Skip to main content

Table 2 Between-stage differences of processes of change, pros, cons, and self-efficacy (N = 1495)

From: Processes of change, pros, cons, and self-efficacy as variables associated with stage transitions for effective stress management over a month: a longitudinal study

Variables

Stage of change for effective stress management

F(4, 1490)

ηp2

Post hoc comparisons

PC

C

PR

A

M

(p value)

 

(p < .05)

Experiential processes

57.0 ± 12.85

63.0 ± 9.09

63.6 ± 9.60

66.8 ± 7.73

68.2 ± 8.52

48.52 (.00)

.12

PC < C, PR < A, M

Behavioral processes

57.3 ± 12.74

62.7 ± 9.45

62.8 ± 9.90

67.1 ± 7.83

68.0 ± 8.52

48.90 (.00)

.12

PC < C, PR < A, M

Pros

10.9 ± 2.55

11.5 ± 2.13

11.6 ± 2.20

11.6 ± 2.16

12.0 ± 1.96

7.44 (.00)

.02

PC < All; C < M

Cons

8.9 ± 2.42

8.3 ± 2.31

8.7 ± 2.37

8.3 ± 2.67

7.7 ± 2.78

7.26 (.00)

.02

M < All

Self-efficacy

11.8 ± 3.75

12.1 ± 3.51

12.2 ± 3.60

13.9 ± 3.92

14.6 ± 3.97

31.27 (.00)

.08

PC, C, PR < A, M

  1. Values show means ± SDs
  2. PC: Precontemplation; C: Contemplation; PR: Preparation; A: Action; M: Maintenance