Skip to main content
Download PDF

The impact of lockdown on child adjustment: a propensity score matched analysis

BMC Psychology volume 12, Article number: 409 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an inestimable impact worldwide, challenging the daily lives and interactions of children and their families. In 2022, Shanghai implemented a three-month lockdown in response to an acceleration of positive cases during the pandemic period. This restrictive policy provided insight into the impact of the lockdown on children's social adjustment and the role of parent–child conflict during this process. Mothers of preschool-aged children participated in this study and completed the Chinese version of Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method, two matched groups were formed: pre-lockdown group and post-lockdown group, with a total of 574 preschoolers (N = 297 in each group; Mage = 4.36, SD = 0.86) were recruited. The results showed that the lockdown directly impacted children's emotional symptoms. Additionally, the parent–child conflict mediated relationship between the lockdown and children's adjustment. Specifically, parent–child conflict deteriorated children's emotional symptoms, hyperactivity-attention problems, and prosocial behaviors. These findings highlight the significant impact of the severe lockdown on children's social adjustment and the role of parent–child interactions during this period.

Peer Review reports

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many institutions and authorities have implemented essential restrictive measures, such as social distancing measures and lockdowns, to curb its spread [1, 2]. Since March 11, 2022, Shanghai's city-wide lockdown, which includes the closure of all kindergartens, has presented new challenges for affected families [3]. Home confinement during lockdowns has particularly burdened parents of preschoolers with concerns about infection, economic pressure, and caregiving responsibilities [4, 5], depleting their energy and motivation [6], and affecting parenting skills [7] and parent–child relationships [8, 9]. The joint effect of limited social interaction and increased parent–child conflict during lockdowns may manifest in children's emotional distress and problematic behaviors. While existing research supports the deterioration of children's social adjustment during the pandemic [10], most studies lack clarity regarding the unique effect of COVID-19 lockdowns and how their implementation affects parent–child conflict, which, in turn, affects child adjustment [11,12,13]. The present study adopts a novel approach by utilizing propensity score matching (PSM) (1) to investigate the direct and unique impact of lockdown measures on social adjustment in preschoolers and (2) to explore whether the relationship between lockdown and social adjustment is mediated by parent–child conflict.

COVID-19 lockdown and child social adjustment

Social adjustment refers to an individual's ability to effectively establish harmonious relationships with others while engaging in satisfactory social interactions [14]. In the context of preschoolers, social adjustment is commonly measured using several key indicators, including social competence, externalizing behavior, and internalizing behavior [15,16,17]. Previous research has consistently shown that early maladjustment has been found to correlate with poorer academic performance and challenges in adapting to school environments during later stages of development [18,19,20].

There is little doubt that the global COVID-19 pandemic has altered the daily lives of many children, subsequently, affecting their early learning and development. According to the life course theory, individual development trajectories are affected by interrelated and intertwined stratification systems [21]. It is widely recognized that the pandemic, along with the social changes associated with the lockdowns, serves as a notable social and historical stressor event [22, 23]. The implementation of lockdown measures during the pandemic has resulted in fundamental changes to the daily routines of young children [24]. Liu and colleagues found that extended periods of stay-at-home measures during lockdowns led to more unpredictable events and an increased risk of social maladjustment [12]. The closure of educational settings (schools and kindergartens) due to the pandemic has deprived children of opportunities for social activities and interactions, leading them to increasingly rely on electronic media as alternative ways of maintaining communication and acquiring essential social skills [25, 26]. Lastly, preschool-aged children lack coping strategies and adequate social support to effectively deal with fear and uncertainty during the pandemic [27]. These factors could pose significant developmental risks for social maladjustment among preschoolers during lockdown periods.

Recent research has highlighted the increased psychological and behavioral problems in children during the pandemic [4, 10, 28, 29]. Several empirical studies have supported the notion that young children exhibit notable social maladjustment following the pandemic [11, 30]. For instance, a study involving Italian preschoolers showed that during the lockdown, young children experienced heightened emotional symptoms and behavioral problems [11]. Similarly, in China, school-age children were found to have experienced significant negative impacts on social adjustment, with the incidence of behavioral problems ranging from 4.7% to 10.3%, including conduct problems, peer problems, hyperactivity-inattention, and emotional problems, as a result of the lockdown measures [31].

To our knowledge, limited research has been conducted to explore the impact of lockdowns on the social adjustment of Chinese preschool children. This is an area that requires attention, as the preschool years are crucial for a child's early learning and development, including the acquisition of social adjustment skills [32, 33]. Moreover, China had approximately 480.521 million preschoolers in 2021 [34]. Including Chinese young children as participants expands the scope of international research in early childhood psychology, which has been predominantly by Western research.

The mediating effect of parent–child conflict

Parent–child conflict is a significant aspect of an unhealthy parent–child relationship. It is characterized by both parents and children engaging in negative behaviors, such as discordant or acrimonious interactions [35]. According to Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory, parents, as the immediate environment in which children grow up (i.e. microsystem), directly influence the development of children's adjustment [36]. Early instances of discord and conflict between parents and children may lead to the development of dysfunctional patterns of interaction [37], ultimately having a detrimental impact on a child's display of externalizing and internalizing problems [38,39,40]. For example, previous research suggests that children exposed to parent–child conflict tend to experience a more negative family atmosphere, which would, in turn, increases the probability of problematic behavior in children [41,42,43].

The negative impact of parent–child conflict on children's social adjustment may become more devastating during the lockdown period. From the perspective of family stress theory (FSM), the pandemic can be viewed as a source of stress, a non-normative life event with the potential to disrupt the social dynamics within a family system [35, 44, 45]. Recent empirical studies have revealed that the increase in parent–child conflict during the pandemic can be attributed to disruptions in daily life routines and the overall chaotic family environment [12, 46]. Prime and colleagues [9] explained that the effects of the pandemic permeate various aspects of family functioning, including parent–child relationships, thereby posing significant risks to children's adjustment.

Indeed, during the lockdown, parents experienced high levels of stress and feelings of being overwhelmed due to multiple factors, including the economic crisis, the risk of infection, work-related issues such as job loss, excessive workload, and reduced income [4, 5, 47]. Under such circumstances, parents were unable to fully attend to their children's needs or provide high-quality parenting practices [48, 49]. A longitudinal study conducted before and after the pandemic found that parents' psychological well-being deteriorated during the pandemic, as evidenced by decreased self-efficacy and increased psychological distress [50].

As a logical progression, the stress experienced by parents during the lockdown may result in low-quality parent–child interactions and a negative parent–child relationship, which in turn affects the social adjustment of their children [48]. It is worth noting that the parent–child relationship during early childhood influences children's development and behaviors at preschool age [51]. The aforementioned studies primarily examined children across different age groups, with limited focus on preschool children and their parents.

In conclusion, based on the ecological systems theory and the family stress model, the stress resulting from the lockdown may lead to the escalation of parent–child conflict within families. As a consequence, the increased occurrence of parent–child conflicts poses a threat to the healthy development of children's social adjustment. In this study, we aim to investigate the complex relationship between the COVID-19 lockdown, parent–child conflict, and various indicators of social adjustment (including emotional symptoms, hyperactivity-inattention, and prosocial behavior) among preschoolers.

The present study

Many studies have focused on changes in preschool children's social adjustment or alterations in parent–child relationships during the pandemic. However, few studies have investigated whether lockdown itself is the primary cause of children's social adjustment issues and parent–child conflict. This is mainly due to the lack of conditions necessary to establish control and experimental groups to manipulate the COVID-19 conditions. Therefore, the present study adopted an innovative approach by employing the propensity score matching technique. The use of propensity score matching allowed us to examine the unique contribution of COVID-19 lockdowns to parent–child conflict and children's social adjustment by mimicking the statistical procedure of experimental studies and comparing outcomes before and after the lockdown (e.g., pre-lockdown versus post-lockdown). The participants remained the similar in terms of their socio-demographic background (e.g., child age, child gender, the number of a siblings, mother's educational level, registered permanent residence, and family structure). The present study aimed to shed light on the impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns on social adjustment in Chinese preschoolers and explore the interplay among the lockdowns, parent–child conflict, and social adjustment in children. This study posits two hypotheses: (1) that lockdown has a negative impact on child social adjustment, and (2) that parent–child conflict mediates the relationship between lockdown and child social adjustment. Specifically, the lockdown condition is expected to exacerbate children's social adjustment problems through higher incidences of parent–child conflict.

Methods

Procedure

The present study included two distinct groups of participants, the pre-lockdown and the post-lockdown. The participants were mothers who had at least one preschool-aged child attending a local kindergarten in Shanghai. Data collection for both groups took place during the pandemic period. The pre-lockdown (N = 900) completed the questionnaires in October 2020. At this time, although the pandemic had begun in December 2019, the situation in Shanghai was relatively stable with only 191 new cases reported throughout the entire month. While certain restrictions were still in place, daily life was not severely disrupted. In contrast, the post-lockdown (N = 1249) completed the questionnaires during a city-wide lockdown in 2022. This lockdown was implemented in response to a significant surge in COVID-19 cases, with daily infections reaching up to 20,000 and a total of 100,000 cases reported in April 2022. Lasting for over three months, the lockdown significantly restricted movement, impacting work, school, and daily life. As the data from both groups were collected during the pandemic period, any observed score differences in parent–child conflict and social adjustment between the two groups can be attributed to changes such as the stress induced by the city-wide lockdown rather than the broader effects of the pandemic.

Propensity score matching

Propensity score matching (PSM) has been widely used in the field of education and evaluation research. It serves as a valuable tool for inferring causality in non-randomized research by addressing differences between two samples using a comprehensive set of covariates [52]. PSM involves a two-step procedure, that is, estimating the propensity scores (PSM), and matching individuals based on these scores. In the context of this study, PSM was adopted to examine the effect of COVID-19 lockdown on parent–child relationships and preschool children's social adjustment, while accounting for potential bias arising from confounding variables (such as socio-demographic characteristics). By employing PSM, this study aimed to eliminate the influence of such confounding factors and estimate the true effect of the specific variable under investigation [53].

Participants

After implementing the group-matching procedure, the final sample consisted of 574 preschoolers with 297 participants in each group (Mage = 4.36, SD = 0.86). The matching process ensured that the two groups had similar socio-demographic characteristics, including child age, child gender, the number of siblings, registered permanent residence, mother's educational level, and family structure. According to the results of the National Bureau of Statistics of China [54], the sample in this study can be considered representative of families in medium to large cities in China in terms of education level and family structure. A detailed demographic profile of each group can be found in Table 1. Both sampling groups completed two questionnaires: the Parent–Child Relationship questionnaire and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The questionnaires were completed by mothers (Mage = 34.74, SD = 4.57).

Table 1 Demographic Profile of the Study Groups
Full size table

Measures

The Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS)

Mothers completed the Chinese version of the Child-Parent Relationship Scale [55, 56]. The CPRS is a widely used and validated tool for assessing the relationship between children and parents, exhibiting strong psychometric properties [57]. It consists of three subscales: intimacy, conflict, and dependence, which provide insight into the nature of the relationship between children and their parents [55]. In this study, the conflict subscale (12 items) was used to measure the extent to which parents perceive their relationships with their children to be characterized by negativity. An example item from this subscale is: "Dealing with my child drains my energy". Participants rated each item on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very unlikely) to 5 (very likely). Higher scores indicate a higher level of parent–child conflict. In the present study, the Cronbach's alpha for the conflict subscale was α = 0.85, indicating good internal consistency reliability.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Mothers completed the Chinese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [58, 59]. The SDQ has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for identifying mental health issues among children and adolescents in China [60]. The SDQ consists of five subscales, each containing five items, resulting in a total of 25 items. Participants rated each item on a three-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not true) to 3 (certainly true). The subscales assess different aspects of children’s behavioral and emotional functioning. Some examples of the items include, "often unhappy, down-hearted or tearful" and "often fights with other children or bullies them". The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients for the subscales were as follows: emotional symptoms (α = 0.60), hyperactivity-inattention (α = 0.75), and prosocial behavior (α = 0.70). Conduct problems and peer problems demonstrated low reliability, which has been revealed in other studies [61, 62]. Consequently, these two subscales were eliminated from further analyses. It should be noted that higher scores on the prosocial behavior subscale indicate strengths, while higher scores on the other subscales (emotional symptoms and hyperactivity-inattention) indicate difficulties.

Data analytical strategy

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26. The significance level for all analyses was set at = 0.05. No missing values were present in the dataset. Initially, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to filter and match the two sets of data. Chi-squared tests were then performed to ensure that there were no significant differences in social demographic variables between the two groups. To examine whether parent–child conflict mediates the relationship between the lockdown and child social adjustment, the PROCESS macro for SPSS was used for mediation analysis.

Results

Preliminary analysis

Matched the pre-lockdown group and the post-lockdown group with similar background characteristics (age, gender, registered permanent residence, the number of a siblings, educational level, and family structure) were created using a propensity score matching procedure with the SPSS PS module [63]. The estimation algorithm used was logical regression, and the matching algorithm utilized was nearest matching with a caliper set at 0.20. An overall balance test was conducted to assess the equivalence between the matching groups [64]. The test results indicated no significant differences between the groups. Furthermore, chi-square tests were performed to examine social demographic information, and the results confirmed that there were no significant differences between the two groups after Propensity Score Matching. All indicators had p-values greater than 0.05, indicating no significant discrepancies (refer to Table 1 for details).

As the independent variable (study group) is categorical, Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlations between the independent variable, mediator and outcome variables. Pearson correlation was used for the analysis of other variables. The correlation analysis results are presented in Table 2. The results revealed that the study group has significant positive correlations with both parent–child conflict and emotional symptoms, indicating that parents from the post-lockdown group reported more conflicts with children and faced more intense child emotional problems than parents from the pre-lockdown group. Additionally, there were significant correlations between parent–child conflict and all three indicators of child social adjustment.

Table 2 Correlations among Analyzed Variables of Interest
Full size table

Main effect of the lockdown on child social adjustment

To test Hypothesis 1, a linear regression analysis was conducted using SPSS to examine the effect of the lockdown on child social adjustment. As presented in Table 3, the study group was significantly and positively associated with emotional symptoms (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), indicating that children in the post-lockdown group exhibited greater emotional symptoms compared to those in the pre-lockdown group. However, the study group was not significantly associated with hyperactivity-inattention and prosocial behavior.

Table 3 Test Result of Total Effect
Full size table

Mediation analyses

To further investigate whether parent–child conflict mediated the effects of the lockdown on child adjustment, a mediation model was examined (see Table 4). The results indicated that the lockdown had a significant positive effect on parent–child conflict, and parent–child conflict had significant positive effects on all three indicators of child social adjustment. After including the mediator variable, the study group still had a significant positive effect on emotional symptoms, but not on hyperactivity-inattention and prosocial behavior. Overall, the lockdown can impact child social adjustment through the mediating role of parent–child conflict.

Table 4 Test Results of the Mediation Model
Full size table

The lockdown's influence on child social adjustment was found to be partly mediated by parent–child conflict. Subsequent mediation analyses confirmed the significance of all three mediation paths, as outlined in Table 5. These outcomes provide support for the mediating function of parent–child conflict in the association between the lockdown and child social adjustment.

Table 5 Test Results of Mediating Effect (Indirect Effect)
Full size table

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent implementation of lockdown measures have had a profound and far-reaching impact on both parents and children. While current studies have focused on changes in social adjustment and the parent–child relationship among preschool children during pandemics, there is a notable gap in exploring the specific effect of lockdown measures on children's social adjustment and parent–child conflicts. To address this gap, the present study used propensity score matching (PSM) to match each family in our sample with similar socio-demographic backgrounds, thereby mitigating potential confounding effects in this line of research. Importantly, our study provides new insights into the perspectives of parent–child conflict and children's social adjustment in the context of the COVID-19 lockdown.

As expected, our findings indicate that, after controlling pre-test covariates related to socio-demographic background, the post-lockdown group exhibited higher levels of parent–child conflict compared to the pre-lockdown group. Our results further suggest that, during the city lockdown, increased parent–child conflict within families was associated with a greater degree of social maladjustment among preschoolers. Specifically, these maladjustment indicators encompassed elevated emotional symptoms, hyperactivity-inattention, and diminished prosocial behavior. Overall, our findings suggest that the COVID-19 lockdown may exacerbate the adverse impact of parent–child conflict on children's social adjustment.

The impact of lockdown on preschooler social adjustment

Overall, our findings demonstrate a significant effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on the social adjustment of preschool children. This aligns with recent research findings that highlight the escalation of behavioral and psychological problems among children during the pandemic [27, 65,66,67]. Specifically, our study reveals that the pandemic lockdown had a direct impact on children's emotional symptoms, but did not have a significant direct effect on hyperactivity-inattention and prosocial behavior.

From the perspective of life course theory, the COVID-19 lockdown represents a significant social and historical event in the development of children. The lockdown has brought about a combination of adverse effects on children's adjustment development, which may be further exacerbated by by the joint impact of lifestyle changes and psychosocial stress induced by home confinement [68]. Children at a young age, in particular, may face even more challenges during strict lockdown periods [69, 70]. This is because young children are in a sensitive period of neurodevelopment, lacking independence, coping strategies, and being more sensitive to environmental changes [23]. Under such circumstances, children are more likely to experience physical and social isolation, fear, anxiety, and other negative emotions [13, 27]. Our research confirms that the COVID-19 lockdown directly led to an increase in emotional problems among young children.

Interestingly, it was found that the lockdown had no significant main effect on preschoolers' hyperactivity-inattention. Hyperactivity-inattention refers to difficulties in maintaining attention and controlling one's activity level [71]. Children with hyperactivity-inattention may display excessive motor activity, struggle to stay focused on tasks, and exhibit impulsive behaviors. Because hyperactivity-inattention is primarily associated with attentional control and activity regulation, it is more likely to be perceived as problematic in structured settings such as classrooms, where children are required to follow instructions, complete tasks, and adhere to specific routines [72]. However, preschoolers' academic demands and structured learning activities are generally less intensive compared to school-age children. They may not have encountered significant academic challenges during the lockdown, which could have contributed to the lack of a main effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on hyperactivity-inattention.

Similarly, our findings indicate that the lockdown did not have a direct impact on preschoolers' prosocial behaviors. Prosocial behaviors of preschoolers are commonly observed during interactions with parents and peers, such as sharing toys, offering assistance, and forming relationships [73]. Despite the limitations imposed by the lockdown, children were still able to engage in prosocial behaviors within the confines of their family environment, where interactions with parents and siblings persisted. Consequently, the lockdown did not directly influence preschoolers' prosocial behaviors.

The mediating effect of parent–child conflict

Our results indicated that the COVID-19 lockdown is associated with higher levels of parent–child conflict among parents of young children in China. This hypothesis is supported by a previous study that demonstrated a link between living in a more unstable situation during the lockdown and a lower-quality parent–child relationship [49]. Overall, the relationship between parents and their children was highly deteriorated during the pandemic [74,75,76]. The results from this study further provide evidence to the conceptual framework proposed by Prime [9], which suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic, as a social disruption, permeates into the family system. Specifically, changes in lifestyle during the lockdown placed increased stress on parents, particularly those with young children [77]. For instance, parents had to invest more time in protecting their children from the virus and explaining why certain daily activities were canceled. This, in turn, contributed to higher levels of parenting exhaustion and tension in the parent–child relationship [77,78,79].

As expected, our results also indicate that parent–child conflict has an impact on children's social adjustment. Parent–child conflict generates distress and insecurity in children, which, in turn, affects their social adjustment. This finding was consistent with previous studies that have identified parent–child conflict as a predictor of children's maladjustment [41, 80]. Research focused on children's mental health has shown that, when children feel unsafe during the pandemic, they are more likely to develop psychological and emotional problems, such as increased anxiety and depression [24, 81]. These maladaptive outcomes can have negative implications for children's psychological and behavioral adjustment [82].

Results from the mediation analyses indicated that the COVID-19 lockdown indirectly predicted child maladjustment through its association with parent–child conflict. During the lockdown, children were unable to have contact with individuals outside their immediate family, such as teachers, extended family members, and friends. Parents became the sole providers for their children's physical, emotional, and educational needs [75]. Under such circumstances, parents had to take care of their young children while managing their own daily responsibilities and work, which increased their level of exhaustion, and may lead to changes in their emotional state, parenting stress and parenting style [4, 7, 83]. As a result, the increase in parent–child conflict during the pandemic was associated with higher levels of parental stress [31, 46], which can make parents less attuned to their children's needs and engaged in more dysfunctional parent–child interactions, leading to increased conflict in the parent–child relationship [82]. Consequently, this can contribute to the occurrence of child social maladjustment [4].

Notably, our findings revealed that parent–child conflict played a complete mediating role between the COVID-19 lockdown and both hyperactivity-inattention and prosocial behaviors in preschoolers. In other words, the connections between the COVID-19 lockdown and these two outcomes were indirect, and entirely mediated by the presence of parent–child conflict. These findings further highlight the significance of the quality of parent–child interactions during the lockdown period [84].

The home environment and the support provided by caregivers play a crucial role in managing children's behaviors [85]. With children learning from home during the lockdown, parents had to take on a more active role in monitoring children's behaviors, facilitating their education, and nurturing and modeling prosocial behaviors [86]. The increased stress and disruptions caused by the lockdown can contribute to higher levels of parent–child conflict within the home environment [87]. This conflict may disrupt the child's sense of security, trust and emotional well-being [81, 88]. As a result, children may exhibit symptoms of hyperactivity-inattention, struggling to regulate their emotions and behaviors in response to the conflictual atmosphere. The heightened emotional arousal caused by conflict can make it challenging for children to concentrate, stay focused on tasks, and control their activity level, ultimately leading to an increase in hyperactivity-inattention problems [89]. In addition, conflictual interactions during parent–child interactions may involve negative and coercive parenting strategies, such as criticism, yelling, or punishment [90]. These negative interactions can potentially have a detrimental impact on the child's development of prosocial behaviors. Children may become less motivated to engage in behaviors such as helping, sharing, or cooperating due to the negative experiences associated with conflictual parent–child interactions. The disruption in the parent–child relationship may hinder the child's inclination and ability to exhibit prosocial behaviors [84].

In summary, the increased stress and disruptions caused by the lockdown can result in elevated parent–child conflict, which in turn affects social development in preschoolers. The negative effects of such parent–child conflict on various aspects of social adjustment highlight the importance of addressing and mitigating parent–child conflict, particularly during challenging circumstances such as lockdown.

Limitations and future directions

The present study employed Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to investigate how the COVID-19 lockdown influenced the social adjustment of preschool children in China. The mediating role of parent–child conflict in the relationship between the lockdown and child adjustment outcomes was also examined. Several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the study was a cross-sectional survey, which could not establish the temporal sequence of the variable. We could not rule out the reverse causality, wherein child adjustment problems could also contribute to greater parent–child conflict. Secondly, the use of questionnaires during the COVID-19 pandemic limited the study to only collecting data from mothers of young children, which may introduce bias as a single source of data. Future research could use multi-source evaluation methods to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the role of parent–child relationships in children's social adjustment in the context. Third, this study primarily focused on the impact of the parent–child relationship on children's social adjustment. Other factors such as parental stress and coparenting has proven to be strong predictors of externalizing behavior in young children [78]. Given the enormous stress experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring the protective role of various caregiver supports (e.g. social support, economic support, marital quality, and positive coping strategies) on children's adjustment would be valuable for future studies.

Finally, while we controlled for the participant's age, gender, mother's educational background and family structure, we did not account for family economic status and regional differences. It is worth noting that low-income families may face additional challenges due to limited resources and rising prices, potentially increasing the risk of children's exposure to the virus [91, 92]. Moreover, our research sample was collected from Shanghai, China, where the average education level and income may be higher than in other regions. This may not be representative of the entire nation. Future research should aim to replicate this study in diverse family backgrounds and regions to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

Conclusion

While previous research has sought to estimate the negative impact of COVID-19 on children and the parent–child relationship, the pandemic itself is often regarded as a research context rather than a variable to be manipulated or analyzed. This study conducted a direct comparison between the post-lockdown group and the pre-lockdown group to examine the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on children's social adjustment and parent–child conflict. The findings suggest that the lockdown contributed to increased parent–child conflict and had a direct impact on various social adjustment indices in children. These findings highlight the negative impact of the lockdown, particularly in relation to parent–child conflict, on the social adjustment of young children. These findings have important implications for early intervention and educational programs that aim to enhance the well-being and adjustment of young children. In adverse situations, it is crucial to prioritize and address the parent–child relationship within families to provide necessary assistance and support.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Bozkurt A, Karakaya K, Turk M, Karakaya Ö, Castellanos-Reyes D. The impact of covid-19 on education: a meta-narrative review. Techtrends. 2022;5(66):883–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00759-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guitton MJ. Cyberpsychology research and covid-19. Comput Human Behav. 2020;111:106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Li J, Zhai YY, Xiao BW, Xia XY, Wang JY, Zhao YN, et al. Maternal covid-19 distress and chinese preschool children’s problematic media use: a moderated serial mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:2553–67. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S414456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hails KA, Petts RA, Hostutler CA, Simoni M, Greene R, Snider TC, et al. Covid-19 distress, negative parenting, and child behavioral problems: the moderating role of parent adverse childhood experiences. Child Abuse Negl. 2022;130:105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Toran M, Sak R, Xu Y, Şahin-Sak OT, Yu Y. Parents and children during the covid-19 quarantine process: experiences from turkey and china. J Early Child Res. 2021;19(1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X20977583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohodes EM, McCauley S, Gee DG. Parental buffering of stress in the time of covid-19: family-level factors may moderate the association between pandemic-related stress and youth symptomatology. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021;49:935–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00732-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown SM, Doom JR, Lechuga-Peña S, Watamura SE, Koppels T. Stress and parenting during the global covid-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;Pt 2(110):104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morelli M, Cattelino E, Baiocco R, Trumello C, Babore A, Candelori C, et al. Parents and children during the covid-19 lockdown: the influence of parenting distress and parenting self-efficacy on children’s emotional well-being. Front Psychol. 2020;11:584645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584645.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Prime H, Wade M, Browne DT. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the covid-19 pandemic. Am Psychol. 2020;75(5):631. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cost KT, Crosbie J, Anagnostou E, Birken CS, Charach A, Monga S, et al. Mostly worse, occasionally better: impact of covid-19 pandemic on the mental health of canadian children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022;4(31):671–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01744-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frigerio A, Nettuno F, Nazzari S. Maternal mood moderates the trajectory of emotional and behavioural problems from pre- to during the covid-19 lockdown in preschool children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01925-0.

  12. Liu J, Zhou T, Yuan M, Ren H, Bian X, Coplan RJ. Daily routines, parent-child conflict, and psychological maladjustment among chinese children and adolescents during the covid-19 pandemic. J Fam Psychol. 2021;8(35):1077–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Romero E, López-Romero L, Domínguez-Álvarez B, Villar P, Gómez-Fraguela JA. Testing the effects of covid-19 confinement in spanish children: the role of parents’ distress, emotional problems and specific parenting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):6975. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196975.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Available from: https://dictionary.apa.org. Accessed 5 Jun 2022.

  15. Chen X, French DC. Children’s social competence in cultural context. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:591–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu X, Zhao S, Yiu WYV, Li D, Liu J, Liu S, et al. Relations between maternal power-assertive parenting and adjustment in chinese children: a longitudinal study. Int J Psychol. 2020;2(55):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu X, Song L, Li X, Li Y. The impact of mothers’ perceived unsupportive intergenerational co-parenting on children’s social competence: evidence from china. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;1(20):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Darney D, Reinke WM, Herman KC, Stormont M, Ialongo NS. Children with co-occurring academic and behavior problems in first grade: distal outcomes in twelfth grade. J Sch Psychol. 2013;51(1):117–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.005. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022440512000842.

  19. Branje S, Morris AS. The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on adolescent emotional, social, and academic adjustment. J Res Adolesc. 2021;3(31):486–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bulotsky-Shearer RJ, Fantuzzo JW. Preschool behavior problems in classroom learning situations and literacy outcomes in kindergarten and first grade. Early Child Res Q. 2011;1(26):61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elder GHJ. The life course as developmental theory. Child Dev. 1998;1(69):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Almeida DM, Wong JD. Life transitions and daily stress processes. In: Elder GH, Giele JZ, editors. The craft of life course Research. New York: Guilford Press; 2009. p. 41–162.

  23. Benner AD, Mistry RS. Child development during the covid-19 pandemic through a life course theory lens. Child Dev Perspect. 2020;4(14):236–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Orgilés M, Morales A, Delvecchio E, Mazzeschi C, Espada JP. Immediate psychological effects of the covid-19 quarantine in youth from italy and spain. Front Psychol. 2020;2986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579038.

  25. Bergmann C, Dimitrova N, Alaslani K, Almohammadi A, Alroqi H, Aussems S, et al. Young children’s screen time during the first covid-19 lockdown in 12 countries. Sci Rep. 2022;1(12):2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05840-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cluver L, Lachman JM, Sherr L, Wessels I, Krug E, Rakotomalala S, et al. Parenting in a time of covid-19. The Lancet. 2020;10231(395). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4.

  27. Jiao WY, Wang LN, Liu J, Fang SF, Jiao FY, Pettoello-Mantovani M, et al. Behavioral and emotional disorders in children during the covid-19 epidemic. J Pediatr. 2021;221:264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun J, Singletary B, Jiang H, Justice LM, Lin T, Purtell KM. Child behavior problems during covid-19: associations with parent distress and child social-emotional skills. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2022;78:101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101375. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0193397321001386.

  29. Kurz D, Braig S, Genuneit J, Rothenbacher D. Lifestyle changes, mental health, and health-related quality of life in children aged 6–7 years before and during the covid-19 pandemic in south germany. 2022;1(16):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-022-00454-1.

  30. Di Giorgio E, Di Riso D, Mioni G, Cellini N. The interplay between mothers’ and children behavioral and psychological factors during covid-19: an italian study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021;30(9):1401–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-020-01631-3. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00787-020-01631-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Q, Zhou Y, Xie X, Xue Q, Zhu K, Wan Z, et al. The prevalence of behavioral problems among school-aged children in home quarantine during the covid-19 pandemic in china. J Affect Disord. 2021;279:412–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bierman KL, Nix RL, Greenberg MT, Blair C, Domitrovich CE. Executive functions and school readiness intervention: impact, moderation, and mediation in the head start redi program. Dev Psychopathol. 2008;3(20):821–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pianta RC, Walsh DJ. High-risk children in schools: constructing sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  34. China MOEO. National statistical bulletin on the development of education. Available from: http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2023/55167/mtbd/202303/t20230324_1052585. Accessed 1 Oct 2023.

  35. Patterson JM. Families experiencing stress: i. The family adjustment and adaptation response model: ii. Applying the faar model to health-related issues for intervention and research. Fam Syst Med. 1998;2(6):202–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bronfenbrenner U, Morris P. The bioecological model of human development. In: Lerner RM, Damon W, editors. Theoretical Models of Human Development: Vol. 1. Handbook of Child Psychology. 5th ed. New York: Wiley; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davies PT, Cummings EM. Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1994;3(116):387–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ingoldsby EM, Shaw DS, Winslow E, Schonberg M, Gilliom M, Criss MM. Neighborhood disadvantage, parent-child conflict, neighborhood peer relationships, and early antisocial behavior problem trajectories. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2006;34:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9026-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ren L, Garcia AS, Esteraich JM, Encinger A, Raikes HH, Acar IH. Parent-child relationships and preschoolers’ social-emotional functioning among low-income families: the moderating role of parental nativity. Infants Young Child. 2019;2(32):123–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weaver CM, Shaw DS, Crossan JL, Dishion TJ, Wilson MN. Parent–child conflict and early childhood adjustment in two-parent low-income families: parallel developmental processes. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;1(46):94–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0455-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. El-Sheikh M, Elmore-Stratton L. The link between marital conflict and child adjustment: parent-child conflict and perceived attachments as mediators, potentiators, and mitigators of risk. Dev Psychopathol. 2004;3(16):631–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579404004705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Jouriles EN, Rosenfield D, McDonald R, Mueller V. Child involvement in interparental conflict and child adjustment problems: a longitudinal study of violent families. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014;42:693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9821-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Parke RD, Buriel R. Socialization in the family: ethnic and ecological perspectives. In: Eisenberg N, editor. Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2006. p. 429–504.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Conger RD, Ge X, Elder GH Jr, Lorenz FO, Simons RL. Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Dev. 1994;2 Spec No(65):541–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Masarik AS, Conger RD. Stress and child development: a review of the family stress model. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cassinat JR, Whiteman SD, Serang S, Dotterer AM, Mustillo SA, Maggs JL, et al. Changes in family chaos and family relationships during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a longitudinal study. Dev Psychol. 2021;10(57):1597–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cusinato M, Iannattone S, Spoto A, Poli M, Moretti C, Gatta M, et al. Stress, resilience, and well-being in italian children and their parents during the covid-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;22(17):8297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Du F, He L, Francis MR, Forshaw M, Woolfall K, Lv Q, et al. Associations between parent–child relationship, and children’s externalizing and internalizing symptoms, and lifestyle behaviors in china during the covid-19 epidemic. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02672-7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-02672-7.

  49. Spinelli M, Lionetti F, Setti A, Fasolo M. Parenting stress during the covid-19 outbreak: socioeconomic and environmental risk factors and implications for children emotion regulation. Fam Process. 2021;2(60):639–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gagné MH, Piché G, Clément MÈ, Villatte A. Families in confinement: a pre–post covid-19 study. Couple Fam Psychol Res Pract. 2021;4(10):260–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shabas S. Relationships between parents and preschool-age children attending kindergartens. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;233:269–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Heidinger T, Richter L. The effect of covid-19 on loneliness in the elderly. An empirical comparison of pre-and peri-pandemic loneliness in community-dwelling elderly. Front Psychol. 2020(11):585308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585308.

  53. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effffects. Biometrica. 1983;70:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. China NBOS. China's population development presents new characteristics and new trends. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/sjjd/202302/t20230202_1896485.html.

  55. Pianta R. Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS). Charlottesville: University of Virginia; 1992.

  56. Zhang X, Chen HC, Zhang G. Children’s relationships with mothers and teachers: linkages to problem behavior in their first preschool years. Xin Li Xue Bao. 2008;40(04):418–26. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Xu X, Xiao B, Zhu L, Li Y. The influence of parent-grandparent co-parenting on children’s problem behaviors and its potential mechanisms. Early Educ Dev. 2022:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2073746.

  58. Du YKJ, Coghill D. The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in china. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008;1(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-2-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;11(40):1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu J, Ooi LL, Li Y, Coplan RJ, Xie Q, Zhang Y, et al. Concomitants and outcomes of anxiety in chinese kindergarteners: a one-year longitudinal study. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2017;52:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheng S, Keyes KM, Bitfoi A, Carta MG, Koç C, Goelitz D, et al. Understanding parent–teacher agreement of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (sdq): comparison across seven european countries. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018;1(27):e1589. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RC, Vermulst AA, Janssens JM. Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010;13:254–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Thoemmes F. Propensity score matching in spss. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv. 2012;1201:6385. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.6385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hansen BB, Bowers J. Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Stat Sci. 2008;23:219–36. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-STS254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Duan L, Shao X, Wang Y, Huang Y, Miao J, Yang X, et al. An investigation of mental health status of children and adolescents in china during the outbreak of covid-19. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:112–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Fitzpatrick O, Carson A, Weisz JR. Using mixed methods to identify the primary mental health problems and needs of children, adolescents, and their caregivers during the coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021;52(6):1082–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01089-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Marques De Miranda D, Da Silva Athanasio B, Sena Oliveira AC, Simoes-e-Silva AC. How is covid-19 pandemic impacting mental health of children and adolescents? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020(51):101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101845.

  68. Wang G, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zhang J, Jiang F. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the covid-19 outbreak. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10228):945–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30547-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sang X, Menhas R, Saqib ZA, Mahmood S, Weng Y, Khurshid S, et al. The psychological impacts of covid-19 home confinement and physical activity: a structural equation model analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;11:614770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614770.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Zebdi R, Plateau E, Delalandre A, Vanwalleghem S, Chahed M, Hentati Y, et al. Confami study: effects of home confinement during the covid-19 epidemic on the lives of children and their families. L’encephale. 2022;6(48):647–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. McClelland MM, Cameron CE. Self-regulation in early childhood: improving conceptual clarity and developing ecologically valid measures. Child Dev Perspect. 2012;6(2):136–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00191.x. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00191.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. DuPaul GJ, McGoey KE, Eckert TL, VanBrakle J. Preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: impairments in behavioral, social, and school functioning. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;5(40):508–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200105000-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hastings P, Utendale W, Sullivan C. The socialization of prosocial development. In: Grusec J, Hastings P, editors. Handbook of socialization: theory & research. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 638–664.

  74. Chung G, Lanier P, Wong PYJ. Mediating effects of parental stress on harsh parenting and parent-child relationship during coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic in singapore. J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):801–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00200-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Russell BS, Hutchison M, Tambling R, Tomkunas AJ, Horton AL. Initial challenges of caregiving during covid-19: caregiver burden, mental health, and the parent–child relationship. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020;51(5):671–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01037-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Rao D, Liu Y, Gen Y, Lin J. He relation between family cohesion and social adaptation of left-behind children during the covid-19 epidemic: a multiple mediation model. Journal of Southwest University(Natural Science Edition). 2022;44(8):28–36. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2022.08.004.

  77. Marchetti D, Fontanesi L, Di Giandomenico S, Mazza C, Roma P, Verrocchio MC. The effect of parent psychological distress on child hyperactivity/inattention during the covid-19 lockdown: testing the mediation of parent verbal hostility and child emotional symptoms. Front Psychol. 2020;11:567052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Giannotti M, Mazzoni N, Bentenuto A, Venuti P, de Falco S. Family adjustment to covid-19 lockdown in italy: parental stress, coparenting, and child externalizing behavior. Fam Process. 2022;2(61):745–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Vaterlaus JM, Shaffer T, Patten EV, Spruance LA. Parent–child relationships and the covid-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative study with parents in early, middle, and late adulthood. J Adult Dev. 2021;28(3):251–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09381-5. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10804-021-09381-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Partington LC, Mashash M, Hastings PD. Family thriving during covid-19 and the benefits for children’s well-being. Front Psychol. 2022;13:879195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Meade J. Mental health effects of the covid-19 pandemic on children and adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2021;68(5):945–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2021.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Babore A, Trumello C, Lombardi L, Candelori C, Chirumbolo A, Cattelino E, et al. Mothers’ and children’s mental health during the covid-19 pandemic lockdown: the mediating role of parenting stress. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021;1(54):134–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-021-01230-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Connell CM, Strambler MJ. Experiences with covid-19 stressors and parents’ use of neglectful, harsh, and positive parenting practices in the northeastern united states. Child Maltreat. 2021;3(26):255–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211006465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ferreira T, Cadima J, Matias M, Vieira JM, Leal T, Matos PM. Preschool children’s prosocial behavior: the role of mother–child, father–child and teacher–child relationships. J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(6):1829–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0369-x. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-016-0369-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Antunes AP, Martins S, Magalhães L, Almeida. Parenting during the covid-19 lockdown in portugal: changes in daily routines, co-parenting relationships, emotional experiences, and support networks. Children. 2021;12(8):1124. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121124.

  86. de Jong PF, Schreurs BGM, Zee M. Parent-child conflict during homeschooling in times of the covid-19 pandemic: a key role for mothers' self-efficacy in teaching. 2022(70):102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102083.

  87. Patrick SW, Henkhaus LE, Zickafoose JS, Lovell K, Halvorson A, Loch S, et al. Well-being of parents and children during the covid-19 pandemic: a national survey. Pediatrics (Evanston). 2020;4(146):e2020016824. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-016824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Brock R, Kochanska G. Interparental conflict, children’s security with parents, and long-term risk of internalizing problems: a longitudinal study from ages 2 to 10. Dev Psychopathol. 2016;1(28):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415000279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Davies PT, Martin MJ, Sturge-Apple ML. Emotional security theory and developmental psychopathology. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ, editors. Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 1: Theory and method. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2016. p. 199–264.

  90. Scaramella LV, Leve LD. Clarifying parent-child reciprocities during early childhood: the early childhood coercion model. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004;2(7):89–107. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ccfp.0000030287.13160.a3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kim SY, Yoo DM, Min C, Choi HG. The effects of income level on susceptibility to covid-19 and covid-19 morbidity/mortality: a nationwide cohort study in south korea. J Clin Med. 2021;20(10):4733. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Rengarajoo S, Tan ST. Household income and its correlation with child hunger during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2022:1–07. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2022.2157693.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all the participants who took part in the study.

Funding

STI 2030—Major Projects (No. 2022ZD0209000).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wanjuan Weng and Mowei Liu are co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai Institute of Early Childhood Education, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China

    Wanjuan Weng, Shumin Wang, Xiaoyun Li, Jinghui Zhang & Yan Li

  2. Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada

    Mowei Liu & Yuke Fu

  3. School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Chuanmei Dong

Authors
  1. Wanjuan Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mowei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shumin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoyun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinghui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuke Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chuanmei Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The execution of this paper was a collaborative effort on behalf of all authors.YL, MYL and WJW conducted the conception study design,and interpretation. The data collection was conducted by WJW, SMW, XYL and JHZ. WJW and JHZ participated in the data analysis and drafting. YKF, CMD and YL critically reviewed the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Research Ethics Committee of Shanghai Normal University (Ethics of Shanghai Normal University 2020040 and 2022043), and based on the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by Research Ethics Committee of Shanghai Normal University (Ethics of Shanghai Normal University 2020040 and 2022043). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents/legal guardians in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weng, W., Liu, M., Wang, S. et al. The impact of lockdown on child adjustment: a propensity score matched analysis. BMC Psychol 12, 409 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01894-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01894-4

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us