Table 3 Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) on Stroop test
From: The role of inhibition capacities in the Iowa gambling test performance in young tattooed women
Stroop | Adjusted mean | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tattooed | Control | |||
Overall | ||||
 Group |  |  | 281 | .97 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.111 | .36 |
 Education |  |  | 1.401 | .19 |
Neutral RT | ||||
 Group | 1031.40 (25.33) | 1049.92 (25.33) | .23 | .62 |
 Smoking |  |  | .52 | .47 |
 Education |  |  | .14 | .70 |
Neutral SD | ||||
 Group | 299.24 (17.19) | 297.00 (17.19) | .00 | .93 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.28 | .26 |
 Education |  |  | .01 | .91 |
Neutral Errors | ||||
 Group | .17 (.07) | .27 (.07) | .69 | .40 |
 Smoking |  |  | 3.42 | .06 |
 Education |  |  | .08 | .76 |
Congruent RT | ||||
 Group | 926.80 (24.78) | 952.49 (24.78) | .47 | .49 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.01 | .31 |
 Education |  |  | .05 | .81 |
Congruent SD | ||||
 Group | 273.04 (20.40) | 282.28 (20.40) | .09 | .76 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.78 | .18 |
 Education |  |  | .32 | .57 |
Congruent Errors | ||||
 Group | .12 (.06) | .21 (.06) | .76 | .38 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.02 | .31 |
 Education |  |  | 3.28 | .07 |
Incongruent RT | ||||
 Group | 1147.70 (28.12) | 1164.86 (28.12) | .16 | .68 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.26 | .26 |
 Education |  |  | .67 | .41 |
Incongruent SD | ||||
 Group | 334.84 (18.76) | 329.18 (18.76) | .04 | .84 |
 Smoking |  |  | .17 | .67 |
 Education |  |  | .36 | .54 |
Incongruent Errors | ||||
 Group | 1.97 (.36) | 2.29 (.36) | .34 | .56 |
 Smoking |  |  | 1.06 | .30 |
 Education |  |  | 94 | .33 |