Not all engaged students are alike: patterns of engagement and burnout among elementary students using a person-centered approach

Table 4 Estimated log odds for teaching styles and student characteristics predicting latent profile membership

	C1 vs. C5	C2 vs. C5	C3 vs. C5	C4 vs. C5	C1 vs. C4	C2 vs. C4	C3 vs. C4	C1 vs. C3	C2 vs. C3	C1 vs. C2
	Β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β	β
Choices	− 0.18	− 0.22	− 0.05	− 0.052	− 0.12	− 0.17*	0.00	− 0.13	− 0.17*	0.04
Understand	0.04	0.21	0.26	0.328	− 0.29*	− 0.12	− 0.07	− 0.22	− 0.04	− 0.18
Criticism	0.07	− 0.07	− 0.14	0.239	− 0.17	− 0.31**	0.38***	0.22	0.08	0.14
Intrude	0.23	0.11	0.14	0.159	0.07	− 0.05	− 0.02	0.09	− 0.04	0.12
Suppress	− 0.11	− 0.20	− 0.32*	− 0.31*	0.21*	0.12	− 0.01	0.22*	0.12	0.09
Meaningless	− 0.21*	0.32**	0.60***	0.54***	0.33***	0.22**	− 0.06	0.39***	0.28**	0.11
Region = 1	− 0.59	− 0.44	0.36	0.88	1.47***	1.32***	− 0.52*	− 0.95**	0.80**	− 0.15
4th grade	− 0.71	− 0.99	− 1.13	− 1.218*	0.51	0.22	0.09	0.42	0.14	0.28
5th grade	− 0.51	− 0.30	− 0.21	0.393	− 0.90*	0.70**	− 0.60*	− 0.3	− 0.10	− 0.21
Male	− 0.43	− 0.63	− 0.48	− 0.78	0.351	0.15	0.30	0.05	− 0.15	0.20

Groups printed in italics are the reference group
C1 Moderately burned out; C2 Slightly burned out; C3 Moderately engaged; C4 Highly engaged; C5 Highly burned out, Region 1 = urban school
*p < .05; **p < .01; **p < .001

ISSN: 2050-7283