The relationship between family communication and family resilience in Chinese parents of depressed adolescents: a serial multiple mediation of social support and psychological resilience

Table 3 Bootstrapping indirect effects and 95% confidence intervals for the final mediational model (N = 229)

	Point estimate	Boot SE	Boot LLCI	Boot ULCI
Effect
Total indirect effect of X on Y	−0.1786	0.0311	−0.2437	− 0.1199
Indirect effect 1: X → M1 → Y	−0.0288	0.0157	−0.0624	− 0.0012
Indirect effect 2: X → M2 → Y	−0.1236	0.0273	−0.1811	− 0.0752
Indirect effect 3: X → M1 → M2 → Y	−0.0263	0.0097	−0.0481	− 0.0108
Contrasts
Model 1 versus Model 2	0.0948	0.0350	0.0267	0.1658
Model 1 versus Model 3	−0.0025	0.0184	−0.0380	0.0363
Model 2 versus Model 3	−0.0973	0.0271	−0.1543	−0.0478

X family communication, M1 social support, M2 psychological resilience, Y family resilience. Model 1 family communication→ social support→ family resilience, Model 2 family communication→ psychological resilience→ family resilience, Model 3 family communication→ social support→ psychological resilience →family resilience, SE standard error, CI confidence interval, LL lower level, UL upper level. The Family Communication Scale is scored in reverse, with lower scores indicating higher levels of family communication

ISSN: 2050-7283