Skip to main content

Table 6 Ovrerview of loneliness trajectories and inclusiveness of mover-stayer LTA

From: Interpersonal predictors of loneliness in Japanese children: variable- and person-centered approaches

 

Profiles identified by mover-stayer LTA

Result

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Benner [3]

          

  Chronically high (11%)

        

Covered

  Low-steady (78%)

        

Covered

  Low-increasing (11%)

 

       

Covered

Harris et al. [12]

          

  Relative high, reducing loneliness (48%)

      

 

Partially covered

  Low, stable loneliness (52%)

   

    

Partially covered

Jobe-Shields et al. [14]

          

  Stable low (66%)

        

Covered

  Increasing (22%)

     

   

Covered

  Decreasing (12%)

      

  

Covered

Ladd and Ettekal [20]

          

  No loneliness (18.9%)

        

Covered

  Low loneliness (19.5%)

   

    

Partially covered

  Moderate loneliness (41.6%)

    

    

Covered

  Declining loneliness (6.2%)

   

     

Covered

  Chronic loneliness (13.7%)

        

Covered

Qualter et al. [35]

          

  Stable high lonely (22%)

        

Covered

  Moderate increasers (18%)

     

   

Covered

  Moderate decliners (23%)

   

     

Covered

  Low stable lonely (37%)

        

Covered

Schinka et al. [38]

          

  Chronic (4.1%)

        

Covered

  Moderate increasing (31.6%)

     

   

Partially covered

  High increasing (4.5%)

  

      

Covered

  Stable low (49.1%)

        

Covered

  Decreasing (10.7%)

      

  

Covered

Vanhalst et al. [42]

          

  Chronically high (3%)

        

Covered

  High decreasing (8%)

       

 

Covered

  Moderate decreasing (9%)

   

     

Covered

  Low increasing (18%)

 

       

Partially covered

  Stable low (63%)

        

Covered

  1. LTA = latent transition analysis, 〇 = match,  = partially match