Skip to main content

“It is like a mind attack”: stress and coping among urban school-going adolescents in India



Mental health problems are leading contributors to the global disease burden in adolescents. This study aims to highlight (1) salient context-specific factors that influence stress and coping among school-going adolescents across two urban sites in India; and (2) potential targets for preventing mental health difficulties.


Focus group discussions were undertaken with a large sample of 191 school-going adolescent boys and girls aged 11–17 years (mean = 14 years), recruited from low- and middle-income communities in the predominantly urban states of Goa and Delhi. Framework analysis was used to identify themes related to causes of stress, stress reactions, impacts and coping strategies.


Proximal social environments (home, school, peers and neighborhood) played a major role in causing stress in adolescents’ daily lives. Salient social stressors included academic pressure, difficulties in romantic relationships, negotiating parental and peer influences, and exposure to violence and other threats to personal safety. Additionally, girls highlighted stress from having to conform to normative gender roles and in managing the risk of sexual harassment, especially in Delhi. Anger, rumination and loss of concentration were commonly experienced stress reactions. Adolescents primarily used emotion-focused coping strategies (e.g., distraction, escape-avoidance, emotional support seeking). Problem-focused coping (e.g., instrumental support seeking) was less common. Examples of harmful coping (e.g., substance use) were also reported.


The development of culturally sensitive and age-appropriate psychosocial interventions for distressed adolescents should attend to the challenges posed by home, school, peer and neighborhood environments. Enhancements to problem- and emotion-focused strategies are needed in order to bolster adolescents’ repertoire of adaptive coping skills in stressful social environments.

Peer Review reports


Adolescence is often described as a period of “storm and stress” [1], marked by increased susceptibility to mental disorders. Early identification and successful management of mental health problems in the adolescent years can improve long-term health outcomes and social adjustment [2]. Such efforts require an in-depth understanding of environmental risks, signs and idioms of psychological distress, and coping strategies for vulnerable youth across different contexts.

The psychological outcomes of an individual’s interactions with his or her environment can be understood through Lazarus and Folkman’s “stress-coping” theory [3]. In particular, an imbalance between internal/external demands and the perceived resources to deal with these challenges leads to negative emotional responses. Specific outcomes are mediated by appraisals of events in terms of perceived threat, control and access to coping resources. A persistent imbalance in this transactional stress-coping system contributes to the development and maintenance of a range of mental disorders, including both internalizing and externalizing difficulties [4, 5].

The majority of the world’s adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where they are exposed to a range of psychosocial adversities [6]. India alone is home to more than 250 million adolescents aged 10–19 years, or 20% of the global adolescent population [7]. The National Mental Health Survey (2016) estimated that 13.3% of all adolescents residing in metropolitan areas have “mental morbidity,” double the prevalence in rural areas [8]. Correspondingly, studies conducted among school-going adolescents in urban India indicate that at least one in five adolescents endure high stress levels in their daily lives [9,10,11,12,13]. Although the relative importance of stressors differs across studies, commonly identified examples include academic pressure, adverse family events, educational/career concerns, challenges in romantic and sexual encounters, and navigating peer group dynamics [9, 14,15,16]. Adolescents reportedly adopt a wide range of coping strategies including problem solving, seeking support from parents and friends, praying, positive reframing, distraction, and avoidance [9, 14, 17].

Much of this surveyed literature from India is based on small and non-representative samples. The available studies provide little by way of in-depth exploration of key environmental stressors, impacts and mitigating strategies across different ages, genders and localities. A nuanced understanding of such contextual factors is essential for identifying intervention components that are culturally relevant and acceptable. In addition, in-depth knowledge of the local ecological context is needed for cultural adaptation of treatments proven to be effective elsewhere (e.g. through the inclusion of local metaphors). This is especially important in low- and middle-income countries such as India, where there is a relatively scarce local evidence base on adolescent mental health interventions.

The current study attempted to address this knowledge gap by using qualitative methods to explore: 1) common ecological stressors faced by adolescents in two predominantly urban states in India; 2) adolescents’ subjective experiences of stress; and 3) strategies used by adolescents to manage stress reactions across age, gender and sites. The ultimate aim was to provide contextually relevant insights for developing mental health interventions in Indian schools. A pragmatic approach was adopted to match the methods to study objectives, guided by principles of interpretivism and reflexivity [18, 19]. We used semi-structured focus group discussions with a large sample, allowing for variation in age, gender and geographic location. This permitted sensitive inquiry across diverse perspectives. For analysis, we employed a structured framework approach for thematic analysis, which has been widely used in other applied health and psychology research [20, 21]. The study is part of a larger research program (PRIDE), which seeks to develop and evaluate a suite of psychological interventions for common mental health problems in school-going adolescents in India [22].


Design and setting

This exploratory qualitative study was conducted in Delhi (India’s capital) and Goa, the country’s most highly urbanized state [7]. The methods have been reported in line with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies - COREQ [23]. A completed COREQ checklist for this study has been provided among the supplementary materials (Additional file 1 - COREQ checklist).

Participating students in Delhi were drawn from eight Hindi-medium high schools, run by the Delhi Government, and one English-medium private sector school. The Government schools were relatively large (with an average population of 2800 students across grades 6–12), providing single-gender education in low-income areas. The private-sector school provided co-education in a middle-class locality. In Goa, participating students were drawn from seven high schools (classes 5–10), run by the Archdiocese Board of Education. These schools were relatively small (with an average population of 500 students) and provided co-education in Konkani and English in middle-class localities.


We conducted 22 focus group discussions (FGDs; Delhi = 12 and Goa = 10) with N = 191 adolescents (n = 112 girls, n = 79 boys; n = 108 in Delhi, n = 83 in Goa). Each focus group included 5–16 participants (median = 9), purposively sampled to maximize variation across age, gender and sites (Table 1). Participants ranged in age from 11 to 17 years, with students of similar age grouped together. Separate boys, girls and mixed groups were organized and participants within a given group often knew each other. Adolescents were invited to participate through classroom announcements by researchers and visits by researchers to community-based youth organizations working with adolescents from the participating schools. Representativeness was addressed by continuously monitoring participation rates across age, gender and site. Rates of non-participation were not systematically assessed, since recruitment activities focused on classrooms rather than individuals.

Table 1 Sample characteristics of the participants of the study

Adolescents who expressed an interest in participating were provided with a printed information sheet containing details about study aims and methods. A parallel parent version of the information sheet was distributed when adolescents were aged under 18 years. Prior written informed consent was obtained from all adolescents, and additional passive parental consent (active opting out of research) was obtained for all participating adolescents. The consent process and other study procedures were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by Institutional Review Boards at the Public Health Foundation of India (Ref:TRC-IEC-275/15), Sangath (Ref:VP_2015_017), Indian Council of Medical Research (Ref:HMSC/1/2016-SBR) and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref:11967). Additional approvals were obtained from the Directorate of Education (Delhi) and Archdiocese Board of Education (Goa).

Data collection

A semi-structured interview guide was developed specifically for this study, including open-ended questions on causes/experiences of stress and use of coping strategies (see supplementary materials, Additional File 2). Additional questions explored preferences for counselling and self-help interventions, findings for which are reported elsewhere [24]. Two researchers (usually RP and MS; both females and holding postgraduate degrees in public health) co-facilitated each FGD over 45–60 min. One researcher moderated the discussion, while the second researcher maintained notes and asked clarifying questions. Other interviewers (see Acknowledgments) included both males and females. FGDs were conducted in Hindi (12), English (9) and Konkani (1). All but two FGDs were audio-recorded, as administrators at the private-sector school denied permission for audio-recording. All audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim. The sole Konkani FGD was further translated into English, as none of the coders were Konkani speakers. We analyzed detailed notes from the two FGDs which were not audio-recorded. Data saturation was discussed within the team on an ongoing basis. Interim FGD summaries were continuously monitored for emergent themes by the lead researcher (RP) in consultation with co-authors. FGDs were concluded when saturation was reached within each subsample (boys/girls, older/younger adolescents across the two sites). Overall, 22 FGDs were conducted: 19 in schools and three at local community sites.


Thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework approach [20, 21]. Transcripts were coded using Nvivo 11 software. Development of the analytical framework began with a set of deductive codes derived from the research questions and background literature. The framework was refined to include codes emergent from the data. Initial codes were assigned to discrete responses comprising phrases, sentences or paragraphs communicating a relevant idea. These were ordered into categories conveying inter-related ideas. The transcripts were distributed among three authors (RP, MS, MK) for coding. RP and MS organised the data in a matrix containing codes and categories in columns, and FGDs in rows. Themes were generated by comparing and contrasting data within and across the FGDs according to age, gender and site attributes. Data triangulation was achieved initially by comparing and contrasting assignment of codes horizontally (i.e. between codes/categories) and vertically (i.e. between FGDs) within our analytic matrix. Higher-order triangulation was undertaken by scrutinizing themes across different sub-groups. Areas of agreement and disagreement have been highlighted in the narrative summary of results.


Themes have been organized into three broad categories: 1) descriptions of stress in relation to the ecological context (‘common ecological stressors’); 2) experienced reactions to stress (‘stress reactions’); and 3) commonly employed methods for coping (‘coping strategies’). A number of distinct and interrelated sub-themes have been used to elaborate differences across site, age and gender. Quotes from Hindi and Konkani have been translated into English and highlighted with an asterisk(*).

Common ecological stressors

Table 2 presents an overview of ecological stressors across family, peer, school, community/ neighborhood domains, with key developmental challenges organized as cross-cutting themes and described under sub-themes below.

Table 2 Developmental challenges and interactions with contextual factors causing stress in adolescents

Academic pressure

Academic pressure was the most commonly identified stressor across the sample, irrespective of age, gender and site. This was largely driven by parental and teacher expectations, as well as personal ambitions. Adolescents expressed that parents were embarrassed, disappointed and would “hate” them due to academic underperformance. Teachers were seen as providing excessive homework, which added to the pressure. Parents and teachers often resorted to shouting, beating, and restriction of extra-curricular and recreational activities in a bid to improve adolescents’ focus on academic performance and thereby boost future career prospects. The pressure was often counterproductive, establishing a vicious cycle of guilt, low self-confidence, lack of productivity and poor performance, even driving some students to contemplate suicide.

“Suppose [a student] studies well, and because of depression and tension he also loses his marks, and then parents shout on him why did you get less marks, then all the tension comes and the child is now in more tension, and then sometimes he makes suicide.” (Boy, 12–15 years, Goa)

Romantic relationships

Adolescents frequently described emotional distress caused by challenges in forming, maintaining and ending romantic relationships, such as romantic rejection, one-sided attractions, arguments with partners, lack of money to buy gifts, break-ups and infidelity. These stressors seemed to be more pronounced in Delhi and were compounded by poor social acceptability for pre-marital relationships, especially for girls. Many girls considered romantic relationships “bad”, and reflected that it caused “loss of personal reputation”, “shame and embarrassment to parents”* and suggested “poor upbringing”. Girls also anticipated coercive responses from parents such as shouting, grounding and initiation of early marriage.

“Where boys and girls go around together like boyfriend and girlfriend… this is not right. This will affect your parents.” (Girl, 13–16 years, Delhi)

Negotiating autonomy

Older adolescents described stress stemming from limited personal freedoms, such that parents seemed to prescribe their life choices and decisions in areas such as education, employment and partners, especially in Goa.

“In my opinion, some parents come in the group of peer pressure because they tell the students to go to a particular school, so after they get the job they would get more money.” (Boy, 13–17 years, Goa)

Prevalent sexism and parental expectations to follow gender roles led girls, particularly in Delhi, to feel even more restricted, compounded by the additional burden of household chores. Younger adolescents were more accepting of parental influences, yet felt anxious about peer acceptance and described conflicts with friends as being particularly stressful. Older boys additionally discussed peer pressure for smoking, chewing ‘gutka’ (an inexpensive mixture of tobacco, areca nut and slaked lime), drinking alcohol and using other substances. Self-assertion was identified as key to dealing with peer pressure.

“They (peers) provoke him, taunt him that he is not capable enough to do it (take drugs), and then, if he is not mentally strong, he goes for it, and although he regrets it, he keeps doing it.” (Boy, 15-17 years, Delhi)*


Adolescents across both sites faced actual and threatened violence and/or victimization in their daily lives. Girls in Delhi experienced a high risk of public sexual harassment, known colloquially as ‘eve teasing,’ including both verbal and physical encounters in their neighborhoods.

“If let’s say that a guy (in the bus) attacks you… then they (parents) will not send us to school. And no one supports us in this problem, neither friends nor teachers.” (Girl, 13–16 years, Delhi)

Younger boys discussed being teased and bullied by older students. Boys also experienced physical punishments at home and school more often than girls. Common reasons for physical punishment were failure to complete homework, poor exam performance and disruptive classroom behavior. Further threats to safety included witnessing domestic violence and the closely related problem of alcoholism among male family members.

“I get tensed when my dad is fighting at home. I feel like doing something to myself.” (Girl, 13-16 years, Delhi)*

Additionally, younger adolescents in Delhi highlighted poverty and consequent hopelessness as stressors.

“Poor people’s financial situation is quite bad. Parents do not have a salary that can cover rent, groceries, and everything… and because of that the child also becomes depressed. He worries what would happen… because of this he doesn’t feel interested in home or school.” (Girl, 14-16 years, Delhi)*

Stress reactions

The English terms “tension” and “stress” were used almost universally across the sample to describe everyday experiences of emotional distress. More pronounced stress reactions were also evident from the use of terms like “mind attack”, “depressed”, “suffering”, “fear” and “sadness”.

“Firstly, we have to face family problems at home, and we feel bad, and then we can’t even concentrate on studies (in school) … It is like a mind attack.” (Boy, 17 years, Delhi)*

“You cannot express to another person. Means you cannot feel well and you cannot tell anyone and then you feel depressed. You feel suffocated and also cry.” (Boy, 13–15 years, Goa)

Sudden and explosive anger, associated with shouting, throwing and breaking things, was also commonly described. Some adolescents – more often boys – resorted to hurting themselves or others when angry. Stress was also associated with irritability, arguments and fights following minor provocations, as well as loneliness and social withdrawal, which were more commonly reported by girls.

“When I get angry, I hit my brother and sister.” (Boy, 14 years, Goa)*

“When angry, we hit ourselves in front of the mirror.” (Boy, 13-15 years, Delhi)*

“Sometimes we get angry suddenly, we can’t control on ourselves. We can’t concentrate on one thing. We get confused… Some of them, they say that I don’t want life fully, say I want to die.” (Girl, 13–15 years, Goa)

Both boys and girls also experienced physiological reactions like loss of appetite and sleep, fever, sweating, headaches and nausea, and cognitive changes such as confusion, poor concentration, forgetfulness and intrusive ruminative thoughts.

“So I can’t sleep properly because all the tension comes in the night.” (Girl, 11–13 years, Delhi)

“I can’t concentrate on studies. I study, but can’t remember anything… There are many thoughts that keep coming from all sides.” (Boy, 17 years, Delhi)*

Coping strategies

Adolescents described a range of coping mechanisms, depending on the type and intensity of stressors, perceived resources and socio-cultural norms.

Support seeking

Across both sites, younger adolescents and girls were more likely to seek advice and instrumental support from parents and teachers, particularly for academic difficulties and ‘ragging’ (referring to junior students being harassed, humiliated or abused by senior students [25]). Friends were generally preferred for emotional support, particularly in situations where adults were considered not to be “open minded” about the stressor (e.g., romantic relationships, sexual harassment).

“Depends on how big the problem is actually. Big problem like ragging or some problem with the teachers, studies, I prefer I should tell my parents about it.” (Boy, 12–16 years, Goa)


Distraction was widely used for immediate relief from negative affect and preoccupying thoughts.

“To take my mind off the stressful things, I divert my mind to something else.” (Girl, 16-17 years, Delhi)*

“When my mood is bad, I just watch TV and eat something.” (Boy, 11-15 years, Delhi)*

Behavioral activation

Adolescents also participated in valued activities like spending time with friends, studying and playing with younger children.

“I meet friends and have fun. That reduces my stress.” (Boy, 15-17 years, Delhi)*

Escape and avoidance

Many adolescents, especially boys, took active steps to avoid confrontations with parents and teachers about academic issues. This included avoiding discussion of exam results with parents, withdrawing from other family interactions, truancy when school work was incomplete, and staying away from particular teachers.

“When schools are to declare exam results, I often go to my aunt’s place to avoid my parents.” (Boy, 12-13 years, Delhi)*


Girls were more likely than boys to describe self-soothing strategies like yoga, meditation, deep breathing and private expressions of affect (e.g., through diary entries and crying). Students also comforted themselves through eating and sleeping.

“And to get away from that bad feeling I cry, because, when my tears come and I cry I feel light inside.” (Girl, 11–13 years, Delhi)

Problem solving

Active problem solving was relatively uncommon overall and was largely confined to older adolescents. This included a handful of instances where adolescents described specific steps of problem solving.

“If I have a problem which is very small and I am in very bad mood, I would sit in a corner for 2-3 minutes in meditation, would think over what is the problem, what solutions I have and then I would go through the solution. If something (is) very serious, then I go to the teacher and my parents.” (Boy, 15–16 years, Goa)


In desperate times, when support was not available from other sources, some adolescents turned to prayer.

“Sometimes… in these problems, no one is there to decide on us, then we are left very lonely… Then who will listen to us? Then we starting asking God.” (Boy, 14–15 years, Goa)

Substance use

A minority of boys used substances, including tobacco, cannabis and alcohol, as a means to “forget about the stress” and “reduce tension.” However, almost all groups suggested that substance use may lead to temporary relief but would ultimately cause harm.

“Some stress they have, they will go drink or smoke, they will think that everything is ok now I’m free from this world, and no pressure is there in their mind… They say that after drinking all our problems are solved, but instead, because of drinking they are getting more pressure, they are spoiling their health.” (Boy, 11–14 years, Goa)


Suicide was considered a last resort to find relief from severe stressors like sexual assault and rape, and severe and sustained academic pressure. Some adolescents identified depression as part of a pathway from stress to suicide.

“So first they go in depression… and then they say that no one is talking to me at all and what will I do… no one will help me… so they then do suicide.” (Girl, 11–14 years, Delhi)


We have reported one of the largest ever qualitative studies on stress and coping among adolescents in India or globally. The large sample size and inclusion of two diverse urban sites enabled us to explore commonalities and differences in adolescents’ experiences of stress and coping in depth. The findings have direct implications for developing and adapting interventions that are responsive to the dynamic interplay of age-related changes in thinking, behaviour and emotional reactivity, and the wider social ecology of adolescents’ lives.

Participating adolescents were drawn from low- and middle-income communities and experienced a variety of stressors related to family, peers, school and their wider communities/ neighborhoods. Broad terms like “tension” and “stress” and specific reactions like explosive anger, irritability and rumination were frequently used to describe stress reactions. Adolescents generally favoured emotion-focused over problem-focused coping strategies; avoidance was employed more widely than active coping. Maladaptive strategies such as substance use and attempted suicide were also mentioned to manage intense emotional reactions.

Notwithstanding differences across age, gender and sites in the relative frequency and salience afforded to different types of stressors, a common thread appeared to be the broad developmental challenge of establishing an independent social identity. This struggle is characteristic of adolescence across cultures, as adolescents attempt to establish autonomy in their romantic and other peer relationships, educational/employment transitions and other life choices [26, 27]. Extensive research from the field of developmental psychopathology has shown that social challenges in adolescence operate within interacting ecological systems, which render differences in the experience of stress and coping according to an individual’s intrinsic characteristics, the immediate physical and social environment, and broader social, political and economic conditions [28]. Within this transactional framework, stress reactions may be amplified by neurobiological processes that affect adolescents’ general predisposition to emotional reactivity [1, 29].

Our study has highlighted a number of areas in which contextual factors have a particular bearing on stress and coping for adolescents in urban India. First, adolescents experienced persistent academic pressure, notably around exam performance, which was closely related to parental aspirations for adolescents to attain high-status occupations. This is corroborated by other contemporary studies from across India, indicating how rapid social changes are causing growing differences between familial expectations and adolescents’ priorities [16, 30,31,32]. Relatedly, the cultural proscription against pre-marital romantic relationships was reflected in the social derogation experienced by adolescents around dating and other pre-marital relations. This was especially pronounced for girls and in Delhi, with violations feared to result in severe punishments from parents. Girls also encountered restrictive gender norms that placed a high burden on their involvement in household chores, while outside the home they faced a high risk of sexual harassment. These are further indications of how contemporary trends in Indian society may be exacerbating intergenerational stresses for adolescents [33, 34]. Boys, on the other hand, appeared to be particularly vulnerable to corporeal punishments at home and in school, a practice which continues commonly in India despite legal prohibitions [35].

We observed a general preference for emotion-focused and avoidant coping across our sample. Studies from other countries have observed a similar tendency towards emotion-focused coping among adolescents, related to perceived lack of control over everyday stressors, especially in family and school domains [36, 37]. Although avoidant coping is generally associated with worse mental health outcomes [38], approaches such as behavioral disengagement and focused distraction may be adaptive when the result is to limit exposure to harmful stressors or to re-direct attention away from negative thoughts without direct suppression [39]. However, it is otherwise notable that predominant emotion-focused and avoidant coping have been linked with self-harm [40] and substance use [9, 41]; this was also borne out in the current study.

Our findings suggest a need for interventions that focus on development of a healthy repertoire of coping skills among adolescents, and which can be applied to mitigate ecological stressors and corresponding stress reactions. Risks for suicide and substance use also require assessment and appropriate interventions. The credibility of alternative coping strategies should be accounted for while developing these interventions, especially given previous research showing significant areas of mismatch between practice elements in evidence-based psychotherapies and adolescents’ habitual coping strategies [42]. Accordingly, there is significant scope for strengthening and streamlining interventions such that constituent elements are more reflective of adolescents’ own preferences and priorities [43].

For example, efforts may be needed to balance the observed dependence on emotion-focused coping with potential enhancements in problem-focused coping. When considering how to bolster adolescents’ coping repertoire, it is notable that problem solving is one of the most common elements of evidence-based psychological interventions for a range of internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents worldwide [44, 45], suggesting the global relevance of this core practice element. Problem solving has been widely applied using self-care and other ‘low-intensity’ modalities, which is significant in terms of designing scalable psychological interventions at low-cost [46].

In addition, systemic interventions may be required to address contextual factors that are typically beyond adolescents’ individual control, such as coercive and restrictive parenting practices [47], bullying and corporeal punishments in schools, and repressive gender norms [48]. Sustaining change at an ecological level would require the committed involvement of key sectors beyond health. As such, schools have been recommended as a promising platform for delivering mental health interventions, and healthy school environments have shown to promote mental health and well-being among adolescents [49]. In India, a recently concluded study successfully used a multi-component whole-school intervention to improve aspects of school environment that are linked with important health and well-being outcomes in adolescents [48].

We note some limitations of our study. First, we did not include participants from rural areas. On the other hand, the large sample size enabled us to explore common and divergent themes across age, gender and different urban localities within India, allowing us to reflect more confidently on the relevance to the vast and growing population of urban adolescents [7]. Second, use of FGDs for data collection may have prevented in-depth exploration of sensitive issues related to sexuality, self-harm and substance use. Third, we were unable to explore variation across socio-economic groups due to relative homogeneity in SES at each site. Finally, although detailed summaries were used, audio-recording was not permitted for two FGDs; some loss of data cannot be ruled out.


This large qualitative study from India has elucidated the interplay between developmental challenges and contextual factors related to home, school, peers and socio-cultural norms in shaping adolescents’ experiences of stress and coping. The findings have direct implications for preventing adolescent mental health problems, insofar as interventions should equip adolescents with age-appropriate and ecologically valid strategies for coping with key stressors and concomitant stress reactions. Efforts to design suitable interventions should balance contextually relevant considerations with broadly applicable evidence from developmental science and the global evidence base on psychotherapies, in order to ensure optimal fit for the target demographic, locality and service resources.



Low- and middle-income countries


  1. 1.

    Arnett JJ. Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. Am Psychol. 1999;54(5):317–26.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, et al. Our future: a lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387(10036):2423–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Pub. Co; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Grant KE, Compas BE, Thurm AE, McMahon SD, Gipson PY, Campbell AJ, et al. Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: evidence of moderating and mediating effects. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(3):257–83.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chandni S, Erin M, Deborah Y-T. Chronic stress in adolescents and its neurobiological and psychopathological consequences: an RDoC perspective. Chronic Stress 2017;1:2470547017715645.

  6. 6.

    Fisher J, Cabral de Mello M, Izutsu T, Vijayakumar L, Belfer M, Omigbodun O. Adolescent Mental Health in Resource-Constrained Settings: A review of the evidence of the nature, prevalence and determinants of common mental health problems and their management in primary health care. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57(1 Suppl):v-vii, 9–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner India. 2011 Census data New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2011 [Available from:

  8. 8.

    Gururaj G, Varghese M, Benegal V, Rao GN, Pathak K, Singh LK, et al. National Mental Health Survey of India, 2015–16: Prevalence, patterns and outcomes. Bengaluru: National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences; 2016. Contract No.: NIMHANS Publication No. 129.

  9. 9.

    Mathew N, Khakha DC, Qureshi A, Sagar R, Khakha CC. Stress and coping among adolescents in selected schools in the Capital City of India. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82(9):809–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kumar KS, Akoijam BS. Depression, anxiety and stress among higher secondary school students of Imphal, Manipur. Indian J Community Med. 2017;42(2):94–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deb S, Strodl E, Sun J. Academic stress, parental pressure, anxiety and mental health among Indian high school students. Int J Psychol Behav Sci. 2015;5(1):26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bhaskar K, Watode KJ, Kohli C. Prevalence of stress among school adolescents in Delhi. Indian Journal of Youth and Adolescent Health. 2015;2(4):4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bhasin SK, Sharma R, Saini NK. Depression, anxiety and stress among adolescent students belonging to affluent families: a school-based study. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77(2):161–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Latha KS, Reddy H. Patterns of stress, coping styles and social supports among adolescents. J Indian Assoc Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2006;3(1):5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Roy K, Kamath V, Kamath A. Determinants of adolescent stress: a narrative review. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies. 2015;2(2):48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sibnath Deb ES, Jiandong S. Academic Stress, Parental Pressure, Anxiety and mental health among Indian high school students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;5(1):26–34.

  17. 17.

    Ramya N, Parthasarathy R. A study on coping patterns of junior college students. Indian J Psychol Med. 2009;31(1):45–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smith J, Bekker H, Cheater F. Theoretical versus pragmatic design in qualitative research. Nurse researcher. 2011;18(2):39–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Neil S, Koekemoer E. Two decades of qualitative research in Psychology, Industrial and Organisational Psychology and Human Resource Management within South Africa. A critical review. 2016;2016:42(1).

  20. 20.

    Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Smith J, Firth J. Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse researcher. 2011;18(2):52–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sangath. PRIDE - Transforming mental health for young people Goa: Sangath; 2017 [Available from:

  23. 23.

    Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Parikh R, Michelson D, Sapru M, Sahu R, Singh A, Cuijpers P, et al. Priorities and preferences for school-based mental health services in India: a multi-stakeholder study with adolescents, parents, school staff and mental health providers. (submitted).

  25. 25.

    Garg R. Ragging: a public health problem in India. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63(6):263–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Persike M, Seiffge-Krenke I. Competence in coping with stress in adolescents from three regions of the world. J Youth Adolesc. 2012;41(7):863–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Allen JP, Loeb EL. The autonomy-connection challenge in adolescent peer relationships. Child Dev Perspect. 2015;9(2):101–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological models of human development. International Encycopedia of education. 3. 2 ed1994. p. 37–43.

  29. 29.

    Casey BJ, Jones RM, Levita L, Libby V, Pattwell S, Ruberry E, et al. The storm and stress of adolescence: insights from human imaging and mouse genetics. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52(3):225–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Verma S, Sharma D, Larson RW. School stress in India: effects on time and daily emotions. Int J Behav Dev. 2016;26(6):500–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bodas J, Ollendick TH, Sovani AV. Test anxiety in Indian children: a cross-cultural perspective. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008;21(4):387–404.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Anup S. Test anxiety research in India: twentieth century in retrospect. Psychol Dev Soc. 2001;13(1):51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jaya J, Hindin MJ. Premarital romantic partnerships: attitudes and sexual experiences of youth in Delhi. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):97–104.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Basu S, Zuo X, Lou C, Acharya R, Lundgren R. Learning to be gendered: gender socialization in early adolescence among urban poor in Delhi, India, and Shanghai, China. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(4s):S24–s9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ministry of Human Resource Development. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 New Delhi, Inida: Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India; 2009 [Available from:

  36. 36.

    Griffith MA, Dubow EF, Ippolito MF. Developmental and cross-situational differences in adolescents' coping strategies. J Youth Adolesc. 2000;29(2):183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Malte P, Inge S-K. Stress with parents and peers: how adolescents from 18 nations cope with relationship stress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. 2016;29(1):38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Saltzman H, Thomsen AH, Wadsworth ME. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(1):87–127.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wegner DM. Setting free the bears: escape from thought suppression. Am Psychol. 2011;66(8):671–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Guerreiro DF, Cruz D, Frasquilho D, Santos JC, Figueira ML, Sampaio D. Association between deliberate self-harm and coping in adolescents: a critical review of the last 10 years' literature. Arch Suicide Res. 2013;17(2):91–105.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rao K, Moudud S, Subbakrishna D. Appraisal of stress and coping behaviour in college students. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 2000;26(1–2):5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Weisz JR. Assessing fit between evidence-based psychotherapies for youth depression and real-life coping in early adolescence. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 53. 2016;45(6):732–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sclare I, Michelson D. Innovations in CBT for young people: Improving access and outcomes for vulnerable youth. In: R.G. Menzies, M. Kyrios, N. Kazantzis, editors. Innovations and Future Directions in the Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies. Samford Valley, Queensland: Australian Academic Press; 2016.

  44. 44.

    Chorpita BF, Daleiden EL. Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(3):566–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Boustani MM, Frazier SL, Becker KD, Bechor M, Dinizulu SM, Hedemann ER, et al. Common elements of adolescent prevention programs: minimizing burden while maximizing reach. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2015;42(2):209–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    World Health Organization. Problem management plus (PM+): psychological help for adults in communities exposed to adversity: WHO Kenyan field-trial version 1.0, 2016: World Health Organization; 2016 [Available from:

  47. 47.

    Healy EA, Kaiser BN, Puffer ES. Family-based youth mental health interventions delivered by nonspecialist providers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare. 2018;36(2):182–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Shinde S, Weiss HA, Varghese B, Khandeparkar P, Pereira B, Sharma A, et al. Promoting school climate and health-related outcomes: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the SEHER multi-component secondary school intervention in Bihar, India. Lancet. 2018;392(10163):2465–77.

  49. 49.

    Fazel M, Patel V, Thomas S, Tol W. Mental health interventions in schools in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(5):388–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Vikas Choudhury, Basavraj Katti, Deepti Parab, Aneeha Singh, Angela joseph, Arpita Anand, Akankasha Joshi, Swapnil Gadhave and Prithvi Prakash to data collection.


This study was supported by a Principal Research Fellowship awarded to Prof. Vikram Patel by the Wellcome Trust (Grant no. 106919/A/15/Z). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing up nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The sponsor of the study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing up nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Availability of data and materials

Qualitative study data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information




RP: developed the study concept and design, drafted the study protocol and data collection tools, collected qualitative data, and led the qualitative analysis and writing up. MS: drafted data collection tools, collected qualitative data and contributed to qualitative analysis and drafting of manuscript. MK: contributed to qualitative analysis and drafting of the manuscript. PC: developed the study concept and design, and made critical revisions to the study protocol and manuscript drafts. VP: developed the study concept and design, and made critical revisions to the study protocol, analytic framework and manuscript drafts. DM: developed the study concept and design, supervised data collection, and made critical revisions to the study protocol, data collection tools, analytic framework and manuscript drafts. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Michelson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior written informed consent was obtained from all adolescents. We also obtained passive parental consent (active opting out of the research) for adolescents aged under 18 years prior to the adolescents’ participation in the study. The consent process and other study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Public Health Foundation of India (Ref:TRC-IEC-275/15), Sangath (Ref:VP_2015_017), Indian Council of Medical Research (Ref:HMSC/1/2016-SBR) and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref:11967). Additional approvals were obtained from the Directorate of Education (Delhi) and Archdiocese Board of Education (Goa).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional Files

Additional file 1:

Title: COREQ checklist. Description: Reporting of the study methods as per the COREQ guidelines for reporting qualitative studies (DOCX 17 kb)

Additional file 2:

Title: FGD Guide. Description: Semi-structured guide for conducting Focus Group Discussions with adolescents (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parikh, R., Sapru, M., Krishna, M. et al. “It is like a mind attack”: stress and coping among urban school-going adolescents in India. BMC Psychol 7, 31 (2019).

Download citation


  • Schools
  • Mental health
  • Stress
  • Coping
  • India