From: What matters for the scalability of prejudice reduction programs and interventions? A Delphi study
Category | Â | Theme | Code | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | 1 | Research and evidence use | *** | Draws from contact literature |
 | 2 | Effectiveness | ** | Large effect size relative to other prejudice reduction field experiments—however, the theoretical approach is based on limited studies |
 | 3 | Acceptability | *** | Subtle intervention, a poster on wall likely to be acceptable as it does not require active engagement |
 | 4 | Format | *** | Poster-based intervention is likely to be easy to scale |
Costs | 5 | Costs and resourcing | *** | Likely to require minimal cost due to poster format but scaling to advertising boards could require further costs |
Delivery | 6 | Feasibility and provide capacity | *** | Poster format is likely to be easy to scale and maintain fidelity |
 | 7 | Legal | *** | Intervention details accessible via journal publication |
 | 8 | Adaptability | ** | Relatively untested approach—current studies do not consider effectiveness beyond Arab-Muslims |
Context | 9 | Stakeholder buy-in | - | Insufficient information to assess application in other contexts |
 | 10 | General context | - | Insufficient information to assess application in other contexts |