Peer Review reports
From: Consequences of screening in cervical cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jan 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Jan 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - John Brodersen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Jan 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Feb 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Haruo Fujino |
| 20 Mar 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kathryn Bould |
| 2 May 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - John Brodersen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 May 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 May 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Haruo Fujino |
| 27 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - John Brodersen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 27 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 5 Jul 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - John Brodersen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 5 Jul 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Jul 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Aug 2018 | Article published | 10.1186/s40359-018-0251-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.