Skip to main content

Table 7 Risk of bias of the studies included in the systematic review assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS)

From: Prepulse inhibition deficit as a transdiagnostic process in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review

Study

Selection

Comparability

Exposure

  

Risk of bias assessment (0–9)

Case definition

Represen-tativeness

Selection of controls

Definition of controls

Confounding factors (*)

Ascertainment of exposure

Same method of ascertainment

Nonresponse rate

Swerdlow et al. [84]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

8

Grillon et al. [85]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

8

Grillon et al. [86]

  

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

6

Grillon et al. [81]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

Grillon et al. [82]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Perry et al. [87]

*

 

*

 

*/*

*

*

 

6

Ludewig et al. [88]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Muñoz et al. [89]

*

 

*

*

*/

*

*

 

6

Hejl et al. [90]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Perry et al. [91]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

 

6

Perriol et al. [92]

*

 

*

 

*/*

*

*

 

6

Rich et al. [93]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Barrett et al. [94]

*

  

*

*/*

*

*

 

6

Ludewig et al. [95]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

8

Lipschitz et al. [96]

*

 

*

 

*/*

*

*

 

6

Quednow et al. [97]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Ueki et al. [98]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

8

Carroll et al. [99]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Giakoumaki et al. [100]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

Duley et al. [101]

*

  

*

*/*

*

*

 

6

Gogos et al. [102]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Holstein et al. [103]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

McMillan et al. [104]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

 

6

Vrana et al. [105]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Zoetmulder et al. [106]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Ivleva et al. [107]

*

*

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

8

Comasco et al. [108]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Vrana et al. [109]

*

 

*

*

*/

*

*

 

6

Sánchez-Morla et al. [110]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

 

6

Pineles et al. [111]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

De la Casa et al. [83]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Comasco et al. [112]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

8

Echiverri-Cohen et al. [113]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Matsuo et al. [114]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Millian-Morell et al. [115]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Meteran et al. [116]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

Bo et al. [117]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Matsuo et al. [118]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Massa et al. [119]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Storozheva et al. [120]

*

*

 

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

San-Martin et al. [121]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Acheson et al. [122]

*

*

*

 

*/*

*

*

*

8

Swerdlow et al. [123]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Castellanos et al. [124]

*

 

*

*

*/

*

*

 

6

Swerdlow et al. [125]

*

 

*

 

*/*

*

*

*

7

Hoenig et al. [126]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

de Leeuw et al. [127]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

Ahmari et al. [128]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Buse et al. [129]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Kohl et al. [130]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

 

6

Zebardast et al. [131]

*

 

*

 

*/*

*

*

 

6

Pittenger et al. [132]

*

 

*

*

*/

 

*

 

5

Steinman et al. [133]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Efferen et al. [134]

*

 

*

*

*/

*

*

 

6

Quednow et al. [135]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

7

Heekeren et al. [136]

*

 

*

*

*/

*

*

 

6

Kedzior et al. [137]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Kedzior et al. [138]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Mathias et al. [139]

*

*

*

*

*/*

 

*

*

8

Preller et al. [140]

*

*

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

9

Winton-Brown et al. [141]

*

 

*

*

*/*

 

*

 

6

Morales-Muñoz et al. [142]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

Gil-Miravet et al. [143]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

*

8

Echevarria et al. [144]

*

 

*

*

*/*

*

*

 

7

  1. Notes: 1. * means a point in the category in which it is indicated; (2) Principal confounding factors were sex, age and smoking status