Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Rasch analysis of the Chinese version of the clinically useful depression outcome scale in patients with major depressive disorder

Original Submission
12 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Jan 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Feb 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Feb 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 5
7 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 8
4 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
6 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ming-Zhi Xu
Resubmission - Version 9
14 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
19 Jul 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
19 Jul 2023 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2023 Article published 10.1186/s40359-023-01255-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page