Skip to main content

Table 2 Depression among respondents aged 18 and over in Moscow

From: Erratum to: Social capital—a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow

Variables Men (n = 507) Women (n = 678)
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.99 0.98–1.00 1.00 0.99–1.01 1.00 0.99–1.01
Educational level
 High 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
 Medium 0.89 0.58–1.36 0.78 0.49–1.22 0.91 0.64–1.29 0.85 0.59–1.22
 Low 1.04 0.66–1.65 1.02 0.63–1.65 0.75 0.50–1.12 0.74 0.49–1.12
Economic problems
 Few 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
 Many 2.34 1.57–3.51*** 2.49 1.65–3.78*** 1.48 1.09–2.01* 1.52 1.11–2.07**
Family relations
 Marital status
  Married/cohabiting 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
  Divorced/widowed 1.20 0.70–2.07 1.13 0.64–1.98 1.48 1.02–2.14* 1.49 1.03–2.17*
  Never married 1.03 0.60–1.76 1.10 0.62–1.95 0.96 0.59–1.56 0.94 0.56–1.55
 Contact with relatives
  Regular 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
  Little 1.62 1.10–2.39* 1.51 1.00–2.30 1.45 1.06–1.98* 1.57 1.10–2.24*
Extra-familial relations
 Contact with friends/acquaintances
  Regular 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
  Little 1.63 1.08–2.45* 1.44 0.93–2.25 1.12 0.81–1.55 0.97 0.67–1.40
 Age-bridging contacts
  Regular 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
  Little 0.99 0.67–1.47 0.88 0.58–1.33 0.72 0.52–0.98* 0.72 0.51–1.00*
 Voluntary associations
  Member 1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00  
  Non-member 1.07 0.70–1.63 1.07 0.68–1.68 0.96 0.66–1.40 1.04 0.70–1.54
  1. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from binary logistic regression. Model 1: age adjusted; Model 2: mutually adjusted
  2. NOTE: Standardised according to the educational-level proportions of the Moscow City population given in the 2002 census for the population over 18 years
  3. * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.005 *** p < 0.001