Skip to main content

Table 3 Hierarchical multiple regression analysis with work engagement as the dependent variables (N = 1000)

From: The impact of negative and positive affectivity on the relationship between work-related psychological factors and work engagement in Japanese workers: a comparison of psychological distress

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

β

95%CI

Demographics

 Age

0.19***

0.11―0.26

0.24***

0.17―0.30

0.17***

0.12―0.23

0.17***

0.12―0.23

 Gender (1 = Men, 2 = Women)

0.03

-0.03―0.09

0.05

-0.00―0.10

0.07**

0.02―0.11

0.07**

0.02―0.11

 Career in the current job (yrs)

0.00

-0.07―0.08

-0.02

-0.08―0.04

-0.01

-0.06―0.05

-0.01

-0.06―0.05

Occupational factors

 Job demands

  

0.17***

0.12―0.22

0.17***

0.12―0.22

0.17***

0.12―0.22

 Job resources

  

0.47***

0.42―0.52

0.28***

0.23―0.33

0.28***

0.23―0.33

Affective factors

 Positive affectivity

    

0.42***

0.37―0.47

0.41***

0.36―0.46

 Negative affectivity

    

-0.20***

-0.25―-0.15

-0.20***

-0.25―-0.15

Occupational factors x Affective factors

 Job demands x Positive affectivity

      

0.02

-0.03―0.06

 Job resources x Positive affectivity

      

-0.01

-0.05―0.03

 Job demands x Negative affectivity

      

-0.03

-0.07―0.01

 Job resources x Negative affectivity

      

-0.02

-0.06―0.03

ΔR2

0.04

0.24***

0.17***

0.00

Adjusted R2

0.03***

0.28***

0.45***

0.45***

  1. β Standardized regression coefficients, R2 Coefficient of determination, CI Confidence interval
  2. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001