Abdullahi AM, Orji R, Kawu AA. Gender, age and subjective well-being: towards personalized persuasive health interventions. Information. 2019;10(10):301.
Article
Google Scholar
Bartram DJ, Sinclair JM, Baldwin DS. Further validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(2):379–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Batz C, Tay L. Gender differences in subjective well-being. In: Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L, editors. Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers; 2018.
Google Scholar
Baker FB. The basics of item response theory. College Park: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Original work published in 1985; 2001. Retrieved from http://echo.edres.org:8080/irt/baker/.
Beauducel A, Wittmann WW. Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Struct Equ Model. 2005;12(1):41–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Bialosiewicz S, Murphy K, Berry T. An introduction to measurement invariance testing: resource packet for participants. Am Eval Assoc. 2013;27(5):1–37.
Google Scholar
Bonacchi A, Chiesi F, Lau C, Marunic G, Saklofske DH, Marra F, Miccinesi G. Rapid and sound assessment of well-being within a multi-dimensional approach: the Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs). PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0252709.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Brooks GR. Despite problems, “masculinity” is a vital construct. Psychol Men Masc. 2010;11:107–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2015.
Google Scholar
Cai L, Monroe S. A new statistic for evaluating item response theory models for ordinal data. CRESST Report 839. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST); 2014.
Cai L, Yang JS, Hansen M. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychol Methods. 2011;16(3):221.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Camilli G, Shepard LA. Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
Google Scholar
Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being. Am Psychol. 1976;31(2):117.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carter NT, Guan L, Maples JL, Williamson RL, Miller JD. The downsides of extreme conscientiousness for psychological well-being: the role of obsessive compulsive tendencies. J Pers. 2016;84(4):510–22.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Castellvi P, Forero CG, Codony M, Vilagut G, Brugulat P, Medina A, Gabilondo A, Mompart A, Colom J, Tresserras R, Ferrer M, Stewart-Brown S, Alonso J. The Spanish version of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is valid for use in the general population. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(3):857–68.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464–504.
Article
Google Scholar
Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Cilar L, Pajnkihar M, Štiglic G. Validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale among nursing students in Slovenia. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(6):1335–46.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Counsell A, Cribbie RA, Flora DB. Evaluating equivalence testing methods for measurement invariance. Multivar Behav Res. 2020;55(2):312–28.
Article
Google Scholar
De Ayala RJ. The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Publications; 2013.
Google Scholar
Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. 1984;95:542–75.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Diener E. Subjective well-being. In: Diener E, editor. The science of well-being. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. p. 11–58.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 63–73.
Google Scholar
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(2):276–302.
Article
Google Scholar
Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory. Hove: Psychology Press; 2013.
Book
Google Scholar
Fan X. Item response theory and classical test theory: an empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educ Psychol Meas. 1998;58(3):357–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.
Google Scholar
Fujita F, Diener E, Sandvik E. Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: the case for emotional intensity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(3):427.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gatignon H. Confirmatory factor analysis. In: Gatignon H, editor. Statistical analysis of management data. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 59–122.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Gomez R, Vance A, Stavropoulos V. Test–retest measurement invariance of clinic referred children’s ADHD symptoms. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2018;40(2):194–205.
Article
Google Scholar
Haring MJ, Stock WA, Okun MA. A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relat. 1984;37(8):645–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Hayes JA, Mahalik JR. Gender role conflict and psychological distress in male counseling center clients. Psychol Men Masc. 2000;1:116.
Article
Google Scholar
Houghton S, Hattie J, Carroll A, Wood L, Baffour B. It hurts to be lonely! Loneliness and positive mental wellbeing in Australian rural and urban adolescents. J Psychol Couns Sch. 2016;26(1):52–67.
Article
Google Scholar
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Hunter SC, Houghton S, Wood L. Positive mental well-being in australian adolescents: evaluating the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Educ Dev Psychol. 2015;32(2):93–104.
Google Scholar
Inglehart R. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
Book
Google Scholar
Iwamoto DK, Brady J, Kaya A, Park A. Masculinity and depression: a longitudinal investigation of multidimensional masculine norms among college men. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(6):1873–81.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA Jr, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(1):6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Joseph S, Linley PA, Harwood J, Lewis CA, McCollam P. Rapid assessment of well-being: the short depression–happiness scale (SDHS). Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract. 2004;77(4):463–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Keyes CL. Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: an introduction. Soc Indic Res. 2006;77(1):1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Kline RB. Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In: Williams M, Paul Vogt W, editors. The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
Google Scholar
Koushede V, Lasgaard M, Hinrichsen C, Meilstrup C, Nielsen L, Rayce SB, Torres-Sahli M, Gudmundsdottir DG, Stewart-Brown S, Santini ZI. Measuring mental well-being in Denmark: validation of the original and short version of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS and SWEMWBS) and cross-cultural comparison across four European settings. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:502–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Larson R. Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. J Gerontol. 1978;33:109–25.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lease SH, Çiftçi A, Demir A, Boyraz G. Structural validity of Turkish versions of the gender role conflict scale and male role norms scale. Psychol Men Masc. 2009;10:273–87.
Article
Google Scholar
Lloyd K, Devine P. Psychometric properties of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in Northern Ireland. J Ment Health. 2012;21(3):257–63.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Magyar-Moe JL. Therapist’s guide to positive psychological interventions. London: Academic Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
Maydeu-Olivares A. Evaluating the fit of IRT models. In: van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK, editors. Handbook of item response theory modelling. London: Routledge; 2014. p. 129–45.
Google Scholar
Maydeu-Olivares A, Shi D, Rosseel Y. Assessing fit in structural equation models: a Monte-Carlo evaluation of RMSEA versus SRMR confidence intervals and tests of close fit. Struct Equ Model. 2018;25(3):389–402.
Article
Google Scholar
Mahalik JR, Locke BD, Ludlow LH, Diemer MA, Scott RP, Gottfried M, Freitas G. Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychol Men Masc. 2003;4:3–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Mavali S, Mahmoodi H, Sarbakhsh P, Shaghaghi A. Psychometric properties of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) in the Iranian older adults. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:693.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McDonald RP, Ho MHR. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):64.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McKay MT, Andretta JR. Evidence for the psychometric validity, internal consistency and measurement invariance of Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale scores in Scottish and Irish adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:382–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miller MJ, Sheu H. Conceptual and measurement issues in multicultural psychology research. Handb Couns Psychol. 2008;4:103–20.
Google Scholar
Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2001;10(5):173–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Parker G, Brotchie H. Gender differences in depression. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):429–36.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Penton H. An investigation into the psychometric performance of existing measures of health, quality of life and wellbeing in older adults (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield); 2019.
Pietraszkiewicz A, Kaufmann M, Formanowicz MM. Masculinity ideology and subjective well-being in a sample of Polish men and women. Pol Psychol Bull. 2017;48(1):79–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ryff CD, Singer B. The contours of positive human health. Psychol Inq. 1998;9(1):1–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, Gundy C, Koller M, Petersen MA, Sprangers MA. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Seligman M, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55:5–14.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shadfar S, Malekmohammadi I. Application of structural equation modeling (SEM) in restructuring state intervention strategies toward paddy production development. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2013;3(12):576.
Google Scholar
Shmotkin D. Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: a multivariate look for differentiated trends. Soc Indic Res. 1990;23:201–30.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith OR, Alves DE, Knapstad M, Haug E, Aarø LE. Measuring mental well-being in Norway: validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Stavropoulos V, Bamford L, Beard C, Gomez R, Griffiths MD. Test–retest measurement invariance of the nine-item internet gaming disorder scale in two countries: a preliminary longitudinal study. Int J Mental Health Addict. 2019;19:1–18.
Google Scholar
Stavropoulos V, Beard C, Griffiths MD, Burleigh T, Gomez R, Pontes HM. Measurement Invariance of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF) between Australia, the USA, and the UK. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;16:377–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Steenkamp JBE, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J Consum Res. 1998;25(1):78–90.
Article
Google Scholar
Stevenson B, Wolfers J. The paradox of declining female happiness. Am Econ J Econ Pol. 2009;1(2):190–225.
Article
Google Scholar
Stewart-Brown S, Mohammed KJ. Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141–66.
Google Scholar
Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, Platt S, Parkinson J, Weich S. Internal construct validity of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7(1):1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Taasoobshirazi G, Wang S. The performance of the SRMR, RMSEA, CFI, and TLI: an examination of sample size, path size, and degrees of freedom. J Appl Quant Methods. 2016;11(3):31–9.
Google Scholar
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Themessl-Huber M. Evaluation of the [Chi]^ sup 2^-statistic and different fit-indices under misspecified number of factors in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Test Assess Model. 2014;56(3):219.
Google Scholar
Trousselard M, Steiler D, Dutheil F, Claverie D, Canini F, Fenouillet F, Naughton G, Stewart-Brown S, Franck N. Validation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) in French psychiatric and general populations. Psychiatry Res. 2016;245:282–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Van de Schoot R, Lugtig P, Hox J. A checklist for testing measurement invariance. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2012;9(4):486–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Waqas A, Ahmad W, Haddad M, Taggart FM, Muhammad Z, Bukhari MH, Sami SA, Batool SM, Najeeb F, Hanif A, Rizvi ZA, Ejaz S. Measuring the well-being of health care professionals in the Punjab: a psychometric evaluation of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale in a Pakistani population. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1264.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Warr P, Payne R. Experience of strain and pleasure among British adults. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:1691–7.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weiss EL, Longhurst JG, Mazure CM. Childhood sexual abuse as a risk factor for depression in women: psychosocial and neurobiological correlates. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:816–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
White JM. Marital status and well-being in Canada. J Fam Issues. 1992;13:390–409.
Article
Google Scholar
Young E, Korszun A. Women, stress, and depression: sex differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation. In: Leibenluft E, editor. Gender differences in mood and anxiety disorders: from bench to bedside. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1999. p. 31–52.
Google Scholar
Zarate D, Marmara J, Potoczny C, Hosking W, Stavropoulos V. Body Appreciation Scale (BAS-2): measurement invariance across genders and item response theory examination. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):1–15.
Article
Google Scholar