Table 3 Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) on Stroop test
From: The role of inhibition capacities in the Iowa gambling test performance in young tattooed women
| Stroop | Adjusted mean | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tattooed | Control | |||
| Overall | ||||
| Group | 281 | .97 | ||
| Smoking | 1.111 | .36 | ||
| Education | 1.401 | .19 | ||
| Neutral RT | ||||
| Group | 1031.40 (25.33) | 1049.92 (25.33) | .23 | .62 |
| Smoking | .52 | .47 | ||
| Education | .14 | .70 | ||
| Neutral SD | ||||
| Group | 299.24 (17.19) | 297.00 (17.19) | .00 | .93 |
| Smoking | 1.28 | .26 | ||
| Education | .01 | .91 | ||
| Neutral Errors | ||||
| Group | .17 (.07) | .27 (.07) | .69 | .40 |
| Smoking | 3.42 | .06 | ||
| Education | .08 | .76 | ||
| Congruent RT | ||||
| Group | 926.80 (24.78) | 952.49 (24.78) | .47 | .49 |
| Smoking | 1.01 | .31 | ||
| Education | .05 | .81 | ||
| Congruent SD | ||||
| Group | 273.04 (20.40) | 282.28 (20.40) | .09 | .76 |
| Smoking | 1.78 | .18 | ||
| Education | .32 | .57 | ||
| Congruent Errors | ||||
| Group | .12 (.06) | .21 (.06) | .76 | .38 |
| Smoking | 1.02 | .31 | ||
| Education | 3.28 | .07 | ||
| Incongruent RT | ||||
| Group | 1147.70 (28.12) | 1164.86 (28.12) | .16 | .68 |
| Smoking | 1.26 | .26 | ||
| Education | .67 | .41 | ||
| Incongruent SD | ||||
| Group | 334.84 (18.76) | 329.18 (18.76) | .04 | .84 |
| Smoking | .17 | .67 | ||
| Education | .36 | .54 | ||
| Incongruent Errors | ||||
| Group | 1.97 (.36) | 2.29 (.36) | .34 | .56 |
| Smoking | 1.06 | .30 | ||
| Education | 94 | .33 | ||
