Skip to main content

Table 4 Hierarchical multiple regression analysis with psychological distress as the dependent variables (N = 1000)

From: The impact of negative and positive affectivity on the relationship between work-related psychological factors and work engagement in Japanese workers: a comparison of psychological distress

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

Demographics

 Age

-0.22***

-0.29―-0.14

-0.20***

-0.27―-0.14

-0.07*

-0.13―-0.01

-0.07*

-0.12―-0.01

 Gender (1 = Men, 2 = Women)

-0.02

-0.08―0.04

-0.04

-0.09―0.02

-0.02

-0.06―0.03

-0.01

-0.06―0.03

 Career in the current job (yrs)

-0.02

-0.09―0.06

0.00

-0.07―0.06

-0.03

-0.09―0.02

-0.04

-0.09―0.02

Occupational factors

 Job demands

  

0.23***

0.18―0.29

0.12***

0.07―0.17

0.11***

0.06―0.16

 Job resources

  

-0.32***

-0.37―-0.26

-0.11***

-0.16―-0.06

-0.11***

-0.16―-0.06

Affective factors

 Positive affectivity

    

-0.15***

-0.20―-0.10

-0.14***

-0.19―-0.09

 Negative affectivity

    

0.57***

0.52―0.62

0.56***

0.51―0.61

Occupational factors x Affective factors

 Job demands x Positive affectivity

      

-0.03

-0.07―0.01

 Job resources x Positive affectivity

      

0.03

-0.01―0.06

 Job demands x Negative affectivity

      

0.02

-0.02―0.06

 Job resources x Negative affectivity

      

-0.06**

-0.10―-0.02

ΔR2

0.05

 

0.16***

 

0.26***

 

0.01**

 

Adjusted R2

0.05***

 

0.21***

 

0.47***

 

0.48***

 
  1. β Standardized regression coefficients, R2 Coefficient of determination, CI Confidence interval
  2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001