Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression coefficients of the relationships of negative parenting styles (predictors, in bold type) on the child’s eating behavior

From: The relationship of parenting style and eating behavior in preschool children

Effect

Estimate

SE

z-value1

p-value

Standardized estimate

Inconsistent parenting

 Food responsiveness

0.149

0.055

2.692

0.007

0.165**

 Emotional overeating

0.258

0.064

4.058

0.000

0.250***

 Enjoyment of food

0.178

0.064

2.789

0.005

0.166**

 Satiety responsiveness

0.253

0.068

3.742

0.000

0.250***

 Slowness in eating

0.108

0.061

1.775

0.076

0.108

 Emotional undereating

0.222

0.067

3.334

0.001

0.185**

 Food fussiness

0.179

0.063

2.837

0.005

0.152**

Corporal punishmen

 Food responsiveness

0.262

0.075

3.489

0.000

0.246***

 Emotional overeating

0.273

0.094

2.919

0.004

0.224**

 Enjoyment of food

−0.019

0.085

−0.228

0.820

−0.015

 Satiety responsiveness

−0.194

0.087

−2.238

0.025

−0.163*

 Slowness in eating

0.041

0.082

0.504

0.614

0.035

 Emotional undereating

−0.009

0.095

−0.092

0.927

−0.006

 Food fussiness

−0.048

0.083

−0.581

0.561

−0.035

Powerful implementation

 Food responsiveness

0.146

0.058

2.492

0.013

0.132*

 Emotional overeating

0.022

0.074

0.291

0.771

0.017

 Enjoyment of food

−0.183

0.070

−2.602

0.009

−0.141**

 Satiety responsiveness

0.013

0.073

0.184

0.854

0.011

 Slowness in eating

−0.061

0.068

−0.888

0.375

−0.050

 Emotional undereating

0.050

0.088

0.575

0.566

0.034

 Food fussiness

−0.128

0.073

−1.737

0.082

−0.089

Low monitoring

 Food responsiveness

0.119

0.066

1.182

0.070

0.138

 Emotional overeating

0.207

0.076

2.725

0.006

0.210**

 Enjoyment of food

0.114

0.068

1.669

0.095

0.111

 Satiety responsiveness

0.135

0.072

1.886

0.059

0.139

 Slowness in eating

0.145

0.066

2.196

0.028

0.150*

 Emotional undereating

0.084

0.079

1.058

0.290

0.072

 Food fussiness

0.063

0.066

0.951

0.341

0.056

  1. Cohen's classification for effect sizes are 0.1 to be small, 0.3 to be medium, and 0.5 to be large.
  2. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
  3. 1Statistic for the test of regression coefficients against 0