Skip to main content

Table 5 Model fit and model comparisons

From: Effectiveness and mechanism of a 4-week online self-help mindfulness intervention among individuals with emotional distress during COVID-19 in China

Model

χ2

df

Δχ2

Δdf

p

CFI

TLI

SRMR

RMSEA(CI)

FFMQ-CPSS

 Unconstrained model

86.026

42

   

0.990

0.979

0.062

0.058 (0.041, 0.076)

 Constrained model

113.466

58

27.440

16

0.037

0.988

0.981

0.079

0.056 (0.040, 0.071)

FFMQ-ODSIS

 Unconstrained model

82.749

42

   

0.990

0.978

0.074

0.056 (0.038, 0.074)

 Constrained model

112.768

58

30.019

16

0.018

0.986

0.979

0.082

0.055 (0.040, 0.070)

FFMQ-K10

 Unconstrained model

70.243

42

   

0.993

0.985

0.065

0.047 (0.026, 0.065)

 Constrained model

82.305

58

12.062

16

0.740

0.994

0.991

0.075

0.037 (0.015, 0.054)

FFMQ-OASIS

 Unconstrained model

80.488

42

   

0.990

0.979

0.069

0.055 (0.036, 0.072)

 Constrained model

99.216

58

18.728

16

0.283

0.989

0.984

0.077

0.048 (0.031, 0.064)

  1. CFI comparative fit index, TLI Tucker–Lewis index, SRMR the standardized root mean square residual, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation