Skip to main content

Job insecurity and mental health related outcomes among the humanitarian workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study



The COVID-19 remains a public health burden that has caused global economic crises, jeopardizing health, jobs, and livelihoods of millions of people around the globe. Several efforts have been made by several countries by implementing several health strategies to attenuate the spread of the pandemic. Although several studies indicated effects of COVID-19 on mental health and its associated factors, very little is known about the underlying mechanism of job insecurity, depression, anxiety, and stress in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study determined the prevalence of job insecurity and depression, anxiety, stress as well as the association between job insecurity, mental health outcomes also contributing determinants amongst humanitarian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.


We conducted a web-based cross-sectional study among 445 humanitarian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in six sub-districts of Cox’s bazar district of Bangladesh between April and May 2021. The questionnaire was composed of socio-demographic, lifestyle and work related factors. Psychometric instruments like job insecurity scale and depression, anxiety also stress scale (DASS-21) were employed to assess the level of job insecurity and mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety and stress). STATA software version 14 was employed to perform statistical analyses.


The prevalence of job insecurity was 42%. The odds of job insecurity was higher in Kutubdia and Pekua (AOR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.36, 7.22) Teknaf (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.33, 6.41), the impact of dissatisfaction on salary (AOR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.49, 3.58) was evident with job insecurity. The prevalence of moderate to severe depression, anxiety and stress among humanitarian worker were (26%, 7%), (25%, 10%) and (15%, 7%) respectively. Further, the region of work, being female, marital status, work environment, and salary dissatisfaction were contributing factors for poor mental health outcomes. Those with job insecurity were almost 3 times more likely to experience depression (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.85, 4.04), anxiety (AOR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.76, 3.71) and stress (AOR: 2.8; 95% CI 1.89, 4.26), respectively.


Our findings highlight that job security remains essential to help tackle the severity of depression, anxiety and stress in humanitarian workers. The results reflected the critical importance of local and international NGOs addressing poor mental health conditions of their employees to prevent mental health outbreaks.

Peer Review reports


The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global health and economic crisis, jeopardizing the health, jobs, and livelihoods of millions of people around the globe [1]. Many countries have implemented various health strategies to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus, including lockdown, closure of non-essential enterprises, and the recommendation to stay and work from home. As a result, numerous productive sectors (from major to small businesses) have been forced to halt operations, resulting in job insecurity, job loss, or temporary layoff of a substantial workforce [2, 3]. Along with the manufacturing, construction, and urban informal economic sectors, the service sector has also been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic [4]. In particular, the development sector has experienced major funding cuts with decrements in projects, which resulted in severe employment losses [5]. Hence, to understand the nature of job insecurity and its subsequent impact on the mental health-related outcomes among the humanitarian workers in the development sector, this study assessed the prevalence and determinants of job insecurity and its associated impact on mental health-related outcomes amongst the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In this regard, job insecurity is a complex topic or two-dimensional topic to understand, as people around the world may face both qualitative and quantitative forms of job insecurity. Quantitative job insecurity refers to the uncertainty about the survival of the job in the future or relates to the employees about the continued existence of their job in the future whereas qualitative job insecurity is related to the concern of employees about the extent to which their job features may unfavorably change [6]. Preceding studies showed that these dual types of job insecurity can result in negative outcomes or well-being related outcomes that include individual effects (such as mental problems and emotional distresses) and organizational effects (such as lower job satisfaction, lower job commitment, higher turnover intention, reduction of organizational products or productivity) [7]. Further, due to COVID-19, most government and non-government funds had to be diverted from the development projects to help support the general public during lockdowns [8, 9]. For example, the United Kingdom Agency for International Development (UKAID), one of the world’s largest donors, has already declared a £2.9 billion (USD 3.7 billion) reduction of such aid budget. A study showed that around 46% of organizations lost donor funding, with around 60% of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) employees losing their jobs in 2020. In addition, leading NGO (such as Oxfam) have announced job cuts and furloughs in 2020, as the pandemic disrupted income flows and development initiatives [10].

Consequently, workers throughout the world perceived moderate to severe levels of job insecurity. For instance, compared to the non-pandemic phases, a relatively high prevalence of job insecurity was reported in Serbia (30%) and Belgium (21%) [11, 12]. Job insecurity was also observed in USA [13], Australia [14] and Saudi Arabia [15] during COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to other regions, Asia has been equally affected [16]. The development workers in countries like Bangladesh were particularly vulnerable to job insecurity, as much of the development and humanitarian projects in these countries depend on government and foreign funding [17]. Then, the dramatic declines in employment opportunities suggest that significant job uncertainty and financial worries are inevitable [18]. Recent research documented a remarkable increase in mental disorders like anxiety and depression due to job insecurity in the COVID-19 pandemic [19, 20]. These findings are consistent with the results of studies conducted on the economic stressor and mental health of different study populations in Bangladesh [21, 22]. Additionally, past studies reported that job insecurity during the pandemic could be a significant risk factor of mental health disorders for not only the general population but also for humanitarian workers [3, 23,24,25].

Although job insecurity and mental health disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic have been studied for different sectors in Bangladesh, much of the conclusions about humanitarian workers are derived from the studies conducted in other countries. However, the socioeconomic context of Bangladesh is quite unique, and due to the recent influx of Rohingya refugees in the southeastern part of Bangladesh, a huge humanitarian workforce has been deployed to support the 1.3 million Rohingya refugees [26]. Therefore, to address existing gaps in knowledge on COVID-19 related job insecurity and the subsequent impact on the mental health of humanitarian workers in Bangladesh, this cross-sectional study has set to fulfill three specific objectives:

  1. (a)

    Analyze the prevalence and determinants of job insecurity among the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh.

  2. (b)

    Assess the prevalence and determinants of job insecurity induced poor mental health outcomes of the humanitarian workers.

  3. (c)

    Evaluate the impact of job insecurity on mental health outcomes of the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh.


Study design and participants

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 466 humanitarian workers from different humanitarian organizations of the Cox’s Bazar district in Bangladesh. They were recruited using the convenience sampling. However, as 21 questionnaires presented incomplete data, only 445 respondents were considered in the data analysis. Further, we used convenient sampling to select the respondents because of two specific reasons. First, this study aimed to capture the precise understanding of job insecurity and the perceived mental health conditions of the respondents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, the study was time-sensitive and required a fast completion to avoid any recall bias. Second, this study did not receive any external funding, and the scope to adopt a more sophisticated sampling procedure was limited by resource constraints. However, non-probability sampling, such as convenience sampling, has been proven to be highly effective in reaching respondents in time-sensitive studies, where the findings do not require generalization beyond the study population [27]. In this regard, convenience sampling perfectly aligned with our primary objective since we aimed to study job insecurity and its associated effect on the mental health of humanitarian workers in Bangladesh.

Study settings

The present study was conducted in 6 sub-districts (Upazilas) of Cox’s Bazar district in Bangladesh. The sub-districts include Cox’s Bazar Sadar, Ukhiya, Teknaf, Moheshkhali, Kutubdia and Pekua. The Cox’s Bazar is home to 2,289,990 people, covering an area of 2,492 km², and with a sex ratio of 104 [28]. The Cox’s Bazar district was selected because it hosts one of the five world’s largest refugee camps [29]. A total of around 1.2–1.3 million Rohingya refugees or Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMN) reside in these camps [26, 30]. Thus, about 50 national and international non-governmental organizations are currently operating in this district to provide various services to the local host community and the FDMN [31].

Data collection procedures

Data collection was carried out from April to May 2021 using a self-reporting questionnaire. Due to COVID-19, an online survey form was created to collect data from the study participants. The online survey link was initially shared among various humanitarian worker groups through popular social media platforms such as Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp, and LinkedIn. Participants were also requested to share the survey link with their colleagues. In addition, a mailed questionnaire was used to acquire data from participants who were not active on social media.

Study variables

Based on existing literature, we collected information on four major types of independent and dependent variables: (1) socio-demographic, (2) lifestyle and work (3) job insecurity, and (4) mental health conditions (depression, anxiety, and stress).

Explanatory variables


Collected data were age, sex (male and female), monthly income (in BDT/Bangladeshi Taka), marital status, education, and location of the workplace (Cox’s Bazar Sadar, Kutubdia and Pekua, Moheshkhali, Teknaf, Ukhiya). Although Kutubdia and Pekua are two different sub-districts, due to the small number of participants, these two regions were grouped into one category and coded as ‘Kutubdia and Pekua’ during data analysis.

Lifestyle and work

Lifestyle variables included smoking, drinking alcohol, and physical exercise. This information was taken as a binary “Yes/No” response. Work-related factors, such as the type of organization, were categorized into international non-governmental organizations (INGO), non-governmental organizations (NGO), and United Nations (UN). The type of contract was classified as permanent or temporary. As the organizations provide services to both the host community and Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals (FDMN), the service types were classified into host community and FDMN.

The job designations were categorized based on job responsibility, such as low, middle, and top levels. Top-level authority was considered as job roles involving the preparation of the organizational objectives, policies, and plans. Contrastingly, the middle-level jobs were considered as those that are directly accountable to top management for the operations of their respective departments and required more commitments to organizational and directional functions. Finally, at the low level, the employee was considered to execute and coordinate day-to-day workflow, which ensures completion of the projects and meeting the deliverable targets [32]. Furthermore, for assessing the working conditions, we asked whether the study participants were satisfied with the working environment and salary. The response was taken as a “Yes/No” response.

Outcome variables

Job insecurity scale (JIS)

JIS is a 4-item psychometric instrument developed by De Witte (2000) and validated by Vander Elst et al. [7]. This instrument is used to assess perceived job insecurity. It is also a global measure of job insecurity that corresponds to our understanding of job insecurity. It includes items referring to the threat or possibility of losing a job and items responding to the fears associated with job loss. The four items in the scale included ‘‘Chances are, I will soon lose my job’’, ‘‘I am sure I can keep my job’’ (reverse coded), ‘‘I feel insecure about the future of my job’’, and ‘‘I think I might lose my job in the near future’’. Respondents were asked to rate these items on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing ‘‘strongly disagree” and 5 referring to ‘‘strongly agree”. The total Scoring was calculated by the items’ sum and then divided by the number of items on the scale, which led to a score between 1 and 5. A higher score from 4–5 was defined as job insecurity, and ‘3’ was considered as the neutral midpoint. In the English version of the JIS, Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.82 [7]. The JIS in our study represented a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s Alpha, α = 0.62) and these findings were supported by the previous studies which documented that the psychometric instrument with an internal consistency of more than 0.6 are categorized to be in acceptable range and then these psychometric instrument can be administered among the respondents [33, 34].

Depression, anxiety and stress scale-21 items (DASS-21)

The DASS-21 is a 21-item self-report psychometric instrument used to assess the level of depression, anxiety, and stress. This instrument was modified and simplified based on the original version composed of 42 items or DASS-42 [35]. The scale was previously used to measure the psychiatric comorbidity in different populations, such as psychiatric patients [36], general workers [37], and healthcare workers [38] during COVID-19. This study employed the version of DASS-21 adapted among the population of Bangladesh in order to measure the severity of depression, anxiety, and stress. Then, DASS-21 is a self-reported instrument that has 21 questions with three sub-scales. Each sub-scale has 7 items of depression, anxiety, stress and is based on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (“never”) to 3 (“always”) [35]. The sum scores are derived by adding the scores from each sub-scale of depression, anxiety, and stress and multiplying the sum with two. Therefore, the value of the DASS-21 score lies between 0 and 42. The cut-off scores for depression were: normal (0–9), mild depression (10–13), moderate depression (14–20), severe depression (21–27), and extremely severe depression (28 and above). Similarly, the cut-offs for stress were: normal (0–14), mild stress (15–18), moderate stress (19–25), severe stress (26–33), and extremely severe stress (34 and above).Moreover, the cut-off scores for anxiety were: normal (0–7), mild anxiety (8–9), moderate anxiety (10–14), severe anxiety (15–19), and extremely severe anxiety (20 and above). In the original Bangla version DASS-21, Cronbach’s Alpha values for depression subscales were 0.99 and for anxiety, stress subscales were 0.96 [39]. In the present study, the internal consistency for the depression, stress and anxiety subscales were satisfactory (Alpha of Cronbach, α = 0.79, α=0.77) respectively.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the STATA Version.14.1 SE (Stata Corp 2015, College Station, TX, USA). The job insecurity and the mental health outcomes, specifically depression, anxiety, and stress, were treated as separate outcome variables. The association between each of the two outcomes and the socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, and work-related variables were assessed using the regression technique. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages of variables, were calculated to describe socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and work-related variables. Further, the unadjusted association between each of the categorical variables with job insecurity and depression, anxiety, also stress were assessed using the Chi-square test. The binary logistic regression model was used to find out the association between job insecurity and relevant exposures. The ordinal logistic regression models were constructed to capture the associations between socio-demographic and other variables with depression, anxiety, also stress levels in the DASS-21 instrument. In both binary and ordinal regression models, known confounders and covariates were adjusted. The exposures were added into the binary or ordinal logistic models if the p value ≤ 0.15 in the crude odds ratio estimates. The results were reported using adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). In cases where p values were reported, a p value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.


The study was carried out following the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration [40].

The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee of the Public Health Nutrition Research Committee of the Department of Public Health Nutrition, Primeasia University (Reference number: PAU/PHN/2021/001). After accepting our online invitation to participate in the study, the respondents were provided with the consent form through a secured and private link. Prior to data collection, the respondents were informed about the study objectives, advantages, risks, and confidentiality of involvement in the study. Then, the written and signed informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality was respected. The participants were only asked to fill out the research questionnaire if they had consented to participate. All data were stored in a depersonalized and anonymised state.


The findings suggest that the study participants were primarily located in the Ukhiya region (58.2%), with few respondents from Cox’s Bazar Sadar (6.3%). Most of the respondents were working in non-governmental organizations (58.9%) and were middle-level employees (48.3%). Additionally, more than half of the study participants were female (54.2%), aged between 25 and 30 years (52.8%), and were married (57.3%). When work-related factors were assessed, 51% of the participants were found to be engaged in services related to the FDMN, having completed at least a postgraduate degree (37.1%). Moreover, 90.1% were employed under a temporary contract, and 80.9% were satisfied with their working environment and 63.8% with their salary. About one-third of the study participants belonged to the low-income category (< BDT15000/SD 174). The results of lifestyle-related variables showed that 15.1% were smokers, 5.6% alcohol users, and 82.9% exercised regularly. Further details on the respondents are tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants in humanitarians (N = 445)

Our result indicated that 42% of study participants suffered from job insecurity. 26%, 7%, and 5% of the humanitarian workers were suffering from moderate, severe, and extremely severe types of depression, respectively. The prevalence of moderate, severe, and extremely severe types of anxiety were 25%, 10%, and 16%, respectively. However, the prevalence of moderate, severe, and extremely severe types of stress was 15%, 7%, and 3%, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and stress)

Figure 2. Reports the determinants of job insecurity among the humanitarian workers. Participants from Kutubdia and Pekua (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.36, 7.22) and Teknaf (AOR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.33, 6.41) were almost three times more likely to experience job insecurity compared to those from Ukhiya. Dissatisfaction with the salary was significantly associated with job insecurity (AOR: 2.3; 95% CI 1.49, 3.58) among the respondents. In individual and unadjusted models, we found that males (UOR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.08, 2.31), completion of post-graduation degree (UOR: 2.0, 95% CI 1.26, 3.16), dissatisfaction with working environment (UOR: 2.0; 95% CI 1.25, 3.25) and smoking (UOR: 2.1; 95% CI 1.25, 3.59) were associated with job insecurity. However, these variables became insignificant when adjusted for potential confounders and covariates (Fig. 2) or see Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Determinants of job insecurity among the humanitarian worker (Circle: Reference category; square: odds ratio; left and right hand arm of the square: 95% confidence interval)

Approximately 36.5% and 7.4% of the study participants with job insecurity had suffered from moderate and extremely severe forms of depression (AOR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.85, 4.04). In comparison, only 17.6% and 2.7% of the participants with job insecurity had experienced moderate and extremely severe depression. The respondents who were employed in Cox’s Bazar Sadar (AOR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.36, 6.72), Kutubdia and Pekua (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI 1.15, 6.27) were more likely to be depressed compared to the respondents of Ukhia. Participants who provide services to FDMN were 2.7 (95% CI 1.52, 4.96) times more likely to have mild to extremely severe depression than the respondents who worked with the host community. Regarding marital status, participants who were not married (never married, widowed, divorced) were 1.6 times (95% CI 1.13, 2.38) more likely to be depressed than the married people. Dissatisfaction on workplace environment was associated with higher depression rates (AOR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.01, 2.75) compared with those who were satisfied with their workplace environment. The odds of being depressed were likely to be higher among the participants who smoked daily (AOR: 2.1; 95% CI 1.2, 3.81) and who did not engage in physical exercise (AOR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.01, 2.71) (Fig. 3) or see Additional file 1: Table S2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Determinants of depression among the humanitarian worker using ordinal logistic regression (Circle: Reference category; square: odds ratio; left and right hand arm of the square: 95% confidence interval)

About half of the humanitarian workers with no job insecurity had experienced a normal anxiety level. In contrast, anxiety was at the normal level for only one-fourth of the participants with job insecurity. Compared to participants without any job insecurity, about 27% of participants with job insecurity reported higher anxiety levels (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.76, 3.71). Respondents who worked in Cox’s Bazar Sadar were almost 3 times more likely to experience anxiety (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.23, 5.48), whereas the respondents who worked in Moheshkhali were least likely (AOR = 0.5; 95% CI 0.32, 0.92) to have any anxiety when compared to their counterparts (Fig. 4) or see Additional file 1: Table S3.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Determinants of anxiety among the Humanitarian Worker using ordinal logistic regression (Circle: Reference category; Square: odds ratio; left and right hand arm of the square: 95% confidence interval)

Approximately 20.1%, 11.1% and 6.3% of study participants with job insecurity experienced from moderate, severe and extremely severe stress, respectively (AOR: 2.8; 95% CI 1.89, 4.26), compared to those without job insecurity (11.7%, 3.5 and 1.2%). The location, designation, and educational qualification were significantly associated with stress in the unadjusted models, but no association was observed in the adjusted analyses. Participants who were not satisfied with their working environments were almost twice stressed (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.15, 3.09) compared to the satisfied group (Fig. 5) or see Additional file 1: Table S4.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Determinants of stress among the Humanitarian Worker using ordinal logistic regression (Circle: Reference category; Square: Odds ratio; Left and right hand arm of the square: 95% Confidence Interval)


The major purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of job insecurity and depression, anxiety, stress. It also assessed the association between job insecurity and mental health outcomes as well as their contributing determinants amongst humanitarian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Further, COVID-19 pandemic causes a tremendous burden on every aspect of human life, including social, economic, and health. It also causes deterioration in mental health conditions among the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh. Due to a substantial reduction in funding, the size of the development and humanitarian projects was reduced during this period, resulting in job losses which increased job insecurity, followed by poor mental health conditions among these workers. This study observed that humanitarian workers with job insecurity were more likely to suffer from adverse mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, and stress.

The prevalence of job insecurity among humanitarian workers is substantially high in Bangladesh. The estimated prevalence in this study is 42%, which is consistent with several recent studies. For example, a survey carried out on employed adults from 27 countries reported that 37% are worried to some extent, 54% are worried and 17% are very worried about losing their job [41]. Another study in the United States found the prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe employment insecurity to be 19%, 23%, and 22%, respectively, amongst the already employed individuals [18]. Thus far, there are no prevalence estimates on job insecurity for the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh, especially during the COVID-19 period. Therefore, the findings in this study would guide employers and policymakers to alleviate job insecurity and overcome this mental health-deteriorating burden among the vast humanitarian workforce working in one of the five largest refugee sites in the world [29].

A number of studies suggest COVID-19 is likely to have significant impacts on mental health related outcomes [42,43,44]. However, the data from the present study revealed that the prevalence of depression (26% & 7%), anxiety (25%, 10%) and stress (15%, 7%) are within the moderate and severe range, respectively. In Bangladesh, there is a lack of comparable statistics on both prevalence and predictors of depression, anxiety, and stress among the humanitarian worker during or before the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to present study elevated level of depression (33.4%) and stress (44.1%), while lower prevalence of moderate (13.8%) and severe anxiety (2.3%) was observed in 7 eastern African countries (Kenya, Rwandan, Somalia, Sudan, Ethiopia, Tanzanian) among humanitarian and healthcare workers [45]. In the USA, study on employed population observed a lower rate of moderate to severe depression and anxiety (8.9%, 3.6% vs. 16.4%, 8.5%) [18]. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, in South Sudan and Kosover the overall prevalence of depression (39%, 8.6%) and anxiety disorder (38%, 17.1%) was prevalent among humanitarian workers, respectively [46, 47]. The difference in study findings is due to different measurement scales and result of depression, anxiety, stress should be interpreted cautiously.

The present study revealed that participants from Kutubdia & Pekua, Teknaf were suffering more (60%) from job insecurity in comparison to Ukhiya. Maybe the reason is that most of the projects are short-term in these three regions (Kutubdia & Pekua, Teknaf), and a few organizations are working there. A study in Sudan on Humanitarian workers stated that during COVID-19, several organizations have had to shut down entirely due to a lack of funding [48]. As a result, there may be the possibility of chances of job uncertainty among the humanitarian worker. On the other hand, salary acts as a motivation and increase job satisfaction among the worker [49]. In accordance with preceding studies [50, 51], in the current study, job insecurity is significantly associated with salary dissatisfaction.

Participants from Cox’s Bazar Sadar, Kutubdia and Pekua were associated with a higher risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms. A possible cause of these findings is that participants from Kutubdia & Pekua already suffered from high job insecurity. Moreover, most of the participants from Cox’s Bazar Sadar are from managerial positions. Nearly all organizations have offices in Cox’s Bazar Sadar since they need to coordinate with district government offices and their respective sectors. A study from Harvard Business Review stated that supervisors, managers, and middle managers had the highest likelihood of depression and anxiety due to lack of autonomy and work pressure [52]. Participants who worked for the FDMN community were more likely associated with depression than their colleagues who work in the host community. The humanitarian aid sector already operates in a complex environment, and those who work in emergency response are finding it more challenging [53]. FDMN workers suffered more from depression as they witnessed the traumatic event of FDMN community.

Another possible reason for the mental health degradation of humanitarian employees could be due to loneliness caused by not being married or the loss of spouses (divorced or widowed). Studies found that married people are less likely to have mental disorders than those who are single, divorced, or widowed [54]. These findings are consistent with the results we obtained in this study. The present study also showed that not performing physical exercise and smoking were associated with depression. These results are collaborating with the previous studies [45, 55]. In concur with a previous study conducted among humanitarian and healthcare workers reported [45], females from humanitarian settings are more likely to have anxiety than males. Surprisingly, most of our predicting variables do not have any effect on stress except job insecurity and satisfaction with the working environment.

As discussed, job insecurity is associated with adverse mental health outcomes. During the COVID-19 outbreak, many people in low-middle income countries lost jobs and experienced severe financial constraints, increasing the misery in lockstep with employment insecurity [5, 12, 19]. As a result, persistent health, social, and financial insecurity has led to the deterioration of mental strength, followed by mental illness [21, 22, 24, 56, 57]. In concordance with the previous studies, our findings confirm the detrimental impacts of job insecurity on mental health. We observed that people with job insecurity are more likely to suffer from mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, and stress.

Strength, limitations and future directions

The strengths of this study stem from its major contributions to the knowledge of challenges faced by humanitarian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, this is the first-ever study in Bangladesh, aiming to assess the prevalence and predictors of job insecurity and mental health-related outcomes (depression, anxiety, and stress). Furthermore, the study explored the potential impacts of job insecurity on depression, anxiety, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic among the humanitarian workers in Bangladesh. The findings of this study imply that strategies for humanitarian workers should be put into action to mitigate the psychological effects. The results also suggest that the potential long-term implications of job insecurity and the associated mental health complications on these workers should be studied further in detail. Humanitarian employees are the major workforces assisting the devastated and help-seeking population across the world, and therefore, it is imperative that their job insecurities are minimized and mental health promotion initiatives are undertaken.

Despite the significance of the study, there are limitations that need to be considered. First, there is an insufficient number of studies on humanitarian workers in Bangladesh, so we were unable to compare and validate our local-specific results. Second, this study was cross-sectional. Hence, we could not establish causal links between job insecurity and mental health outcomes. Third, data was gathered through self-reported surveys, which results in unavoidable reporting bias. However, the lag between the apex of the COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh and the time when this study was conducted is quite small. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that any reporting and recall bias was not substantial enough to impact the findings adversely. Lastly, we did not look at how respondents’ lifestyles changed during the COVID-19 pandemic or how COVID-19-related factors had affected our dependent measures. For researchers, longitudinal surveys might be incorporated in future studies, which would enable examining whether there is a causal relationship between job insecurity and mental health-related outcomes. Future studies may be conducted on the same issues, and study designs may be improved by incorporating these or other similar variables. It will help us visualize non-pandemic scenarios on job insecurity and mental health-related outcomes of humanitarian workers.


In summary, our study demonstrated the presence of job insecurity, depression, anxiety, and stress among humanitarian workers during the COVID-19. Factors determined to be associated with job insecurity were salary dissatisfaction and region of the workplace such as Teknaf, Kutubdia, and Pekua. Job insecurity was significantly associated with depression, anxiety and stress. Moreover, depression and anxiety were associated with the working region, sex and marital status. This study highlights the need for mental health assessment and proper management of these issues during the pandemic like COVID-19. These findings call on policymakers to increase job opportunities with the aim of enhancement of job security Also, mental health policies in humanitarian settings need to be prioritized for reducing the magnitude of depression, anxiety and stress .

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data and information can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. OECD. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on jobs and incomes in G20 economies. ILO-OECD Pap Prep Req G20 Leaders Saudi Arab G20 Pres 2020. 2020;46. On 12th Apr 2022.

  2. Douglas M, Katikireddi SV, Taulbut M, McKee M, McCartney G. Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. BMJ. 2020;369:m1557.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Obrenovic B, Du J. The threat of COVID-19 and Job insecurity impact on depression and anxiety: an empirical study in the USA. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Islam R. The impact of COVID-19 on employment in Bangladesh: pathway to an inclu-sive and sustainable recovery [Internet]. Vol. 11. Bangladesh: Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies-BILS; 2020. p. 1–39. 18th December 2021.

  5. Smith E. Financial crisis deepens for the development sector | Devex [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. On 21st Jan 2022.

  6. Charkhabi M. Quantitative job insecurity and well-being: testing the mediating role of hindrance and challenge appraisals. Front Psychol. 2019;9:1–10. On 30th November 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vander Elst T, De Witte H, De Cuyper N. The job insecurity scale: a psychometric evaluation across five European countries. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2014;23(3):364–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashraf BN. Economic impacts of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: international evidence from financial markets. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020;27:100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29. PMID: 32835011; PMCID: PMC7323651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jørgensen F, Bor A, Lindholt MF, Petersen MB. Public support for government responses against COVID-19: assessing levels and predictors in eight Western democracies during 2020. West Eur Politics. 2021;44(5–6):1129–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Emma Smith VC. COVID-19 job losses accelerate in development sector, survey results say | Devex [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 2]. On 31st Jan 2022.

  11. Blanuša J, Barzut V, Knežević J. Intolerance of uncertainty and fear of COVID-19 moderating role in relationship between job insecurity and work-related distress in the Republic of Serbia. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lippens L, Moens E, Sterkens P, Weytjens J, Baert S. How do employees think the COVID-19 crisis will affect their careers? PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganson KT, Tsai AC, Weiser SD, Benabou SE, Nagata JM. Job insecurity and symptoms of anxiety and depression among U.S. young adults during COVID-19. J Adolesc Heal [Internet]. 2021;68(1):53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daly A, Carey RN, Darcey E, Chih H, Lamontagne AD, Milner A, et al. Using three cross-sectional surveys to compare workplace psychosocial stressors and associated mental health status in six migrant groups working in Australia compared with Australian-born workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Basyouni SS, El Keshky MES. Job Insecurity W-R Flow, and Financial Anxiety in the Midst of COVID-19 Pandemic and Economic Downturn. Front Psychol. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. ILO. Recommendations for garment manufacturers on how to address the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. 2020. On 21st Oct 2021.

  17. Feinstein O, Beckhttp T. Evaluation of development interventions and humanitarian action Evaluation of Development Interventions and Humanitarian Action. In: The SAGE handbook of evaluation evaluation of development interventions and humanitarian action. 2006 [cited 2022 Apr 16];537–58.

  18. Wilson JM, Lee J, Fitzgerald HN, Oosterhoff B, Sevi B, Shook NJ. Job insecurity and financial concern during the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with worse mental health. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62(9):686–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan KI, Niazi A, Nasir A, Hussain M, Khan MI. The effect of COVID-19 on the hospitality industry: The implication for open innovation. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2021;7(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruffolo M, Price D, Schoultz M, Leung J, Bonsaksen T, Thygesen H, et al. Employment uncertainty and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic initial social distancing implementation: a cross-national study. Glob Soc Welf. 2021;8(2):141–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali M, Uddin Z, Hossain A. Prevalence of mental health symptoms and its effect on insomnia among healthcare workers who attended hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic: a survey in Dhaka City. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ali M, Uddin Z, Hossain A. Economic stressors and mental health symptoms among Bangladeshi rehabilitation professionals: a cross-sectional study amid COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lippert JF, Furnari MB, Kriebel CW. The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on occupational stress in restaurant work: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, Mensi S, Niolu C, Pacitti F, Di Marco A, Rossi A, Siracusano A, Di Lorenzo G. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. WHO. Providing mental health support in humanitarian emergencies: an opportunity to integrate care in a sustainable way [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. On 11th Jan 2022.

  26. Mehedi N, Hossain MI. COVID-19 crisis and the necessity for the quick response to the Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;12:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. ACAPS. Bangladesh Upazila Profiles in Cox’s Bazar. 2020. On 12th Feb 2022.

  29. Inside the world’s five largest refugee camps [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 16]. On 22ns Jan 2022.

  30. Rohingya crisis: Challenges in Cox’s Bazar continue - Bangladesh | ReliefWeb [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 23].

  31. NGO network in Cox’s Bazar asks for revised conditions for fund allocation | The Daily Star [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 23].

  32. Tušl M, Brauchli R, Kerksieck P, Bauer GF. Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on work and private life, mental well-being and self_rated health in German and Swiss employees: a cross-sectional online survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;21(2021):741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:1273–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ursachi G, Horodnic IA, Zait A. How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Econ Financ [Internet]. 2015;20(15):679–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Antony MM, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Bieling PJ, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hao F, Tan W, Jiang L, Zhang L, Zhao X, Zou Y, et al. Do psychiatric patients experience more psychiatric symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown? A case-control study with service and research implications for immunopsychiatry. Brain Behav Immun [Internet]. 2020;87:100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Giorgi G, Lecca LI, Alessio F, Finstad GL, Bondanini G, Lulli LG, et al. COVID-19-related mental health effects in the workplace: a narrative review. Int J Env Res Public Heal [Internet]. 2020;17(21):7857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chew NWS, Lee GKH, Tan BYQ, Jing M, Goh Y, Ngiam NJH, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID_19 outbrea. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:559–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Alim SAHM, Kibria SME, Lslam MJ, Uddin MZ, Nessa M, Wahab MA, et al. Translation of DASS 21 into Bangla and validation among medical students. Bangladesh J Psychiatry. 2017;28(2):67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shrestha B, Dunn L. The declaration of Helsinki on medical research involving human subjects: a review of seventh revision. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;17(4):548–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. IPSOS. Ipsos survey for the World Economic Forum: Job loss is a concern for half of workers across the world | Ipsos [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 23].

  42. Kumar A, Nayar KR. COVID 19 and its mental health consequences. J Ment Heal [Internet]. 2020;30(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang C, Riyu P, Xiaoyang W, Yilin T, Linkang X, Cyrus SH, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lakhan R, Agrawal A, Sharma M. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress during COVID-19 pandemic. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11(4):519–525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Nizigiyimana A, Poder PT. Impact of COVID-19 on mental health and health-related quality of life of humanitarian and healthcare workers in low-income countries. The case of Eastern Africa. MDPI [Internet]. 2021;9106. On 11th Jan 2022.

  46. Strohmeier H. Humanitarian workers in south sudan: Mental health, gender, and organizational staff support Hannah Strohmeier: a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy [Internet]. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University; 2019. p. 249. On 21st January 2022.

  47. Cardozo BL, Bilukha OO, Crawford CA, Shaikh I, Wolfe MI, Gerber ML, Anderson M. Mental health, social functioning, and disability in postwar Afghanistan. JAMA. 2004;292(5):575–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Driss H. The effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on humanitarian aid operations in Jordan. Capstone Collect [Internet]. 2020; 52. On 11th Dec 2022.

  49. Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Podsakoff NP, Shaw JC, Rich BL. The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2010;77(2):157–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Menéndez-Espina S, Llosa JA, Agulló-Tomás E, Rodríguez-Suárez J, Sáiz-Villar R, Lasheras-Díez HF, et al. The influence of gender inequality in the development of job insecurity: differences between women and men. Front Public Heal. 2020;8:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu S, Wu N, Liu S, Gong X. Job Insecurity and Employees’ Extra-Role Behavior: Moderated Mediation Model of Negative Emotion and Workplace Friendship. Front Psychol. 2021;12(April). Available from

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Burkus D. Why Managers Are More Likely to Be Depressed [Internet]. 2015. On 23rd Dec 2021.

  53. Snelling M. The impact of emergency aid work on personal relationships: a psychodynamic study. Int J Human Action. 2018;3:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Amato PR. Marriage, cohabitation and mental health. Fam Matters. 2015;(96):5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nie Y, Ma Y, Wu Y, Li J, Liu T, Zhang C, et al. association between physical exercise and mental health during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Godinic D, Obrenovic B, Khudaykulov A. Effects of economic uncertainty on mental health in the COVID-19 Pandemic context: social identity disturbance, job uncertainty and psychological well-being model. Int J Innov Econ Dev. 2020;6(1):61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. LaMontagne AD, Too LS, Punnett L, Milner AJ. Changes in job security and mental health: an analysis of 14 annual waves of an australian working-population panel survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(2):207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


All the authors are thankful to the participants for their cooperation in conducting this study.


The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors made substantial contributions to the conception, design, data acquisition and analysis, and interpretation of results. All the authors contributed to the drafting and revisions of the article and consented to the submission and publication of the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Biracyaza.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ethics committee of the Public Health Nutrition Research Committee of the Department of Public Health Nutrition, Primeasia University (Reference number: PAU/PHN/2021/001). This study was carried out following the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. All respondents provided the written informed consents to participants prior to data collection. All data were anonymously collected. Confidentiality was ensured.

Consent for publication

Not required.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Table S1. Determinants of job insecurity among the humanitarian worker. Table S2. Determinants of depression among the humanitarian worker using ordinal logistic regression. Table S3. Determinants of anxiety among the Humanitarian Worker using ordinal logistic regression. Table S4. Determinants of stress among the Humanitarian Worker using ordinal logistic regression.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sultana, N., Asaduzzaman, M., Siddique, A.B. et al. Job insecurity and mental health related outcomes among the humanitarian workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol 10, 265 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: