Skip to main content

Table 1 Transtheoretical model’s constructs

From: Processes of change, pros, cons, and self-efficacy as variables associated with stage transitions for effective stress management over a month: a longitudinal study

Constructs

Definitions

Stages of change

 Precontemplation

Not intending to initiate a program of effective stress management in the next six months

 Contemplation

Intending to initiate a program of effective stress management in the next six months

 Preparation

Intending to initiate a program of effective stress management in the next 30 days

 Action

Practicing a program of effective stress management for less than six months

 Maintenance

Practicing a program of effective stress management for six months or longer

Experiential processes of change

 Consciousness-raising

Increasing awareness about managing stress

 Dramatic relief

Reacting emotionally to warnings about the consequences of not managing stress

 Environmental re-evaluation

Considering how the practice or lack of stress management impacts others

 Self-re-evaluation

Realizing that managing stress can enhance one’s self-identity

 Social liberation

Acknowledging how society is changing to encourage the practice of stress management

Behavioral processes of change

 Self-liberation

Committing to engaging in managing stress

 Stimulus control

Restructuring one’s environment to facilitate the process of stress management

 Counter-conditioning

Substituting new and positive behavioral choices in the process of managing stress

 Helping relationships

Listing and utilizing support resources for managing stress

 Reinforcement management

Using positive reinforcement and rewards for undertaking the process of stress management

Pros

The advantages of effective stress management

Cons

The disadvantages of effective stress management

Self-efficacy

The confidence that the individual can engage in effective stress management processes despite any barriers to that process