Skip to main content
Download PDF

Psychological distress and associated factors among cancer patients in public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BMC Psychology volume 11, Article number: 41 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cancer has great implications for psychological, social, economic, and emotional dimensions. Psychological distress is overwhelming among cancer patients following a confirmed diagnosis. However, little is known about the prevalence of psychological distress and associated factors among cancer patients in Africa Sub-Saharan. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of psychological distress and associated factors among cancer patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer patients from September 15, 2019, to June 30, 2020. A total of 386 cancer patients selected through a simple random sampling technique participated in the study. Data were collected by an interview-administered questionnaire to evaluate psychological distress with a distress thermometer and social support with the Oslo 3-items Social Support Scale. The collected data were entered into Epi-data version 4.2 and exported into SPSS 25 for analysis, and then binary and multivariate logistic regressions were done to identify the association between dependent and independent variables.

Results

A total of 386 study participants were included in the study with a response rate of 91.4%. The prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia was 64.5%. Age > 45 years [AOR = 0.41; 95% CI (0.22–0.77)], marital status of being divorced [AOR = 3.3; 95%CI (1.23–8.71)] and married [AOR = 3.2; 95%CI (1.03–10.40)], rural residence [AOR = 1.5; 95%CI (1.15–5.18)], cancer stage II [AOR = 3.9; 95%CI (1.90–15.50)], stage III [AOR = 3.5;95%CI (1.45–8.44)] and stage IV [AOR = 3.4; 95%CI (1.90–10.11)], co-morbidity [AOR = 0.07; 95%CI: (0.03–0.17)], and moderate social support [AOR = 0.36; 95%CI (0.14–0.60)] and strong social support [AOR = 0.06; 95%CI (0.03–0.12)] were found to be significantly associated with psychological distress.

Conclusion

The prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia was high, and age, marital status, place of residence, cancer stage, co-morbidity, and social support were associated with psychological distress. Therefore, interventions focusing on these findings require special emphasis during designing interventions aimed at decreasing psychological distress.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cancer is a disease condition caused by uncontrolled cell growth and division; as a result, it damages the immune system, a network of organs, tissues, and specialized cells that protect the body from infections as well as other psychosocial function impairments [1]. It remains one of the principal causes of death and concern that do not respect geographical, economic, ethnic, or social barriers, especially in Africa, which remains poorly prepared and gives less priority to cancer epidemics [2]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the incidence of cancer is still rising alongside infectious disease conditions, which are related to low attention to non-communicable diseases, including cancer, low economic status, and scarce diagnostic treatment modalities [3,4,5,6].

Distress ranges from normal fears, worry, and sadness to disabling problems such as clinical depression, generalized anxiety, panic, isolation, or a spiritual or existential crisis [7]. As a result of distress symptoms and psychiatric problems, maladaptive coping and abnormal illness behavior occur [3]. Psychological distress and psychosocial problems that occur due to cancer diagnosis or cancer progression can be expressed as unpleasant emotional or psychological experiences, including depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders, delirium, and other/mood disorders [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].

Globally, cancer is a major public health problem that causes significant psychological problems for patients and families due to its increasing incidence [3, 15]. It causes devastating emotional and financial distress and overall distress [16]. Moreover, it causes a substantial problem for clients so that families or caregivers involved in end-of-life care suffer from psychological morbidity [17]. Psychological morbidity is higher among patients than among family caregivers or the general population [18, 19]. The incidence of diagnosis of psychological problems rises significantly, which accounts for 97.5% of cancer cases who seek help for mental health [20, 21].

Psychological factors that affect the uptake of screening and investigations, decision-making, and adherence to treatment or those factors that negatively impact trust and relationships with a healthcare team can overwhelm a person’s available resources and significantly affect the person's quality of life (QoL), lowering future life satisfaction and the lives of their families and carers [22,23,24]. In Ethiopia, it is estimated that the incidence of cancer cases was 21,563 and 42,722 among males and females, respectively, predominantly breast cancer in females and colorectal cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in males. The incidence has increased due to the increased prevalence and aging population alongside an increasing adoption of cancer-causing behaviors such as smoking, alcohol, and dietary habits [25,26,27]. Despite the ministry of health proposing continuous measurement of the progress and impact of cancer control activities in about 23% of health facilities offering services for cancer cases, the psychological problems cancer patients face are not fully addressed in Africa Sub-Saharan [28]. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress among cancer patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2020.

Methods and materials

Study area and duration

This study was conducted in the oncology unit of public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, which was reserved for inpatient and outpatient oncology services. Of those hospitals, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) is the only oncology center in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia that gives chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, and comprehensive services to clients. There were five clinical oncologists, seven radiotherapists, nine oncology nurses, and 18 nurses working at the oncology units. TASH aspires to become a center of excellence in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with cancer. With the support of Ethiopia's governmental institutions, non-governmental organizations, and international partners, including the International Network for Cancer Treatment and Research (INCTR), the hospital is hoping to develop a comprehensive cancer care program, including a cancer registry, early detection, prevention, standard treatment, and palliative care [29]. The study was conducted from September 15, 2019, to June 30, 2020.

Study design and population

An institution-based cross-sectional study was employed. All randomly selected adult (18 years and older) cancer patients from the oncology unit of public hospitals during the study period were included, except cancer patients who were critically ill (those cancer patients who were unable to communicate during the data collection time due to being critically ill).

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size of this study was determined using a single population proportion formula by considering the following statistical assumptions: prevalence of psychological distress as 50% since there was no study done in Ethiopia regarding psychological distress among cancer patients, 95% confidence interval, and 5% margin of error. The final sample size, including the non-response rate, yielded 422 cancer patients. To select the eligible study subjects, the number of patients followed per week was determined. Hence, 465 patients were attending the oncology department per week. On average, a total of 1,860 cancer patients attend the oncology unit within one month. A total of 422 cancer patients were selected from 1860 reference populations using a simple random sampling technique.

Study variables

The dependent variable was psychological distress and the independent variables included sociodemographic factors (age, gender, residence, marital status), clinical and treatment factors (type of cancer, stage, duration of illness, comorbidity, treatment), and socioeconomic factors (monthly income, social support, educational status, occupation).

Data collection tools and procedures

The data were collected using Amharic version structured interview questionnaires. First, the questionnaire was prepared in the English language, then translated into the Amharic language. Six nurses holding a Bachelor of Science degree were involved in data collection under the supervision of two Master of Science degree students. The training was provided by the principal investigator for the data collectors and supervisors for one day before the data collection on the objective of the study, the measuring tool, and participant recruitment strategies. The questionnaire consisted of socio-demographic factors, clinical-treatment factors, and socioeconomic factors. Patients' charts were assessed if patients did not know some variables like the stage, site of cancer, and receipt of treatment. Stages of cancer range from stage 0–IV based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [30].

A distress thermometer is an effective distress screening instrument for cancer patients. It is a less time-consuming, accepted, and validated tool with a specificity rate of 0.68 to 0.78 and a sensitivity rate that ranges from 0.65 to 0.77. It is a visual analog scale that runs from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress), with a score of > 5 considered as psychological distress and a score of less than 5 considered as no psychological distress. The checklist has five categories, such as practical, physical, family, emotional, and spiritual categories [31].

Oslo 3-items The Social Support Scale (OSS-3) is an important instrument to screen for social and social-related problems. OSS-3 covers different fields of social support and is put together into a composite index of social support by summing up the standardized Z-scores for each item. The sum index is made by summarizing the raw scores, the sum ranging from 3 to 14. Patients with poor support had a 3–8 score, moderate support had a 9–11 score, and strong support had a 12–14 score [32].

Data processing and analysis

The collected data was cleaned, coded, and then entered using Epi-data version 4.2 and then exported into SPSS version 25 for analysis. Basic descriptive analyses were done in terms of central tendency and dispersion value for continuous data and frequency distribution for categorical data based on the natural distribution. Bivariate and multiple logistic regressions were done using a 0.05 level of significance to determine the association of each independent variable with psychological distress. The p-value < 0.05 in the multivariable analysis, was considered statistically significant. The results were expressed as an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval, and p-values were used to measure the association and to identify statistically significant factors of psychological distress.

Results

Socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the study participants

A total of 386 participants participated in the study, with a response rate of 91.4%. Of the study participants, 72.8% were females. All the participants were between the ages 18–91 with a mean age of 45 ± 13.56 standard deviation years. The majority of the participants were ≤ 45 years (n = 215, 55.7%). One-third of participants (33.9%) resided in rural areas. Nearly half of the study participants, 47.9% had educational status in secondary and higher institution programs. Of the study participants, 37.1% of the study participants were employed. The average monthly income of study participants was 2960.8 ± 4459.8 SD ETB and 45.3% of the participants had poor social support (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of a study participant in public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2020 (n = 386)
Full size table

Clinical characteristics of the study participants

Among the study participants, 162 (42%) had breast cancer. Approximately two-thirds (69.9%) of study participants had late-stage cancer at the time of data collection. Of those, 36.0% had a clinical stage IV. The average length of diagnosis was 17.3 + 19.2 SD months. Nearly half of the participants, 184 (47.7%), had received chemotherapy (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of study participants in public hospitals, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2020(n = 386)
Full size table

Prevalence of psychological distress

The prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients was 64.5%. The mean score of psychological distress was 5.44 ± 2.0SD.

Factors associated with psychological distress

In bivariable analysis, age, marital status, place of residence, monthly income, educational status, cancer stage, co-morbidity, and social support were associated with psychological distress among study participants. In multivariable analysis, age, marital status, place of residence, cancer stage, co-morbidity, and social support were associated with psychological distress.

Study participants over the age of 45 years [AOR = 0.41; 95% CI (0.22–0.77)] were 59% less likely to develop psychological distress than those with an age ≤ 45 years. Those study participants who divorced [AOR = 3.3; 95%CI (1.23–8.71)] and married [AOR = 3.2; 95%CI (1.03–10.40)] were 3.3 and 3.2 times more likely to develop psychological distress compared to a single one, respectively. Study participants living in rural areas were 1.5 times more likely to have psychological distress compared with those living in urban areas [AOR = 1.5; 95%CI (1.15–5.18)]. Study participants who had cancer stage II [AOR = 3.9; 95%CI (1.90–15.50)], stage III [AOR = 3.5;95%CI (1.45–8.44)], and stage IV [AOR = 3.4; 95%CI (1.90–10.11)] were 3.9, 3.5 and 3.4 times more likely to developed psychological distress than those diagnosed at stage I, respectively. Study participants who did not have co-morbid conditions were 93.0% less likely to have psychological distress than those with co-morbid conditions [AOR = 0.07; 95%CI: (0.03–0.17)]. Study participants who had moderate social support [AOR = 0.36; 95%CI (0.14–0.60)] and strong social support [AOR = 0.06; 95%CI (0.03–0.12)] were 64.0% and 94.0% less likely to have psychological distress than those who had poor social support, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors associated with psychological distress among cancer patients in public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 386)
Full size table

Discussion

This study explored the prevalence and factors associated with psychological distress among cancer patients in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and found that 64.5% of cancer patients had psychological distress. The current finding was higher than the studies conducted in South Korea (28.5%) [33], China (39.5%) [34], Taiwan (22.1%) [35], Southern India (38.5%) [36], and Australia (7.5%) [37], but it was lower than the studies conducted in Iran (67.7%) [38] and Germany (89.3%, 84.3%) [39, 40]. This discrepancy might be due to differences in the scale used (other researchers used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and in this study, the distress thermometer was used to measure psychological distress), the length of time that the study participants were enrolled, the cutoff point for the distress thermometer's visual analog score, and the presence of different associated factors that precipitate psychological distress. Another possible reason might be due to the difference in sample sizes, income (e.g., minor resources to address all the needs of the patients, minor infrastructures, and public transport to reach the hospital), various situations (social and cultural differences), different cancer types, and the variability in the mental-health system [41, 42].

This study showed that, compared with younger study participants (≤ 45 years), older study participants (> 45 years) were less likely to develop psychological distress. This finding goes together with other studies done in Saudi Arabia [43], Taiwan [35], and Germany [44]. This might be related to the fact that as age increases, experience, copying mechanisms, and ways of handling stress increase [44]. Thus, younger cancer patients may be in particular need of psychological support, promotion of their well-being, and interventions that will increase their resilience and help lessen the psychological distress during cancer treatment.

Our study found that study participants who were married and divorced were more likely to experience psychological distress than those who were single. This finding goes together with the studies done in Saudi Arabia [43], China [34], Southeast Asia [45], and India [36]. The reason that being married makes one more likely to develop psychological distress might be due to holding more responsibility for their home, family, and child care and an imbalance of demand for and supply of resources to their family while being paired. Divorce increases the likelihood of developing psychological distress, which may be due to its effects on stress stimulators, social support, and health-related behavior [38, 46,47,48,49,50]. Therefore, married and divorced participants need psychological support and promotion of their well-being to lessen their psychological distress during cancer treatment.

This study revealed that residing in rural areas was found to be a significant factor in the development of psychological distress. This finding was similar to a previous study conducted in Iran [38] and Athens [51]. This might be related to the fact that participants residing in rural areas have poor access to health care services, low perception of lifestyle modification, relaxation, and recreation for the management of distress, and low seeking behavior to get psychological and mental health counselors or consultations [41, 52,53,54]. Thus, giving special attention to the participants who reside in rural areas is essential. This is done by bringing community-based health education to their dwellings.

In this study, the cancer stage was found to be significantly associated with psychological distress. Study participants who had cancer at stages II-IV were more likely to develop psychological distress than those diagnosed at stage I. This result was similar to other previous studies done in Southeast Asia [45], Athens [51], and India [55]. This might be related to the fact that cancer patients who had advanced stages of the disease (stages II-IV) had severe signs and symptoms of the disease, and the patients are aware that a disease can metastasize and requires adhering to the different types of treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or surgery) [41, 44, 54, 56]. Therefore, emphasizing cancer patients with late stages of the disease is required when designing interventions aimed at decreasing psychological distress. In addition to these, the government should give special emphasis to developing a comprehensive cancer control program that includes prevention, early detection, standard treatment, and palliative care.

The findings of this study showed that the presence of co-morbid conditions was found to be significantly associated with psychological distress, which was similar to other studies done in Germany, South Korea, and Iran [38, 57, 58]. This could be due to symptom burden, and multiple medication use related to the presence of co-morbid conditions, which might cause distress regardless of social support, income, socioeconomic, clinical-pathological, and socio-demographic factors [44, 59]. Thus, participants with co-morbid conditions require psychotherapy to decrease their psychological distress.

In this study, social support was also found to be significantly associated with psychological distress. Study participants who had poor social support were more likely to have psychological distress than those who had moderate or strong social support. This concept goes together with the studies done in Germany [58], Turkey [60], South India [36], and South Africa [61]. This might be related to the fact that poor social support with an increasing disease stage could be related to decreased relationships within social circles and decreased coping mechanisms [57]. Therefore, participants with poor social support need support services or psychosocial care to lessen their psychological distress during cancer treatment.

Strengths and limitations of the study

This study has a couple of strengths. One, it is the first study on psychological distress among cancer patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Secondly, the study used validated standardized questionnaires and a reasonable sample size. Our study also has some limitations. Firstly, the study is cross-sectional, which means it cannot determine the causation or temporality of the association between associated factors among cancer patients. Prospective and experimental studies are warranted. Secondly, the study used an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire for data collection. Using this method to identify psychological distress and associated factors among cancer patients might involve some risk of concealing information, though qualitative interviews can let participants liberally highlight their concerns about psychological distress.

Conclusion

This study revealed that the prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in Addis Ababa public hospitals was high. According to our results, cancer patients presented a high level of psychological distress during their therapeutic process, especially for specific subgroups of patients (e.g., young age (≤ 45 years), divorced or married participants, patients residing in rural areas, having an advanced cancer stage (stages II-IV)). Therefore, promotion of cancer patient's well-being and prevention of their psychological distress are needed to address the encountered mental health difficulties in cancer patients during oncological treatment. In addition to these, the government should give special attention to developing a comprehensive cancer control program that includes prevention, early detection, standard treatment, and palliative care.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACS:

American cancer society

AJCC:

American joint committee of cancer

Ca:

Cancer

CI:

Confidence interval

ETB:

Ethiopian Birr

HADS:

The Hospital Anxiety and depression scale

IRB:

Institutional review board

INCTR:

International network for cancer treatment and research

AOR:

Adjusted odd ratio

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

OSS-3:

Oslo 3 social support scale

SPSS:

Statistical package for social science

SSA:

Sub Saharan Africa

TASH:

Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital

US:

United States

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. What Is Cancer? [https://www.cancer.org/treatment/understanding-your-diagnosis/what-is-cancer.html]

  2. Sylla B, Wild C. Cancer burden in Africa in 2030: invest today and save tomorrow. J Afr Cancer. 2012;4(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grassi L, Spiegel D, Riba M. Advancing psychosocial care in cancer patients. F1000Research. 2017;6.

  4. Dobríková P, Macková J, Pavelek L, AlTurabi LK, Miller A, West DJ. The effect of social and existential aspects during end of life care. Nurs Palliat Care. 2016;1(3):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caruso R, Nanni MG, Riba MB, Sabato S, Grassi L. The burden of psychosocial morbidity related to cancer: patient and family issues. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017;29(5):389–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olaleye O, Ekrikpo U. Epidemiology of cancers in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer; 2017. pp. 3–19.

  7. Holland JC, Bultz BD. The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2007;5(1):3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood DE. National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for lung cancer screening. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;25(2):185–97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huda N. Psychological distress among patients with advanced cancer: a concept analysis. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:v822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lkhoyaali S, El Haj MA, El Omrani F, Layachi M, Ismaili N, Mrabti H, Errihani H. The burden among family caregivers of elderly cancer patients: prospective study in a Moroccan population. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu F, Zhao H, Tong F, Chi I. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to cancer caregivers. Front Psychol. 2017;8:834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Oers HM, Schlebusch L. Anxiety and the patient with breast cancer: a review of current research and practice. S Afr Fam Pract. 2013;55(6):525–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Richards D, Gask L, Dickens C, Coventry P. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (10).

  14. Hindmarch T, Hotopf M. Owen GSJBme: depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meeker CR, Geynisman DM, Egleston BL, Hall MJ, Mechanic KY, Bilusic M, Plimack ER, Martin LP, von Mehren M, Lewis B. Relationships among financial distress, emotional distress, and overall distress in insured patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12(7):e755–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grande G, Rowland C, van den Berg B, Hanratty B. Psychological morbidity and general health among family caregivers during end-of-life cancer care: a retrospective census survey. Palliat Med. 2018;32(10):1605–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bush SH, Lawlor PG, Ryan K, Centeno C, Lucchesi M, Kanji S, Siddiqi N, Morandi A, Davis DH, Laurent M. Delirium in adult cancer patients: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:iv143–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kisely S, Crowe E, Lawrence D. Cancer-related mortality in people with mental illness. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70(2):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anuk D, Özkan M, Kizir A, Özkan S. The characteristics and risk factors for common psychiatric disorders in patients with cancer seeking help for mental health. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sánchez-Hurtado LA, Hernández-Sánchez N, Moral-Armengol D, Guevara-García H, García-Guillén FJ, Herrera-Gómez Á, Ñamendys-Silva SA, Management. Incidence of delirium in critically ill cancer patients. Pain Res. 2018; 2018.

  22. Wu Y, Jin X, Wang Z, Xue Y, Jing L, Zhang T. A Scientometric research on the relationship between psychological factors and oncology based on paper bibliographic coupling analysis. Neuropsychiatry. 2017;7(2):116–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ben-Ezra M, Palgi Y, Shrira A, Abrahami Y, Hodedi E, Haber Y, Wolf JJ, Goldray O, Shacham-Shmueli E. The association between previous psychological trauma and mental health among gastric cancer patients. Eur J Psychiatry. 2011;25(3):122–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL, Halpin SA, Beck AK, Carter G, Wratten C, Bauer J, Forbes E, Booth D. Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e017959.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Memirie ST, Habtemariam MK, Asefa M, Deressa BT, Abayneh G, Tsegaye B, Abraha MW, Ababi G, Jemal A, Rebbeck TR. Estimates of cancer incidence in Ethiopia in 2015 using population-based registry data. J Global Oncol. 2018;4:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Woldu M, Legese D, Abamecha F, Berha A. The prevalence of cancer and its associated risk factors among patients visiting oncology unit, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa-Ethiopia. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2017; 9(04).

  27. Federal Ministry of Health Ethiopia: Disease Prevention and Control Directorate National Cancer Control Plan 2016–2020. [https://www.bing.com/search?q=FMOH.+Federal+Ministry+of+Health+Ethiopia%3A+Disease+prevention+and+control+directorate+national+cancer+control+plan+2016-2020.2015.&cvid=7df7c3089b994fbf99f12d5b577ebdc8&aqs=edge..69i57.1378j0j1&pglt=43&FORM=ANSPA1&PC=EDGEDB]

  28. Gelibo T, Getachew T, Bekele A, Defar A, Amenu K, Taddesse M, Teklie H, Assefa Y, Kebede A. Availability and readiness of services for cancer care at health facilities in Ethiopia: implication for action. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2017;31(1):391–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Etissa EK, Assefa M, Ayele BT. Prognosis of colorectal cancer in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, the only oncology center in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population‐based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. KEnDAll J, Hamann H, Clayton S. Oncology distress screening: distress prevalence, new standards, and implementation. Oncol Issues. 2012;27(6):22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bøen H, Dalgard OS, Bjertness E. The importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2012;12(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim SJ, Rha SY, Song SK, Namkoong K, Chung HC, Yoon SH, Kim GM, Kim KR. Prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress among Korean cancer patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011;33(3):246–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu C, Wang B, Gao Y, Ma X. Prevalence and relationship of malnutrition and distress in patients with Cancer using questionnaires. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiou Y-J, Chiu N-M, Wang L-J, Li S-H, Lee C-Y, Wu M-K, Chen C-C, Wu Y-S, Lee Y. treatment: prevalence and related factors of psychological distress among cancer inpatients using routine Distress Thermometer and Chinese Health Questionnaire screening. Neuropsychiatric Disease. 2016;12:2765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mason A, Juyal R, Das SC, Shikha D, Saini S, Semwal J. Prevalence and correlates of psychological distress among cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in northern India. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2019;6:2223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Banks E, Byles JE, Gibson RE, Rodgers B, Latz IK, Robinson IA, Williamson AB, Jorm LR. Is psychological distress in people living with cancer related to the fact of diagnosis, current treatment or level of disability? Findings from a large Australian study. Med J Aust. 2010;193:S62–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Taghizadeh A, Pourali L, Vaziri Z, Saedi HR, Behdani F, Amel R. Psychological distress in cancer patients. Middle East J Cancer. 2018;9(2):143–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Küttner S, Wüller J, Pastrana T. How much psychological distress is experienced at home by patients with palliative care needs in Germany? A cross-sectional study using the Distress Thermometer. Palliat Support Care. 2017;15(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wüller J, Küttner S, Foldenauer AC, Rolke R, Pastrana T. Accuracy of the distress thermometer for home care patients with palliative care needs in Germany. Palliat Support Care. 2017;15(3):288–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Abu-Odah H, Molassiotis A, Zhao IY, Su JJ, Allsop M. Psychological distress and associated factors among Palestinian advanced cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol. 2022; 13.

  42. Geerse O, Brandenbarg D, Kerstjens H, Berendsen A, Duijts S, Burger H, Holtman G, Hoekstra-Weebers J, Hiltermann T. The distress thermometer as a prognostic tool for one-year survival among patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2019;130:101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Almigbal TH, Almutairi KM, Fu JB, Vinluan JM, Alhelih E, Alonazi WB, Batais MA, Alodhayani AA, Mubaraki MA. Assessment of psychological distress among cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Saudi Arabia. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Peters L, Brederecke J, Franzke A, de Zwaan M, Zimmermann T. Psychological distress in a sample of inpatients with mixed cancer—a cross-sectional study of routine clinical data. Front Psychol. 2020;11:591771.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Woodward ASGmkmnMKSJSPCYCNNB-PM. Health-related quality of life and psychological distress among cancer survivors in Southeast Asia: results from a longitudinal study in eight low-and middle-income countries. BMC Med. 2017;15:1–13.

  46. Cormio C, Caporale F, Spatuzzi R, Lagattolla F, Lisi A, Graziano G. Psychosocial distress in oncology: using the distress thermometer for assessing risk classes. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(11):4115–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mehari H. Divorce: common causes and socio-economic costs–a survey of divorced individuals in Mekelle City. Mekelle University; 2013.

  48. Olson DH, DeFrain J. Marriage and the family: diversity and strengths: Mayfield Publishing Co.; 2000.

  49. Selome A. The economic, social and psychological aspects of post–divorce problems of women in Addis Ababa: the case of women that came to EWLA. In: Unpublished master‘s thesis 2007.

  50. Serkalem B. Divorce: its cause and impact on the lives of divorced women and their children a comparative study between divorced and intact families. Addis Ababa: University School Of Graduate Studies; 2006.

  51. Tsaras K, Papathanasiou IV, Mitsi D, Veneti A, Kelesi M, Zyga S, Fradelos EC. Assessment of depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients: prevalence and associated factors. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2018;19(6):1661.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Loughery J, Woodgate R. Supportive care needs of rural individuals living with cancer: a literature review. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2015;25(2):157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Knaul FM, Farmer PE, Krakauer EL, De Lima L, Bhadelia A, Kwete XJ, Arreola-Ornelas H, Gómez-Dantés O, Rodriguez NM, Alleyne GA. Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief—an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1391–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Belete AM, Alemagegn A, Mulu AT, Yazie TS, Bewket B, Asefa A, Shiferaw WS. Prevalence of depression and associated factors among adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy during the era of COVID-19 in Ethiopia. Hospital-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(6):e0270293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Saxena PP, Kulkarni V, Thapar R, Pai K, Gupta A, Kotian H. Assessment of spectrum of mental disorders in cancer patients. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(6):1312.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hassan A, Saleem AN, Eziada SJ, Bashir A, Gameil A, Elmalik H, Allam A. The prevalence of psychosocial distress among cancer patients: a single institution experience at the State of Qatar. Br J Cancer Res. 2021; 4(2).

  57. Kim GM, Kim SJ, Song SK, Kim HR, Kang BD, Noh SH, Chung HC, Kim KR, Rha SY. Prevalence and prognostic implications of psychological distress in patients with gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Götze H, Brähler E, Gansera L, Polze N, Köhler N. Psychological distress and quality of life of palliative cancer patients and their caring relatives during home care. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(10):2775–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Byles JE, Robinson I, Banks E, Gibson R, Leigh L, Rodgers B, Curryer C, Jorm L. Psychological distress and comorbid physical conditions: disease or disability? Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(6):524–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Şengül MCB, Kaya V, Şen CA, Kaya K. Association between suicidal ideation and behavior, and depression, anxiety, and perceived social support in cancer patients. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2014;20:329.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Skaal L. Prevalence of psychological distress and associated factors in urban hospital outpatients in South Africa. S Afr J Psychiatry. 2012;18(1):10–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First of all, our gratitude goes to the School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health

Sciences, Addis Ababa University, and public hospitals for sponsoring and allowing us to conduct this research. We would like to extend our deepest appreciation to the study participants and data collectors.

Funding

The cost of the study was covered by Addis Ababa University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Center of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Frehiwot Negussie

  2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, 4412, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Berhanu Wordofa Giru, Nete Tewfik Yusuf & Debela Gela

Authors
  1. Frehiwot Negussie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Berhanu Wordofa Giru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nete Tewfik Yusuf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Debela Gela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FN conceptualized and designed the study; collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data; and also drafted the manuscript. BWG, DG, and NTY were involved in data analysis, drafting of the manuscript, and advising on the whole research paper. They were also involved in the interpretation of the data and contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debela Gela.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance for the proposed study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Addis Ababa University, College of Health Science (Protocol No: IRB/066/20/SNM). A permission letter was obtained from Addis Ababa University, College of Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, to the administrator of the study site. A letter of cooperation was secured from the administrative bodies of the hospitals. Consent was obtained from the medical directors and cancer treatment centers' focal persons of public hospitals. Written informed consent had been obtained from them for literate participants and from their literate legally authorized representatives or guardians for illiterate participants before the interview. The privacy of the participants was respected during the interview. Confidentiality of the information was maintained throughout the study by anonymously excluding patient names as identification from the data collection form. The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared that they have no competing interests in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negussie, F., Giru, B.W., Yusuf, N.T. et al. Psychological distress and associated factors among cancer patients in public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 11, 41 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01079-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01079-5

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us