Skip to main content
  • Study Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Acute and long-term psychosocial consequences in grandparents when a grandchild is diagnosed with cancer – the GROKids Project: a population-based mixed-methods study protocol



Grandparents play a crucial role in providing their families with love, support, and wisdom, often also supporting them in practical and financial ways. The psychosocial effects experienced by grandparents when a grandchild is diagnosed with an illness can be significant, including increased stress, anxiety, grief, and disruptions in their own lives. Yet, the experience of grandparents is often overlooked in the literature.


The GROKids Project aims to investigate how grandparents are affected by a grandchild's cancer diagnosis. It employs a mixed-methods approach and consists of three studies: a longitudinal cohort study (Study 1) and a qualitative study (Study 2) involving grandparents of children with a recent cancer diagnosis, and a cross-sectional study (Study 3) of grandparents of childhood cancer survivors. Study 1 covers four time points over two years after the cancer diagnosis, while Study 2 explores the lived experiences of a subsample of these grandparents. Study 3 collects data from grandparents of childhood cancer survivors diagnosed 3 to 10 years ago. Participants are recruited across eight pediatric oncology centers in Switzerland, and through patient advocacy and support groups. Eligibility criteria include having a grandchild diagnosed with cancer and being fluent in German, French, or Italian.

Study procedures involve requesting grandparents’ contacts from eligible families, and later contacting grandparents, providing study information, obtaining informed consent, and sending out questionnaires by post or online. Reminder calls and mails are used to improve response rates. Data analysis includes multilevel regression (Study 1), thematic analysis (Study 2), and regression analyses (Study 3). Various validated questionnaires are used to assess physical health and overall well-being, psychological health, internal, and external factors.


This project addresses the gaps in understanding the psychosocial effects on grandparents having a grandchild diagnosed with cancer. It utilizes a comprehensive approach, including multiple methodologies and considering the broader family context. The project’s strengths lie in its mixed-methods design, longitudinal approach, and inclusion of the perspectives of the sick children, siblings, and parents, besides grandparents. By gaining a more profound understanding of grandparents' experiences, researchers and healthcare professionals can develop targeted interventions and support services to address grandparents’ unique needs.

Peer Review reports


Grandparents play a crucial role in the family structure, providing their grandchildren with love, support, and wisdom [1]. Many grandparents support their families in practical, emotional, and financial ways. Care for grandchildren may range from occasional care to legal guardianship. For many families, childcare by grandparents is essential to allow parents to attend paid work [2, 3]. In Switzerland, almost one-third of grandmothers care for their grandchildren at least once a week, when they are under six years old; later, this proportion decreases to about 15% [4]. A European study showed that grandparents looked after their grandchildren for 57 h per month on average [5]. In Switzerland, the annual number of hours of grandparental care for grandchildren was estimated to 160 million hours, and its monetary equivalent to CHF 8.2 million in 2016 [4]. In cases of difficulty, grandparents may take on additional grandparental role duties for their grandchildren, including providing economic support for the family and helping to look after young grandchildren.

When a child is acutely ill, grandparents play an essential role for the affected families and can care for siblings at home or the sick child in the hospital [6]. Therefore, grandparents need the appropriate resources, such as good physical and emotional health and finances [7], to support their children’s families, especially with the potentially increased burden of an ill grandchild. The literature on the psychosocial effects of childhood illness on grandparents reveals a range of emotional and psychological experiences [8]. When a grandchild is diagnosed with an illness, grandparents often experience heightened stress, anxiety, and grief [9, 10]. They may struggle with helplessness, guilt, and concern for their grandchild's well-being. Furthermore, they may face significant disruptions in their own daily lives, including financial strain [11], alterations in social activities [9, 12], and adjustments in caregiving roles [13]. However, most studies were exploratory, using qualitative analysis to identify the impact on grandparents. Few studies used surveys, and none have done longitudinal analyses or utilized a holistic approach through mixed methods.

There is a huge knowledge gap on the effects on health and wellbeing on the aging population for when their grandchild suffers a life-threatening disease. Understanding the specific contributions and challenges grandparents face in these situations is important for providing effective support systems and health promotion. Our studies will shed light on the often-neglected experiences of grandparents, highlighting their unique needs and challenges. By gaining a deeper understanding of their emotional and psychological well-being, researchers and healthcare professionals can develop targeted interventions and support services to address these needs. Recognizing and addressing the psychosocial effects on grandparents may benefit their mental health and contribute to a more comprehensive and holistic approach to supporting families facing a childhood illness.


The overall objective is to investigate how grandparents are affected by a childhood cancer diagnosis of a grandchild (Fig. 1). The study will address the following questions: (a) How and to what extent are grandparents involved in caring for their grandchildren during and shortly after cancer treatment? (b) What are the acute consequences for grandparents of a grandchild diagnosed with cancer? (c) What are the long-term consequences of childhood cancer on grandparents?

Fig. 1
figure 1

Conceptual framework. This diagram shows the population, the main outcomes observed, and the confounding factors in the association (see Table 3 for details of the tools/questionnaires used for measurement)

This is an ongoing observational study using a mixed-methods approach combining: a longitudinal cohort study (Study 1), a qualitative semi-structured interview study (Study 2), and a cross-sectional survey study (Study 3) (Fig. 2). Study 1 repeatedly assesses participants at four time points, namely, at three months (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), and two years (T4) after the grandchild’s cancer diagnosis. Follow-up length was chosen because after two years cancer therapy should be completed for all cancer types. Study 2 will explore the lived experience of grandparents during the grandchild’s cancer therapy. Study 3 will collect data from grandparents of childhood cancer survivors who are 3 to 10 years (T5) from the diagnosis (completed treatment; Table 1). This population-based study will enroll participants from eight pediatric oncology centers across Switzerland (Table 2). The study started enrollment in 25 November 2020 and the last data collection (follow-up) is until 19 December 2024.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic diagram on grandparent enrollment and follow-up (See Table 3 for details on tools/questionnaires used at each observation period)

Table 1 Comparison of the different components of the three studies of the GROKids project in detail
Table 2 Collaborating centers

Eligibility criteria

Studies 1 and 2 focus on the acute consequences of a childhood cancer diagnosis for grandparents. Eligible childhood cancer cases include: (a) newly diagnosed patients, age ≤ 18 years), (b) undergoing treatment for cancer, and (c) treatment in Switzerland (at one of the participating centers). Each participating center will provide study information to eligible parents or grandparents. Interested parents or grandparents provide their own and family / grandparents contact details that the study team uses for initial contact. From this, we will contact and select grandparents who can understand one of the official languages in the country (German, French, Italian).

Study 3 focuses on the long-term consequences of a childhood cancer diagnosis on grandparents. Each participating center will identify childhood cancer survivors in their hospital registry. We use the following eligibility criteria: (a) availability of contact information of parents (if the survivor is < 18 years old) or survivors (if survivors are at least 18 years old), (b) cancer diagnosis 3 to 10 years before recruitment, and (c) has undergone treatment and is alive at study. Each participating center sends out study information and an invitation to join the study. Parents of CCS under 18 years old or adult survivors share the contact information of the grandparents to the study team. Grandparents will be contacted directly by the study team, and included if they understand one of the official languages in the country (German, French, Italian).

To expand the enrollment, we will distribute advertisements to advocacy groups and parents support groups in Switzerland. Interested participants can contact the study team by phone, mail, or email. The eligibility of the volunteer participant will be reviewed for any of the three studies.

Study procedures

With the first contact from the study team, grandparents receive an information letter including the study's aims, the team's contact details, and a consent form for study participation. After providing their consent, grandparents receive the respective questionnaire for the study they are included in. We also provide the contact information of a psychologist, should any participant need counseling. All information and questionnaires are sent by post (with an option for online follow-up questionnaires in Study 1), and are available in German, French, and Italian. For Study 1, questionnaires are sent at T1, T2, T3, and T4. At T4, separate questionnaires are also sent to the parents, the child diagnosed with cancer and siblings (if available). For Study 3, questionnaires are sent after consent is provided. We send reminder mails in case of no response for four weeks. These reminders are done three times before classifying as a dropout. The reasons for dropout will be recorded, if available. Several cohort retention strategies are used to prevent dropouts in Study 1, namely, (a) newsletters, (b) appreciation cards and small gifts, and (c) follow-up calls by study staff.

Participants have an option to complete all questionnaires online (Qualtrics XM, Provo, Utah). If participants complete the questionnaire on paper, the study staff enter the responses in the online questionnaire. Personal data or personally identifiable information are encoded separately and saved in a secured server. Data quality and audits are performed weekly.

For Study 2, we will invite grandparents eligible for Study 1 for an interview. It will be a semi-structured interview following the interview guide in Appendix Table S1. Interested participants will be asked when and where the interview will take place. Interviews will be done individually, unless they want to be interviewed as a couple. Audio recording will be done and will be transcribed verbatim. The interview will be conducted in German, French, or Italian.


Information for studies 1 and 3 is collected through self-administered questionnaires (Table 3), which are based on a previously published theoretical framework on the grandparents-grandchildren relationship considering the family context [14]. Information on diagnosis and treatment of the grandchild is obtained from participating centers if the survivor or their parents provide consent.

Table 3 Domains investigated in the study (including the standardized questionnaires as applicable)a

Physical health and overall well-being outcomes

Physical health refers to absence of symptoms, disability, impairment, or chronic conditions with adequate energy level for daily functioning [38]. Overall wellbeing refers to health in a biopsychosocial framework, including quality-of-life. These outcomes are measured using self-reported health conditions and physical, mental and overall health perception of the participants using the following instruments: Health-related Quality-of-Life (SF-36) [15, 16]; the European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) [39]; and chronic disease checklist [19].

Psychological health outcomes

Psychological health refers to psychological, mental and behavioral outcomes that are affected by the grandchild’s cancer diagnosis. We include validated self-administered questionnaires to measure and operationalize psychological health outcomes at different time points. These questionnaires include: Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) to measure somatization, depression and anxiety and overall psychological distress; Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire (WAQ) to measure worries and anxiety [22]; Impact of Event Scale (IES-R) to measure post-traumatic stress [23]; Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to quantify the level of stress [24]; and Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) [25] and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10 & 25) [26] to measure adaptations to stress.

Internal/personal factors

There are multiple personal factors that may affect the physical, psychological, and overall well-being of grandparents. We also collect several of these internal factors that may act as confounders on the well-being of grandparents. These tools include: Swiss Federal Statistical Office census questions to determine sociodemographic profile [40]; Information needs questionnaire to measure the perceived needs [30]; European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q12) to determine health literacy [31]; and Big Five Inventory of personality (BFIK) to assess personality [32].

External factors (family and society)

The family and society may affect the well-being of grandparents. As such, we also collect information on social constructs surrounding the participants. These include: Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) to assess the support from family, friends and partner [33]; Impact on Family Relationships (FaBel) to measure the impact of illness on family [34]; and Relationship Attachment Scales [36] to measure partner relationship.

Sociodemographic information

Other demographic and economic information are obtained through a subset of questionnaires adapted from the questionnaires of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office [40]. We developed questions to evaluate self-reported changes in income, employment, housing and other variables due to cancer. Sociodemographic characteristics are known to be determinants of health and well-being.

Other information

For Study 1, we also collect additional information from the child with cancer, siblings, and parents. This will provide a broader context of the family dynamics that the grandparents are within. These questionnaires include sociodemographic data, self-reported health and well-being, and psychological status (Table 4).

Table 4 Other information obtained from the family of the grandparents (taken at the end of follow-up, longitudinal study, Study 1)

Data analysis

For Study 1, we plan to analyze using multilevel (hierarchical) regression analysis with individuals and families as a cluster (repeated measures approach). We will explore the changes across time, with and without time-varying covariates. Time interaction will be fitted to account for changes across time. Determinants of outcome changes will also be explored using multivariable regression and/or by fitting interaction terms (between exposure and risk factor).

For the qualitative study (Study 2), the analysis of interview transcripts will follow the principles of qualitative thematic analysis according to guidelines developed by Braun and Clarke [43]. The transcripts will be entered into the qualitative data analysis software ATLAS.ti. (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin). After familiarizing with the data, initial codes will be generated to search for major themes systematically. Each transcript will be coded once and then enriched with new codes inductively evolving from the transcripts. Subsequently, the coded segments are systematized and categorized.

For Study 3, regression analyses will determine the risk factors for physical and psychological outcomes. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses will be done with covariates chosen according to the theoretical framework by Davey, et al., and Wakefield, et. al. on the grandparent-grandchild relationship [10, 14]. All calculations will be done using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp, Texas), using two-tailed tests, with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Adjustments for multiple testing will be done, if appropriate.

Sample size

Power analyses for Health-related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL) and psychological distress showed that the sample size of 100 is sufficient to detect a difference of 3 points on the SF-36 (a small effect) measuring HRQoL [17] between grandparents and the general population with a power of > 0.80 (alpha 0.05; two-sided), and a difference of 10% in the prevalence of individuals with clinically significant psychological distress between grandparents and the general population with a power of > 0.80 (alpha 0.05; two-sided) [44].

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Commission in Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ 2020–01409, 23 September 2021). This study complies with the Swiss Federal Laws on data protection (235.1 Federal Act of June 19, 1992, on Data Protection) and the Swiss Human Research Act (810.30 Federal Act of September 30, 2011, on Research involving Human Beings).

Grandparents sign an informed consent form before receiving the questionnaire set (Study 1 and Study 3). Informed consent forms will be obtained on families enrolled in Study 1 signed by at least one adult in the family. Another informed consent will be obtained for interview participants stipulating consent for audio recording and storage (Study 2). Finally, for the study team to access medical records, parents sign informed consent if the child is < 14 years old, and provide written informed consent to their child signing an informed consent if the child is < 16 years. Children age 14 years and older sign their own informed consent. Electronic data are kept under the secured servers of the University of Lucerne, and any patient-related information is kept in a secured locker at all times. Any identifying information will be removed before data analysis to maintain anonymity.


Studies in the aging population are often challenging. For our research, we applied some best practices based on the literature to maximize enrollment and encourage participation. First, childhood cancer is a rare disease with an incidence of 14.1/100,000 children [45], making the identification of grandparents particularly difficult. Thus, indirect recruitment is the most practical approach. We initially identify the child with cancer, followed by tracing their parents, who subsequently refer grandparents to our study. However, it involves a series of informed consents (informed consent from the patient, parents, and grandparents) that may seem to the respondents as repetitive, yet a requirement by ethics commission. Second, we use post as a way to communicate the enrollment process. While electronic means have been predominantly utilized for data collection in most studies, prior research has demonstrated that adopting a more personalized approach enhances participation among the aging population [46]. We implemented both electronic and paper/pencil data collection, and the overwhelming majority, thus far, prefer the paper/pencil over electronic questionnaire completion. Third, our study materials are also tailored for the aging population. Information sheet includes statements that appeal to empathy, availability of study psychologist for counseling, and contact details of study staff ready to assist in filling out questionnaires. All these components convey an atmosphere of expertise, trust, support, and professionalism, theoretically encouraging participation [47,48,49]. Finally, the interview is an essential component of the study. Interviews will enable us to triangulate our findings from surveys and discover new domains that were not yet studied in the literature. To date, we have observed a high interview participation rate. Our participants, so far, have been receptive to the interviews and are willing to provide their time to share their experiences.

We have foreseen critical challenges that are a potential source of bias and could compromise the study conduct, namely, the delicate/emotional nature of the topic, the older adults’ declining cognition, participation on indirect recruitment, and drop-outs in longitudinal studies. First, childhood cancer is a psychologically sensitive topic that may trigger negative emotions, further hindering participation. As such, we provided the participants access to a psychologist if needed. Also, older adults may have a limited cognitive or physical capacity for surveys [46, 50]. Some may have cognitive impairment due to aging. Others may be technologically incapable of answering an electronic survey or have difficulties in writing due to a medical condition. Some may have limited literacy skills, considering mandatory education may not have been enforced during their childhood. To overcome this issue, we provide study staff contact details should they require assistance in answering the questions. Nevertheless, this problem is inherent in this age group and can be challenging to account for. Another anticipated challenge was participation following certain circumstances not controlled by the study team because of the indirect recruitment. Some families may not be invited to participate because they deem emotionally unstable to join a study. Some parents may also opt out sending information to grandparents because of dysfunctional or distant relationships. This would be mitigated by exploring the emotions and relationships deeper through interviews (Study 2). Otherwise, this is a recognized limitation of our enrollment design, as the alternative strategy of inviting all elderly in Switzerland and identifying those with a grandchild’s cancer is logistically impossible to implement. Finally, dropouts are expected to be higher in this population [50]. As such, we employ some cohort retention strategies to keep them engaged and, more importantly, to check if they need any psychological help.

Our study will collect one of the most comprehensive datasets on this topic as of the time of writing [8]. Our results will provide high-quality evidence as we employ a mixed-methods approach using various methodologies and sources. We will be able to provide robust effect estimates (through quantitative Studies 1 and 3), and a deeper context of the data through the grandparents’ lived experience (through the qualitative Study 2). We also collect data from the child with cancer, siblings, and the parents taking the whole family in context, which is rarely done in the literature. Another critical feature of our study is the longitudinal approach that could explore the temporality of psychosocial changes. Physical, mental, and social health are dynamic outcomes that change over time. Also, longitudinal studies are important in deriving any causal associations by considering the baseline measure to its outcome. Finally, this population-based, nationwide study will enroll grandparents from all over the country with high projected sample size, enabling us to perform more complex models, which have not been attempted due to sample size limitation in the literature.

The psychosocial impact of a grandchild’s illness has been gaining importance due to the increasing aging population and the increasing involvement of older adults in family dynamics. Our study will give insight into the impact of childhood cancer on a neglected group of family members. We will learn about the well-being and psychosocial health of grandparents of childhood cancer patients and survivors. Furthermore, the study will provide important information about the costs associated with the care provided by grandparents. Our findings will provide insights about where, when, and how to implement specific services that will help support those who provide vital support to families with a child diagnosed with cancer.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be made available to interested parties upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.



Big Five Inventory of personality


Brief Symptom Inventory short form (18 items)


Childhood Cancer Follow-up study


Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale


European Quality of Life questionnaire


Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen (Family relationships questionnaire)


European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (12 items)


Health-related Quality of Life


Impact of Event Scale revised questionnaire


Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support


Perceived Stress Scale


Post Traumatic Growth Inventory questionnaire


Health-Related Quality of Life Short Form Survey


Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire


  1. Mitchell W. Research Review: The role of grandparents in intergenerational support for families with disabled children: a review of the literature. Child Fam Soc Work. 2007;12(1):94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neuberger FS, Haberkern K. Structured ambivalence in grandchild care and the quality of life among European grandparents. Eur J Ageing. 2014;11(2):171–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bundesamt für Statistik. Familien in der Schweiz. In: Mosimann A, Berrut S, Helfer F, editors. Statistischer Bericht 2021. Neuchatel: Bundesamt für Statistik; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mosimann A, Carmenish M. Erhebung zu Familien und Generationen 2013. Neuchatel: Bundesamt fur Statistik; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muller Z, Litwin H. Grandparenting and well-being: How important is grandparent-role centrality? Eur J Ageing. 2011;8(2):109–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindemann H. Why FAMILIES Matter. Pediatrics. 2014;134(Supplement_2):S97–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Igel C. Großeltern in Europa. Springer. 2012.

  8. Priboi C, Gantner B, Holmer P, da NevesSilva L, Tinner EM, Roser K, Michel G. Psychological outcomes and support in grandparents whose grandchildren suffer from a severe physical illness: a systematic review. Heliyon. 2022;8(5):e09365.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Butow P, Lenthen K, Cohn RJ. Parental adjustment to the completion of their child’s cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(4):524–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakefield CE, Drew D, Ellis SJ, Doolan EL, McLoone JK, Cohn RJ. Grandparents of children with cancer: a controlled study of distress, support, and barriers to care. Psychooncology. 2014;23(8):855–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moules NJ, McCaffrey G, Laing CM, Tapp DM, Strother D. Grandparents’ experiences of childhood cancer, part 2: the need for support. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2012;29(3):133–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wakefield CE, Fardell JE, Doolan EL, Drew D, De Abreu LR, Young AL, Cohn RJ. Grandparents of children with cancer: Quality of life, medication and hospitalizations. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64(1):163–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall EO. A double concern: grandmothers’ experiences when a small grandchild is critically ill. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(1):61–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davey A, Savla J, Janke M, Anderson S. Grandparent-grandchild relationships: from families in contexts to families as contexts. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2009;69(4):311–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maruish M, Maruish M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Gandek B, Turner-Bowker D, Ware JEJ. User’s manual for the SF36v2 Health Survey. 2011. p. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDowell I. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):903–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perrig-Chiello P, Hutchison S, Hoepflinger F. Role involvement and well-being in middle-aged women. Women Health. 2008;48(3):303–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 2009;13(3):595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Franke GH, Ankerhold A, Haase M, Jager S, Togel C, Ulrich C, et al. The usefulness of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) in psychotherapeutic patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2011;61(2):82–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dugas MJ, Freeston MH, Provencher MD, Lachance S, Ladouceur R, Gosselin P, Le Questionnaire sur l’Inquiétude et l’Anxiété. Validation dans des échantillons non cliniques et cliniques. The Worry and Anxiety Questionnaire: Validation in non-clinical and clinical samples. J de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive. 2001;11:31–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weiss DS, Marmar CR. The Impact of Event Scale—Revised. In J. P. Wilson & T. M. Keane. Eds. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. New York: The Guilford Press; 1997. pp. 399–411.

  24. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4);385–96.

  25. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9:455–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Baranowski MD, Schilmoeller GL. Grandparents in the lives of grandchildren with disabilities: Mothers' perceptions. Educ Treat Child. 1999;22(4);427–46.

  29. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Methodische Grundlagen Neuchatel. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. 2023 [Available from:

  30. Wakefield CE, Drew D, Ellis SJ, Doolan EL, McLoone JK, Cohn RJ. “What they’re not telling you”: a new scale to measure grandparents’ information needs when their grandchild has cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):351–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Finbraten HS, Wilde-Larsson B, Nordstrom G, Pettersen KS, Trollvik A, Guttersrud O. Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):506.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rammstedt B, John OP. Kurzversion des big five inventory (BFI-K). Diagnostica. 2005;51(4):195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ravens-Sieberer U, Morfeld M, Stein RE, Jessop DJ, Bullinger M, Thyen U. The testing and validation of the German version of the impact on family scale in families with children with disabilities. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2001;51(9–10):384–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stein RE, Riessman CK. The development of an impact-on-family scale: preliminary findings. Med Care. 1980;18(4):465–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Asendorpf J, Banse R, Wilpers S, Neyer F. Beziehungsspezifische bindungsskalen fur erwachsene (Relationship-specific attachment scales for adults). Diagnostica. 1997;43:289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Asendorpf JB, Wilpers S. Attachment security and available support: closely linked relationship qualities. J Soc Pers Relat. 2016;17(1):115–38.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Breslow L. A quantitative approach to the world health organization definition of health: physical, mental and social well-being*. Int J Epidemiol. 1972;1(4):347–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ, von der Schulenburg JM. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6(2):124–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Methodische Grundlagen [].

  41. Eiser C, Cotter I, Oades P, Seamark D, Smith R. Health-related quality-of-life measures for children. Int J Cancer. 1999;83(S12):87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(4):1–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Christen S, Vetsch J, Mader L, Dehler S, Korol D, Kuehni C, Rueegg CS, Michel G. Preferences for the organization of long-term follow-up in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(8):3425–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Michel G, von der Weid NX, Zwahlen M, Redmond S, Strippoli M-PF, Kuehni CE, Group FtSPO. Incidence of childhood cancer in Switzerland: The Swiss childhood cancer registry. Pediatric Blood Cancer. 2008;50(1):46–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Palonen M, Kaunonen M, Åstedt-Kurki P. Exploring how to increase response rates to surveys of older people. Nurse Res. 2016;23(5):15–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kilsdonk E, Wendel E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van Leeuwen FE, van den Berg MH, Jaspers MW. Participation rates of childhood cancer survivors to self-administered questionnaires: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26:e12462.

  48. Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jorstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to postal questionnaires–a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Groves RM, Cialdini RB, Couper MP. Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1992;56(4):475–95.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Samelson EJ, Kelsey JL, Kiel DP, Roman AM, Cupples LA, Freeman MB, Jones RN, Hannan MT, Leveille SG, Gagnon MM, et al. Issues in conducting epidemiologic research among elders: lessons from the MOBILIZE Boston Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(12):1444–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Study sites

• Jannic Zeller - Kantonsspital Aarau, Aargau, Switzerland

• Monika Imbach - Universitäts-Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland

• Dr. med. Bettina Blank - Universitäts-Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland

• Dr. med. Christina Schindera - Universitäts-Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland

• Pamela Balestra - Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland

• Dr. med. Eva Maria Tinner Oehler - Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

• Rebecca Bächtold - Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland

• Maryline Bovero - Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

• Rodolfo Lo Piccolo - Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland

• Eléna Lemmel - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

• Katja Bannenberg – Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Barbara Gantner - Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Janine Garibay - Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Eva Schweizer - Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Karin Hollenstein - Ostschweizer Kinderspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland

• Nadja Muehlebach – Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Dr. Katharina Roser – Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Salome Christen – Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Dr. Daniela Dyntar – Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

Support for enrollment of participants

• Swiss Paediatric Oncology Group

• Kinderkrebshilfe Schweiz)

Scientific support

• Stefan Boes – Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

• Clare Wakefield - School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia


The GROKids project received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No: 10001C_182129/1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations




GM & KS conceptualized the study design. GM & PFR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. CP, AI, PH & KS provided critical comments and revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisela Michel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Commission in Northwest and Central Switzerland (EKNZ 2020–01409, 23 September 2021). This study complies with the Swiss Federal Laws on data protection (235.1 Federal Act of June 19, 1992, on Data Protection), the Swiss Human Research Act (810.30 Federal Act of September 30, 2011, on Research involving Human Beings) and the Helsinki Declaration. Grandparents sign an informed consent form before receiving the questionnaire set (Study 1 and Study 3). Informed consent forms will be obtained on families enrolled in Study 1 signed by at least one adult in the family. Another informed consent will be obtained for interview participants stipulating consent for audio recording and storage (Study 2). Finally, for the study team to access medical records, parents sign informed consent if the child is < 14 years old, and consent to their child signing an informed consent if the child is 14 and older.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michel, G., Raguindin, P.F., Priboi, C. et al. Acute and long-term psychosocial consequences in grandparents when a grandchild is diagnosed with cancer – the GROKids Project: a population-based mixed-methods study protocol. BMC Psychol 11, 280 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: