Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationships between working alliance and coaching outcome indicators across T0-T1, adjusted for demographic factors, number of coaching sessions, and initial level of outcome variables

From: Prospective associations between working alliance, basic psychological need satisfaction, and coaching outcome indicators: a two-wave survey study among 181 Dutch coaching clients

T1 Goal attainment

Step 1

Step 2

Adj. R2

p

ΔR2

p

pFWE

.486

 < .001

.023

 < .001

 < .001

β(SE)

95% CI

p

β(SE)

95% CI

p

pFWE

Age

 − .06 (.05)

[ − .17, .05]

 

 − .03 (.05)

[ − .14, .07]

  

Gender

 − .08 (.11)

[ − .31, .15]

 

 − .11 (.11)

[ − .33, .11]

  

Educationa

 − .04 (.05)

[ − .15, .07]

 

 − .05 (.05)

[ − .15, .06]

  

â„– sessions T0

.10 (.06)

[ − .02, .22]

 

.13 (.06)

[.01, .24]

.029

 

â„– sessions T0-T1

.11 (.05)

[< .01, .22]

.043

.10 (.05)

[<  − .01, .21]

  

T0 Goal attainment

.65 (.06)

[.53, .77]

 < .001

.52 (.07)

[.38, .66]

 < .001

 < .001

T0 Working Alliance

   

.20 (.07)

[.07, .34]

.003

.011

T1 Wellbeing

Step 1

Step 2

Adj. R2

p

ΔR2

p

pFWE

.582

 < .001

− .002

  

β(SE)

95% CI

p

β(SE)

95% CI

p

pFWE

Age

 − .08 (.05)

[ − .18, .01]

 

 − .09 (.05)

[ − .18. .01]

  

Gender

 − .03 (.10)

[ − .23, .18]

 

 − .02 (.10)

[ − .22, .19]

  

Educationa

 − .14 (.05)

[ − .24,  − .05]

.004

 − .14 (.05)

[ − .24,  − .04]

.006

.022

â„– sessions T0

 − .08 (.05)

[ − .18, .02]

 

 − .08 (.05)

[ − .18, .02]

  

â„– sessions T0-T1

.08 (.05)

[ − .02, .18]

 

.08 (.05)

[ − .02, .18]

  

T0 Wellbeing

.79 (.05)

[.69, .89]

 < .001

.80 (.05)

[.70, .90]

 < .001

 < .001

T0 Working Alliance

   

 − .03 (.05)

[ − .13, .07]

  

T1 Psychopathology (absence)

Step 1

Step 2

Adj. R2

p

ΔR2

p

pFWE

.870

 < .001

 < .001

  

β(SE)

95% CI

p

β(SE)

95% CI

p

pFWE

Age

 − .02 (.03)

[ − .07, .04]

 

 − .02 (.03)

[ − .07, .04]

  

Gender

 − .03 (.06)

[ − .14, .08]

 

 − .03 (.06)

[ − .14, .09]

  

Educationa

.02 (.03)

[ − .04, .07]

 

.02 (.03)

[ − .04, .07]

  

â„– sessions T0

 − .03 (.03)

[ − .09, .02]

 

 − .03 (.03)

[ − .09, .02]

  

â„– sessions T0-T1

.01 (.03)

[ − .04, .06]

 

.01 (.03)

[ − .04, .06]

  

T0 Psychopathology (absence)

.94 (.03)

[.88, .99]

 < .001

.94 (.03)

[.88, .99]

 < .001

 < .001

T0 Working Alliance

   

 − .01 (.03)

[ − .06, .05]

  

T1 Personal growth initiative

Step 1

Step 2

Adj. R2

p

ΔR2

p

pFWE

.205

 < .001

 − .001

  

β(SE)

95% CI

p

β(SE)

95% CI

p

pFWE

Age

 − .03 (.07)

[ − .17, .10]

 

 − .02 (.07)

[ − .16, .11]

  

Gender

.05 (.14)

[ − .23, .32]

 

.03 (.14)

[ − .26, .31]

  

Educationa

 − .06 (.07)

[ − .19, .08]

 

 − .06 (.07)

[ − .20, .07]

  

â„– sessions T0

 − .02 (.07)

[ − .15, .12]

 

.02 (.07)

[ − .16, .11]

  

№ sessions T0 − T1

.18 (.07)

[.05, .32]

.007

.18 (.07)

[.05, .31]

.009

.035

T0 Personal growth initiative

.46 (.07)

[.33, .60]

 < .001

.45 (.07)

[.31, .58]

 < .001

 < .001

T0 Working Alliance

   

.06 (.07)

[ − .08, .21]

  
  1. Values in bold represent significant findings when correcting for multiple testing
  2. aHighest educational level completed; pFWE = family-wise error-corrected p-values, computed by multiplying the unadjusted p-value by the total number of outcomes (N = 4). ΔR2 is based on adjusted R2 values
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us