From: What matters for the scalability of prejudice reduction programs and interventions? A Delphi study
Category | Â | Theme | Code | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | 1 | Research and evidence use | *** | Draws from research literature |
 | 2 | Effectiveness | *** | Effective results reported, extensive literature on contact—but less in online settings |
 | 3 | Acceptability | ** | Intervention tested in a number of countries; may be difficult to implement outside of school environment; significant time requirement; electronic contact may be more acceptable than in person |
 | 4 | Format | ** | May not scale outside of school environment, significant time requirement |
Costs | 5 | Costs and resourcing | ** | Leverages common technology e.g., video conferencing or text chat but requires digital access; relatively effective intervention in non-face-to-face contact category; similar to typical school curriculum so costs likely to be considered reasonable |
Delivery | 6 | Feasibility and provide capacity | ** | Requires an adequate number of minority group members to pair up in exercise |
 | 7 | Legal | *** | Intervention details accessible via publication |
 | 8 | Adaptability | ** | Good potential to adapt contents to other contexts—however, may be difficult to adapt outside of the school environment due to the nature of tasks |
Context | 9 | Stakeholder buy-in | - | Insufficient information to assess application in other contexts |
 | 10 | General context | - | Insufficient information to assess application in other contexts |