Skip to main content

Music, families and interaction (MUFASA): a protocol article for an RCT study

Abstract

Background

General mental health and interpersonal skills of families are crucial to children's development and future. Research suggests a link between participation in music activities and individuals' own sense of mental health, as well as an effect in objective measures of health such as quality of life, social skills, and rehabilitation of various kinds. However, in Denmark there are not many services for families with school-aged children (7–12 years) that focus on prevention and strengthening family interaction hereby minimising the risk of children not thriving and developing optimally in terms of social and emotional skills and competences. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of shared music activities on family interaction, parental stress, and child well-being.

Methods

The study is a controlled effect study where 40 family dyads from Aalborg and Aarhus are randomized into 4 different groups including music therapy activities, community music, family concerts and a control group. Measurements of family interaction (Assessment of Parent Child Interaction, APCI) and mental health (Parental Stress Scale, PSS, and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, SDQ) will be made at baseline/pre intervention, at post intervention and a follow-up measurement 12 month after baseline (month 1, 3 and 12) 3 times in total. Furthermore, data about the family dyad’s regular participation in music events as part of every-day life at the same measure points (month 1, 3 and 12). Since this is a planned prospective study, results are not yet available, but clinical experience from a feasibility study in 2021 were promising and expected challenges and changes are discussed in the article.

Discussion

Findings of this study will be relevant for all fields where music is applied for families, such as education, mental health, social work and for basic research on the study of music and interaction. Music used as a resource for families is crucial in understanding how different modalities can influence the family interaction including emotional communication and attachment.

Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17290015, Registered 03 March 2022, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17290015

Date and protocol version

July 2022, version 1. Protocol is planned to be updated after finalized recruitment during second data collection point and again after the third and last data collection point (see Additional file 1: SPIRIT Checklist).

Peer Review reports

Background

World Health Organization reports that at least 55 million children in the European Region are affected by child maltreatment. Child neglect or child maltreatment has great human costs and is serious societal challenge as it risks healthy child development [1]. Several studies and government reports urge us to develop better prevention strategies designed to reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors by promoting factors for optimal family functioning [1,2,3] We must organise varied prevention interventions for children, young people, and their parents throughout the school years, with the aim of strengthening family interaction. Research studies on the impact of the current pandemic on family functioning indicate a further need for widespread family support and intervention to prevent and reduce parent and child mental health and behavior problems during crises recommending promoting individual and family resilience [4]. Thus, there is a need for more resource-focused services for all families with school-age children, and specifically more knowledge about effective long-term interventions.

We know from several studies that there is a clear link between participation in music activities and individuals' own sense of mental health, as well as effect on objective measures of health such as quality of life, social skills, and rehabilitation of various kinds [5,6,7,8]. Research indicates that doing music together creates joy and a sense of connection between those who play or sing as this supports the ability to listen, tune and synchronise with each other all of which are basic elements of all healthy relationships [9, 10]. A recent study on parent–child musical engagement in childhood and adolescence as a predictor of relational quality in emerging adulthood concluded that joint musical engagement is associated with stronger interpersonal relationships in the family [11]. Furthermore, recent music therapy research and literature tells us that through music therapy, vulnerable children, and families with different types of problems can improve their communication and increase well-being and health including improved attachment, engagement, interaction, responsiveness and sensitivity between parent and child [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Music therapy with families can also positively influence children and parents individually including developing better social, emotional, and cognitive skills in the child as well as reducing stress, anxiety and depression in different levels and stages and creating better well-being in the parent [19, 20].

Research on community music specifically with families is sparse, but there is research on various other community music activities. Recent research is gradually focusing less on cognitive and reasoning skills and more on emotional and social skills when examining the effects of community music [21, 22]. Emotional training is increasingly understood as an innovative educational tool that is useful in addressing the many social and general education needs and challenges. There is some scientific evidence on the positive effects of good social and emotional skills including, among others, increased self-esteem, learning enhancement and motivation, good adjustment, and participation in school, and better relationships with peers and teachers [23, 24]. Other studies examine the effects of community music, where it becomes clear that social and emotional skills are improved in participants who are actively involved in making music with others [21, 25, 26]. Research often builds on an understanding that active music-sharing naturally requires or demands collaborative skills and a desire to work together including respect for others, the importance of helping others, and a focus on redressing inequalities [27, 28].

The mechanisms of family communication can be understood on the perspective of developmental psychology and complex theories of early non-verbal parent–child interactions. Interpersonal interaction relies mainly on nonverbal forms of communication. Verbal language is not enough to express the quality, intensity, and different nuances of our emotions [29]. The ability to send, receive and decode non-verbal messages is an important part of our ability to communicate—both verbally and non-verbally [30]. According to Malloch and Trevarthen, we all fundamentally possess a communicative musicality that we use when we learn to communicate nonverbally and learn to understand emotion and express emotion [31]. We learn through playing with sounds and the theory of communicative musicality provides a framework for understanding how play occurs naturally and spontaneously in musical interactions [31]. Communicative musicality and non-verbal communication are essential when it comes to building and improving interaction patterns and communication skills in the family. Musical interaction can be offered as a potential route to repairing difficulties in early and later parent-infant interaction. Using music enables the family to try out and explore different communication patterns aiming to break inappropriate patterns, and here non-verbal communication skills are thus essential in the development of self-regulation. Supporting the child to become emotionally stable and emotionally self-regulated is one of the key aspects of parenting and parenting skills [32]. Stern further describes how intersubjective experiences and affect attunement between parent and child are necessary for the child to develop a robust emotional self [33]. For example, through exploration, play, and interaction with non-verbal sounds, the infant learns about complex behaviours and can gradually recognise and understand some behavioural elements and patterns better than others. Attachment theories are often associated with affective attunement, as the quality of attachment between parent and child depends on the emotional availability, responsiveness, and sensitivity of the parent over time. Music activities are often described as a positive approach that enables ongoing work on attachment, as meaningful moments can occur despite the most severe and uncertain circumstances [20].

Despite our knowledge from international research studies that music experiences of various kind can have a positive effect for many different types of families, too few music-based and resource-focused activities are offered to families with school aged children. To aid society challenges and prevent child neglect and child maltreatment, we need more knowledge about how music activities can be used more consciously and if it can be used to strengthen family life.

Objectives

The objectives of this study are as follows:

  • To investigate how targeted music activities can strengthen family interaction including music therapy activities, community music activities and family music concerts.

  • To investigate if different formats of music experiences can strengthen families including their interactions well as individual measures of well-being and parental stress.

It is predicted that through the targeted use of music therapy methods, group music therapy can enable families to strengthen family interaction as well as improve general well-being, decrease levels of stress in the parent and enhance the well-being of the child. Also, it is expected that through targeted community music activities, community group music can provide families with opportunities to strengthen family interactions as well as general well-being and decreased levels of stress in the parent and enhance well-being in the child. Finally, it is predicted that participating in family concert will provide the families with opportunities to increase general well-being and decrease levels of stress in the parent and strengthen the well-being of the child.

Method

Participants

The study will include voluntary families invited from primary schools in Aalborg and Aarhus municipalities and invited through social media posts on Facebook, school intranets and university website. Dyads of one parent and one child participating in the study will comply to the following inclusion criteria: Voluntary families with school-age children aged 7–9 from the cities of Aalborg and Aarhus.

Study design

The project is both a classical controlled effect study (pilot, before, after and follow-up measurement) and a correlation study of the relationship between participation in everyday art/music activities and parental stress, child well-being and parent–child interaction in the family. After inclusion in the study and baseline assessment, participants will be assigned to one of the study conditions. Paired samples randomization is implemented to ensure equal distribution of types of families between each intervention and control. The allocation ratio of intended numbers of families in the comparison groups will be 1:1:1 so that the number of families receiving each intervention will be similar. Before random assignment is performed, it has to be confirmed by the investigator recruiting participants that the eligibility criteria have been met and participants are formally enrolled. We decided to have three dyads in the MT group and five in the CM group. Once recruitment and data collection at baseline are complete and informed consent to participate in the study has been obtained, the respective randomisation code will be revealed to the investigator by an administrative person at the central randomisation office who will have no contact to participants. An overview of the study design is shown in Fig. 1

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort Flowchart

Interventions

When comparing different interventions, it is important to be able to identify differences between the interventions. Waltz and colleagues [34] discuss how to secure interventions and keep them flexible to meet the need of participants. They suggest a differentiation between four different layers: Unique and and essential, essential, compatible, and proscribed [40]. Working with the creative media of music and the dynamic complexity of families, developing a treatment guide can be quite a challenge. However, several music therapy research projects have successfully addressed the issue of creating clear intervention manuals and treatment guides [35,36,37]. Below are intervention guides for the active interventions including family-centered music therapy and community music therapy implemented in the MUFASA project including underlying theory, goals, role of the therapist, role of music, forms of intervention, techniques, and methods. The intervention guides are also presented in Table 1 below the descriptions where the differences and similarities are more distinct. The are no specific guidelines for family concerts as they are of more receptive nature and not possible to control or impact within the scope of this project. However, the project did create criteria for which types of family concerts to include which are also described below.

Table 1 Treatment guidelines

Music therapy intervention

The unique and essential goal is to provide the family with the opportunity to strengthen their emotional communication and interaction. It is about creating a safe, respectful, and non-judgmental environment where the family can experience positive interaction, strengthen their confidence, and where they can play and explore different ways of being together. New friendships with other families might evolve, and the family might become more aware of the use of music (either as individuals and/or as a family) but this is not essential. Instead, is about making the family believe in themselves, strengthening their coping strategies and resilience and making them the primary change agents in their family life. The goal is to help the family to become clearer to each other, to find their own inner resources and to help them find good ways of being together [38].

The approach is mainly resource-oriented with a focus on adapting to the family's individual needs. Working with flexibility and variation can help strengthen the family's ability to meet and juggle daily demands. The music therapist should focus more on solutions than problems, as everyone is an expert in their own reality, and all experiences should be acknowledged. All families have their own core values and beliefs and their own unique set of challenges.

The music therapist can act as a role model for healthy and clear interaction and communication, but also needs to be constantly aware of not overshadowing the parent by forming a strong alliance with the child or conversely forming a strong alliance with the parent and overshadowing the child. Imbalances in alliance must be avoided. The music therapist also acts as a facilitator of parent–child interaction and attachment, and here it is often an advantage to be able to switch modality and go to the music, where it is possible to take on several roles simultaneously. The music therapist is therefore active in musical activities. As the approach is family-centred, the whole family is involved and there is a strong focus on orienting and adapting to the family's dynamics, patterns, and emotional needs. The music therapist also adapts to the family's musical skills and focuses on being welcoming, inviting, playful and flexible. The music therapist might help facilitate the use of instruments and may also explain how music can be used intentionally but this is not essential. The music therapist is careful to refer according to current ethical guidelines and chooses activities that are appropriate to their own musical and therapeutic skills [38].

Music has a specific role, which links strongly to underlying psychology around parent–child interaction and relationship [38]. The family's musical interaction can be understood as a reflection or mirror of the family's general communication patterns, and therefore the family's interaction can be strengthened and vitalised through music. Musical interaction between family members facilitates dynamic and varied social interaction and, depending on the need, the focus can be on the training of social skills in the form of, for example, mutual turn-taking or exploration of different patterns and roles. Music motivates engagement and involvement through play because music facilitates play and the inherent communicative functions of play [38]. Through musical play, interaction occurs naturally and spontaneously, and in music parents and children can experience intimate encounters and try out new patterns through shared timing, rhythm, pulse, melody, and pitch. Music enables the sharing of feelings and thoughts, and can basically act as a common third, can help reminisce, explore identity, and sometimes bring aesthetic and vitalising experiences [39].

In terms of activities, the primary focus is on improvisation, exploring non-verbal emotional communication and allowing the family to explore and experience their own and others' family patterns, family traits, and family identity through music. The aim is to set up opportunities for family members to become accessible to each other and to share meaningful moments. Activities are group-based, with the music therapist inviting the use of different instruments and different ways of using the instruments. The music therapist may also use other music therapy techniques including song-writing and receptive methods, but these are not considered as primary activities. Mainly, the music therapist should be guided by what the families themselves want and adapt the activities flexibly and accordingly [38].

Community music intervention

The unique and essential goal of the intervention is to enable positive shared musical experiences and to enable musical expression. It is about exploring and enhancing musical creativity and musical abilities, and this is unique [40]. Of course, it must also be a safe place for the family, so that individual self-esteem can be strengthened. For some families it may be about discovering genres or different preferences within the family, while for others it may be about forming new friendships across families or deepening existing relationships, but this is not essential.

The approach to music with families is mainly resource-oriented, with a focus on flexibility, diversity, and facilitation. There is a parallel focus on process and product, and much of the approach is about listening and adapting to families' individual skills social as well as musical and allowing space for diversity across. It is about seeing opportunities rather than constraints and creating a safe space that is accessible to all and where everyone makes space for each other [46]. At the beginning of the course, the focus is on getting to know each other and creating a safe space.

The role of the facilitator is to empower and make music accessible to families. Although the activities are based on the families' own social and personal skills and preferences, it is the facilitator who initiates and leads the activities to enable participation by all families and family members—possibly in turn [41]. It is about being welcoming, playful and flexible and helping families to get started using instruments or voice and including families and letting them be co-creators. The facilitator is careful to choose activities that suit the families and their own personal musical level and individual pedagogical considerations. Sometimes it makes sense to motivate families through their own musical skills, and other times it can have the opposite effect. It is the facilitator's role to keep an eye on this balance [42].

Everyone has the right and ability to create and enjoy their own music. The role of music is to enable shared aesthetic and revitalizing experiences and expressions. Music can be understood as a common third, and as something that enables social interaction [41, 42]. For some families it may be about exploring identity and evoking memories, but this is not essential.

The content and activities of the sessions consist of structured activities that facilitate positive musical experiences and expression. Repetition and a sense of practicing something together, collaborating on a specific product is unique and essential. The facilitator guides primarily group-based use of music, and other types of community music-focused activities such as singing games, circle songs, stomp elements, etc. may also be included but this is not essential. The facilitator has an eye on the difficulty of the activities also in relation to the start of the process and facilitating a safe space for everyone.

Training facilitators

For it to make sense to compare and differentiate between the two active music interventions, according to Waltz [34] it is necessary to describe them in detail and train facilitators of the intervention thoroughly. The MUFASA group worked towards making the level of “essential and unique” obviously different while elements of both “essential” and especially “compatible” and “proscribed” are more alike. The facilitators were trained separately and their training including reading an elaborate intervention guide, reading relevant literature, and trying out the interventions in a role model teaching format where co-trainees and voluntary music therapy students roleplayed different types of family dyads with children in the age of 7–8. Based on short descriptions of the dyads, the facilitator-trainee planned a session with activities, tried it out in the role-model format and received feedback from peers as well as members from the MUFASA group. The group discussions were also used to clarify and edit elements of the written treatment guideline. The trainees only had access to one intervention guideline to avoid confusion about differences and similarities and to not be influenced by the other guideline.

Concerts for families

The primary goal for family-concerts is to provide families with shared and meaningful experiences to strengthen family well-being. The criteria for which family concerts families should be offered to participate in are developed together with Musikkens Hus in Aalborg and Musikhuset in Aarhus, respectively, which also have many years of successful experience in offering activities for families with school children. Due to Covid19, it was not possible during the pilot study to choose or have families participate in family concerts. However, based on discussion with Musikkens Hus and Musikhuset the following criteria were chosen for the main study; concerts aimed at families in their description and/or title including both classical music and rhythmical music in both small and larger ensembles. The rationale behind these criteria is that included concerts should portray or represent regular possibilities in everyday life for families with children aged 7–9.

Assessment of treatment fidelity

As mentioned, it is necessary to monitor whether the planned intervention is also the intervention delivered in the study [34]. Therefore, both facilitator as well as independent raters in the MUFASA project are to evaluate if it is possible to follow the intervention guide. Partly to know more about what is happening during the sessions so that we can understand the outcomes, but also for us to be able to validate the interventions. Below you can read the preliminary forms that we expect will be filled in partly after each session by the therapist and by independent raters who will watch random videos from the sessions. The treatment fidelity forms are strongly linked to the intervention guides and should be familiar to the facilitator.

Power calculation and sample size

As no similar studies have been carried out previously, the basis for this calculation is sparse. There is no consensus on the minimal clinical difference in measures of parent-stress, child well-being, and parent–child interaction when participating in music activities. Overall, effect sizes appear to range from medium to large, e.g., between d = 0.57 and 1.60, and to be evident in similar studies where families participate in music and music therapy activities [43, 44].

The power calculation for the primary outcome measure APCI is based on a comparison between music therapy with vulnerable families and music therapy with more well-off families. For 32 randomised parent–child pairs, 90% power will be achieved for effect sizes between 0.57 and 1.6. Assuming drop-out does not exceed 10%, the aim is to recruit approximately 40 participants in total in addition to the pilot families.

Outcomes measures

The study will use assessments by blinded clinicians as well as reports by parents/guardians. The music therapy activities will take place from 18 to 22 months and will be supported by an experienced family supervisor. The family concerts will take place 18–24 month, where the families' participation is closely followed by the project manager also through questionnaires. Measures of mental health and family interaction will be taken before and after participation in music and music therapy activities and subsequently one year after (months 18, 22 and 34) three times in total. The APCI is the primary outcome, and the PSS and the SDQ the secondary outcome measures. Besides these standardized questionnaires, the study will also collect data about family's everyday participation in other cultural or music activities and whether there is any shared music activates besides the activities offered in the MUFASA study.

Assessment of Parent Child Interaction (APCI) combines structure with flexibility and measures the actual interaction between parent and child. It is an observational and improvisational music therapy assessment tool with validity and reliability evidence [45, 46] that assesses the dyads of parent and child (5–12 years). The family sees the music therapist for 2 × 25 min with a week in between the two sessions, during which they do various exercises together and their interaction is videorecorded. The tool is thus based on video analysis and produces information about parent–child interaction and parenting skills including degree of mutual attunement, nonverbal communication, indication of attachment and degree of emotional parent response [47, 48].

Parental Stress Scale (PSS) is an internationally used questionnaire with evidence of validity and reliability [38] that assesses positive and negative aspects of parenting, including perceived stress, positive emotions, or experiences with parenting (including emotional gains, enrichment, and personal development), and negative aspects of parenting, such as guilt or lifestyle limitations. The positive and negative aspects of parenting are elucidated through 18 questions resulting in an overall parenting stress score [49].

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a short questionnaire with evidence of validity and reliability [39] that assess children and young people's psychological well-being and functioning. It has been tested worldwide and translated into over 70 different languages and dialects. The SDQ has 25 questions and five additional questions asking the respondent (parents, when the child is under 11) to rate the duration of difficulties and their impact on everyday life, the latter being expressed in a strain score. The 25 questions have five questions on strengths and 20 questions on difficulties [50].

Data management and storage

As the principal investigator and first author has no active task in assessing, rating, or facilitating intervention in connection with data collection, together with the second author they have shared responsibility to enter, code, anonymize, store and secure data using legal university software and storage with the aim of promoting data quality and accuracy. Furthermore, data monitoring is also handled by PI using closed excel sheets and SPSS docs. All participants are informed about legal GDPR storage of data including anonymization (code for finding individuals are available as long as the study runs and is then deleted) and rights and possibilities to cancel participation. Each participant gives individual consent to publication and different types of usage of video material for research analysis and training purposes.

Statistical analysis

To examine the effect, repeated measures between groups (split-plot factorial) are used, where families are randomly assigned to participate in 4 different activities. Furthermore, adjusted linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) are used to account for random effects in relation to participation in other cultural activities over the 3 years of the study. Measures are taken before music activities, shortly after and long after families have participated in music activities (see Fig. 1). To examine the relationship between parent-stress, child well-being and parent–child interaction and cultural participation, extended correlation analyses are also used, focusing on change over time and with time as a factor. A Mauchly test will be calculated for each variable to ensure the assumption of sphericity. Likewise, a Box's test will be performed to ensure covariance (equality of covariance). An alpha level of 0.05 is planned to be used for all statistical tests. If necessary, missing observations can be estimated and degrees of freedom should be adjusted downwards accordingly. Effect sizes are measured by calculating Cohen's d using the average of the standard deviations from pre- and post-measurements in both groups and conditions and adjusting for the correlation between the three measurements.

Different correlation measures will be used in this study to verify the degree of association between the APCI measures with that of the PSS and SDQ questionnaires in each of the different interventions, considering the different timepoints. These correlations are important because the constructs of each outcome measure are not the same, but they measure related constructs that may be associated in some way.

Discussion

We aim to discuss results and clinical applicability of the findings looking at possible effect, possible patterns and correlations between intervention conditions and different types of families. We want to know if different formats of music experiences can strengthen different families in alternating ways, their interactions, relationships as well as individual measures of well-being and parental stress. As we are still in a post pandemic period, we anticipate that recruitment will still be challenging even if the need of families might be more evident than usual.

The study has limitations related to the fact that there are no other similar studies to compare with which weakens the validity of the power calculation. Furthermore, it is impossible to accurately evaluate, measure or control the impact of other parallel interventions or music activities that families are receiving or attending even though we collect this information. The two active interventions seem quite similar reading the intervention guide even if their unique and essential elements are different. However, experience from the pilot showcase evident differences when looking at video recordings of the session and this will be further discussed as well.

Findings of this study is aimed to be published in national and international peer-reviewed journals and through more public and accessible channels to reach any family member in a community. Findings will be relevant for other fields where music is applied for families, such as education, mental health, social work and for basic research on the study on music and families. If music is to be used as a resource for families in general, it is crucial to understand how different modalities can influence the family relationship, and how we might be able to strengthen interaction and emotional communication.

Availability of data and materials

Access to data related to the study protocol can be obtained by contacting the first author.

Abbreviations

APCI:

Assessment of parent child interaction (outcome measure)

GDPR:

General data protection regulation

PPS:

Parental stress scale (outcome measure)

MUFASA:

Music, families and interaction (name of the study)

RCT:

Randomised controlled study

SDQ:

Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (outcome measure)

References

  1. Sethi D, Yon Y, Parekh N, Anderson T, Huber J, Rakovac I, Meinck F. European status report on preventing child maltreatment. WHO 2018. Available at https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/381140/wh12-ecm-rep-eng.pdf.

  2. Jones Harden B, Simons C, Johnson-Motoyama M, Barth R. The child maltreatment prevention landscape: where are we now, and where should we go? Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2020;92:97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McLuckie A, Landers AL, Curran JA, Cann R, Carrese DH, Nolan A, Carrey NJ. A scoping review of mental health prevention and intervention initiatives for infants and preschoolers at risk for socio-emotional difficulties. Syst Rev. 2019;8:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feinberg ME, Mogle J, Lee JK, Tornello SL, Hostetler ML, Cifelli JA, Hotez E. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parent, child, and family functioning. Fam Process. 2022;61:361–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobsen SL, Lund HN, Bertelsen LR. Music as integral part of ‘Culture on prescription.’ In: Bonde LO, Theorell T, editors. Music and public health—a nordic perspective. Cham: Springer Publishing; 2022. p. 201–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen A, Stickley T, Torrissen W, Stigmar K. Arts on prescription in Scandinavia: a review of current practice and future possibilities. Perspect Public Health. 2017;137:268–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen A. Mental health recovery and arts engagement. J Mental Health Train Educ Pract. 2018;13:157–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen A, Bonde LO. Deltagelse i kunst-og kulturaktiviteter har positiv effekt på somatiske sygdomme. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018;180:2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Holck U. Kommunikativ musikalitet. Kognition and pædagogik. Tidsskr Gode Læring. 2008;18:70–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holck U. Det tidlige samspil og musikterapi. Livsbladet. 2011;05:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wallace S, Harwood J. Associations between shared musical engagement and parent-child relational quality: the mediating roles of interpersonal coordination and empathy. J Fam Commun. 2018;18:02–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2018.1466783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abad V. The effectiveness of a short-term group music intervention for young parents and their children (Unpublished master’s thesis). Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicholson JM, Berthelsen D, Abad V, Williams K, Bradley J. Impact of music therapy to promote positive parenting and child development. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(2):226–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholson JM, Berthelsen D, Williams K, Abad V. National study of an early parenting intervention: implementation differences on parent and child outcomes. Prev Sci. 2010;11:360–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Teggelove K, Thompson G, Tamplin J. Supporting positive parenting practices within a community-based music therapy group program: Pilot study findings. J Community Psychol. 2019;47(4):712–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang S, Oldfield A. The effect of music therapy sessions on the interactions between children and their parents and how to measure it, with reference to attachment theory. Psychiatr Danub. 2018;30:546–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams K, Berthelsen D, Nicholson JM, Walker S, Abad V. The effectiveness of a short-term group music therapy intervention for parents who have a child with a disability. J Music Ther. 2012;49(1):23–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang YH. Parents and young children with disabilities: the effects of a home-based music therapy program on parent-child interactions. J Music Ther. 2016;53(1):27–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thv018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassidy C, Stegemann T. Parental involvement in music therapy: systematic review of the literature and insights into international training programmes. Nord J Music Ther. 2016;25:16–16.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobsen SL, Thompson G. Working with families: emerging characteristics. In: Jacobsen SL, Thompson G, editors. Therapeutic approaches and theoretical perspectives. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2016. p. x–x.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ros-Morente A, Oriola-Requena S, Gustems-Carnicer J, Filella GG. Beyond music: emotional skills and its development in young adults in choirs and bands. Int J Music Educ. 2019;37(4):536–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419853634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayer JD, Roberts RD, Barsade SG. Human abilities: emotional intelligence. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:507–36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Björklund K, Liski A, Samposalo H, Lindblom J, Hella J, Huhtinen H, Santalahti,. Together at school-a school-based intervention program to promote socio-emotional skills and mental health in children: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):10–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pérez-González JC. Propuesta para la evaluación de programas de educación emocional. Electron J Res Educ Psychol. 2008;6(2):523–46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feldman AE, Matjasko JL. The role of school-based extracurricular adolescent development: a comprehensive review and future directions. Rev Res. 2005;75(2):159.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mellor L. An investigation of singing, health and well-being as a group process. Br J Music Educ. 2013;30(2):177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirschner S, Tomasello M. Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evol Hum Behav. 2010;31:354–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritblatt S, Longstreth S, Hokoda A, Cannon BN, Weston J. Can music enhance school-readiness socioemotional skills? J Res Child Educ. 2013;27:257–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.796333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mandal MK, Ambady N. Laterality of facial expressions of emotion: universal and culture-specific influences. Behav Neurol. 2004;15:23–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Knapp M, Hall J. Nonverbal communication in human interaction. International. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Malloch S, Trevarthen C. Communicative musicality. Exploring the basis of human companionship. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schore J, Schore A. Modern attachment theory: the central role of affect regulation in development and treatment. Clin Soc Work J. 2008;36(9):9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stern D. The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Waltz J, Addis ME, Koerner K, Jacobson NS. Testing the integrity of a psychotherapy protocol: assessment of adherence and competence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:620–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Geretsegger M, Holck U, Carpente J, Elefant C, Kim J, Gold C. Common characteristics of improvisational approaches in music therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder: developing treatment guidelines. J Music Ther. 2015;52:258–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thv005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hannibal N, Nygaard Pedersen I, Bonde LO, Bertelsen LR. A pilot study investigating research design feasibility using pre-post measures to test the effect of music therapy in psychiatry with people diagnosed with personality disorders. Voices: World Forum Music Ther. 2019. https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v19i1.2731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rolvsjord R, Gold C, Stige B. Research rigour and therapeutic flexibility: rationale for a therapy manual developed for a randomised controlled trial. Nord J Music Ther. 2015;14(1):15–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098130509478122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jacobsen SL, Thompson G. Music therapy with families. Therapeutic approaches and theoretical perspectives. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilingham L. Community music at the boundaries. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yerichuk D, Krar J. The problem of community: What does it really mean to be inclusive. In: Wilingham L, editor. Community music at the boundaries. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2021. p. 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Coffman DD, Higgens L. Community music ensemples. In: Bartleet BL, Higgens L, editors. The oxford handbook of music education. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 845–59.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Higgens L, Bartleet BL. The community music facilitator and school music education. In: Bartleet BL, Higgens L, editors. The oxford handbook of music education. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 495–511.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jacobsen SL, McKinney CH, Holck U. Effects of a Dyadic music therapy intervention on parent-child interaction, parent stress, and parent-child relationship in families with emotionally neglected children: a randomized controlled trial. J Music Ther. 2014;51(4):310–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Colegrove V, Havighurst SS, Kehoe CE, Jacobsen SL. Pilot randomized controlled trial of tuning relationships with music: intervention for parents with a trauma history and their adolescent. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;79:259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobsen SL. Assessment of parent-child interaction. In: Jacobsen SL, Waldon EG, Gattino GS, editors. Music therapy assessment: theory, research, and application. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2018. p. 275–91.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jacobsen SL, McKinney CH. A music therapy tool for assessing parent-child interaction in cases of emotional neglect. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24:2164–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0019-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jacobsen SL, Killén K. Clinical application of music therapy assessment within the field of child protection. Nord J Music Ther. 2015;24(2):148–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2014.908943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Swanick R, Jacobsen SL. Assessment of parent-child interaction. Manual: Aalborg Universitets Forlag; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Berry JO, Jones WH. The parental stress scale: initial psychometric evidence. J Soc Pers Relat. 1995;12(3):463–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595123009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stasiak K, Parkin A, Seymour F, Lambie I, Crengle S, Pasene-Mizziebo E, Merry S. Measuring outcome in child and adolescent mental health services: consumers’ views of measures. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;18(4):519–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge all participating collaborators including music interventionist, concert halls and volunteering pilot families.

Funding

The study was funded by Det Obelske Familiefond from Denmark of which we are grateful (See Additional file 2: Funding letter). The study was peer-reviewed in relation to this process. The funding body does not have any role in the study in terms of developing design, analysis or results dissemination but mainly monitors the study through yearly reports provided by the principal investigator SLJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to the manuscript in a meaningful way and all authors have reviewed and approved the manuscript. SLJ is the principal investigator, designed the study and successfully applied for funding. She has main responsibility for all sections in the manuscript. GG has supported in writing the methods section in terms of design and RCT standard. UH and JØB has supported in writing the background information sections as well as description of intervention sections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stine L. Jacobsen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study has been evaluated by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Northern Jutland in Denmark and it was declared that ethics approval was not required (See Additional file 3: Declaration). The study thus was given exempt from ethical approval in September 2019 with journal number 2019-000199 in accordance with Danish law https://en.nvk.dk/rules-and-guidelines/act-on-research-ethics-review-of-health-research-projects (Sect. 14). All participants have to give or have given informed consent either in written form as an adult or orally as a child. Legal guardians have to or will give informed consent for all participating children under 18. Further ethical considerations include the following: It is the facilitator's responsibility to be aware that the family will not be stressed or anxious by participating. Activities must not discourage a positive sense of mastery or diminish self-esteem in individuals. It is not about working with individuals, problems or family conflicts and family members must not be excluded, devalued, or judged. Of course, activities should not overstimulate or overwhelm families, or be too difficult for families to carry out. The facilitator must be careful not to reinforce power struggles and unhealthy competitive activities. Activities must not be capable of destroying instruments beyond repair, nor should violent and/or aggressive behaviour be tolerated.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare to no interest of conflict in relation to the content or future results of the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

A checklist providing page numbers for each SPIRIT item adressed in this protocol.

Additional file 2.

Documentation of extempt from ethical approval from regional Danish ethics committe - in Danish.

Additional file 3.

Documentation of funding for the MUFASA research project - in Danish.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobsen, S.L., Gattino, G., Holck, U. et al. Music, families and interaction (MUFASA): a protocol article for an RCT study. BMC Psychol 10, 252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00957-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00957-8

Keywords

  • Music therapy
  • Community music
  • Families
  • Interaction
  • Prevention