Skip to main content
Download PDF

Social media addiction and academic engagement as serial mediators between social anxiety and academic performance among college students

BMC Psychology volume 12, Article number: 190 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Social anxiety has been shown to affect college students’ academic performance. However, the role of social media addiction and academic engagement in this association is unclear.

Methods

A total 2661 college students completed a self-report questionnaire including Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, the Utrecht Student Work Engagement Scale for Students, and the grade point average. Hayes’ PROCESS macro for SPSS was employed to test the serial mediation effect.

Results

Results indicated that social anxiety was negatively related to academic performance, only academic engagement played a single mediating role in the relationship between social anxiety and academic performance, meanwhile social media addiction and academic engagement acted as serial mediators between social anxiety on academic performance.

Conclusions

Social media addiction and academic engagement can explain the potential mechanisms of the association between social anxiety and academic performance, which have implications for devising intervention strategies to enhance the mental health and academic outcomes of college students.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Social anxiety, a strong emotional reaction and avoidance behavior of apprehension, nervousness, or fear of one or more interpersonal situations, is the most common psychiatric disorder other than major depression and alcohol dependence owing to its high lifetime prevalence of 12% [1]. Social anxiety usually emerges in adolescence and its duration can last for approximately 25 years [2], which encompasses important stages in the educational, social, and professional development of college students. Entering college means adjusting to a new environment in which many college students face a series of challenges, such as meeting new people, establishing positive interpersonal relationships, and completing appropriate academic tasks [3]. However, in this context, college students may not like to express their emotions and opinions publicly and may become self-conscious and doubt their abilities [4]. According to studies conducted in Europe and the United States, the incidence rate of social anxiety ranges from 10 to 40% amongst college students [5, 6]. In a study in China, 33.38% of the participants reported at least one symptom of social anxiety [7].

Individuals with social anxiety may isolate themselves and adopt avoidant behaviors to reduce feelings of anxiety [8]. Avoidant behavioral strategies, such as inability to engage in learning in class, avoidance of speaking, questioning, discussion, and other learning activities, can lead to problems including maladjustment and absenteeism that impair college students’ academic performance. Although previous studies have found that socially anxious college students exhibit low academic performance [9, 10], the underlying causes have been less explored. Thus, it is important to further explore the underlying mechanisms of how social anxiety affects academic performance to provide a reference for the management of college students’ academic performance.

Tinto’s dropout theory model proposes that the key to college completion is the degree of integration of participation in the academic and social systems within the school [11]. Moreover, college students with social anxiety may have problems with academic failure due to blocked academic and social integration [8, 12]. Through a survey of 300 college students and an analysis of grade point average (GPA) data, Parikh had found that academic engagement was positively correlated with GPA [13]. In a study of Canadian university students, social anxiety significantly and negatively predicted academic performance [14]. Russell and Topham also attributed college students’ low academic performance to the negative influence of social anxiety. Therefore, this study proposes the hypothesis.

H1

Social anxiety is negatively associated with college students’ academic performance.

Social media addiction is a psychological state that involves a non-adaptive dependence on social media use that develops into behavioral addiction symptoms [15, 16]. A meta-analysis showed that the overall prevalence of social media addiction was 24% in 32 countries and regions, with college students being the focus group for addiction to social media use [17]. Social media addiction manifests itself as obsession with social media, excessive use, emotional control, and so on. This is similar to and is considered a subtype of Internet addiction [18].. Difficulties in social interaction are also necessary for addiction. According to Social Compensation Hypothesis [19] and the Compensatory Internet Use Theory [20], individuals suffering from social anxiety may choose to communicate and interact via online social media as a compensation to reduce anxiety and isolation to satisfy the desire to escape, which makes them particularly susceptible to social media addiction. Previous research had proposed that individuals who experience social anxiety are more inclined to develop addictive tendencies towards the excessive use of social media that offers more control and comfort [21, 22].Addiction to social media can lead students to spend excessive time on social media [23], with excessive access to specific websites for leisure reasons, leading to distractions from studying [24], causing a decrease in academic performance. It has also been proposed that student Facebook activity negatively predicts GPAs [25]. Hence, we propose the hypothesis.

H2

Social media addiction mediates the relationship between social anxiety and academic performance.

Academic engagement is a continuous motivation to learn, characterized by a state of energy, dedication, and focus that is experienced as emotionally positive. Academic engagement is an important learning process factor that serves as an important factor in predicting academic performance [26]. Numerous studies have consistently highlighted the critical role of student engagement as a precursor to academic performance [27,28,29].. Notably, Salanova conducted a longitudinal study using cross-lagged correlation analyses, which revealed significant results supporting student engagement as a leading indicator of academic performance [26]. In fostering better academic engagement among adolescents, the significance of interpersonal relationships has been highlighted in previous research [30]. Conversely, social anxiety, which impairs individuals’ ability to effectively navigate social interactions [31], had been found to lead to reduced academic participation and engagement. It had previously been established that social anxiety affected classroom engagement due to limited communication with instructors [32]. Moreover, research had indicated a negative correlation between social anxiety and adolescents’ study engagement mediated through decreased intentional self-regulation and self-concept clarity [33]. Thus, social anxiety is associated with reduced academic performance through reduced academic engagement. Accordingly, we propose the hypothesis.

H3

Academic engagement mediates the relationship between social anxiety and academic performance.

Academic engagement is characterized by energetic, purposeful, and sustained action [34], which may be regarded as visible and core manifestation of potential motivation [35]. One study found that Internet addiction was negatively correlated with motivation [36]. Furthermore, relevant empirical studies have shown that social media use can strongly interfere with learning [37]. Tong et al. suggested that prolonged use of social media may be detrimental to academic attention [38]. The above analysis suggests that when socially anxious individuals also have social media addiction, the interaction of these two factors will result in lower academic engagement, which in turn affects their academic performance. In other words, social media addiction and academic engagement may act as two distinct behavioral factors mediating the chain of social anxiety in relation to academic performance. In summary, this study proposes the hypothesis.

H4

Social media addiction and academic engagement are negatively related, with social media addiction and academic engagement serially mediating the association between social anxiety and academic performance.

In summary, this study hypothesized that social anxiety and academic engagement are predictors of college students’ academic performance, which is a significant negative correlation between social anxiety and academic performance, as well as a moderating mediator role for social media addiction and academic engagement between the two. The proposed model is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The proposed serial mediation model

Full size image

Method

Participants

The data used in this study was extracted from a larger investigation study about mental and behavior factors with health and academics, conducting from November 2020 to January 2021 at Nantong University in Jiangsu, China. Convenience sampling methods was performed. We firstly recruited 20 student investigators from all schools of main campus of the university. Then the student investigators were responsible for sending the online questionnaire by WeChat or QQ group to students of his/her school to invite them to participate on a voluntary basis. A total of 3451 students accessed the online survey and 2947 of them completed the questionnaire, with response rate of 85.4%. As the main campus of the university has about 30,000 students, our sample representative 10% of the target students. After data cleaning, 286 questionnaires with the omission of key study variables or logical errors were excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 2,661 participants in the present study (effective rate of 90.3%). Participants’ age was 19.97 ± 1.25 (ranging from 16 to 24 years). 1508 were female (56.7%), 1666 (62.6%) were non-medical students. The grades of participants are as followed: freshmen (n = 682; 25.6%), sophomores (n = 697; 26.2%), juniors (n = 977; 36.7%), and seniors (n = 305; 11.5%).

Measurements

Social anxiety

Social anxiety was measured using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) [39].The LSAS, including two subscales of fear and avoidance, is composed of 24 items including 11 items assessing social interaction and 13 items assessing performance/observation situations. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale to measure the intensity of fear from 0 (none) to 3 (severe fear) and the frequency of avoidance from 0 (never) to 3 (usually). The total LSAS score is the sum of the subscale scores fear and avoidance (ranging from 0 to 144), with higher score indicating higher level of social anxiety. The Chinese version of the LSAS have been validated [40]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha of the LSAS was 0.973. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the four-dimensional scale had acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 3.26, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.884, TLI = 0.867, SRMR = 0.0615, RMSEA = 0.809), which were comparable with previous study [41].

Social media addiction

Social media addiction was measured by the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) [42],which has been widely used in previous studies [43, 44]. The BSMAS consists of 6 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (very rarely) to 5(very often). The total BSMAS score ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher addiction to social media. The Chinese version of the BSMAS has been used and validated [45]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha of the BSMAS was 0.877.

Academic engagement

Academic engagement was evaluated by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-9s) [46]. The UWES-9 S consists of 9 items assessing three dimensions of vigor, dedication, and absorption related to study. Each item of is UWES-9 S rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 6 (always). The total UWES-9 S score ranges from 0 to 54, and the higher the total score, the higher the student’s academic engagement. The UWES-9 S shows good psychometric properties [47, 48]. In the present study, Cronbach’s alpha for the UWES-9 S was 0.959. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the three-dimensional scale had good model fit (χ2/df = 2.90, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.975, TLI = 0.962, SRMR = 0.025, RMSEA = 0.083).

Academic performance

GPA was employed to reflect academic performance. GPA can evaluate students’ learning quality in a more scientific, comprehensive, dynamic and quantitative way, which is widely used in academic performance studies [49, 50].

Data analyses

IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 was used to conduct data analyses. Prior to the formal analysis, the variance inflation factor (VIF) [51] and Harman’s single-factor test [52] was used to test multi-collinearity and common method bias between the study variables. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analyses were then performed. Model 6 in the SPSS PROCESS macro was used to test the serial mediation effect [53]. In regression-based analysis, effect sizes are interpreted according to Cohen’s conventions: β coefficients below 0.3 were considered small, between 0.3 and 0.5 were considered medium, and equal to or greater than 0.5 are considered large [54, 55]. Finally, bootstrap confidence interval (CI) analysis based on 5000 random resamples was performed to test the significance of the mediation effect, with the effects being considered significant if the CIs did not include zero.

Results

Preliminary analyses

Collinearity diagnostics showed that none of the VIF values of the study variables were > 3, and no tolerance values were < 0.3, indicating low concern for multi-collinearity issues [56]. Harman’s single-factor test showed that 11 factors had eigenvalues greater than 1, with 36.77% of the total variance explained by the largest component, which was below 50% [57]. Consequently, the common method bias was not an issue.

Descriptive and correlational analyses

As Table 1 showed that the study variables were significantly associated with each other, providing preliminary support for our hypotheses.

Table 1 Means, standard deviations, and correlations for study variables
Full size table

Test of the serial mediation model

The results of the serial mediation model were showed in Table 2. Results revealed that social anxiety was significantly negatively associated with academic performance (β = -0.097, p < 0.001), indicating that for per one standard deviation (SD) increase in social anxiety, academic performance would decrease by 0.097 SD. Consequently, hypothesis H1 was validated. Furthermore, social anxiety showed a positive correlation with social media addiction (β = 0.364, p < 0.001), implying that social media addiction would increase 0.364 SD per one SD increase in social anxiety. However, the association between social media addiction and academic performance was not found to be significant, thus hypothesis H2 was not supported. As predicted by hypothesis H3, social anxiety was significantly negatively related to academic engagement (β = -0.307, p < 0.001). This suggested that for per one SD increase in social anxiety, academic engagement would decrease by 0.307 SD. Then, academic engagement in turn significantly positively related to academic performance (β = 0.219, p < 0.001), indicating that academic performance would increase 0.219 SD per one SD increase in academic engagement. Finally, social media addiction and academic engagement was significantly negative related (β = -0.160, p < 0.001), meaning that academic engagement would decrease 0.160 SD per one SD increase in social media addiction. Thus, hypothesis H4 was validated. Moreover, these findings indicated the presence of small and medium correlations among the study variables.

Table 2 The serial mediation model for relationship between social anxiety and academic performance in regression-based analysis
Full size table

The bootstrap results (Table 3) showed that all the three indirect paths were significant. The total indirect effect was − 0.094 (95% CI: -0.117 to -0.071), accounting for 49.2% of the total effect. Specifically, although the pathway of social anxiety →social media addiction → academic performance was not statistically significant (effect= -0.014, 95% CI: -0.031 to 0.003), the other specific pathway of social anxiety → academic engagement → academic performance was significant (effect= -0.067, 95% CI: -0.084 to -0.052), accounting for 35.1% of the total effect; the sequential pathway of social anxiety → social media addiction → academic engagement → academic performance was also significant (effect= -0.013, 95% CI: -0.018 to -0.008), accounting for 6.8% of the total effect. The detailed pathway model was shown in Fig. 2.

Furthermore, social anxiety has a significant direct on academic performance (effect= -0.097, 95% CI: -0.138 to -0.056), suggesting that social media addiction and academic engagement played a partial mediating role in link between social anxiety and academic performance. The serial mediation model explained 8.9% of the variance in college students’ academic performance (F = 43.240, p < 0.001).

Table 3 Social anxiety and academic performance in the mediation effect analysis
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The serial mediation model of the relationship between social anxiety and academic performance. ***p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

This study provided a possible explanatory mechanism for the effects of social anxiety on academic performance among college students. By examining the serial mediation pathway of social media addiction and academic engagement, the study expands on existing knowledge regarding the negative impact of mental disorders on academic life. Consistent with previous research [58,59,60], the findings demonstrate a significant negative correlation between social anxiety and academic performance. This aligns with self-presentation theory [61], which suggests that the characteristics of social anxiety, such as reluctance, avoidance, and fear, hinder students’ learning activities, particularly in teacher-student interactions and academic integration. These hindrances can lead students to doubt their own abilities to achieve their goals and lower their expectations of impression-related outcomes. Consequently, their task performance may be weakened, ultimately affecting their academic performance in a negative manner. Social anxiety may lead to cognitive and attentional biases that interfere with information processing, problem-solving, and decision-making [62]. Students with social anxiety may have difficulty focusing on academic tasks due to excessive worry or fear of negative evaluation, leading to decreased academic performance [63].Furthermore, social anxiety can increase stress levels and reduce self-esteem, which can have a detrimental effect on academic performance [64].

Our research has revealed that social media addiction can develop as a result of social anxiety. This finding is consistent with previous studies that have highlighted the dominant role of social anxiety in online addiction [65]. Socially anxious individuals may become excessively fixated on social media to compensate for a lack of fulfilling face-to-face social interaction. The desire for connection could be one possible explanation for this behavior [66]. Socially anxious individuals who are overly concerned with the evaluations and approvals of others may spend excessive time and energy on social media to satisfy their connection desires, ultimately leading to social media addiction [67]. Surprisingly, we did not find a significant association between social media addiction and academic performance. Previous research is not without precedents. A study among Qatari university students showed no linear relationship between social media use and academic performance [68]. This could be attributed to the fact that different individuals perceive and use social media differently [69]. Our finding suggested that while college students with social anxiety may have a higher tendency towards social media addiction, this does not necessarily translate into lower academic performance unless it is accompanied by reduced academic engagement.

This study found a significant independent mediation effect of academic engagement on the association between social anxiety and academic performance, revealing that low academic engagement due to social anxiety was associated with poor academic performance. Individuals who experience social anxiety may fear not being valued equally in interpersonal or social interactions, further inhibit their willingness to participate or engagement in the classroom [8].In contrast, the vigor of engagement, dedication and absorption are all related to the intensive effort required to learning in higher education [70]. Students who are more vigorous and dedicated to their studies are more likely to excel [71]. Therefore, students will achieve better academic performance when they have a proactive engagement toward emotional and energy.

In addition, as hypothesized, we found a significant sequential mediation effect between social anxiety and academic performance, that is, social media addiction was an antecedent of academic engagement. In a majority of college students, excessive use of social media focuses on non-academic needs. These non-targeted tasks on social media can compete with learning, which may consistently disrupt the learning process [72]. In addition, social media addiction manifests in excessive attention to social media and wasting time and energy on social platforms [73]. Combined this with the difficulties in inhibitory control associated with addiction, social media addiction leads to more attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder [74], which in turn inhibits academic engagement. Thus, when social media addiction is combined with low academic engagement, individuals with social anxiety exhibit poor academic performance.

Given the non-significant results of the single indirect effect of social anxiety on academic performance through social media addiction, our finding demonstrated that although an increase in social anxiety could lead to a higher level of social media addiction, this did not necessarily lead to decreased academic performance unless it was followed by decreased academic engagement. In other words, the negative effect of social anxiety on college students’ academic performance was more strongly related to academic engagement than social media addiction. These findings are of great importance in revealing the significant role of academic engagement that is affected by social anxiety in the academic performance of college students, which is conducive to formulating psychological and behavioral intervention strategies aimed at improving their academic achievement.

Although this study successfully established a serial mediation pathway to understand the impact of social anxiety on academic performance in college students, it is important to acknowledge that academic performance is influenced by a multitude of factors including but not limited to cognitive abilities, academic skills, pedagogical approach, study habits, motivation, and external support systems. This is a possible exaptation of small R2 in this study. Therefore, future research should aim to investigate the complex interplay between these factors and how they relate to academic performance in students with social anxiety to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex factors that influence academic performance in college students with social anxiety and identify effective strategies for improving their academic outcomes.

This study had several limitations that should be considered. First, the current study was limited to students from one college in Nantong, China, and the cross-regional and cross-cultural applicability of the findings must be properly validated. Second, the present study relied only on self-reported data, and the effects of subjective bias and social desirability effects on the findings should be considered. Third, owing to the limitations of cross-sectional and non-experimental studies, no causal inferences can be made. In addiction we were unable to exclude the effects of all potential confounding variables.

Conclusion

Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the negative effect of mental disorders on academic performance, highlighting the importance of social media addiction and academic engagement as serial mediators between social anxiety and academic performance. In addition, the negative effect of social anxiety on academic performance is more strongly related to academic engagement than to social media addiction. Findings of this study suggest that a joint psychological, behavioral and academic support intervention targeting social anxiety and social media addiction to improve academic engagement and outcomes among college students. It is recommended to incorporated personalized academic support, mentoring programs to enhance academic engagement. Additionally, interventions aimed at reducing social anxiety and social media addiction such as cognitive-behavioral techniques, exposure-based interventions, and promoting a supportive campus environment can also play a role in improving academic engagement and outcomes.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyses during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GPA:

grade point average

LSAS:

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale

BSMAS:

Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale

UWES-9s:

Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students

VIF:

variance inflation factor

CI:

confidence interval

M:

Mean

SD:

standard deviation

SE:

Standard Error

References

  1. Stein DJ, Lim CCW, Roest AM, de Jonge P, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Benjet C, Bromet EJ, Bruffaerts R et al. The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. BMC MED 2017, 15(1).

  2. Steinert C, Hofmann M, Leichsenring F, Kruse J. What do we know today about the prospective long-term course of social anxiety disorder? A systematic literature review. J Anxiety Disord. 2013;27(7):692–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyson R, Renk K. Freshmen adaptation to university life: depressive symptoms, stress, and coping. J Clin Psychol. 2006;4(410):1231–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elemo AS, Turkum AS. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS): Psychometric properties of the Amharic Version in Ethiopian University Student Sample. Int J Ment Health AD 2021.

  5. Russell G, Shaw S. A study to investigate the prevalence of social anxiety in a sample of higher education students in the United Kingdom. J Ment Health. 2009;18(3):198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tillfors M, Furmark T. Social phobia in Swedish university students: prevalence, subgroups and avoidant behavior. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2007;42(1):79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meng T, He Y, Zhang Q, Yu F, Zhao L, Zhang S, Chen Z, Wang S, Gong J, Liu J. Analysis of features of social anxiety and exploring the relationship between childhood major adverse experiences and social anxiety in early adulthood among Chinese college students. J Affect Disorders. 2021;292:614–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell G, Topham P. The impact of social anxiety on student learning and well-being in higher education. J Ment Health. 2012;21(4):375–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baptista CA, Loureiro SR, de Lima Osório F, Zuardi AW, Magalhães PV, Kapczinski F, Filho AS, Freitas-Ferrari MC, Crippa JAS. Social phobia in Brazilian university students: prevalence, under-recognition and academic impairment in women. J Affect Disorders. 2012;136(3):857–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Djidonou A, Tchégnonsi FT, Adoukonou T, Ataïgba INE, Assa-Issa CN, Gandaho P. Associated factors and impacts of Social Phobia on Academic Performance among students from the University of Parakou (UP). Open J Psychiatry. 2016;06(02):151–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tinto V. Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Rev Educ Res. 1975;45(1):89–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein MB, Kean YM. Disability and quality of life in Social Phobia: epidemiologic findings. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(10):1606–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parikh M. The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: An exploration of the paradox of international undergraduates.|.*69*69.: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2008:1699.

  14. Brook CA, Willoughby T. The Social ties that bind: social anxiety and academic achievement across the University years. J Youth Adolescence. 2015;44(5):1139–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao X, Gong M, Yu L, Dai B. Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction: an empirical study from WeChat users. Internet Res. 2020;30(4):1305–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen A. From attachment to addiction: the mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;98:80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng C, Lau Y, Chan L, Luk JW. Prevalence of social media addiction across 32 nations: Meta-analysis with subgroup analysis of classification schemes and cultural values. Addict Behav. 2021;117:106845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan T, Reece J, Chester A, Xenos S. Who gets hooked on Facebook? An exploratory typology of problematic Facebook users. Cyberpsychology 2016, 10(3).

  19. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of Research. Curr Dir Psychol Science: J Am Psychol Soc. 2009;18(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kardefelt-Winther. Daniel: a conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31(31):351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Bérail P, Guillon M, Bungener C. The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: a moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;99:190–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ali F, Ali A, Iqbal A, Ullah Zafar A. How socially anxious people become compulsive social media users: the role of fear of negative evaluation and rejection. Telemat Inf. 2021;63:101658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malita L. Social media time management tools and tips. Procedia Comput Sci. 2011;3:747–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kolhar M, Kazi RNA, Alameen A. Effect of social media use on learning, social interactions, and sleep duration among university students. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(4):2216–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Michikyan M, Subrahmanyam K, Dennis J. Facebook use and academic performance among college students: a mixed-methods study with a multi-ethnic sample. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:265–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Salanova M, Schaufeli W, Martínez I, Bresó E. How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23(1):53–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee J. The relationship between Student Engagement and Academic Performance: is it a myth or reality? J Educational Res. 2013;107(3):177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W. Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Social Behav Personality: Int J. 2018;46(3):517–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. van Beek I, Kranenburg IC, Taris TW, Schaufeli WB. BIS- and BAS-activation and study outcomes: a mediation study. Pers Indiv DiffeR. 2013;55(5):474–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amerstorfer CM, Freiin Von Münster-Kistner C. Student perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher relationships in Problem-based learning. Front Psychol. 2021;12:713057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Klein AM, Salemink E, de Hullu E, Houtkamp E, Papa M, van der Molen M. Cognitive Bias Modification reduces social anxiety symptoms in socially anxious adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(9):3116–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Archbell KA, Coplan RJ. Too anxious to talk: social anxiety, Academic Communication, and students’ experiences in Higher Education. J Emot Behav Disord. 2022;30(4):273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou A, Yanbing H, Guan X, Chen X, Lu X, Pan T. Social Anxiety and Study Engagement in Adolescents: The Role of Self Cognition Model. In: 2019-1-1 2019. IEEE; 2019:209–213.

  34. Qahri-Saremi H, Turel O. School engagement, information technology use, and educational development: an empirical investigation of adolescents. Comput Educ. 2016;102:65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang Y, Qin X, Ren P. Adolescents’ academic engagement mediates the association between internet addiction and academic achievement: the moderating effect of classroom achievement norm. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;89:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Odaci H. Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students. Comput Educ. 2011;57(1):1109–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boer M, Stevens GWJM, Info EDN, Finkenauer C, Info EDN, van den Eijnden RJJM, Info EDNX, Finkenauer L, Youth ICCC. Attention deficit hyperactivity Disorder-Symptoms, Social Media Use Intensity, and social media use problems in adolescents: investigating directionality. Child Dev. 2020;91(4):e853–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wen TT, Islam MA, Low WY, Choo WY, Abdullah A. Prevalence and Determinants of Pathological Internet Use among Undergraduate Students in a Public University in Malaysia. 2019.

  39. Liebowitz MR. Social phobia. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;22:141–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. He YL, Zhang MY. Psychometric investigation of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. J Diagnostics Concepts Pract. 2004;3(2):5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Beard C, Rodriguez BF, Moitra E, Sibrava NJ, Bjornsson A, Weisberg RB, Keller MB. Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) in a longitudinal study of African americans with anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2011;25(5):722–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, Pallesen S. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(2):252–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin C, Brostrom A, Nilsen P, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Psychometric validation of the Persian Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale using classic test theory and Rasch models. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):620–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Monacis L, De Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(2):178–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Huang L, Zhang J, Duan W, He L. Peer relationship increasing the risk of social media addiction among Chinese adolescents who have negative emotions. Curr Psychol 2021.

  46. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire - A cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Loscalzo Y, Giannini M. Study Engagement in Italian University students: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement ScaleStudent Version. Soc Indic Res. 2019;142(2):845–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tang H, Huo Z, Liu C, Liu Z, Wong YJ. Psychometric properties of the academic encouragement scale in Chinese University students. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2021;39(2):258–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lau WWF. Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;68:286–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Reuter PR, Forster BL. Student health behavior and academic performance. Peer J. 2021;9:e11107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th Edition. New York: Prentice Hall; 2009.

  52. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1988.

  55. Nieminen P. Application of standardized regression coefficient in Meta-Analysis. BioMedInformatics. 2022;2(3):434–58.

  56. Akinwande MO, Dikko HG, Samson A. Variance inflation factor: as a Condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open J Stat. 2015;05(07):754–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shiau W, Luo MM. Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: a social exchange theory perspective. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(6):2431–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vilaplana-Perez A, Perez-Vigil A, Sidorchuk A, Brander G, Isomura K, Hesselmark E, Kuja-Halkola R, Larsson H, Mataix-Cols D, Fernandez DLCL. Much more than just shyness: the impact of social anxiety disorder on educational performance across the lifespan. Psychol Med. 2021;51(5):861–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Al AN, Zaidi U, Awad SS, Alroqaiba N, Aldhahi MI, Alsaleh H, Akil S, Mortada EM. Moderating effects of Self-Esteem on the relationship between Communication Anxiety and Academic Performance among Female Health College Students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Env Res Pub He 2022, 19(21).

  60. Al-Hazmi BH, Sabur SS, Al-Hazmi RH. Social anxiety disorder in medical students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(8):4329–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schlenker BR, Leary MR. Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. Psychol Bull. 1982;92(3):641–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Peschard V, Philippot P. Social anxiety and information processing biases: an integrated theoretical perspective. Cognition Emot. 2016;30(4):762–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Exploring the Links Between Social Anxiety., Performance-Avoidance Goal Orientation, Fear of Negative Evaluation and Task Persistence.

  64. Nordstrom AH, Goguen LMS, Hiester M. The effect of social anxiety and self-esteem on College Adjustment, Academics, and Retention. J Coll Couns. 2014;17(1):48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Prizant-Passal S, Shechner T, Aderka IM. Social anxiety and internet use– A meta-analysis: what do we know? What are we missing? Comput Hum Behav. 2016;62:221–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Allen KA, Ryan T, Gray DL, McInerney DM, Waters L. Social Media Use and Social Connectedness in adolescents: the positives and the potential pitfalls. Australian Educational Dev Psychol. 2014;31(1):18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen Y, Li R, Zhang P, Liu X. The moderating role of state attachment anxiety and avoidance between social anxiety and social networking sites Addiction. Psychol Rep. 2020;123(3):633–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Al-Yafi K, El-Masri M, Tsai R. The effects of using social network sites on academic performance: the case of Qatar. J Enterp Inf Manag. 2018;31(3):446–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Giunchiglia F, Zeni M, Gobbi E, Bignotti E, Bison I. Mobile social media usage and academic performance. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;82:177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vizoso C, Rodríguez C, Arias-Gundín O. Coping, academic engagement and performance in university students. High Educ Res Dev. 2018;37(7):1515–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Salmela-Aro K, Upadaya K. The Schoolwork Engagement Inventory. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011;28(1):60–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Throuvala MA, Griffiths MD, Rennoldson M, Kuss DJ. A ‘Control Model’ of social media engagement in adolescence: a grounded theory analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019, 16(23).

  73. Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychol Rep. 2012;110(2):501–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Montagni I, Guichard E, Kurth T. Association of screen time with self-perceived attention problems and hyperactivity levels in French students: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2016, 6(2).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants and research assistants for their cooperation. We would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 72004104]; the Innovation Training Program for College Students in Jiangsu province [grant number 202010304104Y]; and the 14th Five Year Plan of Jiangsu Education Science [grant number B/2021/01/74]. The funders had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, and writing of this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qiaoxing Mou and Jie Zhuang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Management, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China

    Qiaoxing Mou, Jie Zhuang, Qunhong Wu, Yaqin Zhong, Xin Cao, Yuexia Gao, Qingyun Lu & Miaomiao Zhao

  2. School of Public Health, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

    Qiaoxing Mou

  3. Department of Group Health Care, Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China

    Qunhong Wu & Qianqian Dai

Authors
  1. Qiaoxing Mou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qunhong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yaqin Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qianqian Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xin Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuexia Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qingyun Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Miaomiao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QM: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - original draft. JZ: Investigation; Methodology. QW: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. YZ: Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. QD: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology. XC: Investigation; Methodology. YG: Project administration, Writing- review & editing. QL: Investigation, Methodology. MZ: Conceptualization; Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Supervision. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuexia Gao, Qingyun Lu or Miaomiao Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and Informed Consent

This study was approved by the Nantong University Research Ethics Committee. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mou, Q., Zhuang, J., Wu, Q. et al. Social media addiction and academic engagement as serial mediators between social anxiety and academic performance among college students. BMC Psychol 12, 190 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01635-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01635-7

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us