Skip to main content
Download PDF

Relationship between psychological detachment from work and depressive symptoms: indirect role of emotional exhaustion and moderating role of self-compassion

BMC Psychology volume 11, Article number: 344 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The importance of psychological detachment during nonwork time has been emphasized, and its effect on depressive symptoms has been identified. However, the mechanism underlying this association remains to be elucidated. This study was conducted to identify the indirect role of emotional exhaustion in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms and the moderating role of self-compassion in the relationship between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms on the basis of the recovery–engagement–exhaustion model and emotion regulation theory. Through an online survey, relevant data were collected from 727 university teachers (mean age, 37.65 ± 7.77 years; 38.5% men). Indirect and moderation effect were analyzed through structural equation modeling (Mplus). Psychological detachment was found to be associated with depressive symptoms through emotional exhaustion. Self-compassion moderated the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms. The association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms was weaker among university teachers with high levels of self-compassion than among those with low levels of self-compassion. This study improves our understanding of the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms by identifying the emotional pathway and protective function of self-compassion. Interventions for improving mental health in work context should be designed considering psychological detachment and self-compassion to deal with work-induced emotional strain.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

High levels of work stress have adverse consequences, including the impairment of emotional well-being (e.g., positive and negative affect), relational well-being (e.g., social undermining toward partner), and mental health (e.g., increased depressive symptoms) [1,2,3,4]. As a core recovery experience, psychological detachment has received substantial attention because mental disengagement during nonwork hours and leisure time helps individuals to detach from work pressure and recover during rest [5, 6]. Psychological detachment is positively associated with recovery, mental health, work engagement, and well-being [7,8,9,10] and buffers the negative effects of work-related stressors on work and mental health outcomes [11, 12]. Most studies focus on the antecedents (e.g., learning goal orientation and problem-solving rumination) and direct consequences (e.g., reduced insomnia and work engagement) of psychological detachment; a negative association has been reported between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms [13,14,15,16]. However, very few studies have been conducted to investigate the mechanism underlying the association between psychological detachment and outcomes (e.g., well-being and emotional rejection) [17,18,19]. How psychological detachment contributes to reducing individuals’ depressive symptoms requires further investigation. In the present study, we investigated the indirect role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of self-compassion in the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms on the basis of the recovery–engagement–exhaustion model and emotion regulation theory [10, 20].

The importance of recovery experiences has been emphasized in studies on the alleviation of job stress. Drawing on the positive psychology perspective, Newman and colleagues [5] proposed the DRAMMA model, which highlights the roles of detachment, recovery, autonomy, mastery, meaning, and affiliation in the relationship between leisure and subjective well-being. On the basis of the mood regulation and recovery, Sonnentag and colleagues [6] identified four recovery experiences (psychological detachment from work, relaxation, mastery, and control) and demonstrated their associations with various job stressors, strain reactions, and psychological well-being [21]. As a core recovery experience, psychological detachment from work has received considerable attention.

Psychological detachment refers to mental disconnection or disengagement from work (not thinking about job-related matters) and refrainment from job-related activities during nonwork time [22, 23]. Psychological detachment, which helps reduce the psychological strain resulting from stressful work situations [22], is associated with affective states, well-being, sleep quality, and psychological adjustment [7, 8, 24]. One important contribution of psychological detachment is its effect on depressive symptoms, which has been identified in different populations (e.g., managers and primary school teachers) [15, 25, 26]. Teachers who react negatively to imperfection are less likely to experience mental detachment from work, which leads to higher levels of depressive symptoms [15]. Furthermore, among managers, core self-evaluation can weaken the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms [25]. Although the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms has already been reported, the precise mechanism underlying this association is yet to be comprehensively understood [10, 27].

As a core component of burnout, emotional exhaustion may play an indirect role in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms. Emotional exhaustion is a chronic state of physical and emotional depletion (e.g., emotional overextension and drain) resulting from excessive work or personal demands and a heavy workload [28,29,30,31]. Emotional exhaustion at work is an antecedent of depressive symptoms [32, 33]. Notably, emotional exhaustion mediates the longitudinal association between sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms among nursing students [28]. Informal caregivers with high levels of emotional exhaustion are more likely to be depressed and perpetrate physical violence toward care recipients [34]. Emotional exhaustion can be relieved by detachment from work. Psychological detachment has been demonstrated to exert a substantial effect on emotional exhaustion [7, 10] and it predicts changes of emotional exhaustion over time [8, 9].

The recovery–engagement–exhaustion model, proposed by Headrick and colleagues [10], supports the indirect role of emotional exhaustion in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms. This model was developed on the basis of meta-analytic associations between recovery experiences, engagement, exhaustion, and outcomes in work and health domains. The model illustrates that two separate mechanisms (engagement and exhaustion pathways) link recovery experiences with work and health outcomes. In this dual-process model, work engagement and exhaustion mediate the effects of recovery experiences on outcomes. Of four recovery experiences (i.e., psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control), only psychological detachment has substantive effect on exhaustion [10]. Reducing emotional exhaustion may translate the positive function of psychological detachment in ameliorating depressive symptoms. In university teachers, psychological detachment may alleviate emotional exhaustion, thus preventing the exacerbation of depressive symptoms.

As an effective emotional self-regulation strategy and a personal resource [35, 36], self-compassion may moderate the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms. Self-compassion refers to exhibiting positive and supportive responses toward oneself when encountering personal inadequacies or external difficulties in life [36, 37]. It includes compassionate self-responding (i.e., self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness) and reduced uncompassionate responding (i.e., reduced self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification). Individuals with high levels of self-compassion are more likely to treat themselves in a caring (rather than harsh) manner, view suffering as a shared (rather than isolated) human experience, and address negative thoughts and emotions in a balanced manner (rather than over-identifying with them). Self-compassionate individuals usually treat themselves with kindness and accept personal flaws when facing substantial work stress [38, 39]. They may believe that stressful work consequences (e.g., work-related rumination) are common experiences shared by individuals in the same circumstances. In addition, these individuals regulate their emotions and maintain a balanced view of their situation when facing work stress. Thus, self-compassion helps them to cope with the negative consequences of high work stress in a resilient manner.

Emotion regulation theory emphasizes the importance of regulating the magnitude and duration of emotional responses with activation purpose (e.g., promoting positive affect and alleviating negative affect), which is beneficial for individuals dealing with challenges in daily life [40]. As an emotional self-regulation strategy, self-compassion buffers the adverse effects of emotional stressors or strains on depressive symptoms [41,42,43]. The association of emotional stressors or strains (e.g., external shame and body shame) with depressive symptoms is weaker (or even nonexistent) among individuals with high levels of self-compassion than among those with low levels of self-compassion [42, 43]. Individuals who self-respond compassionately are more inclined to functionally address emotional stressors and strains. Treating themselves in a caring manner, maintaining emotional stability, and understanding the situation from a comprehensive perspective help these individuals avoid the adverse effects of negative emotional processes. For teachers, transitioning from work to home and disengaging from their professional role is difficult; high daily levels of emotional demand usually lead to maladaptive affective states [2, 24, 44]. Because self-compassion is a personal resource that can buffer the adverse effects of emotional stressors or strains on different outcomes, it may buffer the negative effect of work-related emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms in university teachers.

Although studies on the positive function of psychological detachment mainly focus on its antecedents (e.g., learning goal orientation), direct consequences (e.g., reduced insomnia and depressive symptoms), and its buffering effects in the association between work-related stressors on work and mental health outcomes [11,12,13,14,15,16], the mechanisms underlying the positive effects of psychological detachment on outcomes (e.g., well-being and job performance) remain unclear [27]. A limited number of studies have investigated how psychological detachment contributes to health outcomes and the mechanism underlying this association (for a meta-analysis, see [10]), which is key to understanding the function of psychological detachment and applying it in stress management. In the present study, we adopted the recovery-engagement–exhaustion model and emotion regulation theory [10, 20] and examined emotional exhaustion as an emotional pathway from psychological detachment to depressive symptoms and the moderating role of self-compassion in the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms among university teachers. We hypothesized that university teachers who had mental detachment from work during nonwork time would experience less emotional exhaustion and thereby low levels of depressive symptoms. We further hypothesized that the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms would be weaker among teachers with high levels of self-compassion than among those with low levels of self-compassion. The model hypothesized in the present study is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hypothesized model

Full size image

Methods

Participants and Procedure

Data used in the present study were obtained from a project on the relationship between work stress and psychosocial adjustment among Chinese university teachers. University teachers were recruited to participate in this project. Recruitment information was disseminated by authors and university teachers through social networks. Participants were informed about the study purpose, data confidentiality, and voluntary participation. They provided informed consent before completing the online survey. Qualifying participants received a small monetary reward (80 RMB; approximately US $ 11). The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Social Development and Public Policy at Beijing Normal University.

In total, 800 participants completed the online survey. After the exclusion of participants who failed attention check (n = 72) or whose affiliation was outside China (n = 1), the final sample included 727 participants (280 men). The sample comprised 269 (37%) teachers from national key institutions (211/985 National Key Universities), 396 teachers (54.5%) from provincial key institutions, and 53 teachers (7.3%) from vocational and technical institutions. Regarding the regions of the universities, 196 (27%) teachers were from universities in southern China, 131 (18%) were from those in eastern China, 65 (8.9%) were from those in northern and northeastern China, and 329 (45.3%) from those in western and central China. The average age of the participants was 37.65 years (SD = 7.77). Nearly all participants (99.7%) obtained a bachelor’s degree or higher. Of the participants, 461 (63.4%) obtained a PhD degree. Regarding teaching experience, 41% of the participants had < 5 years of teaching experience; 23.5%, 5–10 years; 24.2%, 11–20 years; and 11.3%, > 20 years. Of the participants, 13.3% were senior research assistants, 46.6% were lecturers/assistant professors, 29.3% were associate professors, and 10.7% were professors.

Measures

Psychological detachment from work during nonwork time was assessed using the psychological detachment subscale of the Chinese version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire [6, 45], which has acceptable reliability in the Chinese population [11, 26]. This scale comprises four items; the responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Some example items are as follows: “I distance myself from my work” and “I do not think about work at all.” A higher mean score indicates a higher level of psychological detachment. In the present study, Cronbach’s α for this scale was 0.74.

Emotional exhaustion was measured using the emotional exhaustion subscale of the Chinese version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey [46, 47]. This scale has five items; the responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Some example items are as follows: “I feel emotionally drained from my work” and “I feel burned out from my work.” A high mean score indicates a higher level of emotional exhaustion. In the present study, Cronbach’s α for this scale was 0.95.

Self-compassion was measured using the Chinese version of the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF) [48, 49]. This scale comprises 12 item; the responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Some example items are as follows: “When something upsets me, I try to keep my emotions in balance” and “When I feel inadequate in some way, I try to remind myself that feelings of inadequacy are shared by most people.” A higher mean score indicates a higher level of self-compassion. In the present study, Cronbach’s α for this scale was 0.81.

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the depression subscale of the Depression–Anxiety–Stress Scale [50, 51]. This scale comprises seven items; the responses are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (did not apply to me at all) to 4 (applied to me very much). Some example items are as follows: “I felt downhearted and blue” and “I felt that I had nothing to look forward to.” Higher mean scores indicate higher degrees of depressive symptoms. In the present study, Cronbach’s α for this scale was 0.89.

Covariates commonly used in studies on work stress and depressive symptoms in university teachers [52,53,54,55] were also controlled for in the present study. These covariates included demographic variables (i.e., age, sex, educational level) as well as variables related to profession (i.e., years of teaching, professional title, and concurrent administrative position), location (i.e., northern and northeastern China, eastern China, southern China, and western and central China), and university level (i.e., national key institutions, provincial key institutions, junior vocational and technical institutions).

Data analysis

Structural equation modeling was performed (using Mplus 8.3) to examine the hypothesized model. Missing data were accounted for through full information maximum likelihood. The following model fit indices were used to evaluate the model fit adequacy: χ² statistic, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; <0.08), comparative fit index (CFI; >0.90), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR; <0.08). First, the direct and indirect effects of psychological detachment on depressive symptoms were tested using bootstrapping with 5000 resamples. Second, we investigated the moderating role of self-compassion in the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms. Emotional exhaustion and self-compassion were centered around the mean. The main effect of emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms and its interaction with self-compassion were analyzed. Third, simple slope analysis was performed to determine the conditional slope for the associations between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms at high and low levels of self-compassion (low level: M − ≥1 × SD; high level: M + ≥ 1 × SD).

Results

The mean scores and standard deviations of the key variables and the correlations are presented in Table 1. Psychological detachment was positively associated with self-compassion and negatively associated with emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms. Emotional exhaustion was positively associated with depressive symptoms and negatively associated with self-compassion. Self-compassion was negatively associated with depressive symptoms.

First, we investigated the indirect role of emotional exhaustion in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms. The model fit the data well: χ² = 21.276, df = 5, RMSEA = 0.067 with 90% CI [0.039, 0.097], CFI = 0.939, and SRMR = 0.018. Psychological detachment was negatively associated with emotional exhaustion (β = −0.118, SE = 0.037, p = .001), which was positively associated with depressive symptoms (β = 0.524, SE = 0.028, p < .001). The indirect effect of psychological detachment on depressive symptoms via emotional exhaustion (β = −0.062, SE = 0.023, p = .008, 95%CI [− 0.110, − 0.018]).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics and correlations among key study variables
Full size table

We investigated the moderating role of self-compassion in the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms. The model fit the data well: χ² = 21.402, df = 5, RMSEA = 0.067 with 90% CI [0.040, 0.098], CFI = 0.970, and SRMR = 0.017. The interaction between emotional exhaustion and self-compassion was negatively associated with depressive symptoms (β = –0.172, SE = 0.028, p < .001). The simple slope analysis revealed that the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms was stronger when the level of self-compassion was low (β = 0.523, SE = 0.035, p < .001) than when this level was high (β = 0.217, SE = 0.042, p < .001; Fig. 2). Overall, self-compassion alleviated the effect of emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms. The indirect effects of psychological detachment on depressive symptoms through emotional exhaustion were found at both high and low levels of self-compassion (high level: β = −0.026, SE = 0.011, p = .023, 95% CI = [− 0.054, − 0.008]; low level: β =−0.062, SE = 0.023, p = .009, 95% CI = [− 0.111, − 0.018]).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Plots depicting the interaction between emotional exhaustion and self-compassion

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the indirect role of emotional exhaustion in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms and the moderating role of self-compassion. Our findings clarified how psychological detachment contributes to reducing depressive symptoms through an emotional pathway and how the emotion regulation strategy of self-compassion moderates this process. Psychological detachment and self-compassion work together to alleviate the adverse effect of emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms. Consistent with the results obtained using the recovery–engagement–exhaustion model, which emphasizes the mediating role of exhaustion in the associations between recovery experiences and health outcomes [10], our findings suggest that psychological detachment from work during nonwork hours was negatively associated with depressive symptoms through emotional exhaustion. This finding corroborates those of studies reporting the effects of psychological detachment on affective state and depressive symptoms [2, 8, 15, 56], indicating that these effects can be noted in university teachers.

Our finding reveals that emotional exhaustion is a stress-related, emotional, and social problem that induces or exacerbates depressive symptoms [28]. Emotional exhaustion caused by work stressors depletes individuals’ energy and impairs mental health (e.g., depressive and anxiety symptoms) [34, 57]. With a positive function similar to those of other resources (e.g., social support), psychological detachment serves as a personal resource and disrupts the harmful relationship between emotional exhaustion and mental health [58]. Teachers who can “turn off” thoughts related to job and “switch off” mentally from job during nonwork time are more likely to enjoy the life and recovery from their leisure time [15, 24], which helps them to better deal with emotional exhausted and depressive state.

We identified a moderating role of self-compassion in the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms; this finding supports those of studies indicating that self-compassion is an effective emotion regulation strategy buffering the negative effect of emotional strain on depressive symptoms [42, 43]. In university teachers with higher levels of self-compassion, the association between emotional exhaustion and depressive symptoms was weaker. When self-compassionate teachers face emotional exhaustion resulting from work stress, they may exhibit resilience, treat themselves with care, accept their situation as a shared experience in educational settings, and maintain emotional stability [59, 60]. Thus, these teachers are able to protect their mental health from impairment due to emotional exhaustion.

The significant indirect effect of psychological detachment and the moderating effect of self-compassion indicate that these two psychological resources may work together to alleviate the harmful effect of emotional exhaustion caused by high levels of work stress. Detaching from work helps university teachers recover during leisure time, which contribute to reducing their subsequent exhaustion [7, 9], and self-compassion helps them to alleviate the detrimental effect of emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms [41]. Our findings indicate that psychological detachment and self-compassion protect mental health by weakening the negative emotional pathway and affect-based mechanism involved in emotional exhaustion.

Implications and limitations

Our findings have several implications. First, our model responds to calls for exploring the mechanism through which recovery experiences affect health outcomes and identification of how and for whom psychological detachment is the most beneficial [10, 27]. Our study expands the literature on the positive effects of psychological detachment and self-compassion in the contexts of work and education [15, 41]. By incorporating the recovery–engagement–exhaustion model and emotion regulation theory [10, 20], we identified the indirect role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of self-compassion. Our findings indicate that addressing psychological detachment and self-compassion can be an effective recovery strategy to deal with emotional strain resulting from work and protect mental health from impairment due to occupational stress. Universities should develop environments with restorative qualities (e.g., fascination and compatibility) for university teachers, which may help them better recover from work [27]. Our findings also suggest that the interplay between emotional pathway and emotion regulation strategies and their effects on depressive symptoms should be considered when exploring the positive effects of personal resources on mental health. This study provides insights into work stress management and mental health improvement programs. Because our findings demonstrate a combined weakening effect of psychological detachment and self-compassion on the adverse effect of emotional exhaustion on depressive symptoms, integrated interventions can encourage detachment from work (e.g., boundary management and engagement in recovery activities) and self-compassion (e.g., mindful self-compassion training) and combine these to reduce the emotional strain and distress that result from work stress [61, 62].

This study has several limitations. First, the present study could not investigate the longitudinal associations between key variables because of the cross-sectional design. Future studies should investigate causal relationships and the underlying moderated mediation mechanism by adopting longitudinal and experimental designs; in addition, within-person designs (e.g., daily diary and experience sampling approaches) should be adopted to examine within-person differences in the occurrence and intensity of recovery experiences and how these differences affect depressive symptoms [21]. Second, we only examine an emotion-based mechanism and emotion-related buffer in the association between psychological detachment and depressive symptoms. Nonetheless, other underlying mechanisms (e.g., fatigue) and moderators can influence the association between psychological detachment and outcomes [17]. Future studies should investigate these mechanisms and the protective role of other personal resources in the associations between psychological detachment and other outcomes (e.g., personal and work-related outcomes) [21]. Third, similar to most psychological detachment studies, the present study examines the associations between key variables in a multiorganizational convenience sample of Chinese university teachers; this limits the generalizability of our findings to other populations, contexts, and cultures. In the future, our model should be examined through additional systematic sampling and by considering the contextual and cultural influences. Finally, the present study is in line with most recovery studies relying on self-report data, which raises concerns regarding potential self-report bias and common method variance [63]. Future studies should measure strain and related outcomes by using cardiovascular and endocrinological indicators (e.g., cortisol levels and heart rate) [27].

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical issues but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Meier LL, Cho E. Work stressors and partner social undermining: comparing negative affect and psychological detachment as mechanisms. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019;24:359–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Virtanen A, Van Laethem M, de Bloom J, Kinnunen U. Drammatic breaks: break recovery experiences as mediators between job demands and affect in the afternoon and evening. Stress and Health. 2021;37(4):801–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawhney G, Jennings KS, Britt TW, Sliter MT. Occupational stress and mental health symptoms: examining the moderating effect of work recovery strategies in firefighters. J Occup Health Psychol. 2018;23(3):443–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Qiu D, Li RQ, Li YL, He J, Ouyang FY, Luo D, Xiao SY. Job dissatisfaction mediated the associations between work stress and mental health problems. Front Psychiatry 2021, 12.

  5. Newman DB, Tay L, Diener E. Leisure and subjective well-being: a model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. J Happiness Stud. 2014;15(3):555–78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12(3):204–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schulz AD, Schöllgen I, Wendsche J, Fay D, Wegge J. The dynamics of social stressors and detachment: long-term mechanisms impacting well-being. Int J Stress Manage. 2021;28(3):207–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chong S, Kim YJ, Lee HW, Johnson RE, Lin S-H. Mind your own break! The interactive effect of workday respite activities and mindfulness on employee outcomes via affective linkages. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020;159:64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dettmers J. How extended work availability affects well-being: the mediating roles of psychological detachment and work-family-conflict. Work Stress. 2017;31(1):24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Headrick L, Newman DA, Park YA, Liang Y. Recovery experiences for work and health outcomes: a meta-analysis and recovery-engagement-exhaustion model. J Bus Psychol 2022.

  11. Lu L, Chou CY. Protecting job performance and well-being in the demanding work context: the moderating effect of psychological detachment for Chinese employees. Appl Psychology-an Int Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Int. 2020;69(4):1199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu J, Liu J, Lin S, Chi X. The relationship between stressors and Chinese employees’ innovative work behavior: The role of task crafting and psychological detachment. Eur J Innov Manage 2023.

  13. Mehmood Q, Hamstra MRW. Panacea or mixed blessing? Learning goal orientation reduces psychological detachment via problem-solving rumination. Appl Psychol. 2021;70(4):1841–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ng TWH, Wang M. An actor-partner interdependence model of employees’ and coworkers’ innovative behavior, psychological detachment, and strain reactions. Pers Psychol. 2019;72(3):445–76.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gluschkoff K, Elovainio M, Hintsanen M, Mullola S, Pulkki-Råback L, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Hintsa T. Perfectionism and depressive symptoms: the effects of psychological detachment from work. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;116:186–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sonnentag S, Kühnel J. Coming back to work in the morning: psychological detachment and reattachment as predictors of work engagement. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21(4):379–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi Y, Xie J, Zhou ZE, Ma H, Tang Y. How parents’ psychological detachment from work affects their children via fatigue: the moderating role of gender. Stress and Health. 2022;38(3):463–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Li A, Liu P, Rao M. The relationship between psychological detachment and employee well-being: the mediating effect of self-discrepant time allocation at work. Front Psychol 2018, 9.

  19. MacGowan RL, Gabriel AS, da Motta Veiga SP, Chawla N. Does psychological detachment benefit job seekers? A two study weekly investigation. J Appl Psychol. 2022;107(12):2319–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross JJ. The extended process model of emotion regulation: elaborations, applications, and future directions REPLY. Psychol Inq. 2015;26(1):130–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sonnentag S, Cheng BH, Parker SL. Recovery from work: advancing the field toward the future. Annual Rev Organizational Psychol Organizational Behav. 2022;9(1):33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sonnentag S. Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: the benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(2):114–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J Organizational Behav. 2015;36(S1):72–S103.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Türktorun YZ, Weiher GM, Horz H. Psychological detachment and work-related rumination in teachers: a systematic review. Educational Res Rev. 2020;31:100354.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hentrich S, Zimber A, Sosnowsky-Waschek N, Gregersen S, Petermann F. Are core self-evaluations a suitable moderator in stressor-detachment relationships? A study among managers’ perceived job demands, detachment and strain reactions. Work. 2018;59:413–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hou WK, Lau KM, Ng SM, Lee TMC, Cheung HYS, Shum TCY, Cheng ACK. Psychological detachment and savoring in adaptation to cancer caregiving. Psycho-oncology. 2016;25(7):839–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sonnentag S, Venz L, Casper A. Advances in recovery research: what have we learned? What should be done next? J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):365–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu S, Ouyang X, Shi X, Li Y, Chen D, Lai Y, Fan F. Emotional exhaustion and sleep-related worry as serial mediators between sleep disturbance and depressive symptoms in student nurses: a longitudinal analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2020;129:109870.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wright TA, Cropanzano R. Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83(3):486–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roster CA, Ferrari JR. Does work stress lead to office clutter, and how? Mediating influences of emotional exhaustion and indecision. Environ Behav. 2020;52(9):923–44.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar N, Jin YH. Impact of nurses’ emotional labour on job stress and emotional exhaustion amid COVID-19: The role of instrumental support and coaching leadership as moderators. J Nurs Adm Manag 2022, 30(7).

  32. Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2019, 10.

  33. Chen C, Meier ST. Burnout and depression in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;124:104099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gérain P, Zech E. A harmful care: the association of informal caregiver burnout with depression, subjective health, and Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2022;37(11–12):NP9738–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu Q, Cao H, Lin X, Zhou N, Chi P. Child maltreatment and subjective well-being in Chinese emerging adults: a process model involving self-esteem and self-compassion. J Interpers Violence 2021.

  36. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity. 2003;2(3):223–50.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Neff KD. Self-compassion: theory, method, research, and intervention. Ann Rev Psychol. 2023;74(1):null.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wu Q, Cao H, Du H. Work stress, work-related rumination, and depressive symptoms in university teachers: buffering effect of self-compassion. Psychol Res Behav Manage. 2023;16:1557–69.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dodson SJ, Heng YT. Self-compassion in organizations: a review and future research agenda. J Organizational Behav. 2022;43(2):168–96.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion. 2013;13(3):359–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCade D, Frewen A, Fassnacht DB. Burnout and depression in Australian psychologists: the moderating role of self-compassion. Australian Psychol. 2021;56(2):111–22.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sick K, Pila E, Nesbitt A, Sabiston CM. Does self-compassion buffer the detrimental effect of body shame on depressive symptoms? Body Image. 2020;34:175–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Callow TJ, Moffitt RL, Neumann DL. External shame and its association with depression and anxiety: the moderating role of self-compassion. Australian Psychol. 2021;56(1):70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Crain TL, Schonert-Reichl KA, Roeser RW. Cultivating teacher mindfulness: effects of a randomized controlled trial on work, home, and sleep outcomes. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22:138–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei H, Zhao H. Psycholigucal detachment from work: conceptualization, measurement, and influential factors. Adv Psychol Sci. 2015;23(5):897–906.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C, Jackson SE. MBI-general survey: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.

  47. Li C, Shi K. The influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on job burnout. Acta Physiol Sinica. 2003;35(5):677–84.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hu Y, Wang Y, Sun Y, Arteta-Garcia J, Purol S. Diary study: the protective role of self-compassion on stress-related poor sleep quality. Mindfulness. 2018;9(6):1931–40.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(3):250–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wen Y, Wu D-X. Lü X-j: psychometric properties of the Chinese short version of depression anxiety and stress scale in Chinese adults. Chin J Public Health. 2012;28(11):1436–8.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wu Q, Zhou N. Work stress and personal and relational well-being among Chinese college teachers: the indirect roles of sense of control and work-related rumination. Psychol Res Behav Manage. 2023;16:2819–28.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yin H, Han J, Perron BE. Why are Chinese university teachers (not) confident in their competence to teach? The relationships between faculty-perceived stress and self-efficacy. Int J Educational Res. 2020;100:101529.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sabagh Z, Hall NC, Saroyan A. Antecedents, correlates and consequences of faculty burnout. Educational Res. 2018;60(2):131–56.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wiegel C, Sattler S, Göritz AS, Diewald M. Work-related stress and cognitive enhancement among university teachers. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 2016;29(1):100–17.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wu J, Mei W, Liu L, Ugrin JC. The bright and dark sides of social cyberloafing: effects on employee mental health in China. J Bus Res. 2020;112:56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang H, Tang L, Ye Z, Zou P, Shao J, Wu M, Zhang Q, Qiao G, Mu S. The role of social support and emotional exhaustion in the association between work-family conflict and anxiety symptoms among female medical staff: a moderated mediation model. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):266.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang H, Cui N, Chen D, Zou P, Shao J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Du J, Du C, Zheng D. Social support, anxiety symptoms, and depression symptoms among residents in standardized residency training programs: the mediating effects of emotional exhaustion. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21(1).

  59. Chen JJ. Self-compassion as key to stress resilience among first-year early childhood teachers during COVID-19: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Teach Teacher Educ 2022, 111.

  60. Hwang YS, Medvedev ON, Krageloh C, Hand K, Noh JE, Singh NN. The role of dispositional mindfulness and self-compassion in educator stress. Mindfulness. 2019;10(8):1692–702.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Karabinski T, Haun VC, Nübold A, Wendsche J, Wegge J. Interventions for improving psychological detachment from work: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2021;26:224–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kotera Y, Van Gordon W. Effects of self-compassion training on work-related well-being: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:630798.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Ann Rev Psychol. 2012;63(1):539–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

(Not applicable)

Funding

This work was support by the Foundation for Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong Province [2021WQNCX307], the Guangdong Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science [GD22YXL01], and Start-Up Fund of Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai [310432101].

Author information

Author notes

  1. Qinglu Wu and Tengfei Qi contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China

    Qinglu Wu

  2. Department of Sociology, School of Government, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    Tengfei Qi

  3. Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Jun Wei

  4. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China

    Amy Shaw

Authors
  1. Qinglu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tengfei Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amy Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QW: Conceptualization, data collection, methodology, writing-original draft; TQ: Conceptualization, writing-original draft;JW: Conceptualization, writing-reviewing and editing;AS: Methodology, writing-reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinglu Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

This manuscript is not under review elsewhere and the results have not been published previously or accepted for publication. This manuscript has been seen and approved by all authors.

Compliance of ethical standard statement

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School of Social Development and Public Policy at Beijing Normal University before data collection.

Consent to participants

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Q., Qi, T., Wei, J. et al. Relationship between psychological detachment from work and depressive symptoms: indirect role of emotional exhaustion and moderating role of self-compassion. BMC Psychol 11, 344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01384-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01384-z

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us