Table 5 Testing the moderated mediation model of social media usage on PWB and SWB
Independent variables | Mediators | Dependent variables | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEE | OSS | PWB | SWB | |||||||||||||||||
B | SE | t | 95%CI | B | SE | t | 95%CI | B | SE | t | 95%CI | B | SE | t | 95%CI | |||||
LLCI | ULCI | LLCI | ULCI | LLCI | ULCI | LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||||||
Constant | 2.55 | .15 | 17.47 | 2.27 | 2.84 | 2.74 | .16 | 17.48 | 2.43 | 3.05 | .1.21 | .30 | 4.06 | .63 | 1.79 | 2.49 | .30 | 8.20 | 1.90 | 3.09 |
SMU | .22 | .01 | 17.69 | .19 | .24 | .12 | .01 | 9.12 | .10 | .15 | .16 | .02 | 7.17 | .12 | .21 | .22 | .02 | 9.49 | .18 | .27 |
SEE | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | .47 | .03 | 15.73 | .41 | .53 | .42 | .06 | 7.64 | .31 | .53 | .31 | .06 | 5.50 | .20 | .42 |
OSS | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | .41 | .05 | 7.88 | .31 | .52 | .41 | .05 | 7.65 | .31 | .52 |
CBB | -.24 | .02 | -10.24 | -.28 | -.19 | -.16 | .02 | -7.16 | -.21 | -.12 | -.30 | .04 | -7.67 | -.38 | -.22 | -.19 | .04 | -4.67 | -.26 | -.11 |
SMU*CBB | -.11 | .02 | -7.30 | -.14 | -.08 | -.10 | .01 | -6.66 | -.13 | -.07 | .00 | .02 | .10 | -.05 | .05 | .00 | .03 | .11 | -.05 | .05 |
R2 | .31 | Â | Â | Â | Â | .47 | Â | Â | Â | Â | .42 | Â | Â | Â | .39 | Â | Â | Â | ||
F | 55.65*** | Â | Â | Â | Â | 97.11 *** | Â | Â | Â | Â | 70.89*** | Â | Â | Â | 63.68*** | Â | Â | Â | ||
Conditional indirect effects at a specific value of moderator | Effect | SE | 95%CI | Effect | SE | 95%CI | ||||||||||||||
LLCI | ULCI | LLCI | ULCI | |||||||||||||||||
Indirect effect of SMU via SEE | -1 (low) | .128 | .02 | .093 | .165 | .094 | .02 | .061 | .130 | |||||||||||
+1(high) | .056 | .01 | .036 | .078 | .041 | .01 | .024 | .061 | ||||||||||||
Indirect effect of SMU via OSS | -1 (low) | .082 | .01 | .058 | .107 | .081 | .01 | .055 | .107 | |||||||||||
+1(high) | .019 | .01 | .003 | .036 | .019 | .01 | .003 | .037 | ||||||||||||