Table 3 Framework of scalability criteria for prejudice reduction interventions
From: What matters for the scalability of prejudice reduction programs and interventions? A Delphi study
Category | Theme | Sub-theme | Detail or example |
|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | Research and evidence use | Application of research and evidence in intervention—evidence-based design | Access to evidence |
| Â | Effectiveness | Impact of the intervention on prejudice | Variable approach to effectiveness |
| Â | Acceptability | Level of engagement and acceptability with target audience | Tailoring to participant needs |
| Â | Format | Suitability of format based on capabilities, costs and target audience | Online vs in-person |
Costs | Costs and resourcing | Funding constraints | Source of funding and resources identified and cost-effectiveness |
Delivery | Feasibility and provider capacity | Internal physical constraints on scaling | Staff capacity at scale |
| Â | Legal | Intellectual property constraints on scaling | Terms of collaboration |
| Â | Adaptability | Adaptability of intervention to specific context and practical realities | Tailoring required |
Context | Stakeholder buy-in | Political stakeholders | High profile events |
| Â | Â | Organisational | Cause champions / leaders and organisational imperatives; provider reputation |
| Â | Â | Community stakeholders | Role models |
| Â | General context | Societal dynamics | Intergroup conflict, language, sentiment |