Skip to main content

Table 4 Adjustment indices and factorial weights of the different models of the scale

From: Meaning of life questionnaire (MLQ) in peruvian undergraduate students: study of its psychometric properties from the perspective of classical test theory (CTT)

Model

Fit indices

Factor 1 (λ)

Factor 2 (λ)

 

χ2

df

p

CFI

TLI

SRMR

RMSEA [90%CI]

1

4

5

6

9

2

3

7

8

10

Model 1a

138.6

34

.000

.96

.95

.074

.081 [.067–.095]

.79

.88

.85

.86

.49

.71

.83

.84

.77

.72

Model 1b

148.9

35

.000

.96

.94

.106

.083 [.070–.097]

.79

.88

.85

.86

.49

.71

.83

.85

.77

.71

Model 2a

92.7

26

.000

.97

.96

.059

.075 [.059–.092]

.78

.88

.85

.86

-

.71

.83

.84

.77

.72

Model 2b

101.2

27

.000

.97

.96

.090

.078 [.062–.094]

.79

.88

.85

.86

–

.71

.83

.85

.77

.71

  1. Note: 1a Two factors related to ten items, 1b Two unrelated factors with ten items, 2a Two factors related to nine items, 2b Two unrelated factors with nine items