‘Pawing’ uncertainty! how dogs attenuate the impact of daily hassles at work on uncertainty

BMC Psychology

Table 1 Comparison of measurement models

Model		χ2 (df)	RMSEA	CFI	TLI	SRMR_within	SRMR_between	Comparison	Δχ2	Δdf	P
M1	3 latent factors	642.201 (62)	0.07	0.98	0.97	0.06	0.06	-	-	-	-
M2	2 latent factors	2648.474 (64)	0.16	0.91	0.89	0.13	0.12	M2-M1	2006.273	2	< 0.001
M4	1 latent factor	9589.365 (65)	0.30	0.66	0.59	0.20	0.20	M3-M1	8947.164	3	< 0.001

Note. RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker–Lewis’s index; SRMR: standardized root mean square residual;
Best-fitting model in italics
M1: daily hassles, perceived uncertainty and adaptive performance fit load onto three separate latent factors
M2: daily hassles and perceived uncertainty were loaded onto one latent factor plus adaptive performance was loaded onto one separate latent factor
M3: all the variables (daily hassles, perceived uncertainty and adaptive performance) were loaded onto one single factor

ISSN: 2050-7283