The Persian version of the revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS): a validation study in infertile patients

BMC Psychology

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and internal consistency of the RDAS

Item	Mean	SD	Corrected item-total correlation				Alpha if item deleted
Item	Mean	SD	Consensus	Satisfaction	Cohesion	RDAS	Consensus	Satisfaction	Cohesion	RDAS
1	4.04	1.11	0.292			0.263	0.829			0.850
2	4.20	0.96	0.664			0.575	0.749			0.833
3	3.97	1.03	0.672			0.551	0.744			0.834
4	3.98	1.08	0.542			0.472	0.773			0.838
5	3.94	1.09	0.635			0.606	0.751			0.831
6	3.86	1.19	0.579			0.556	0.765			0.833
7	4.30	1.05		0.681		0.547		0.802		0.834
8	3.44	0.94		0.663		0.584		0.810		0.833
9	4.39	0.99		0.681		0.590		0.802		0.832
10	3.33	0.99		0.695		0.554		0.795		0.834
11	2.17	0.99			0.367	0.368			0.650	0.844
12	2.55	1.33			0.534	0.553			0.538	0.833
13	2.14	1.60			0.562	0.441			0.507	0.844
14	2.94	1.54			0.360	0.379			0.662	0.848
Consensus	23.99	4.59
Satisfaction	15.46	3.29
Cohesion	9.81	3.91
RDAS	49.26	9.34
Cronbach’s α							0.801	0.844	0.664	0.847

ISSN: 2050-7283