Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression Analysis of Adversity Scores (Disengaged and Controlling Environment), Attachment and Group Status on Facial Emotion Recognition (FER) (n = 85)

From: Adversity, attachment and emotion recognition in BPD adolescents: the distinct roles of disengaged and controlling environment

 

β

t

p

R2

Accuracy

Group

0.08

1.88

.065

0.370

Disengaged environment

0.02

1.44

.155

 

Controlling environment

− 0.01

− 0.78

.439

 

Group x Disengaged environment

− 0.02

− 1.33

.189

 

Group x Controlling environment

− 0.04

− 2.32

.024

 

Avoidant Attachment

0.00

0.41

.682

 

Anxious Attachment

− 0.00

− 0.77

.442

 

Sensitivity

Group

− 8.37

− 3.04

.004

0.362

Disengaged environment

− 2.38

− 2.77

.008

 

Controlling environment

.84

1.06

.295

 

Group x Disengaged environment

4.32

3.98

< .001

 

Group x Controlling environment

− .90

− .79

.433

 

Avoidant Attachment

.09

1.08

.286

 

Anxious Attachment

− .03

− .27

.792

 
  1. All models controlled by age, sex, CSP
  2. Bold indicates threshold is significant, i.e. < 0.05