Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview of emotion recognition based on facial expression

From: Development and application of emotion recognition technology — a systematic literature review

No

Author & year

Feature extraction

N

Emotions

Test sample

Pattern recognition methods

Accuracy

1

Madrigal Garcia (2018)

Facial image

34

Sadness, Fear

Patients at risk of clinical deterioration

Pearson, Chi-square test, T-test, Cluster analysis, 1LR

NA

2

Xin Chen (2019)

Facial image

49

NA

Inpatients

CNN

Training is 92%, Test is 83%

3

Isabelle Chiu (2015)

Facial stimulation

49

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished

Healthy individuals aged between 52 and 79

2GLMM

NA

4

Kowallik Andrea E (2021)

Facial action unit

55

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished

Patients with different degrees of autism

Multinomial Logistic Regression Algorithm

F(1, 53)= 2.428, p = 0.125, ηp2 = 0.044

5

Onyema, Edeh Michael (2021)

Facial image

NA

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished, Neutral

FER 2013 dataset

CNN

70%

6

Masulli Paolo (2022)

Eye tracking data

111

Autism, Depression, Attention deficit

Psychiatric outpatients

PCA, Linear regression

NA

7

Parra-Dominguez (2022)

Eyebrows, eyes, mouth (angle, slope, Euclidean distance, perimeter of a closed shape)

120

NA

MEEI database

5-fold cross validation, 3ANN

90.25%

8

Toshiya Akiyama (2022)

Facial action unit and image

71

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished, Neutral

Schizophrenics

Multi-task CNN

66.29%

9

Jiayu Ye (2022)

Facial action unit and image

164

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished, Neutral

Depression patients

Spearman correlation analysis, Random forest, 4LR-RFE

41.7%

10

Muhammad Munsif (2022)

Facial image

70

Normal, Happy, Angry, sad

KEDF dataset

CNN

Training is 96%, Test is 97%

11

Kuttenreich, Anna-Maria (2022)

Facial image

60

Anger, Disgust, Fear, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished

Patients with facial linkage after paralysis

NA

FER accuracy 67.7 ± 11.3%, AER accuracy 67.7 ± 11.3%

12

Yiming Fan (2022)

Facial image

84

Anger, Pain, Tension, Happiness, Sadness, Astonished, Fatigue, Neutral

RAF-DB dataset, FER + dataset, Private dataset of stroke patients

CNN

FER+:88.21%, RAF-DB:89.44%, private datasets 99.81%

  1. 1LR: Logistic Regression; 2GLMM: Generalized Linear Mixed Model; 3ANN: Artificial Neural Network; 4LR-RFE: Recursive Feature Elimination based on Logistic Regression