Skip to main content

Table 4 Measurement invariance of BWAS across four major economic districts in China based on Sample B (N = 347)

From: Work addiction in Chinese white-collar workers: the psychometric properties of its measure and its comorbidity with general anxiety in network analysis

Model

χ 2

df

p

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

SRMR

△χ2

â–³df

â–³p

|â–³CFI|

|â–³RMSEA|

M1: Configural invariance

85.264

56

0.007

0.961

0.942

0.078

0.044

-

-

-

-

-

M2: Metric

invariance

101.722

74

0.018

0.963

0.958

0.066

0.064

16.459

18

0.561

0.002

0.012

M3: Scalar

invariance

127.044

92

0.009

0.954

0.958

0.066

0.071

25.321

18

0.116

0.009

0.000

M4: Strict invariance

142.754

113

0.031

0.961

0.971

0.055

0.077

15.710

21

0.786

0.007

0.011

  1. Note. BWAS = Bergen Work Addiction Scale; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. Sample B includes 88 participants from central China, 200 from eastern China, 36 from western China, and 23 from northeastern China