Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Psychology

Open Access

Erratum to: Social capital—a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow

  • Sara Ferlander1Email author,
  • Andrew Stickley1, 2, 3,
  • Olga Kislitsyna4,
  • Tanya Jukkala1,
  • Per Carlson5 and
  • Ilkka Henrik Mäkinen6
BMC PsychologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20175:20

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-017-0190-3

Received: 12 June 2017

Accepted: 12 June 2017

Published: 19 June 2017

The original article was published in BMC Psychology 2016 4:37

Erratum

After publication of the original article [1], the author reported an error to the columns depicting the results for “Women (n = 678)” in Table 2. The correct version of Table 2 is included in this erratum.
Table 2

Depression among respondents aged 18 and over in Moscow

Variables

Men (n = 507)

Women (n = 678)

Model 1

Model 2

Model 1

Model 2

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Age

1.00

0.99–1.01

0.99

0.98–1.00

1.00

0.99–1.01

1.00

0.99–1.01

Educational level

 High

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Medium

0.89

0.58–1.36

0.78

0.49–1.22

0.91

0.64–1.29

0.85

0.59–1.22

 Low

1.04

0.66–1.65

1.02

0.63–1.65

0.75

0.50–1.12

0.74

0.49–1.12

Economic problems

 Few

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Many

2.34

1.57–3.51***

2.49

1.65–3.78***

1.48

1.09–2.01*

1.52

1.11–2.07**

Family relations

 Marital status

  Married/cohabiting

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Divorced/widowed

1.20

0.70–2.07

1.13

0.64–1.98

1.48

1.02–2.14*

1.49

1.03–2.17*

  Never married

1.03

0.60–1.76

1.10

0.62–1.95

0.96

0.59–1.56

0.94

0.56–1.55

 Contact with relatives

  Regular

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Little

1.62

1.10–2.39*

1.51

1.00–2.30

1.45

1.06–1.98*

1.57

1.10–2.24*

Extra-familial relations

 Contact with friends/acquaintances

  Regular

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Little

1.63

1.08–2.45*

1.44

0.93–2.25

1.12

0.81–1.55

0.97

0.67–1.40

 Age-bridging contacts

  Regular

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Little

0.99

0.67–1.47

0.88

0.58–1.33

0.72

0.52–0.98*

0.72

0.51–1.00*

 Voluntary associations

  Member

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

1.00

 

  Non-member

1.07

0.70–1.63

1.07

0.68–1.68

0.96

0.66–1.40

1.04

0.70–1.54

Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from binary logistic regression. Model 1: age adjusted; Model 2: mutually adjusted

NOTE: Standardised according to the educational-level proportions of the Moscow City population given in the 2002 census for the population over 18 years

* p < 0.05 ** p < 0.005 *** p < 0.001

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stockholm Centre for Health and Social Change (SCOHOST), Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University
(2)
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
(3)
Department of Human Ecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo
(4)
Department of Quality of Life Measurement Problems at the Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
(5)
Stockholm Centre for Health and Social Change (SCOHOST), Department of Social Work, School of Social Sciences, Södertörn University
(6)
Department of Sociology, Uppsala University

Reference

  1. Ferlander S, Stickley A, Kislitsyna O, Jukkala T, Carlson P, Mäkinen IH. Social capital—a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow. BMC Psychology. 2016;4:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement