Skip to main content

Table 4 Effectiveness of face-to-face counselling intervention

From: Effectiveness of an online versus face-to-face psychodynamic counselling intervention for university students before and during the COVID-19 period

 

T0

M (DS)

T1

M (DS)

t

p

d

SCL-90 R

 Somatization

.83 (.78)

.59 (.64)

4.15

.000***

.46

 Obsessive–compulsive

1.54 (.80)

1.22 (.79)

4.78

.000***

.53

 Interpersonal sensitivity

1.18 (.75)

1.01 (.72)

2.67

.009**

.29

 Depression

1.62 (.83)

1.22 (.83)

5.12

.000***

.57

 Anxiety

1.15 (.81)

.87 (.71)

4.40

.000***

.48

 Anger-hostility

.90 (.85)

.72 (.70)

2.21

.029*

.24

 Phobic anxiety

.51 (.68)

.41 (.51)

1.74

.08

 

 Paranoid ideation

1.02 (.75)

.97 (.73)

.68

.49

 

 Psychoticism

.81 (.60)

.65 (.54)

3.22

.002**

.35

 GSI

1.12 (.60)

.87 (.57)

5.37

.000***

.59

Life satisfaction

5.01 (2.00)

5.43 (1.66)

2.31

.023*

.26

  1. M (DS), mean and standard deviation; p, level of significance; d, effect size
  2. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .000