Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable analyses (ENTER method)

From: The co-moderating effect of social support and religiosity in the association between psychological distress and coping strategies in a sample of lebanese adults

 

Unstandardized Beta

Standardized Beta

p

95% CI

VIF

Model 1: Linear regression taking the problem-focused engagement as the dependent variable (R 2  = 0.306)

Social support

0.07

0.40

< 0.001

0.05; 0.09

1.597

Mature religiosity

0.03

0.12

0.026

0.003; 0.05

1.598

Psychological distress

0.16

0.28

< 0.001

0.11; 0.21

1.010

Model 2: Linear regression taking the problem-focused disengagement as the dependent variable (R2 = 0.384)

Social support

− 0.05

− 0.27

< 0.001

− 0.06; − 0.03

1.615

Mature religiosity

− 0.09

− 0.40

< 0.001

− 0.11; − 0.06

1.621

Household crowding index

− 0.16

− 0.05

0.229

− 0.42; 0.10

1.016

Psychological distress

− 0.07

− 0.14

0.001

− 0.12; − 0.03

1.011

Model 3: Linear regression taking the emotion-focused engagement as the dependent variable (R2 = 0.254)

Social support

0.02

0.13

0.024

0.003; 0.04

1.601

Mature religiosity

0.05

0.22

< 0.001

0.02; 0.07

1.608

Region of living (rural vs. urban*)

0.74

0.10

0.031

0.07; 1.41

1.008

Psychological distress

0.21

0.39

< 0.001

0.16; 0.26

1.011

Model 4: Linear regression taking the emotion-focused disengagement as the dependent variable (R2 = 0.251)

Social support

− 0.01

− 0.07

0.212

− 0.03; 0.01

1.615

Mature religiosity

− 0.06

− 0.26

< 0.001

− 0.08; − 0.03

1.647

Region of living (rural vs. urban*)

− 0.93

− 0.12

0.007

-1.62; − 0.25

1.054

Sex (females vs. males*)

0.41

0.06

0.18

− 0.18; 1.01

1.076

Marital status (married vs. single*)

− 0.10

− 0.01

0.821

− 0.96; 0.76

1.460

Education (university vs. secondary or less*)

− 0.97

− 0.11

0.038

-1.88; − 0.05

1.463

Psychological distress

− 0.19

− 0.36

< 0.001

− 0.24; − 0.14

1.023

Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us