Skip to main content

Table 5 Multivariable analysis

From: Factors associated with alexithymia among the Lebanese population: results of a cross-sectional study

Model 1: Linear regression taking the TAS score as dependent variable and all the scales as independent variables.

 

Unstandardized Beta

Standardized Beta

p-value

Confidence interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Stress

0.456

0.266

<0.001

0.317

0.596

Mental work fatigue

0.249

0.246

<0.001

0.164

0.333

Emotional work fatigue

0.114

−0.093

0.015

0.022

0.206

Alcohol dependence

0.225

0.170

<0.001

0.126

0.323

Married status

−1.933

−0.082

0.019

−3.552

−0.313

Anxiety

.096

0.088

0.035

0.007

0.184

Model 2: Linear regression taking the TAS score as dependent variable and three factors obtained in the factor analysis as independent variables.

 

Unstandardized Beta

Standardized Beta

p-value

Confidence interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Factor 2: High physical and mental work fatigue & high stress

0.162

0.339

<0.001

0.130

0.195

Factor 3: Low self-esteem, high suicidal ideation and alcohol dependence

0.197

0.172

<0.001

0.118

0.277

Factor 1: High emotional intelligence & low emotional work fatigue

−0.036

−0.122

<0.001

−0.055

−0.017

Intermediate familial monthly incomea

−2.745

−0.123

<0.001

−4.267

−1.223

High familial monthly incomea

−2.875

−0.092

0.008

−5.014

−0.736

Model 3: Linear regression taking the TAS score as dependent variable and all the scales as independent variables.

 

Unstandardized Beta

Standardized Beta

p-value

Confidence interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Cluster 3b

7.336

0.320

<0.001

5.490

9.182

Intermediate familial monthly incomea

−2.906

−0.130

<0.001

−4.486

−1.326

Cluster 2b

−2.184

−0.103

0.012

−3.893

−0.475

High familial monthly incomea

−2.712

−0.084

0.018

−4.948

−0.476

  1. Variables entered: Audit score, HAMD score, HAMA score, PSC score, Liebowitz social anxiety scale, Emotional awareness, Emotional management, Social Emotional awareness, Relationship management, emotional work fatigue, physical work fatigue, mental work fatigue, suicidal ideation score, Number of kids, familial monthly income, marital status
  2. Factor 1 = High emotional intelligence & low emotional work fatigue; Factor 2 = High physical and mental work fatigue & high stress; Factor 3 = Low self-esteem, high suicidal ideation and alcohol dependence.
  3. Variables entered in the model: Factor 1, Factor 2, Factor 3, number of kids, familial monthly income, and marital status.
  4. Variables entered in the model: cluster 1, cluster 2, cluster 3, number of kids, familial monthly income and marital status
  5. aReference = low familial monthly income
  6. bcluster 1 = People with depersonalization (low emotional intelligence and high emotional work fatigue but low physical and mental work fatigue and low stress); cluster 2 = People with high wellbeing (high emotional intelligence and low emotional work fatigue, with high self-esteem, low suicidal ideation and low alcohol dependence); cluster 3 = People in distress (low self-esteem, high suicidal ideation and high alcohol dependence, with high physical and mental work fatigue and high stress)