Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Psychology

Fig. 4

From: Improving goal striving and resilience in older adults through a personalized metacognitive self-help intervention: a protocol paper

Fig. 4

Residualization-based calculation of stressor reactivity. In panel A, the dashed line represents the hypothesized relationship between psychological distress and stressor exposure estimated after the first week (W1) of the intervention. The green and red dots illustrate two example participants, with a negative and positive residual (i.e., distance to the regression line), respectively. A negative residual is considered to reflect low levels of resilience to daily stressors, whereas a positive residual is considered to reflect high levels of resilience to daily stressors. For each subsequent week, individual stressor reactivity scores will be estimated (with x representing the week number) using the reference relationship estimated after the first week. Panel B shows a potential change in stressor reactivity over time. Panel C is analogous to Panel A, only here stressor reactivity is quantified based on the relationship between the average daily stressor exposure and daily mood of the first three days. After that, residuals will be quantified for each subsequent triplet of days (tD), in sliding windows, to shed light on potential changes in stressor reactivity over time (Panel D)

Back to article page