Skip to main content

Table 5 ANCOVA analysis of Power of Food Scores between anthropometric and body composition classes

From: Cross-sectional association study of hedonic hunger, self-control, cognitive distortion, and well-being with adiposity measures among a sample of urban Malaysian adults

Anthropometric/Body Composition Classes

PFS

Food Available

Food Present

Food Tasted

Aggregated Score

BMI Classification (Overweight)

 Non-overweight

2.547 ± 0.079

3.000 ± 0.083

3.049 ± 0.081

2.815 ± 0.07

 Overweight

2.850 ± 0.127

3.376 ± 0.134

3.167 ± 0.130

3.100 ± 0.116

 F; p

4.013; 0.047*

5.577; 0.019*

0.586; 0.445

4.265; 0.040*

 df; η2

1; 0.022

1; 0.030

1; 0.003

1; 0.023

BMI Classification (Obese)

 Non-obese

2.584 ± 0.068

3.071 ± 0.073

3.063 ± 0.070

2.855 ± 0.063

 Obese

3.328 ± 0.268

3.582 ± 0.277

3.348 ± 0.266

3.440 ± 0.237

 F; p

7.190; 0.008**

3.153; 0.078

1.064; 0.304

5.619; 0.019*

 df; η2

1; 0.039

1; 0.017

1; 0.006

1; 0.031

TBF Classification

    

 Normal

2.542 ± 0.081

2.980 ± 0.085

3.023 ± 0.083

2.797 ± 0.074

 High

2.829 ± 0.121

3.381 ± 0.126

3.211 ± 0.123

3.110 ± 0.109

 F; p

3.777; 0.054

6.750; 0.010*

1.572; 0.212

5.491; 0.020*

 df; η2

1; 0.021

1; 0.037

1; 0.009

1; 0.030

VFL Classification

    

 Normal

2.598 ± 0.069

3.081 ± 0.074

3.082 ± 0.071

2.870 ± 0.064

 High

3.075 ± 0.265

3.425 ± 0.273

3.094 ± 0.262

3.220 ± 0.235

 F; p

2.980; 0.086

1.458; 0.229

0.002; 0.963

2.040; 0.155

 df; η2

1; 0.017

1; 0.008

1; 0.000

1; 0.011

SM Classification

    

 Normal

2.757 ± 0.084

3.220 ± 0.090

3.145 ± 0.086

3.004 ± 0.077

 High

2.417 ± 0.112

2.910 ± 0.119

2.974 ± 0.115

2.709 ± 0.103

 F; p

5.650; 0.019*

4.149; 0.043*

1.361; 0.245

5.107; 0.025*

 df; η2

1; 0.031

1; 0.023

1; 0.008

1; 0.028

WC Classification

    

 Normal

2.619 ± 0.076

3.055 ± 0.081

3.074 ± 0.077

2.868 ± 0.070

 High

2.681 ± 0.152

3.296 ± 0.158

3.114 ± 0.152

2.998 ± 0.137

 F; p

0.130; 0.719

1.68; 0.183

0.054; 0.817

0.694; 0.406

 df; η2

1; 0.001

1; 0.010

1; 0.000

1; 0.004

WHR Classification

    

 Normal

2.657 ± 0.080

3.074 ± 0.085

3.100 ± 0.081

2.900 ± 0.073

 High

2.565 ± 0.135

3.192 ± 0.142

3.037 ± 0.136

2.885 ± 0.123

 F; p

0.326; 0.569

0.486; 0.486

0.154; 0.695

0.012; 0.914

 df; η2

1; 0.002

1; 0.003

1; 0.001

1; 0.000

WHtR Classification

    

 Normal

2.603 ± 0.078

3.058 ± 0.083

3.058 ± 0.079

2.859 ± 0.071

 High

2.722 ± 0.141

3.256 ± 0.148

3.157 ± 0.141

3.010 ± 0.127

 F; p

0.529; 0.469

1.327; 0.251

0.362; 0.548

1.029; 0.312

 df; η2

1; 0.003

1; 0.007

1; 0.002

1; 0.006

  1. All parameters were either transformed by log or reciprocal transformation to conform to the normal distribution of data in univariate General Linear Model analysis
  2. Values are estimated marginal means ± standard error, generated after controlling for sociodemographic factor covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, monthly household income, education level and marital status
  3. *p-value is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
  4. **p-value is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)