahfarokhi F, Kiyan Ersi F. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on depression and hope on dialysis patients in Hajar Hospital of Shahrekord in 2013. J Clin Psychol. 2017;8(4):12–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder CR. The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. Manhattan: Simon and Schuster; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park GY, Yoo EK. A Study on Hope in Hemodialysis Patients. Adv Sci Technol Lett. 2016;128:244–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Javanmardifard S, Heidari S, Sanjari M, Yazdanmehr M, Shirazi F. The relationship between spiritual well-being and hope, and adherence to treatment regimen in patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19(2):941–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rafiee Vardanjani L, Parvin N, Mahmoodi Shan G, Molaie E, Hasheminia SA. Adherence to hemodialysis treatment and some related factors in hemodialysis patients admitted in Shahrekord Hajar hospital. J Clin Nurs Midwifery 2014;2(4).

  14. Modanloo S, Zolfaghari M, Dehghankar L, Mohamammadi Y, Mohammadkhani Ghiasvand A. Assessment the effect of small message service (SMS) follow up on self-efficacy in dialysis patients. Iran J Nurs Res (IJNR). 2014;8(4):61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ozen N, Cinar FI, Askin D, Mut D, Turker T. Nonadherence in hemodialysis patients and related factors: a multicenter study. J Nurs Res. 2019;27(4): e36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahdar Z, Haghighi MJ, Mansouri A, Siasary A, Alahyari J, Jahantigh F. Probing the relationship between treatment regimen compliance and the quality of life in hemodialysis patients: a descriptive-analytic study. Med-Surg Nurs J. 2019;8(2).

  17. Murali KM, Mullan J, Roodenrys S, Hassan HC, Lambert K, Lonergan M. Strategies to improve dietary, fluid, dialysis or medication adherence in patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized intervention trials. PloS one. 2019;14(1):e0211479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quilliam S. Positive thinking and applied positivism. Translated by Farid Barati Sedeh and Afsaneh Sadeghi. Tehran: Javaneh Roshd Publishing; 2007.

  19. Snyder CR, Lopez SJ. Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khademian F, Aslani A, Bastani P. The effects of mobile apps on stress, anxiety, and depression: overview of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021;37(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barjoee LK, Amini N, Keykhosrovani M, Shafiabadi A. Effectiveness of positive thinking training on perceived stress, metacognitive beliefs, and death anxiety in women with breast cancer: perceived stress in women with breast cancer. Archiv Breast Cancer. 2022;9(2):195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Makaremnia S, Dehghan Manshadi M, Khademian Z. Effects of a positive thinking program on hope and sleep quality in iranian patients with thalassemia: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peyravi M, Amirkhani M, Abadi F, Abbasijahromi A, Sheidaie S, Modreki A. The effect of positive thinking training on different dimensions of quality of life of hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Nephro-urology monthly. 2020;12(3).

  24. Mousavi E, Esmaeili A, Shahid Saless S. The effect of positive thinking on quality of life and resiliency of cancer patients. Razavi Int J Med. 2015;3(3):24–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cengiz DU, Sarıtaş SÇ. The effect of illness perception on hopelessness level of patients receiving hemodialysis. Turkish J Nephrol. 2019;28:257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blumrosen C, Desta R, Cavanaugh KL, Laferriere HE, Bruce MA, Norris KC, Griffith DM, Umeukeje EM. Interventions incorporating therapeutic alliance to improve hemodialysis treatment adherence in Black patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, Yoshinobu L, Gibb J, Langelle C, Harney P. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(4):570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdel-Khalek A, Snyder C. Correlates and predictors of an Arabic translation of the Snyder Hope Scale. J Posit Psychol. 2007;2(4):228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim Y, Evangelista LS, Phillips LR, Pavlish C, Kopple JD. The End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ): testing the psychometric properties in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. Nephrol Nurs J J Am Nephrol Nurses’ Assoc. 2010;37(4):377.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fai EK, Anderson C, Ferreros V. Role of attitudes and intentions in predicting adherence to oral diabetes medications. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(2):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahmatkeshan N, Khademian Z, Zarshenas L, Rakhshan M. Experience of adherence to treatment among patients with coronary artery disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Health Promot Perspect. 2021;11(4):467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peterson JC, Charlson ME, Hoffman Z, Wells MT, Wong S-C, Hollenberg JP, Jobe JB, Boschert KA, Isen AM, Allegrante JP. A randomized controlled trial of positive-affect induction to promote physical activity after percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(4):329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zahmatkeshan N, Rakhshan M, Zarshenas L, Kojuri J, Khademian Z. The effect of applying the information-motivation-behavioral skills model on treatment adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Commun Based Nurs Midwifery. 2021;9(3):225.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Takaki J, Nishi T, Shimoyama H, Inada T, Matsuyama N, Sasaki T, Kumano H, Kuboki T. Possible variances of blood urea nitrogen, serum potassium and phosphorus levels and interdialytic weight gain accounted for compliance of hemodialysis patients. J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(6):525–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pasyar N, Rambod M, Sharif F, Rafii F, Pourali-Mohammadi N. Improving adherence and biomedical markers in hemodialysis patients: the effects of relaxation therapy. Complement Ther Med. 2015;23(1):38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bellomo G, Coccetta P, Pasticci F, Rossi D, Selvi A. The effect of psychological intervention on thirst and interdialytic weight gain in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. J Ren Nutr. 2015;25(5):426–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Moattari M, Ebrahimi M, Sharifi N, Rouzbeh J. The effect of empowerment on the self-efficacy, quality of life and clinical and laboratory indicators of patients treated with hemodialysis: a randomized controlled trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10(1):115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hejazi SS, Nikbakht S, Nasiri ZarrinGhabaee D, Akaberi A, Nazari Sheyhaki A. Hope in caregivers and hemodialysis patients. J North Khorasan Univ Med Sci. 2015;6(4):807–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Farnam A. The effect of positive thinking training in enhancement of quality and hope of life among the elderly. Posit Psychol. 2016;2(1):75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leontopoulou S. A positive psychology intervention with emerging adults. Eur J Couns Psychol. 2015;3(2):113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saeedi H, Nasab SHM, Zadeh AM, Ebrahimi HA. The effectiveness of positive psychology interventions with Islamic approach on quality of life in females with multiple sclerosis. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2015;8(2):965–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for financially supporting the study. They would also like to thank the Center for Development of Clinical Research of Namazi Hospital and Mr. Keshtvarz and Dr. Motazedian who collaborated in study design, statistics, and data analysis. The honorable officials of Namazi and Shahid Faghihi Hospitals who contributed to this study are acknowledged, as well. Thanks also go to Ms. A. Keivanshekouh at the Research Improvement Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for improving the use of English in the manuscript. Finally, the researchers wish to express their gratitude to the patients undergoing hemodialysis who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Vice Chancellor of Research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran under Grant No. 97-01-08-17374. The funding body did not play any roles in the in the design and conduct of the study; and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study. FS performed the interventions and collected data. ZKh and FS analyzed and interpreted the data. ZKh and FS participated in drafting the manuscript. FS, MR, and ZKh revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Khademian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran approved the study (code: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.704). The authorities of the hospitals also issued the necessary permits to conduct the research. All participants were required to complete the informed consent forms and were assured about the voluntary participation and the confidentiality of their information.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabouri, F., Rambod, M. & Khademian, Z. The effect of positive thinking training on hope and adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol 11, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01036-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01036-2

Keywords

  • Education
  • Hemodialysis units, Hospital
  • Psychology, Positive
  • Renal dialysis
  • Treatment adherence and compliance