Skip to main content

Table 2 Significant predictors of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness perceptions during thermal grill stimulation

From: Rumination and interoceptive accuracy predict the occurrence of the thermal grill illusion of pain

 

B

S.E.

Wald

df

p

Odds ratio

95.0% C.I. for odds ratio

Predictors for pain intensity:

      

Lower

Upper

Rumination

3.58

1.39

6.59

1

.01* 2

35.86

2.33

551.67

Interoceptive Accuracy (IA)

3.01

1.23

5.93

1

.01*

20.19

1.80

226.81

Interaction Terms:

        

State Anxiety x Rumination

.51

.21

5.75

1

.02*

1.67

1.10

2.55

Pain Expectancy x Rumination

.46

.20

5.40

1

.03*

1.48

1.04

2.13

Pessimism/Optimism x Rumination

1.03

.36

8.13

1

.004**

2.81

1.38

5.70

IA x Rumination

.53

.20

7.38

1

.007*

1.71

1.16

2.51

IA x Pain Expectancy x Rumination

.10

.04

6.49

1

.01*

1.11

1.02

1.20

Predictors for pain unpleasantness:

        

Rumination

3.42

1.62

4.45

1

.03*

30.72

1.28

738.85

Suggestibility (WSS):

        

Intensification Test – Concentration

-.88

.45

3.71

1

.05*

.42

.17

1.01

  1. 2 p-values < .05* (two-tailed) were considered significant and values < .001** (two-tailed) as highly significant.
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us