Skip to main content

Table 7 Summary of the Findings in Model 2

From: A Lenz into the predictive power of language teacher emotion regulation and self-evaluation on L2 grit, teaching style preferences, and work engagement: a case of Chinese EFL instructors

Paths

Path coefficient

T Statistics

Test results

Situation Selection

→

Teacher Engagement

0. 86

26.12

Supported

Situation Modification

→

Teacher Engagement

0.88

26.62

Supported

Attention Deployment

→

Teacher Engagement

0.91

29.45

Supported

Reappraisal

→

Teacher Engagement

0.93

30.77

Supported

Suppression

→

Teacher Engagement

0.80

22.37

Supported

Seeking Social Support

→

Teacher Engagement

0.83

24.86

Supported

Situation Selection

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.71

16.68

Supported

Situation Modification

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.79

21.95

Supported

Attention Deployment

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.74

19.88

Supported

Reappraisal

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.77

21.28

Supported

Suppression

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.66

14.31

Supported

Seeking Social Support

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.68

14.72

Supported

Situation Selection

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.62

13.73

Supported

Situation Modification

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.65

14.09

Supported

Attention Deployment

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.60

12.44

Supported

Reappraisal

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.58

11.96

Supported

Suppression

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.53

10.47

Supported

Seeking Social Support

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.56

11.31

Supported

Self-evaluation

→

Teacher Engagement

0.44

5.98

Supported

Self-evaluation

→

L2-Teacher Grit

0.51

9.83

Supported

Self-evaluation

→

Teaching Style Preferences

0.47

7.65

Supported