Skip to main content

An examination of procrastination in a multi-ethnic population of adolescents from New Caledonia



Although procrastination has been widely studied in adults, comparatively little work has focused on adolescent procrastination, especially in the Pacific region. As a contribution to knowledge and diversification of population sampling, therefore, we examined procrastination in a multi-ethnic sample of adolescents from New Caledonia. Specifically, we examined gender and ethnic differences in procrastination, as well as sociodemographic and ethnic identity predictors of procrastination.


927 adolescents (474 boys, 453 girls; age M = 13.2 years) completed measures of procrastination and ethnic identity, and reported their ethnicity (Kanak vs. Polynesian vs. European). Sociodemographic data (sex, age, area of residence and socioeconomic status) were also collected.


An analysis of variance indicated significant ethnic (Kanak and Polynesian adolescents had higher procrastination than European adolescents) and sex differences (girls had higher procrastination than boys), but no significant interaction. Regression analysis showed that higher procrastination was significantly associated with sex, ethnicity, age, and the interaction between ethnicity and ethnic identity. Moderation analysis showed that ethnic identity moderated the relationship between ethnicity and procrastination, but only in Kanak adolescents.


Relatively high levels of procrastination were observed in Kanak and Polynesian adolescents, and in girls. These findings, while preliminary, may have important implications for academic attainment in the New Caledonian context.

Peer Review reports


Procrastination is a widespread phenomenon that can be defined as “the voluntary delay of an intended and necessary and/or [personally] important activity, despite expecting potential negative consequences that outweigh the positive consequences of delay” [1]. Although individuals differ in the extent to which they procrastinate [2], cross-national studies have reported that large numbers of adults—between 15 and 30%—engage in problematic procrastination [2,3,4]. Moreover, the prevalence of procrastination may be even higher in some populations: for instance, studies have reported that up to 50% of university students engage in problematic procrastination [5]. Such findings are important because procrastination is associated with a range of negative outcomes, including impaired work and academic performance [6,7,8], poorer psychological well-being [9, 10], negative health behaviours [11,12,13], and poorer sleep quality [14].

Although much is now known about procrastination in adult and especially university samples, surprisingly little research has been conducted with adolescent populations [15]. This is particularly important given the negative association between age and procrastination [2], suggesting that individuals get better at dealing with procrastination as they age. Indeed, some research has suggested that the prevalence of procrastination may be especially high in adolescence [16,17,18], with about 80% of adolescents procrastinating for an hour or more a day [19]. In particular, adolescents tend to procrastinate on unpleasant tasks, such as academic writing and anxiety-inducing tasks [20, 21]. Moreover, the consequences of procrastination in adolescence may be similarly deleterious as it is in adulthood. For example, procrastination in adolescence has been associated with significantly lower self-esteem, poorer academic achievement, greater symptoms of depression, and poorer sleep quality [22,23,24,25].

The little research that is focused on adolescent procrastination is primarily concerned with predictive factors. For instance, an important body of work has shown that perceived parental control is significantly associated with greater adolescent procrastination, whereas perceived parental autonomy is significantly associated with lower procrastination [26]. Likewise, parental attachment styles have also been found to be associated with adolescent procrastination, with maternal and paternal alienation in particular associated with significantly higher levels of procrastination [27]. Other research among adolescents has focused on uncontrolled Internet and smartphone use, which mediates relationships between procrastination and psychological functioning (e.g., sleep quality, stress; [28,29,30]). Beyond psychological traits and behaviours, other relevant research has focused on demographic characteristics that may shape procrastination.

Thus, a small handful of studies have examined sex and cross-national differences in procrastination. In terms of the former, whereas the evidence among adults suggests that men are significantly more likely to procrastinate than women (for meta-analyses, see [31, 32]), findings among adolescent samples are more equivocal. In samples of adolescents from Canada and Singapore, for example, boys were found to have significantly higher levels of procrastination than girls [19]. In contrast, studies of adolescents from Turkey have reported no significant sex difference in levels of procrastination [33, 34]. In terms of cross-national differences, Klassen et al. [19] reported that Singaporean adolescents had significantly higher levels of procrastination than their Canadian peers, which may be ascribed to cross-cultural differences in time orientation and centrality [35]. It remains the case, however, that the vast majority of studies on (adult) procrastination have relied on samples from Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic nations (for exceptions, see [36, 37]).

As a contribution to the literature on adolescent procrastination, the present study sought to examine sociodemographic predictors of procrastination in a hitherto under-researched population, namely adolescents from New Caledonia. Located in the Pacific Ocean, New Caledonia is a special collectivity of France and is divided into three provinces (North Province, South Province, and Loyalty Islands Province), with provincial populations varying in ethnic composition, socioeconomic status (SES), and the degree of urbanisation. The ethnic composition of New Caledonia is especially important: at the 2014 census [38], 39.1% of the population reported having Kanak ancestry (i.e., part of the Melanesian group, indigenous to New Caledonia), 27.2% identified as European, and 10.3% identified as Polynesian (Tahitian and Wallisian), with other groups making up the remainder. While the Kanak tend toward more traditional, collectivist, and Pacific lifestyles and norms, Europeans and other ethnic groups have adopted a more Westernised way of life [39, 40].

A primary objective of the present study, therefore, was to examine possible ethnic differences in adolescent procrastination. This is important, firstly, because we are not aware of any previous study that has considered within-nation ethnic differences in adolescent procrastination. Doing so may, therefore, point to a unique intra-national factor that impacts upon procrastination, although it is difficult to determine a priori how that will play out in the context of New Caledonia. Second, any relationship between ethnicity and procrastination may be complicated by ethnic identity [41]. For instance, one previous study with New Caledonian adolescents reported that more positive ethnic identity was significantly associated higher self-esteem across ethnic groups [42]. In the present case, therefore, we considered the extent to which ethnicity and ethnic identity both in isolation and interactively were associated with procrastination.

The present study

The overall objective of the present study was to examine sociodemographic differences in, and factors associated, with procrastination in a sample of adolescents from New Caledonia. More specifically, we first considered the relationship between procrastination and participant sex, with the expectation that boys would show significantly higher levels of procrastination that girls [31]. Second, we examined the extent to which both ethnicity and ethnic identity—in isolation and also interactively—were associated with adolescent procrastination. Given the dearth of research here, we considered these analyses to be exploratory. Similarly, for exploratory purposes, we also included socioeconomic status and urbanicity of residence in our analyses, as these may pertinent in the New Caledonian context [43]. Finally, we also included participant age, with the expectation that of a negative association between levels of procrastination and age [16]. We acknowledge at the outset the largely exploratory and preliminary nature of our study design, but believe this is offset—to some extent at least—by the inclusion of an under-investigated sample.



The sample for this study consisted of 927 adolescents (474 boys, 453 girls) recruited from New Caledonia (Kanak n = 452, European n = 375, Polynesian n = 100). Participants ranged in age from 10.5 to 16.1 years (M = 13.2, SD = 1.2). Full descriptive information about the sample is reported in Table 1.



To measure the tendency to procrastinate, we used the Procrastination Assessment Scale–Students (PASS; [44]). The original PASS consists of 12 items that were specifically designed to assess procrastination in French-speaking populations (sample item: “When I have work to do, I wait a long time before starting”). However, Osiurak and colleagues [44] also recommended the removal of one item (Item #1) to improve composite reliability. Participants in the present study were, therefore, asked to complete the 11-item version of the PASS, with all items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (false) to 5 (true). Although the PASS has been shown to have adequate internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability up to 11 weeks, and adequate construct validity in French-speaking populations [44], it has not been previously used in New Caledonian adolescents. We, therefore, computed a principal-axis exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with the total sample, using a quartimax rotation. Bartlett’s test of sphericity, χ2[55] = 2185.69, p < .001, and the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (0.86) indicated that the 11 PASS items had adequate common variance for factor analysis. The results of the EFA revealed three factors with λ > 1, but parallel analysis indicated that only one factor from the actual data had λ greater than the criterion λ generated from the random data (λ1 = 3.03 > 1.78, λ2 = 0.53 < 1.27, λ3 = 0.40 < 1.01). As such, we retained one factor, which explained 28% of the common variance. Two PASS items (Items #7 and 5, following the numbering convention from the original 12-item version) had poor item-factor loadings (0.06 and 0.01, respectively), so were discarded. It is likely that this reflects method issues given that Items #7 and 5 are both negatively worded items; alternatively, it may be that these items are less relevant for adolescent populations, given that the PASS was originally developed with university students. All remaining PASS items had adequate item-factor loadings (> 0.46). A final PASS score was, therefore, computed as the mean of the nine retained items (McDonald’s omega = 0.81, 95% CI 0.79, 0.83).

Ethnic identity

Participants completed the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure–Revised [45, 46]. The 6-item MEIM-R is an abbreviated version of the MEIM [47], both of which assess affiliation with one’s ethnic group, and the instrument can be used with adolescents as young as 10 years [48]. Items were rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). In its parent form [45] and in a range of national groups [49], MEIM-R scores have been found to consist of two factors indexing exploration of, and commitment towards, one’s ethnic group. However, among New Caledonian adolescents, MEIM-R scores have been found to reduce to a single dimension consisting of all 6 items [42]. We, therefore, computed an overall score as the mean of all 6 items, with higher scores reflecting greater affiliation with one’s ethnic group. Frayon and colleagues [42] reported that the MEIM-R had adequate composite reliability. In the present study, McDonald’s omega scores was 0.74 (95% CI 0.70, 0.78).


Ethnicity was self-reported by the adolescents from a single question (“What community do you feel you belong to?”) and categorised as recommended by the INSERM report on New Caledonia [50], with the exception that we did not allow participants to choose more than one ethnic group. Participants from other ethnic groups (N = 64) were not included for analysis in the present study because of the small subsample size.


Socioeconomic status (SES) and area of residence were determined as previously described by Frayon and colleagues [42]. Briefly, SES was indexed on the basis of the occupation of the household reference person (defined as the householder with the highest income) and three categories were retained: managerial and professional occupations (higher SES), intermediate occupations (intermediate SES), and routine and manual occupations (lower SES). Area of residence was determined using a European standard [51].


Ethics approval for this project was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of New Caledonia and the project was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki. As part of a larger study, eight secondary public schools were randomly selected to obtain a representative repartition between rural and urban areas, which is, in New Caledonia, 63% and 37%, respectively. The selection criterion was school size (n > 150) to ensure sufficient data in a single field trip. One or two classes were then randomly selected in each of four grades (levels) by a staff member, for a total of approximatively 150 students (6 groups with a mean of 25 students per division). We obtained only 89.5% of the expected data due to parental refusal or no return of the parental agreement. Participants completed an anonymous, paper-and-pencil questionnaire consisting of the measures described above. Adolescents with missing data (n = 71; i.e., around 7%) for one value were then excluded from analyses. Parents gave informed written consent prior to the adolescents’ participation in the study and all participants received written debriefing information at the end of the study. Data were between July 2018 and April 2019.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS v.25. We first examined between-group (Kanak vs. European vs. Polynesian) differences in sample characteristics using univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) or χ2 tests. Next, we computed a 3 × 2 ANOVA with ethnicity (Kanak vs. European vs. Polynesian) and sex (boys and girls) entered as independent variables and PASS scores as the dependent variable. Multivariable linear regression were used to explored factors that were significantly associated with procrastination in each ethnic group separately, as previously described by Frayon and colleagues [42]. PASS scores were the criterion variable and predictor variables in the model were age, sex, SES, area of residence, and MEIM scores. Gender, area of residence, and SES were categorised into groups by creating dummy variables. The moderation effect of ethnic background on the relationship between ethnic identity and procrastination was determined using the PROCESS macro (release 3.4.1) [52]. Ethnicity was the moderator, procrastination was the dependent variable, and the predictor was ethnic identity. Other variables not used in the models (age, SES, area of residence, gender) were entered as covariates.


Sample characteristics and preliminary analyses

Table 1 presents descriptive statistics as a function of ethnicity. Preliminary analyses indicated significant between-group differences in SES (European adolescents had significantly higher SES than Kanak and Polynesian adolescents) and area of residence (Kanak and Polynesian adolescents mostly lived in rural areas, while European and adolescents from other origin mostly lived in urban areas), and ethnic identity (Polynesian and Kanak adolescents had significantly higher scores than adolescents from European and other origin). There were no significant between-group differences in the distribution of sex and age.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics and scores of the participants by ethnicity

Sex and ethnic differences in procrastination

Descriptive statistics for levels of procrastination as a function of sex and ethnicity are reported in Table 2. A 3 × 2 ANOVA showed no significant ethnicity by sex interaction, F(2, 927) = 0.09, p = .916. There was, however, a significant main effect of ethnicity, F(2, 927) = 20.67, p < .001, ηp2 = 0.06. Tukey testing indicated that Kanak and Polynesian adolescents had significantly higher procrastination score than European adolescents (p < .001; ds = 0.47 and 0.70, respectively). All other comparisons did not reach significance (ds = 0.22 to 0.24). Finally, there was a significant main effect of sex F(1, 927) = 5.69, p = .017, ηp2 < 0.01, with girls having significantly higher procrastination than boys (d = 0.22).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for procrastination scores as a function of sex and ethnicity

Regression analysis

Table 3 shows the results of linear models analyses for the total sample and within ethnic group separately. For the total sample, higher procrastination scores were significantly associated with ethnicity (being Kanak or Polynesian), sex (being female), and higher age. Ethnic identity, area of residence, and SES were not significantly associated with procrastination scores in this analysis. In European adolescents, the regression was significant, higher procrastination scores being significantly associated with higher age. In Kanak adolescents, the regression was likewise significant, with higher procrastination scores significantly associated with greater ethnic identity and higher age. In Polynesian adolescents, by contrast, the regression did not reach significance.

Table 3 Linear regression models examining predictors of procrastination among ethnic group

Because of the difference found within ethnic groups, notably concerning the impact of ethnic identity, we computed moderation models to better examine how ethnicity moderates the relationship between ethnic identity and procrastination. The outcome variable was procrastination scores, the moderator was ethnicity, and the predictor was MEIM scores. Other variables (SES, gender, age and area of residence) were added as covariates. After adding the interaction term (ethnicity x MEIM scores), R² changed significantly (ΔR ²= 0.010, p = .007). The conditional effect of ethnic identity scores was significant for Kanak adolescents (b = 0.225, p = .002), but not for European or Polynesian adolescents (b = − 0.068, p = .336, b = 0.297, p = .064, respectively), indicating higher procrastination in Kanak adolescents with higher ethnic identity scores (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Interaction between ethnic identity and ethnicity on procrastination score


Studies of procrastination have primarily focused on adult populations and the smaller body of work on adolescent procrastination has typically relied on samples from Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic nations. In the present study, we conducted an examination of adolescent procrastination in a hitherto under-researched population, namely New Caledonian adolescents. There were a number of important findings in the present study. First, we found that girls had significantly higher procrastination than boys. Second, we found significant between-group differences in procrastination as a function of ethnicity. Third, in regression analyses, we found that—beyond sex and ethnicity effects—procrastination was also significantly associated with older age and the ethnicity by ethnic identity interaction. Some of our findings stand in contrast to both our hypotheses and the findings of other studies, so we highlight these differences below.

In terms of sex differences, we found that girls had significantly higher procrastination than boys. This stands in contrast to findings among adults, where men have generally been found to have significantly higher levels of procrastination than women [31, 32]. The literature on sex differences in adolescence is more equivocal [19, 33, 34] but to our knowledge ours is the first study to report that girls have significantly higher procrastination scores than boys. One possible explanation for our finding is that the relationship between procrastination and sex is affected by national or cultural factors [32]. In the context of New Caledonia, for instance, there may be greater cultural pressure on boys to be successful and to be responsible. As a result, boys may experience greater fear of failure and consequently may be less likely to take risks on tasks [53]. Boys may also be subjected to stricter control during adolescence (e.g., being assigned more responsibility on tasks), which may mean they have fewer avenues to behaviourally express risk-taking, such as through procrastination. It should be noted, however, that the effect size of the sex difference in the present study was small (d = 0.22), which warrants further investigation before firm conclusions are drawn.

In terms of ethnic differences, our results indicated that Kanak and Polynesian adolescents had significantly higher levels of procrastination than European adolescents. It is difficult to explain these differences, especially given dearth of research focused on adolescent procrastination in multi-ethnic nations. One possibility is that it is reflective of ethnic differences in time perspective, that is, an individual’s understanding of one’s psychological past, present, and future [54]. In particular, low future time perspective has been associated with greater procrastination [54] and, importantly, non-European populations in the South Pacific and neighbouring regions have been found to have lower future time perspective than European populations [55]. Another possibility is that European adolescents in New Caledonia experience relatively greater societal pressure to attain success, and as result are less likely to procrastinate. Conversely, the more traditional lifestyles of Kanak and Polynesian adolescents may mean that they experience less strict control during adolescence and, as a consequence, have more opportunities to risk-take over tasks.

Here, we also examined the extent to which ethnic identity interacts with ethnicity, but with the exception of a significant and weak effect in Kanak adolescents, our findings in this regard were mainly null. However, in Kanak adolescents specifically, we did find that a conditional effect of ethnic identity, such that Kanak adolescents who more strongly identified with their ethnicity were more likely to have higher procrastination scores. This broadly supports our contention that ethnic identity (beyond ethnicity per se) complicates how procrastination manifests in specific cultural contexts. Indeed, previous work in the New Caledonian context has shown that greater ethnic identity was associated with significantly higher self-esteem [42]. However, explaining why ethnic identity moderated the relationship between ethnicity and procrastination only in Kanak adolescents is more difficult, particularly as we expected similar relationships across ethnic groups. This is certainly an area that is worthy of further investigation.

In terms of age, we found a positive relationship between age and procrastination scores in our sample. In fact, of the variables included in our analyses, age was the strongest correlate of procrastination. This was contrary to our expectation of a negative relationship [16] and requires some consideration. One possibility is that, within this age group (i.e., 10- to 16-year-olds), levels of procrastination are impacted by the changes in the school system. That is, as adolescents advance through the schooling system, they may begin to procrastinate more when faced with more anxiety-inducing tasks [20, 21]. Relatedly, older adolescents may also be given greater responsibilities or given individual, rather than group-based tasks, which may lead to increased procrastination. An alternative possibility is that our findings are reflective of developmental changes in Conscientiousness [56], a trait that is essential for task completion and responsibility. Although Conscientiousness generally increases with advancing age, it may be that developmental trajectories remain unstable in adolescence and, consequently, have an impact on levels of procrastination. It is important to note, however, that we are not aware of any previous studies that have examined developmental trajectories of procrastination in adolescence and, given our findings, this seems to be worthy of further investigation.

A strength of the present work is the focus on procrastination in an adolescent population that has generally been under-researched. Nevertheless, a number of limitations of the present study should be considered. First, it is unlikely that our sample is representative of the wider adolescent population in New Caledonia. As such, caution should be exercised when thinking about generalising our findings more broadly, whether in New Caledonia or in other Pacific populations. Second, our subsample sizes may have been too small in some cases. We conducted a post hoc power calculation, which indicated that our sample size was adequately powered for regression analysis (power = 0.93), but was slightly less-than-adequate for between-group analyses in terms of ethnicity (power = 0.89). As such, it may be important to replicate our findings with larger groups of New Caledonian adolescents. While data for this study was collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the literature showed that procrastination may have been negatively impacted by COVID-19-related factors [57, 58] and, as such, it would be interesting to replicate our work to determine whether any change has occurred in the New Caledonian context. Finally, we remind readers that this is a preliminary study: there is much more that could be done to better understand procrastination in this population. This might include a focus on parental control and attachment styles [26, 27], as well as outcomes of adolescent procrastination, such as academic performance and psychological well-being [2, 7].


These limitations notwithstanding, our work contributes to the literature on adolescent procrastination by considering the case of a hitherto under-researched population. Our findings are noteworthy, as they suggest that there are moderate-to-large ethnic differences and smaller sex differences in procrastination among New Caledonian adolescents. These results may have important implications for educational programs in New Caledonia. For instance, to the extent that procrastination is associated with poorer academic performance [7], ethnic and sex differences in procrastination may have downstream differential impacts on school achievement. Practitioners working with adolescents may find it useful to consider these differences in their everyday practice and tailor their pedagogic methods appropriately, so that no one group is negatively impacted [53]. From a scholarly point-of-view, further research on procrastination in adolescent populations in samples that have traditionally featured in the research literature is urgently needed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Klingsieck KB. Procrastination. When good things don’t come to those who wait. Eur Psychol. 2013;18:24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steel P. The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrari JR, Díaz-Morales JF, O’Callaghan J, Díaz K, Argumedo D. Frequent behavioral delay tendencies by adults: international prevalence rates of chronic procrastination. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2007;38:458–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hen M, Goroshit M. General and life-domain procrastination in highly educated adults in Israel. Front Psychol. 2018;9. Available from:

  5. Day V, Mensink D, O’Sullivan M. Patterns of academic procrastination. J Coll Read Learn. 2000;30(2):120–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong JC, Lee YF, Ye JH. Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Person Individ Differ. 2021;174:110673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KR, Seo EH. The relationship between procrastination and academic performance: a meta-analysis. Person Individ Differ. 2015;82:26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Melgaard J, Monir R, Lasrado LA, Fagerstrøm A. Academic procrastination and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;196:117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Strongman KT, Burt CD. Taking breaks from work: an exploratory inquiry. J Psychol. 2000;134(3):229–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeh YC, Wang PW, Huang MF, Lin PC, Chen CS, Ko CH. The procrastination of internet gaming disorder in young adults: the clinical severity. Psychiatry Res. 2017;254:258–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sirois FM, Melia-Gordon ML, Pychyl TA. “I’ll look after my health, later”: an investigation of procrastination and health. Person Individ Differ. 2003;35(5):1167–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stead R, Shanahan MJ, Neufeld RWJ. “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: procrastination, stress and mental health. Person Individ Differ. 2010;49(3):175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westgate EC, Wormington SV, Oleson KC, Lindgren KP. Productive procrastination: academic procrastination style predicts academic and alcohol outcomes. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2017;47(3):124–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill VM, Rebar AL, Ferguson SA, Shriane AE, Vincent GE. Go to bed! A systematic review and meta-analysis of bedtime procrastination correlates and sleep outcomes. Sleep Med Rev. 2022;66:101697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martín-Puga ME, Pelegrina S, Gómez-Pérez MM, Justicia-Galiano MJ. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the academic procrastination scale-short form in Spanish children and adolescents. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2022;40(7):880–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beutel ME, Klein EM, Aufenanger S, Brähler E, Dreier M, Müller KW, et al. Procrastination, distress and life satisfaction across the age range: a German representative community study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148054.

  17. Ferrari JR, Olivette MJ. Perceptions of parental control and the development of indecision among late adolescent females. Adolescence. 1993;28(112):963–70.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrari JR, Olivette MJ. Parental authority and the development of female dysfunctional procrastination. J Res Person. 1994;28:87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klassen RM, Ang RP, Chong WH, Krawchuk LL, Huan VS, Wong IYF, et al. A cross-cultural study of adolescent procrastination. J Res Adolesc. 2009;19(4):799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Milgram N, Marshevsky S, Sadeh C. Correlates of academic procrastination: discomfort, task aversiveness, and task capability. J Psychol Interdiscip Appl. 1995;129:145–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Milgram N, Toubiana Y. Academic anxiety, academic procrastination, and parental involvement in students and their parents. Br J Educ Psychol. 1999;69(Pt 3):345–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pychyl TA, Coplan RJ, Reid PAM. Parenting and procrastination: gender differences in the relations between procrastination, parenting style and self-worth in early adolescence. Person Individ Differ. 2002;33(2):271–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang P, Liu S, Zhao M, Yang X, Zhang G, Chu X, et al. How is problematic smartphone use related to adolescent depression? A moderated mediation analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;104:104384.

  24. Yang X, Liu RD, Ding Y, Hong W, Jiang S. The relations between academic procrastination and self-esteem in adolescents: a longitudinal study. Curr Psychol. 2021. Available from:

  25. Pu Z, Leong RLF, Chee MWL, Massar SAA. Bedtime procrastination and chronotype differentially predict adolescent sleep on school nights and non-school nights. Sleep Health 2022. Advance online publication.

  26. Won S, Yu SL. Relations of perceived parental autonomy support and control with adolescents’ academic time management and procrastination. Learn Individ Differ. 2018;61:205–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen BB. Parent-adolescent attachment and procrastination: the mediating role of self-worth. J Genet Psychol. 2017;178(4):238–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gökalp Z, Saritepeci M, Durak HY. The relationship between self-control and procrastination among adolescent: the mediating role of multi screen addiction. Curr Psychol N B NJ. 2022;1–12.

  29. Reinecke L, Meier A, Beutel ME, Schemer C, Stark B, Wölfling K, et al. The Relationship between trait procrastination, internet use, and psychological functioning: results from a community sample of german adolescents. Front Psychol. 2018;9:913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Wang P, Yang X, Zhang G, Wang X, Zhao F, et al. Fear of missing out and procrastination as mediators between sensation seeking and adolescent smartphone addiction. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2019;17(4):1049–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van Eerde W. A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Person Individ Differ. 2003;35(6):1410–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steel P, Ferrari J. Sex. Education and procrastination: an epidemiological study of Procrastinators’ characteristics from a global sample. Eur J Person. 2013;27(1):51–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ozer BU, Demir A, Ferrari JR. Exploring academic procrastination among Turkish students: possible gender differences in prevalence and reasons. J Soc Psychol. 2009;149(2):241–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klassen RM, Kuzucu E. Academic procrastination and motivation of adolescents in Turkey. Educ Psychol. 2009;29(1):69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mann L. Procrastination revisited: a commentary. Aust Psychol. 2016;51(1):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fulano C, Cunha J, Núñez JC, Pereira B, Rosário P. Mozambican adolescents’ perspectives on the academic procrastination process. Sch Psychol Int. 2018;39(2):196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fulano C, Magalhães P, Núñez JC, Marcuzzo S, Rosário P. As the twig is bent, so is the tree inclined: lack of prior knowledge as a driver of academic procrastination. Int J Sch Educ Psychol. 2021;9(sup1):S21-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. ISEE. Structure de la population et évolutions. 2014. Available from:

  39. Frayon S, Cavaloc Y, Wattelez G, Cherrier S, Touitou A, Zongo P, et al. Body image, body dissatisfaction and weight status of Pacific adolescents from different ethnic communities: a cross-sectional study in New Caledonia. Ethn Health. 2020 Feb;25(2):289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wattelez G, Frayon S, Cavaloc Y, Cherrier S, Lerrant Y, Galy O. Sugar-Sweetened beverage consumption and associated factors in school-going adolescents of New Caledonia. Nutrients. 2019;11(2).

  41. Phinney JS. Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. Psychol Bull. 1990;108(3):499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Frayon S, Swami V, Wattelez G, Todd J, Galy O. Associations between weight status, body satisfaction, ethnic identity and self-esteem in Oceanian adolescents. Pediatr Obes. 2021;16(12):e12824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Anderson K. Identity Ignited - The politicisation of ethnicity in Fiji and New Caledonia. 2004. Available from:

  44. Osiurak F, Faure J, Rabeyron T, Morange D, Dumet N, Tapiero I, et al. Déterminants de la procrastination académique: motivation autodéterminée, estime de soi et degré de maximation. Prat Psychol. 2015;21(1):19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Phinney JS, Ong AD. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future directions. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54(3):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tremblay C, Corbière M, Perron J, Coallier JC. Equivalence interculturelle de la mesure d’identité ethnique (MIE). Orientat Sc Prof. 2000;(29/4). Available from:

  47. Phinney JS. The multigroup ethnic identity measure: a new scale for use with diverse groups. J Adolesc Res. 1992;7(2):156–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dandy J, Durkin K, McEvoy P, Barber BL, Houghton S. Psychometric properties of multigroup ethnic identity measure (MEIM) scores with Australian adolescents from diverse ethnocultural groups. J Adolesc. 2008;31(3):323–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Herrington HM, Smith TB, Feinauer E, Griner D. Reliability generalization of the Multigroup ethnic identity measure-revised (MEIM-R). J Couns Psychol. 2016 Oct;63(5):586–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. INSERM. Situation sociale et comportements de santé des jeunes en Nouvelle-Calédonie. 2008.

  51. European Communities. The European Union labour force survey - Methods and definitions – 2001 (Eurostat, Guidelines, Labour statistics, Survey). 2003. Available from:

  52. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford publications; 2017.

  53. Evans BF. Teaching practices that support high achievement in the education of Pacific boys. Unitec Institute of Technology; 2011.

  54. Díaz-Morales JF, Ferrari JR. More time to procrastinators: the role of time perspective. In: Stolarski M, Fieulaine N, van Beek W, editors. Time perspective theory; review, research and application: essays in honor of Philip G Zimbardo. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 305–21. Available from:

  55. Lo KD, Houkamau C. Exploring the cultural origins of differences in time orientation between European New Zealanders and Māori. 2012.

  56. McCrae RR, Costa PT, Pedroso de Lima M, Simões A, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, et al. Age differences in personality across the adult life span: parallels in five cultures. Dev Psychol. 1999;35(2):466–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Doğanülkü HA, Korkmaz O, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. Fear of COVID-19 lead to procrastination among turkish university students: the mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Unda-López A, Osejo-Taco G, Vinueza-Cabezas A, Paz C, Hidalgo-Andrade P. Procrastination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a scoping review. Behav Sci. 2022;12(2):38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the school teaching teams and administrative staffs for their help and support in our investigations, especially the Vice-Rectorat of New Caledonia. We would like to thank Christophe Serra-Mallol, Emilie Paufique, Paul Zongo, Solange Ponidja, Pierre-Yves Le Roux, and Fabrice Wacalie for their help for collecting the data.


This work was supported by the University of New Caledonia, Nouméa, New-Caledonia and the Fondation Nestlé France, Paris, France. The funding had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation and writing of the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SF and OG conceived and designed the experiment. SF, GW, and OG collected the data. SF and VS analysed the data. SF and VS wrote the original draft. All the authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Frayon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research met all legal requirements as well as mandates of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of New Caledonia (CCE 2018-06 001). All parents gave written informed consent prior to the adolescent participation in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frayon, S., Swami, V., Wattelez, G. et al. An examination of procrastination in a multi-ethnic population of adolescents from New Caledonia. BMC Psychol 11, 1 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Procrastination
  • Pacific
  • Oceania
  • Ethnicity
  • Sex differences
  • Adolescence
  • Ethnic identity