Table 3 Framework of scalability criteria for prejudice reduction interventions
From: What matters for the scalability of prejudice reduction programs and interventions? A Delphi study
Category | Theme | Sub-theme | Detail or example |
|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | Research and evidence use | Application of research and evidence in intervention—evidence-based design | Access to evidence |
Effectiveness | Impact of the intervention on prejudice | Variable approach to effectiveness | |
Acceptability | Level of engagement and acceptability with target audience | Tailoring to participant needs | |
Format | Suitability of format based on capabilities, costs and target audience | Online vs in-person | |
Costs | Costs and resourcing | Funding constraints | Source of funding and resources identified and cost-effectiveness |
Delivery | Feasibility and provider capacity | Internal physical constraints on scaling | Staff capacity at scale |
Legal | Intellectual property constraints on scaling | Terms of collaboration | |
Adaptability | Adaptability of intervention to specific context and practical realities | Tailoring required | |
Context | Stakeholder buy-in | Political stakeholders | High profile events |
Organisational | Cause champions / leaders and organisational imperatives; provider reputation | ||
Community stakeholders | Role models | ||
General context | Societal dynamics | Intergroup conflict, language, sentiment |