Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview concepts, instruments and assessment time points administered

From: A future orientation intervention delivered through a smartphone application and virtual reality: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Concept

Instrument

#Items

T1

Int

T2

T3

T4

Future self-identification

Based on Hershfield et al.[35] and Van Gelder et al. [9]

8

x

x

x

x

x

Future orientation

Future Orientation Scale [1]

15

x

x1

x

x

x

Consideration of future consequences

Consideration of Future Consequences questionnaire [36, 37]

9

x

 

x

x

x

Self-defeating behavior

Self-defeating behavior list based on Van Gelder et al. [9]

15

x

x

x

x

x

Goal commitment

Goal Commitment Questionnaire [38]

7

x

 

x

x

x

Weekly goal achievement

Self-developed

3

 

x

x

  

Monthly goal achievement

Self-developed

3

  

x

  

Self-efficacy

General Self-efficacy Questionnaire [39]

10

x

 

x

x

x

Academic results2

University records

–

    

x

Impulsiveness

Barratt Impulsivity Scale 15 item version [40]

15

x

 

x

x

x

Think about future (self)

Self-developed

2

x

x

x

x

x

Personality

HEXACO-60 [41, 42]

60

x

   

x

App experiences3,4

TWEETS [43] and self-developed items

30

 

x

x

  

App usage4

Log data app

–

 

x

   

VR experiences5

VR related concepts (e.g., embodiment, presence, Proteus effect) Based on previous studies [27, 44, 45] and self-developed items

34

 

x

   

VR usage5

Log data of the VR environment

–

 

x

   

Goals

Qualitative coding

–

x

x

x

  
  1. T1 = baseline, Int. = interim assessments, T2 = post measurement, T3 = 3-months follow-up, T4 = 6-months follow-up, 1On the Int. a subset of 6 items is assessed, 2University records will be requested at the end of the academic year, 3Self-developed items are only assessed at T2, 4Only assessed in the smartphone condition, 5Only assessed in the VR condition