Does dynamic balance affect cube mental rotation task in badminton vs. volleyball female players?

BMC Psychology

Table 2 Pairwise comparison

Measure		Mean Diff	Std. Error	Sig.	Effect Size
RT Gen	SP vs. FB	1019.760	178.332	0.000**	5.728
	SP vs. SB	962.108	179.749	0.000**	5.374
	FB vs. SB	57.652	115.476	0.621	0.495
RT 45°	SP vs. FB	804.073	155.891	0.000**	5.187
	SP vs. SB	704.147	151.127	0.000**	4.663
	FB vs. SB	99.927	98.043	0.316	1.010
RT 90°	SP vs. FB	750.811	158.681	0.000**	4.751
	SP vs. SB	576.568	189.796	0.005**	3.050
	FB vs. SB	174.243	138.019	0.216	1.260
RT 135°	SP vs. FB	1441.656	267.137	0.000**	5.399
	SP vs. SB	1427.148	233.007	0.000**	6.125
	FB vs. SB	14.508	154.791	0.926	0.090
RT 180°	SP vs. FB	981.735	264.738	0.001**	3.718
	SP vs. SB	980.958	286.039	0.002**	3.429
	FB vs. SB	0.777	218.420	0.997	0.001
RT 225°	SP vs. FB	1073.192	284.994	0.001**	3.778
	SP vs. SB	1197.909	274.484	0.000**	4.371
	FB vs. SB	124.716	212.842	0.562	0.584
RT 270°	SP vs. FB	985.027	242.755	0.000**	4.070
	SP vs. SB	1013.812	244.763	0.000**	4.154
	FB vs. SB	28.784	170.324	0.867	0.164
RT 315°	SP vs. FB	1018.559	209.184	0.000**	4.873
	SP vs. SB	850.489	208.869	0.000**	4.088
	FB vs. SB	168.070	140.400	0.240	1.200

(RT) Response time; (EP) Error percentage; (Gen) General; (SP) Standing position; (FB) Frontal balance; (SB) Sagittal balance; (*) Significant at p < 0.05; (**) Significant at p < 0.001

ISSN: 2050-7283